Not surprisingly, victims of a natural disaster can experience stress and anxiety, but a new study indicates that it might also cause them to make more errors – some serious – in their daily lives. Researchers have explored how cognitive performance can decline after earthquakes and other natural disasters.
Under fire … debate gathers heat on how clean it is. Photo: Glenn Hunt
GREENHOUSE gases are leaking from some US gas drilling sites at up to double the expected amounts, raising questions over the use of gas as a low-emissions fuel, according to researchers from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
The report has implications for Australia’s coal seam gas industry, which is marketing itself as a source of clean energy.
The industry body, the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association, said that, regardless of how coal seam gas emissions were calculated, they would all ultimately be accounted for under the federal government’s carbon price plan.
Advertisement: Story continues below
The US researchers calculated that about 4 per cent of the gas being extracted at a Colorado shale gas field was escaping as methane, a highly potent heat-trapping gas that is accelerating global warming. The gas industry in the US has argued that not more than 2 per cent of the gas brought up by drilling escapes into the atmosphere.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scientists stumbled upon the findings during an air monitoring experiment, when unusual levels of methane were detected and traced back to the gasfield.
”Our analysis suggests that the emissions of the [methane] we measured are most likely underestimated in current inventories and that the uncertainties attached to these estimates can be as high as a factor of two,” said their report, which is published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Geophysical Research.
Small extra amounts of methane can make significant differences to climate change because it is up to 100 times more potent than carbon dioxide.
It also has a shorter life span than carbon dioxide, meaning that most of the warming effect of gas released today is concentrated into the next two decades, a crucial period for avoiding future tipping points into dangerously rapid climate change.
The study comes in the middle of a global boom in gas extraction and fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, that has resulted in an increase in the use of gas fuel in many countries.
The Greens seized on the US research to argue that similar studies should be done in Australia to find out if greenhouse emissions from the coal seam gas industry were as low as the industry has said.
“The coal seam gas industry’s claims to be better for the climate than coal are increasingly being called into question by the evidence,” Senator Christine Milne said.
“Given these results from field measurements in the USA, it’s no wonder the industry in Queensland, NSW and across Australia is fighting hard to stop credible measurements of its performance being done.”
The chief operating officer of the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association, Rick Wilkinson, said in a statement that ”irrespective of the credibility or accuracy of the report in question, the important thing to note is that unlike the American industry, Australian gas producers will very shortly have a carbon pricing scheme that requires they pay for all emissions and provides an even greater incentive to reduce emissions.”
The Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency has previously told the Herald that it monitors scientific developments in the measurement of greenhouse gas emissions and would update its accounting methods if required.
“A swindle…” Bob Brown says allowing the forestry industry to continue burning native woodschips as renewable energy will mislead the public. Photo: Peter Mathew
THE independent federal MPs Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor have backed out of what the Greens say was a ”critical” part of the carbon tax deal, moving to allow the forestry industry to continue burning native woodchips as renewable energy.
In a manoeuvre that will infuriate conservationists, the two independents have moved to strike down regulations that were to tighten the definition of renewable energy to exclude electricity created from burning waste woodchips from native forests.
Since 1997, forestry firms have been able to earn renewable energy certificates, which can be sold for profit, by burning such woodchips in furnaces to create electricity.
The Greens leader, Bob Brown, said the regulations were a critical part of the carbon tax package agreed to by the multi-party climate change committee, made up of Labor, the Greens, Mr Oakeshott – who moved the disallowance yesterday – and Mr Windsor – who seconded it.
The legislation was passed last year, but some details are still being dealt with in the form of regulations.
”Rob Oakeshott signed up to this agreement as we all did and … I hope we all end up honouring it,” Senator Brown said yesterday.
Conservationists say that defining native woodchip waste burning as renewable energy helps to boost the financial value of logging. Senator Brown said that it would be ”a swindle on the public who thought they were buying accredited sustainable energy”.
Neither Mr Oakeshott nor Mr Windsor could be reached for comment.
A spokesman for the Minister for Climate Change, Greg Combet, said the government would ”continue to work with members of the Parliament to progress changes to the eligibility of wood waste under the Renewable Energy Target to help protect our native forests”.
The Coalition climate action spokesman, Greg Hunt, said: ”We would be very interested in talking with Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor and we’ll look at their proposal. Our view has always been that the government proposal would both destroy renewable energy from waste through biomass and destroy blue collar jobs.”
New volcano watch center opens in Menlo Park InMenlo by Linda Hubbard Gulker on February 10, 2012 The US Geological Survey has opened the California Volcano Observatory (CalVO) at its headquarters in Menlo Park with the purpose of increasing awareness of and resiliency to volcano threats in California. See all stories on this topic »
Danger below the surface European Voice Another event that could occur this year is the eruption of one or more of Iceland’s volcanoes, possibly on a much larger scale than the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull, which in 2010 caused the largest disruption of air travel in Europe since the end of … See all stories on this topic »
That contrasts strikingly with the more glamorous sister of deep geothermal energy, nuclear power. Both ultimately tap the heat generated by the decay of radioactive elements. Geothermal plants send water down holes to bring to the surface the heat from natural radioactive decay deep in the mantle. Nuclear power mines the radionucleides, concentrates them, sends them critical and then wonders what to do with the leftover mess – not very elegant by comparison. The coalition government has pledged that nuclear power will receive no taxpayer subsidies. But it can receive financial support by other means which are subsidies in all but name. So what support is there for deep geothermal projects? Nothing. As Tim Smit – founder of the Eden project where one of just two projects in the UK is sited – put it last night at a Renewable Energy Association event in Westminster: “I’d like the same ‘lack of support’ the government is giving to nuclear.” Geothermal energy has been tapped in the UK since Roman times, via the hot springs at Bath and elsewhere. Shallow geothermal projects – such as ground source heat pumps – are slowly growing. But even Decc’s own and very conservative estimate is that deep geothermal – a few kilometres down – could provide 10% of the UK’s electricity. And how! It runs 24 hours a day, so perfect for baseload. The water circulates in a closed-loop, so it’s clean and sustainable. It is virtually zero carbon and the plants have a small surface footprint, so it’s pretty nimby-proof. The catch is this: you’d be awfully brave to invest in it right now. Unlike most European nations, there is no licensing system in the UK. So you could sink your test wells at the cost of millions of pounds, find the right spot, then see someone else set up in the next field. There is no feed-in tariff support for electricity from geothermal. And the Renewable Obligation Certificates (Roc) support scheme is set at 2 Rocs, compared to the equivalent of 4 Rocs in Germany. It’s a familiar tale of German succes and British failure. Germany itself lags the leaders, the US and the Philippines, as well as El Salvador, Kenya and Papua New Guinea, but is the fastest growing in the world. It has about 150 projects in planning this year, representing a total investment of €4 billion, says Ryan Law, from Geothermal Engineering, which is developing the UK’s other current project near Redruth, Cornwall. In terms of plants, Munich already has 24 alone, for both heating and electricity, he told me, adding that the geothermal potential for both countries is more or less the same. Germany has invested about €10m a year in geothermal research since 2002: the coalition government cut in half the available funds to £1m and there is nothing more in the pipeline. What is the government afraid of? The tiny earthquakes that some geothermal plants have triggered are surely less worrying than piles of nuclear waste, particularly in seismically stable country like the UK. I’ll declare an interest: I used to be a geologist and I like geothermal’s style. It is simple and proven. And it has all of the advantages of the nuclear power coveted by successive governments, but none of the problems. And while the nuclear industry will benefit handsomely from low-carbon energy incentives, geothermal stands to get next to nothing. If there was ever a time to hold our minister’s feet to a renewable fire, this is it.
Shedding Some Light on Peak Oil OilPrice.com By Gail Tverberg | Thu, 09 February 2012 22:44 | 0 Titled Limits to Growth, their report suggested the world was heading toward economic collapse as it exhausted the natural resources, such as oil and copper, required for economic production. See all stories on this topic »
A new oil boom? Examiner.com A flurry of new mainstream media articles telling people not to worry about Peak Oil and hydrocarbon depletion have begun appearing on financial sites like Bloomberg, Forbes or The Wall Street Journal. Peak Oil is the point when global oil production … See all stories on this topic »