Category: Columns

Geoff has written for publications as diverse as PC User and The Northern Star His weekly columns have been a source of humour and inspiration for tens of thousands of readers and his mailbox is always full.
Here you can find his more recent contributions.

  • Can you reverse the Chinese curse?

    Apparently no Chinese ever uttered the curse, “May you live in interesting times.” Certainly, I have been cursed by descendants of the Central Kingdom, but mostly using English swear words involving money, or their daughters. Perhaps I misunderstood, I now have daughters of my own.

    Regardless, we do live in interesting times: Water, grain, fish and energy are in short supply. The American empire declines along with its dollar. Interesting, indeed.

    The media reinforces, every day, China’s role.

    Amazon rainforest is cut down to grow soyabeans to feed pigs and cows destined for Chinese tables. The Kimberley is developed to exploit natural gas and iron ore for “the Far East”.

    Given that the average Chinese earns less than one tenth the average Australian wage and consumes one tenth the resources, it seems churlish to deny them the opportunity to eat meat more than once a week, or to make a decent living. Chinese factories make the solar panels, shoes and gadgets that we want but can’t be bothered making.

    Adidas, alone, has 700 factories in Shanghai to supply its global market. Wage rises and new regulations have driven the company to try and move offshore. Unfortunately, no other country can cost effectively absorb 700 sporting goods factories.

    Prices of the three stripe running shoe will rise as a result.

    The theory that Wall St traders, Madison Avenue marketing gurus and Rodeo Drive entertainment moguls can control the hearts, minds and hip pockets of the world’s consumers while the Chinese do the dirty work for next to nothing has come crashing into conflict with reality. Chinese banks now sit on cash reserves of $US1.3 trillion. Acts of Congress preventing the Chinese from purchasing American companies only postpone the inevitable.

    Australian’s are insulated from these global machinations primarily because we happily sell our significant iron, aluminium, coal and natural gas reserves to the highest bidder. We’ve sold our biscuit manufacturers, dairy producers, mining and energy companies to foreign interests. We have slavishly followed the logic of level playing fields and free trade agreements in exchange for a cosy relationship with whatever empire holds sway. We switched allegiance from the Brits to the Yanks last century, and now mandarin Kev is taking Keating’s admonition that we are part of Asia to its logical conclusion.

    As Sidney Kidman said when he opposed the purchase of large chunks of Australia by the British Vestey Brothers in the 1880s, the danger is that we lose control of the nation.

    The answer is to buy Australian. It is an effort that many people think Quixotic, meaning foolish in the face of insurmountable odds. I interviewed Dick Smith on The Generator in March. He told me that his Buy Australian project, Dick Smith Foods, has been a commercial failure. Most of his suppliers have sold to international interests.

    On the back of increasing oil prices, all goods will become more expensive. The cheapest goods will be those produced locally. If we knock down our factories, though, and ship the equipment to China, as we have done with our dairy processors, shoe manufacturers and other regional industry, we will have to go barefoot, or buy imported shoes at the going, inflated, price.

    It may be interesting to indulge ourselves in stores stocked with goods from around the world but the relative dullness of local produce is far less dangerous.
    Tellingly, the third line of the apocryphal curse is, “May you get what you want.”

  • Head for the hills – at least once this winter

    Regular or otherwise, whatever the weather they head for the beach when they get here then catch a little local colour at Pottsville Beach, Tweed Boys Club or Kingscliffe market.

    We all love the seaside, that’s why we’re here, but I confiscate their travel documents until they’ve done at least one trip inland. A beer at the Uki pub, a cuppa at Chillingham, coffee at Sphinx Rock Café or a picnic at Natural Bridge will do.

    I’m not simply promoting the tourist trail, or our great natural beauty. It’s the agricultural wealth of the area that I like to emphasise.

    As the global food shortage begins to dominate the front pages of the newspapers it pays us all to remember that agricultural land, fertile soil and regular rainfall are our most precious resources.

    Australia might be rich because we export coal, iron ore and aluminium, but when push comes to shove, as the famous red indian on the t-shirt says you can’t eat money … or coal, iron or aluminium.

    The farming families of the Tweed Valley have seen the dairy industry move to the Murray Darling, the bottom fall out of the sugar industry world wide, and the price of Macadamia’s plummet as South African farms flooded the world with cheap nuts.

    Now, the Murray Darling is in real trouble, sugar is eagerly sought after as a source of energy.

    It’s not just the dearth of water that is crippling the industrial scale farms across the Murray Darling basin, high diesel and fertiliser prices are killing them as well. There’s a lot to be said for the small family farm of 50 – 200acres that can be run by the people who live on it, selling the food locally. The agribusiness companies say that it is a relic of a bygone era, but the handful of people that have maintained small holdings, especially those that have rejected fossil fuel based fertilisers in favour of organic farming, are immune to the latest oil shock.

    The world’s richest people are busily buying block up in them thar hills and laughing merrily all the way to the bank because the real estate prices inland are a fraction of what they are on the coast.

    English rock stars, Israeli business magnates, retired European beauracrats all know that oil prices are never going down again, food shortages will get worse and that US Vice President Dick Cheney meant it when he said that Iraq “is the war that will not end in our lifetimes.”

    They are heading for those corners of the world that have stable government, fertile soil and rainfall that will remain good despite global warming. There are not too many places in the world that fit that description. You and I live right on the edge of one. The Wollumbin caldera.

    Our beaches may be magnificent, but our hinterland is unique.

    Whatever else you do this winter, make sure you drive through it at least once.

    And while you’re there, get yourself a little fresh food.

    You’ll never eat better.

  • Soothing Gaia’s Fever

    Meeting Gaia

    James Lovelock is a scientist who invented a device in 1958 to detect minute concentrations of chemicals. It was used to show that pesticides like DDT accumulate in animals a long way from where they are used. He used it himself a decade later to show that ChloroFlouroCarbons (CFCs) were present in large concentrations in the Antarctic.

    Lovelock was hired by NASA to design instruments that could find life on Mars if it existed. Lovelock started designing very sensitive instruments. Then he realised that they would be unable to differentiate between the contamination brought to Mars on the space ship and any life already there on the red planet.

    He started to focus on ways to tell from the outside if life existed. He reached the remarkable conclusion that there is a very simple indicator of life and that is activity, or more accurately, instability.

    Life consumes nutrients, extracts what it needs and exhales what it does not. It reorganises the world around it. There is one very significant thing about that reorganisation. It is more complex as a result of life than it would be without it. Plants consume sunlight, dirt and water and create forests. Animals eat plants and drink water and create societies.

    When you look at a living thing from the outside you see change happening that cannot be explained by simple chemical processes. We see the seething compost and we know the worms are well.

    Lovelock reported to NASA that he had completed his experiments and had proven that there was no life on Mars. They sacked him and insisted that he did not report his findings.

    He went one step further. He founded a movement, named after the Greek goddess of the Earth, Gaia, based on the principle that the planet is alive. It is not just covered in life, it is, itself, a living organism.

    There is no doubt in my mind that it is a very useful way to understand the systems which operate on a global scale.

    When we describe the rainforest as the lungs of the planet we are using exactly such an analogy. When we look at the ocean currents and their interaction with the life that depends on them, it is a circulatory system we describe. David Suzuki reports that the Nitrogen in the temperate rainforests that blanket the west coast of the USA and Canada has all come from the sea in the bodies of salmon. On a planetary scale, I see small, salmon-shaped cells carrying nutrients through that circulatory system to an organ that helps the planet breathe.

    This is not a far-fetched notion, it is a practical tool.

    Diagnosing Gaia

    As an organism, our body can deal with a wide variety of external temperatures. It can also deal with wide fluctuations in internal temperature. The testicles, for example, shrink into the body cavity when it is cold, and hang low when the body is hot, to maintain an even temperature for their precious cargo. The temperature of our blood, however, rarely strays more than a fraction of a degree from 36.8 on the Celsius scale. The medical definition of a fever is an increase of half a degree Celsius.

    Scientists have reached a broad consensus that an increase of four degrees in the earth’s temperature will be fatal to life on earth as we know it. Humans will not be able to live north of Melbourne or south of Paris, the seas will become acid and will inundate almost all the great fertile river deltas of the world. The earth as a planet will survive. Living things will survive, but in the great planetary illness this represents, human civilisation will be thrown aside like a fevered patient sweats out body fluids.

    With the planet as our patient, it is possible to observe some alarming truths.

    Almost one per cent of the patient’s lungs are eaten away. More than ten per cent of the lungs have been damaged in the last decade alone.

    The immune system of the planet is the wide range of species that exist, ready to adapt to changes in the environment and fill new niches in ecosystems as they respond to change. Over 50,000 species of plants or animals disappear off the face of the earth each year, irreversibly weakening this immune system.

    More than 6.66% of the freshwater on the planet is consumed every year. This is rising above the rate at which it is replenished by rain and snow. That rate of replenishment is falling while the rate of consumption is rising.

    These are not the causes of the illness, they are the symptoms. The cause of the illness is a virus that has invaded the earth’s ecosystems and is affecting the vital organs. That virus is rearranging the natural flows of Gaia’s systems. The destruction of the forests, for example, leads to reduced rainfall that makes the forests drier and more vulnerable to fire. This indirect  damage amplifies the damage caused directly.The nature of the virus is to grow more voracious as it develops. In those areas where it is most densely populated, it consumes resources from other parts of the planet, starving some areas and poisoning the immediate vicinity with its excretement.

    For the good of the patient, the virus simply has to be brought under control. The supply of resources to those areas where the infection is most developed needs to be limited to give natural systems an opportunity to regain balance and to slow down the creation of toxic wastes. Those areas where the virus is multiplying rapidly need to be soothed to slow down the rate of infection. Mechanisms that encourage more benign strains of the virus to dominate need to be explored.

    Evolution has favoured pathogens that are not too effective. The most effective pathogens kill their hosts before they have time to spread and are eliminated from the gene pool as a result.

    With only one Gaia, we cannot afford to discover this law of evolution the hard way. We simply have to reduce our impact, quickly, or we destroy our civilisation.

    There is no other choice.

  • The Earth has a morbid fever

    The climate centres around the world, which are the equivalent of the pathology lab of a hospital, have reported the Earth’s physical condition, and the climate specialists see it as seriously ill, and soon to pass into a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years. I have to tell you, as members of the Earth’s family and an intimate part of it, that you and especially civilisation are in grave danger.

    Our planet has kept itself healthy and fit for life, just like an animal does, for most of the more than three billion years of its existence. It was ill luck that we started polluting at a time when the sun is too hot for comfort. We have given Gaia a fever and soon her condition will worsen to a state like a coma. She has been there before and recovered, but it took more than 100,000 years. We are responsible and will suffer the consequences: as the century progresses, the temperature will rise 8 degrees centigrade in temperate regions and 5 degrees in the tropics.

    Much of the tropical land mass will become scrub and desert, and will no longer serve for regulation; this adds to the 40 per cent of the Earth’s surface we have depleted to feed ourselves.

    Curiously, aerosol pollution of the northern hemisphere reduces global warming by reflecting sunlight back to space. This “global dimming” is transient and could disappear in a few days like the smoke that it is, leaving us fully exposed to the heat of the global greenhouse. We are in a fool’s climate, accidentally kept cool by smoke, and before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.

    By failing to see that the Earth regulates its climate and composition, we have blundered into trying to do it ourselves, acting as if we were in charge. By doing this, we condemn ourselves to the worst form of slavery. If we chose to be the stewards of the Earth, then we are responsible for keeping the atmosphere, the ocean and the land surface right for life. A task we would soon find impossible – and something before we treated Gaia so badly, she had freely done for us.

    To understand how impossible it is, think about how you would regulate your own temperature or the composition of your blood. Those with failing kidneys know the never-ending daily difficulty of adjusting water, salt and protein intake. The technological fix of dialysis helps, but is no replacement for living healthy kidneys.

    My new book The Revenge of Gaia expands these thoughts, but you still may ask why science took so long to recognise the true nature of the Earth. I think it is because Darwin’s vision was so good and clear that it has taken until now to digest it. In his time, little was known about the chemistry of the atmosphere and oceans, and there would have been little reason for him to wonder if organisms changed their environment as well as adapting to it.

    Had it been known then that life and the environment are closely coupled, Darwin would have seen that evolution involved not just the organisms, but the whole planetary surface. We might then have looked upon the Earth as if it were alive, and known that we cannot pollute the air or use the Earth’s skin – its forest and ocean ecosystems – as a mere source of products to feed ourselves and furnish our homes. We would have felt instinctively that those ecosystems must be left untouched because they were part of the living Earth.

    So what should we do? First, we have to keep in mind the awesome pace of change and realise how little time is left to act; and then each community and nation must find the best use of the resources they have to sustain civilisation for as long as they can. Civilisation is energy-intensive and we cannot turn it off without crashing, so we need the security of a powered descent. On these British Isles, we are used to thinking of all humanity and not just ourselves; environmental change is global, but we have to deal with the consequences here in the UK.

    Unfortunately our nation is now so urbanised as to be like a large city and we have only a small acreage of agriculture and forestry. We are dependent on the trading world for sustenance; climate change will deny us regular supplies of food and fuel from overseas.

    We could grow enough to feed ourselves on the diet of the Second World War, but the notion that there is land to spare to grow biofuels, or be the site of wind farms, is ludicrous. We will do our best to survive, but sadly I cannot see the United States or the emerging economies of China and India cutting back in time, and they are the main source of emissions. The worst will happen and survivors will have to adapt to a hell of a climate.

    Perhaps the saddest thing is that Gaia will lose as much or more than we do. Not only will wildlife and whole ecosystems go extinct, but in human civilisation the planet has a precious resource. We are not merely a disease; we are, through our intelligence and communication, the nervous system of the planet. Through us, Gaia has seen herself from space, and begins to know her place in the universe.

    We should be the heart and mind of the Earth, not its malady. So let us be brave and cease thinking of human needs and rights alone, and see that we have harmed the living Earth and need to make our peace with Gaia. We must do it while we are still strong enough to negotiate, and not a broken rabble led by brutal war lords. Most of all, we should remember that we are a part of it, and it is indeed our home.

    james Lovelock is an independent environmental scientist and Fellow of the Royal Society. ‘The Revenge of Gaia’ is published by Penguin on 2 February

  • Military Expands Intelligence Role in U.S.

    Published: January 14, 2007

    WASHINGTON, Jan. 13 — The Pentagon has been using a little-known power to obtain banking and credit records of hundreds of Americans and others suspected of terrorism or espionage inside the United States, part of an aggressive expansion by the military into domestic intelligence gathering.

    Full story, go to The New York TImes

  • DU Death Toll Tops 11,000

    This view was expressed by Arthur Bernklau, executive director of Veterans for Constitutional Law in New York, writing in Preventive Psychiatry E-Newsletter.

    “The real reason for Mr. Principi’s departure was really never given,” Bernklau said. “However, a special report published by eminent scientist Leuren Moret naming depleted uranium as the definitive cause of ‘Gulf War Syndrome’ has fed a growing scandal about the continued use of uranium
    munitions by the U.S. military.”

    The “malady [from DU] that thousands of our military have suffered and died from has finally been identified as the cause of this sickness, eliminating the guessing. . . . The terrible truth is now being revealed,” Bernklau said.

    Of the 580,400 soldiers who served in Gulf War I, 11,000 are now dead, he said. By the year 2000, there were 325,000 on permanent medical disability. More than a decade later, more than half (56 percent) who served in Gulf War I have permanent medical problems. The disability rate for veterans of the world wars of the last century was 5 percent, rising to 10 percent in Vietnam.

    “The VA secretary was aware of this fact as far back as 2000,” Bernklau said. “He and the Bush administration have been hiding these facts, but now, thanks to Moret’s report, it is far too big to hide or to cover up.”

    Terry Johnson, public affairs specialist at the VA, recently reported that veterans of both Persian Gulf wars now on disability total 518,739, Bernklau said.

    “The long-term effect of DU is a virtual death sentence,” Bernklau said. “Marion Fulk, a nuclear chemist, who retired from the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab, and was also involved in the Manhattan Project, interprets the new and rapid malignancies in the soldiers [from the second war] as ‘spectacular’­and a matter of concern.’ ”

    While this important story appeared in a Washington newspaper and the wire services, it did not receive national exposure­a compelling sign that the American public is being kept in the dark about the terrible effects of this toxic weapon. (Veterans for Constitutional Law can be reached at (516) 474-4261.)
     

    Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute – as long as full credit is given to American Free Press – 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003