Ultra-Efficient Green Diesel to be Produced from Natural Oils and Animal Fats
Posted: 18 May 2012 04:08 PM PDT
Ultra-Efficient Green Diesel to be Produced from Natural Oils and Animal Fats
Posted: 18 May 2012 04:08 PM PDT
Nuclear disaster or plague likely unless population shrinks and natural resources are reassigned to poor, says Prof Paul Ehrlich
The world’s most renowned population analyst has called for a massive reduction in the number of humans and for natural resources to be redistributed from the rich to the poor.
Paul Ehrlich, Bing professor of population studies at Stanford University in California and author of the best-selling Population Bomb book in 1968, goes much further than the Royal Society in London which this morning said that physical numbers were as important as the amount of natural resources consumed.
The optimum population of Earth – enough to guarantee the minimal physical ingredients of a decent life to everyone – was 1.5 to 2 billion people rather than the 7 billion who are alive today or the 9 billion expected in 2050, said Ehrlich in an interview with the Guardian.
“How many you support depends on lifestyles. We came up with 1.5 to 2 billion because you can have big active cities and wilderness. If you want a battery chicken world where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept just about alive you might be able to support in the long term about 4 or 5 billion people. But you already have 7 billion. So we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage.”
“The question is: can you go over the top without a disaster, like a worldwide plague or a nuclear war between India and Pakistan? If we go on at the pace we are there’s going to be various forms of disaster. Some maybe slow motion disasters like people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because the more people you have the greater the chance of some weird virus transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a vast die-off.”
Ehrlich, who was described as alarmist in the 1970s but who says most of his predictions have proved correct, says he was gloomy about humanity’s ability to feed over 9 billion people. “We have 1 billion people hungry now and we are going to add 2.5 billion. They are going to have to be fed on more marginal land, from water that is purified more or transported further, we’re going to have disproportionate impacts on how we feed people from the population increase itself,” he said.
“Most of the predictions [in Population Bomb] have proved correct. At that time I wrote about climate change. We did not know then if it was warming or cooling. We thought it was going to be a problem for the end of this century. Now we know it’s warming and a problem for the beginning of the century; we didn’t know about the loss of biodiversity. Things have been coming up worse than was predicted. We have the threats now of vast epidemics”.
“I have a grim view of what is likely to happen to my children and grandchildren. Politicians can control the financial mess we are in but they don’t have control over the systems of the planet that provide us our food, our welfare, those are deteriorating and it will take us a long time to turn it around if we start now. It’s hard to think of anything that will pop up and save us. I hope something will but it really will be a miracle.”
But he agreed with the Royal Society report that said human population and consumption should not be divided. “[They] multiply together. You have to be deal with them together. We have too much consumption among the rich and too little among the poor. That implies that terrible thing that we are going to have to do which is to somehow redistribute access to resources away the rich to the poor. But in the US we have been doing the opposite. The Republican party is wildly in favour of more redistribution, of taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich.”
Fukushima Reactor 4 poses massive global risk
CTV.ca
The troubled Reactor 4 at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant is at the centre of this potential catastrophe. Reactor 4 — and to a lesser extent Reactor 3 — still hold large quantities of cooling waters surrounding spent nuclear fuel, all bound by a …
See all stories on this topic »

Prices: Sydney Water want to gouge an extra $335 from bill payers. Source: Supplied
THE state government is secretly backing a Sydney Water application to gouge an extra $335 from households over the next four years.
Despite the O’Farrell government promising to limit bill increases from state-owned water and electricity suppliers, Sydney Water wants to boost revenue by $570 million – an application backed by the NSW Treasury Corporation.
Sydney Water’s submission to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal would result in 1.7 million households facing a 30 per cent rise in bills over the next four years, or $84 each year.
The submission to the pricing watchdog to set prices over the next four years claims IPART’s proposal to restrict bill rises would see Sydney Water lose $140 million each year, which represents “a very large change with significant business impact”.
Sydney Water claims it needs the money to pay for infrastructure upgrades.
Its price claims are backed by two letters from NSW Treasury Corporation. One letter submitted last week claims allowing Sydney Water to maintain higher finance costs were essential to maintaining the state’s triple-A credit rating.
Treasurer Mike Baird has washed his hands of the application, declaring the final decision on prices rests with the independent regulator, not the government.
“The government’s debt adviser has independently raised concerns that IPART has not appropriately reflected current market conditions for the cost of debt in its calculations, which could subject customers to unnecessary price volatility and leave the state vulnerable to financial shocks,” he said.
But Opposition water spokesman Luke Foley said Premier Barry O’Farrell had promised to keep prices as low as possible for families.
“Yet they’ve now had Treasury and Sydney Water make secret submissions to the pricing regulator that, if adopted, will add $335 to every household water bill,” he said. “In opposition, Mr O’Farrell was on the side of hard-working families struggling under cost of living pressures. In government, he’s become out of touch very early on.”
Finance Minister Greg Pearce, who is responsible for Sydney Water, said it was important prices remained low and the quality of Sydney’s water was maintained.
“IPART sought submissions from all stakeholders… the government will respect IPART’s final determination in June,” he said.
The submission comes amid threats of stop work action by Sydney Water workers after the organisation refused an Australian Services Union request to end a cost-cutting roster trial that made cuts to overnight supervisor staff.
Mining companies are increasingly taking an interest in shale after it took off in the US, writes Paddy Manning.
Nobody knows the extent of the shale gas resource in Australia but the potential is big, perhaps big enough to reduce coal seam gas to a sideshow.
The federal agency Geoscience Australia set the theme of this week’s annual Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association conference by estimating shale gas could double Australia’s natural gas reserves, from 400 to 800 trillion cubic feet of recoverable gas.
The US shale revolution, spurred by the advent of horizontal drilling and fracture stimulation (or fracking) technology, transformed world energy markets in five years.
Shale gas now accounts for about 23 per cent of the US’s annual gas production, according to the US Energy Information Administration. By contrast, coal seam gas (CSG, or coal bed methane as it is known in the US) provides about 7 to 9 per cent, says the managing director of Beach Energy, Reg Nelson.
What has happened in the US is likely to happen here, he says.
Beach, which gets most of its revenue from oil production, has been a pioneer in unconventional gas. Beach sold an early-stage investment in coal seam gas play Arrow Energy to Shell, at a handsome profit.
Beach has some of the best exploration acreage in Australia’s most prospective shale gas field, the Cooper Basin in South Australia. Beach shares dived this week after a media report suggested the company had shut down a data room opened to potential co-investors, due to a lack of interest. Nelson says Beach terminated the sale process once it got strong gas flows from one of its wells in the Cooper: ”We thought, we’ve got something big here, we can add value to this. And when we sell it, we’re not going to sell it for a small premium. It’s going to be a big one.”
Certainly there is plenty of jockeying going on, with juniors including Senex, Drillsearch and others seeking to prove up their shale reserves and sell on to a larger company. Big oil producers such as BP, Total and Shell are interested; BHP Billiton’s petroleum chief, Mike Yeager, said his team was ”studying every square inch of Australia right now” looking for shale gas.
Australia’s shale gas reserves are not located under prime agricultural country but in the middle of the desert, and there is a gas pipeline nearby at Moomba. Shale gas wells are deeper – generally well below aquifers – and typically recover more gas per well, meaning fewer wells need to be drilled.
Drew Hutton, the president of the anti-coal seam gas group Lock the Gate, warns shale gas production in the Cooper could have implications for Western Queensland’s wild rivers, protected under legislation. ”The nomination of the western rivers came about because the traditional owners, local cattleman and local councils got together with the wilderness society and lobbied for it.”
He says the US experience shows there are still groundwater concerns associated with shale gas extraction, and there would likely be an environmental campaign – though perhaps not a Lock the Gate campaign – against shale gas in the Cooper.
Nelson, a former South Australian mining regulator who spent much time capping uncontrolled flows from bores in the Great Artesian Basin, says he has ”no concerns whatsoever” about groundwater contamination from shale gas.
”The important point is, Cooper Basin gas has been around for 40-50 years. A lot of these reservoirs have been fracked, because the sands are tight. There’s been about 700 wells fracked since 1969.”
If Cooper Basin shale production was safer, could the entire coal seam gas debate be bypassed? The vice-president for eastern Australia at Santos, James Baulderstone, says at an estimated $6 per gigajoule, shale gas is 20 to 30 per cent more expensive to produce than coal seam gas, and technology and capital constraints mean significant shale production is unlikely to be economic this decade. Santos is concentrating on getting more out of the declining conventional gas reserves in the Cooper Basin, with advanced infill drilling, and on developing its coal seam gas fields in the NSW Gunnedah Basin.
”You need a diversity of supply,” he says. ”One of the great things about NSW’s gas resource is its location to market and where it sits on the cost structure. When you model the cost curve, the coal seam gas will be cheaper than shale to start with, it’s easier to develop and we believe that it will fill market demand in the 2015-25 window. Shale would then come on stream towards the end of the 2020 decade, and start to displace coal seam gas as it becomes cheaper over time.”
With a majority stake in the Moomba gas plant, and the most acreage in the Cooper Basin, Santos will play a big role in developing Australia’s shale resource. It has recently drilled its first vertical shale well, and will drill its first horizontal well later this year.
”We’re all very excited about shale but it’s not something you can do overnight,” Baulderstone says.
Oil Price Daily News Update
|
|
The UK can Protect itself from High Oil Prices by Investing in Renewables Posted: 18 May 2012 04:06 PM PDT National energy sectors and are still heavily dependent on the global oil market, and the global oil market is so finely balanced that any disruption ripples out to affect most of the world. This means that domestic energy prices can be heavily influenced by incidents half a world away.The best way to avoid these price spikes is to obtain a certain level of, or complete, energy independence, or use energy sources that don’t rely upon the global oil market.An analysis by Oxford Economics, commissioned by the UK government, and presented by…
|
|
The Ocean Prospector will Return to Operation after 14 years on the Dock Posted: 18 May 2012 04:04 PM PDT Back in 1971 ODECO designed and built The Ocean Prospector, the first ever semisubmersible drilling rig that was self-propelled, a standard feature with today’s rigs. It operated in warm waters around the world for ODECO and later Diamond Offshore, after their merger in 1992.In 1998 the rig was towed into Galveston harbour in Texas for inspections and maintenance work when the decision was made to decommission it. It never left Galveston for the next 14 years, and although its ownership has changed several times it still remains there to…
|