Category: Articles

  • Fracking action ‘induced’ quakes

    Fracking action ‘induced’ quakes

    March 11, 2010

    WASHINGTON: A series of small earthquakes in Ohio late last year was probably caused by activity from fracking, a review by authorities in the US has concluded.

    The Ohio Department of Natural Resources said its review revealed the quakes in the north-east of the state in December appeared to be caused by a rare confluence of events in which wastewater injected into the ground triggered seismic activity in an unmapped fault area.

    ”Geologists believe induced seismic activity is extremely rare but it can occur with the confluence of a series of specific circumstances,” the report said.

    ”After investigating all available geological formation and well activity data, state regulators and geologists found a number of co-occurring circumstances strongly indicating the Youngstown area earthquakes were induced.”

    It concluded that disposal fluid from the Northstar 1 well ”intersected an unmapped fault in a near-failure state of stress, causing movement along that fault”.

    With the report, Ohio’s oil and gas regulators announced new standards for transporting and disposing of brine, a by-product of oil and natural gas hydraulic fracturing, or ”fracking”, saying the rules will be ”among the nation’s toughest”. Some US states and other countries have moved to ban certain types of fracking, although the industry contends the techniques have been in use for decades and are safe.

    The new rules call for a review of geologic data for known faulted areas within the state and a ban on putting certain disposal wells within these areas.

    The state will also require oil and gas operations to plug with cement any wells that penetrate into the Precambrian basement rock and prohibit injection into these formations.

    The report is the latest to raise fresh questions about fracking, a technique that offers the potential to unlock vast quantities of natural gas from shale formations but has come under intense scrutiny from environmentalists.

    The Ohio Oil and Gas Association said the report simply indicated the well was in an unknown fault area.

    The association’s executive vice-president, Thomas Stewart, said that the report ”confirmed … our belief that the recent seismic activity in the Youngstown area was associated with a previously unknown geologic factor, in this case, an unmapped fault”.

    Agence France-Presse

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/fracking-action-induced-quakes-20120310-1ur0v.html#ixzz1olDY9WAl

  • Dam full but desalination plant on line at $500m a year

    initial cost 2 Bn.

    Dam full but desalination plant on line at $500m a year

    Rachel Browne, Heath Aston

    March 11, 2012

    IT WILL be more than four years before the Sydney desalination plant produces a drop of water again, if the water level at Warragamba Dam declines at the same rate as the last time it topped out in August 1998.

    Even if levels drop at the same rate as the fastest decline it would be two years before the dam falls to 70 per cent – the point at which the desalination plant would be turned on.

    Assuming the former rate, a private owner of the plant – to be announced by the State Government this year – will take more than $500 million from NSW taxpayers without producing a litre of water.

    Based on estimates from the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal, a private sector owner would take $591 million in ”availability charges” from Sydney Water – payment for keeping the plant available.

    Taking away fixed costs, including $1.1 million a month to be paid to the plant’s operator, Veolia Water, and financing debt on the expected $1.1 billion price tag – which excludes a possible privatisation of the $600 million pipeline – a little over $50 million a year will go to the owners in profit.

    The Greens MP John Kaye said: ”Labor’s desalination plant was always a white elephant, but the coalition are now taking away the opportunity to turn the plant off and avoid $600 million of wasted availability charges,” he said.

    Interested bidders include local and international, a number of investment banks and pension funds from Canada and Korea.

    Warragamba Dam, one of the largest domestic water supply dams in the world, is likely to continue to spill if the Bureau of Meteorology’s long-range forecast for more rain proves correct.

    The Bureau of Meteorology NSW climate manager, Dr Aaron Coutts-Smith, warned NSW residents to brace for more wet weather.

    He said there was a 60 per cent chance of above average rainfall throughout autumn when low pressure systems off the east coast are more prevalent.

    ”There are increased odds of above average rainfall over the next three months, but most of that will be west of the divide,” he said.

    ”We can’t tell whether it will come in heavy showers like Thursday’s downpour or whether it will be more evenly spread.”

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/water-issues/dam-full-but-desalination-plant-on-line-at-500m-a-year-20120310-1ur5i.html#ixzz1ol59IWyn

  • Nuclear meltdown kept secret

    How many other countries or govt’s would keep stumm on this.

    Nuclear meltdown danger kept secret

    March 11, 2012

    A man looks for his photographs at a collection centre for items which were found in the rubble of an area devastated by the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Sendai, Miyagi prefecture March 9, 2012, ahead of the one-year anniversary of last March 11 earthquake and tsunami. More than 250,000 photographs and personal belongings are displayed at the centre for owners to recover.

    A year later … looking for personal photographs at a tsunami collection centre for effects in Sendai. Photo: Reuters

    TOKYO: Just four hours after a tsunami swept into the Fukushima nuclear power plant on March 11 last year, Japan’s leaders knew the damage was so severe the reactors could melt down, but they kept it secret for months.

    The revelations were in documents released late last week. The minutes of the government’s crisis management meetings from the day the earthquake and tsunami struck until late December had to be reconstructed retroactively.

    They show confusion, delayed responses and miscommunication among government and plant officials as some ministers expressed the sense nobody was in charge while conditions quickly worsened.

    Star fish are being dried for plant food on the ground in Tashirojima island, off Ishinomaki city, Miyagi Prefecture.Click for more photos

    Japan – one year on

    Star fish are being dried for plant food on the ground in Tashirojima island, off Ishinomaki city, Miyagi Prefecture. Photo: AP/Itsuo Inouye

    • Star fish are being dried for plant food on the ground in Tashirojima island, off Ishinomaki city, Miyagi Prefecture.
    • An empty street is seen in the highly radiated town of Iitate, in the village of IItate, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Radiation is still being emitted from the now defunct nuclear Dai-ichi plant and more than 20,000 people are registered on waiting lists to get their radiation levels measured.
    • A policeman stands guard at one of the entrances to the 20km evacuation zone surrounding the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant. Radiation is still being emitted from the shutdown plant.
    • The Takahama Nuclear Power Station is seen in a roadside mirror which runs by Kansai Electric Power Co, on March 9, 2012 in Takahama, Japan. Only two of Japanese's 54 nuclear reactors are online nearly 12 months after last year's March 11 earthquake and tsunami.
    • Tamiko Abe, 71, whose home was destroyed in last year's tsunami cooks a seaweed dish in a temporary housing unit.
    • Reina Endo, 7, and her brother Shun Endo, 10, from Minamisoma, are prepared to be screened for radiation during a whole body radiation check at the Minamisoma City General Hospital, just outside the 20km evacuation zone surrounding the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, on March 09, 2012.
    • A man looks for his photographs at a collection centre for items which were found in the rubble of an area devastated by the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Sendai, Miyagi prefecture on march 9, 2012.
    • A worker offers prayer during a ceremony to commemorate their colleagues who were killed by a tsunami at the the Nippon Paper Industries Co.  Miyagi Prefecture, Japan.
    • Tsunami victim Shigemi Yoshida, 58, holds a photograph of himself and his wife at their wedding party, which was found in the rubble of an earthquake devastated area.
    • Police officers walk past a pine tree which survived the  earthquake and tsunami, during an operation searching for bodies,  in Rikuzentakata, northeastern Japan, one year after the disaster.
    • Cars damaged by the tsunami, on March 11, 2011, are stacked on the ground in Ishinomaki City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan.
    • Schoolchildren wear padded hoods to protect them from falling debris during a disaster drill named
    • Schoolchildren take shelter underneath their desks during a disaster drill named
    • A Volunteer group from Tokyo works to clear buried drainage pipes in Rikuzentakata, Japan. Volunteer groups have come from all across Japan to help in the massive recovery effort.
    • Rie Komatsu lays flowers at the site of a convenience store where two of her friends were killed by last years' tsunami in Rikuzentakata, Japan.
    • Bulldozers work to sort and clear massive piles of scrap metal and debris in Rikuzentakata, Japan.
    • A replica of the Statue of Liberty that was damaged by the March 11 tsunami stands in Ishinomaki, Miyagi Prefecture.

    The minutes quoted an official as saying the reactors’ cooling functions were being kept running by batteries that would last eight hours. ”If temperatures in the reactor cores keep rising … there is a possibility of meltdown,” the official said during a meeting hours after the tsunami.

    The revelation comes as people continue to look for cherished possessions in centres set up by recovery authorities.

    Associated Press

     

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/nuclear-meltdown-danger-kept-secret-20120310-1ur0y.html#ixzz1okmXhShN

  • Doomsday business is booming

    News 3 new results for PEAK-OIL
    I would be sceptical about this report.
    There are Post Carbon deniers out there.

    Peak oil‘ debate dead amid US boom: BMO’s Sherry Cooper
    Globe and Mail
    An “unexpected boom” in oil supplies ends the debate on “peak oil,” Bank of Montreal’s chief economist believes. Sherry Cooper took a look this week on the surge in production in the United States and Canada. And ironically, she says, many are looking
    See all stories on this topic »

    Last one into Bantry, please turn off the lights
    Irish Times
    Colin Campbell (no relation), an Oxford-educated petrogeologist who lives in the village of Ballydehob, nine miles from Bantry, has just produced a book, Peak Oil Personalities . Now an expert in peak oil, his first graduate assignment was to map the
    See all stories on this topic »

    Irish Times
    Doomsday business is booming
    Off-Grid
    Whether or not you believe in the Mayan prophecy, Peak Oil or Global flooding, there is big money being made out of the coming collapse. From society’s wealthiest and powerful Wall Streeters to rural bug-out types, people are preparing for the worst,
    See all stories on this topic »

    Off-Grid
  • Global accord on nuclear safety needed urgently- World Energy Council

    Global accord on nuclear safety needed urgently – World Energy Council

    A year on from Fukushima disaster, council says safety in nuclear industry should be a ‘collaborative, not competitive issue’

    • guardian.co.uk, Friday 9 March 2012 07.15 GMT
    • Article history
    • The Unterweser nuclear power plant near Stadland, Germany

      The Unterweser nuclear power plant near Stadland, Germany – one of seven nuclear reactors Chancellor Angela Merkel chose to shut in the wake of the Fukushima disaster. Photograph: Sean Gallup/Getty Images

      A new international accord on the management and safety of nuclear power plants should be a priority for governments, an influential global energy organisation has said.

      A year after Japan’s Fukushima reactor was shut down, the World Energy Council – whose members include many of the biggest energy companies from around the world – said an agreement was possible and should be a matter of urgency. “Global nuclear power is one of the rare issues on which an international accord could be achieved with a reasonable level of efforts— the need to act is urgent, and the time is right,” its report found.

      “Very little has changed in respect of improving global governance of the nuclear sector, highlighting the need for action. There is critical need to inform the public about issues relating to nuclear generation technologies, safety, costs, benefits and risks.”

      The WEC also found that nuclear energy continues to be a popular choice when governments around the world are setting their future priorities, despite concerns over the safety of reactors following the Fukushima disaster last March.

      Although many countries have paused their work on nuclear power developments, and some – including Germany, Italy and Switzerland – have withdrawn altogether, the WEC study concluded that the impetus for nuclear development in key parts of the developing world would continue.

      Christoph Frei, the secretary general of WEC, said: “The nuclear renaissance is continuing. But there is a strong need for the public to be informed, and for more discussion around safety procedures. Safety should not be a competitive issue – it should be something where companies collaborate to ensure that everyone is using the best practice.”

      The WEC study found that most countries had not materially reduced their plans for new nuclear reactors, and that 60 plants were still under construction. “Very little has changed, especially in non-OECD [developing] countries, in respect of the future utilisation of nuclear in the energy mix after Fukushima,” was the report’s verdict.

      However, some nuclear experts disputed the claims, pointing out that proposed new reactors can take many years to come to fruition, and that while countries’ plans for new nuclear development may remain in favour of the technology on paper, this was far from a guarantee that the plans would be carried out in reality.

      Steve Thomas, professor of energy studies at the University of Greenwich, said on Wednesday that while construction began on 38 new reactors between 2008 and 2010, construction only began on two between 2011 and 2012. He said estimates from the nuclear industry more than a decade ago that nuclear power would cost about $1,000/KW of capacity to construct had now been revised upwards to about $6,000.

      Mycle Schneider, a nuclear energy consultant speaking at a conference held by the Greens/EFA party at the European parliament to discuss the impact of Fukushima on the nuclear industry a year on, said there had been a “dramatic decline” since the 1980s in the number of nuclear plants around the world. Keith Baverstock, of the University of Eastern Finland, added that the three major examples of nuclear accidents – Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima – showed that nuclear power was “very dangerous and very accident-prone”.

      Connie Hedegaard, the European Union’s climate chief, warned that the costs of nuclear power had probably increased after the Fukushima incident. “I’m sure that nuclear power has not gone down in price, because of the extra security.”

      But the WEC said it was essential for a public debate on nuclear to include the question of how safety and governance could be co-ordinated at an international level. Pierre Gadonneix, chairman of the World Energy Council, said: “It is clear from the report that nuclear energy will play a full part in the future energy mix, especially in developing countries, provided nuclear safety and transparency are continuously being reinforced. I believe there is a real opportunity for our world leaders to promote a consensual solution to this issue and thus demonstrate that real international governance, where emerging economies fully participate, can be successful.”

  • Renewable Energy (Hansen) 2012

     

    Renewable Energy

    This figure is available also in PDF. Data source: EIA International Energy Statistics for Coal, Oil, Gas (1980-2010) and Total (1980-2008); Table 1.8 in International Energy Annual for Nuclear and Hydroelectric (1980-2006). (Last modified: 2012/02/24)

    This figure is available also in PDF (data source: same as the above figure, last updated 2012/02/23).

    This figure is available also in PDF. Data source: EIA Table 1.3 Primary Energy Consumption by Source, 1949-2010 for Fossile Fuels, and EIA Table 10.1 Renewable Energy Production and Consumption for Renewable Energy. (Last modified: 2012/02/28)

    This figure is available also in PDF, (data source: EIA Total Energy page, last modified: 2012/02/27)

     

    Electricity Generation

    This figure is available also in PDF.

    This figure is available also in PDF. The data are through 2008. (Last modified: 2011/07/12)

    The same quantities in fraction.

    This figure is available also in PDF. (Last modified: 2011/07/19)

    This figure is available also in PDF. Data source:EIA International Energy Statistics. (Last modified: 2011/07/08)

    This figure is available also in PDF. The data are through 2009. (Last modified: 2011/07/12)

    The same quantities in fraction.

    This figure is available also in PDF. (Last modified: 2011/07/19)

    This figure is available also in PDF. Data source:EIA International Energy Statistics. (Last modified: 2011/07/08)

    This figure is available also in PDF. (Last modified: 2011/11/17)

    This figure is available also in PDF. (Last modified: 2011/11/17)

    This figure is available also in PDF. (Last modified: 2011/11/17)

    This figure is available also in PDF. (Last modified: 2011/11/18)

    This figure is available also in PDF. (Last modified: 2011/11/29)

    This figure is available also in PDF. (Last modified: 2011/11/29)

    Above figures are summarized in World line graph, World pie charts, U.S. line graph, U.S. pie charts.

    Data Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration.