Category: Sustainable Settlement and Agriculture

The Generator is founded on the simple premise that we should leave the world in better condition than we found it. The news items in this category outline the attempts people have made to do this. They are mainly concerned with our food supply and settlement patterns. The impact that the human race has on the planet.

  • Urgent: asylum seeker petition on TV today.

    Urgent: asylum seeker petition on TV today.

    Inbox
    x

    GetUp!
    12:02 PM (12 minutes ago)

    to me

    — Yesterday, another boat capsized north of Christmas Island. An estimated 150 asylum seekers were onboard; 130 have been rescued and one person has been confirmed dead. Parliament debated late into the night on a bill for offshore processing in Nauru and Malaysia, but that bill will today be defeated in the Senate. A new approach is urgently needed. —

    Dear NEVILLE,

    Recent tragedies at sea show that we must find policies that are both humane to asylum seekers, and also reduce dangerous boat journeys. The Government and Opposition are both fixated on enacting their own variants of offshore processing, but we can’t stop the boats without addressing why people board them in the first place.

    That’s why we need a solution that offers a real alternative to asylum seekers who are considering coming by boat to Australia. Many experts in the refugee and migration sector say the best way to do this is by substantially increasing Australia’s refugee intake, particularly from countries in our region–like Indonesia and Malaysia–where people are most likely to board a boat to our shores.

    Today is a crucial moment. All sides of politics are searching for a new approach: for one that can be agreed on, and passed, by this Parliament.

    That’s why today, we’re putting your voice on Sky News, the station played on most every TV in Parliament House. We’re airing an ad that will update each hour as more Australians sign this petition so that when decisions are made today, our politicians have no doubt about where our community stands. Please add your name now, and ask friends and family to do the same:

    http://www.getup.org.au/anewapproach

    How will increasing the refugee intake help reduce the number of people who risk their lives on dangerous voyages to seek asylum here?

    Currently, Australia makes available a very small number of humanitarian visas through official channels in our region. In the 10 months to April this year, Australia granted only 97 refugee visas out of Indonesia. A further 1126 were made available through Malaysia, but 95% of those went to Burmese refugees. So for those fleeing other troubled countries, including Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq, their chances of receiving refuge are slim. Many are left with little choice but to risk their lives on leaky boats.

    The policy alternatives are bleak. Experts, including the Immigration Department, tell us that offshore processing in Nauru is unlikely to work; and conditions for asylum seekers in Malaysia are very concerning. What’s more, neither proposal can break the deadlock in Parliament: the Coalition will not support the “Malaysian solution”, Labor will not support the Coalition’s Nauru proposal without Malaysia, and the Greens are staunchly against both.

    That’s why we need to move to a humane solution that can be implemented right away. Increasing our refugee intake, combined with efforts to improve conditions in transit countries in our region, such as Indonesia and Malaysia, can provide refugees with a genuine alternative to a dangerous boat journey.

    http://www.getup.org.au/anewapproach

    Incrementally doubling Australia’s intake of UNHCR-approved refugees will undermine the business model of people smugglers. Moreover, working with our neighbours to give asylum seekers better human rights protection, freedom from detention, and a sense of security during processing will also help reduce the incentives for asylum seekers to embark on journeys to Australia.

    As our politicians search for solutions, can you add your name to the campaign for a new approach?

    http://www.getup.org.au/anewapproach

    With hope,
    the GetUp team.

    PS – For more detail on this policy option, see the briefing paper we have just released with The Edmund Rice Centre and others: http://www.getup.org.au/anewapproach


    GetUp is an independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group. We use new technology to empower Australians to have their say on important national issues. We receive no political party or government funding, and every campaign we run is entirely supported by voluntary donations. If you’d like to contribute to help fund GetUp’s work, please donate now! If you have trouble with any links in this email, please go directly to www.getup.org.au. To unsubscribe from GetUp, please click here. Authorised by Simon Sheikh, Level 2, 104 Commonwealth Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010

  • Devil Ark update…

    Extinction is not an option

    Inbox
    x

    Monique Ryan info@devilark.com.au via icontact.com
    2:53 PM (7 hours ago)

    to me

    Devilish Encounters

    Extinction is not an option!

    The latest figures from Tasmania report that around 90% of Tasmanian devils are extinct in the wild, and some scientists are predicting that our Australian icon will be extinct within ten years.

     

    But here at Devil Ark, we say that EXTINCTION IS NOT AN OPTION. We are working hard to breed genetically diverse Tasmanian devils in a naturalistic environment that maintain their natural behaviour. Devil Ark enclosures are large (at least two hectares) and naturalistic with multiple dens. Each enclosure houses small groups of devils that socialise as they would in the wild. It is very different to a zoo where small enclosures mean loss of natural behaviour.

     

    Minimising the devils’ exposure to humans (especially handling) maintains their independence and wild traits.

     

    This is important for devils that will eventually be returned to the Tasmanian bush.

    Our approach is extremely devil-friendly and cost effective too. It costs less than $2,000 a year to raise a devil at Devil Ark; compare this with the $7,000+ that some zoos are saying it costs.

    Watch our tv advertisement and share it with your family and friends.

     

     

    Devil Ark update…

    It’s now more eighteen months since the first Tasmanian devils were released at Devil Ark – and the second breeding season has been bearing fruits at the hideaway in the picturesque Barrington Tops.

     

    Watch the update on one of Australia’s most important conservation projects...

     

    Health checks are revealing a very special find

     

    All devils at Devil Ark receive quarterly health checks, but the winter health check is our favourite! This is the opportunity for our keepers to have a ‘sneak peak’ into the pouches of the female devils to see how many young they have.

     

    They still have about half the females to check, but already the count is up to 20! We are looking forward to another very successful breeding season.

    Keepers Andrew and Adrian very carefully checking the pouch of a female devil and were delighted to see three joeys half the size of a man’s thumb.

     

    Winter wonderland

     

    Winter has well and truly arrived at Devil Ark, with average day-time temperature reaching 7 degrees and night temperatures now around -2. Barrington Tops was selected as the location of Devil Ark because the high altitude and wet and snowy conditions resemble that of their native homeland.

     

    Since our long term goal is to breed and maintain a healthy population of devils whose descendants will eventually repopulate the Tasmanian eco system; not only do we need devils with wild behaviour, but also animals that can cope with the harsh, cold weather conditions.

     

    Why your donations
    are critical

     

    It might seem like we keep asking for your help to build free-range enclosures at Devil Ark, and that is because we must!

     

    Without the support of a significant benefactor and therefore the ability to build free range enclosures that will provide capacity for many years, we are currently building on an as-needs basis.

     

    With the dramatic decline of devils in the wild, it is critical to have capacity for disease-free stock from areas decimated by disease. We must act urgently to secure genetically important stock before they are all lost to DFTD.

     

    It costs $72 to build a metre of Devil Ark free range enclosure (we need to build 6500m).

     

    Please help us; your donation

    will build the future for our disappearing devil.

     

    Raising awareness of the plight of the devil

     

    Please tell your family and friends about the risk we face of losing the Tasmanian devil.

     

    Education is critical to saving the species.

     

     

     

    early morning fog at the Ark

     

    Devil Ark

    Tel 1300 553 565 PO Box 737 Gosford NSW 2250

    www.devilark.com.au info@devilark.com.au

     

    This message was sent to nevilleg729@gmail.com from:

    Australian Reptile Park | Tomalla | Barrington Tops , NSW 2337, Australia

    Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free!

    Manage Your Subscription Forward To a Friend

  • Palmer seeks permission to pollute reef: Burke

    Palmer seeks permission to pollute reef: Burke

    ABCJune 25, 2012, 3:02 pm

    The Federal Government says an application to pump waste water from a north Queensland nickel refinery into the Great Barrier Reef is not being taken lightly.

    Mining magnate Clive Palmer is seeking approval from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority to take contaminated water held in tailing tanks at his nickel refinery plant near Townsville, and release it into nearby Halifax Bay.

    The waste water would only be released if levels in tailing tanks reached crisis levels.

    Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke says Mr Palmer is effectively applying for “permission to pollute” the Great Barrier Reef.

    He says the level of nutrients in the water tanks is significantly below the standard required for the marine park.

    “Nitrogen levels, when they get too high, can in the extreme levels cause fish kills and take away all the oxygen that’s needed for marine life,” he said.

    The Marine Park Authority does have scope to allow the nutrient-rich water into the reef under strict guidelines, if it can be proved the waste water being held is at crisis levels.

    Mr Burke says that should only happen as a last resort.

    “There’s specific equipment that can be used in trying to get the water to a better standard,” he said.

    “There’s issues of raising dam walls but there’s questions whether that can be done in time.

    “And then as I said there’s options if the water were to be released whether it could be done at very, very slow pace, but none of it’s easy.”

    He says it is up to the Marine Park Authority to decide if it is possible to do so and not compromise the reef.

    “Is there such a thing where it could be done more slowly at lower volumes and not have a negative impact on the marine park?” he said.

    “Those sorts of questions are being considered. But if it was all to go out to the marine park in a short amount of time, the potential impact of this could be extraordinary.”

    Libby Connors from the Queensland Greens says the release of nickel tailings would have a detrimental effect on the reef.

    “It’s pretty insulting for him to claim that there is the jobs of 1,000 of his employees at risk because what the people of Queensland have to weigh up is the damage to the reef – which employees 60,000 people through tourism and related industries – versus Mr Palmer’s nickel refinery,” she said.

    The refinery, Queensland Nickel, has declined to comment.

  • Shelve new ports to save reef, UN says

    Shelve new ports to save reef, UN says

    Updated: 09:30, Thursday June 21, 2012

    Shelve new ports to save reef, UN says

    More details have been released from the United Nations investigation of the Great Barrier Reef.

    A brief summary of the UN monitoring mission’s finding were released earlier this month but the longer document is more scathing of the failures of state and federal authorities to properly protect the World Heritage listed asset.

    The report says the Reef could be listed as a World Heritage site in danger unless high-risk coastal developments including new ports are shelved.

    It also identifies water quality as among the most significant risks to the reef.

    Updated: 09:30, Thursday June 21, 2012

    Shelve new ports to save reef, UN says

    More details have been released from the United Nations investigation of the Great Barrier Reef.

    A brief summary of the UN monitoring mission’s finding were released earlier this month but the longer document is more scathing of the failures of state and federal authorities to properly protect the World Heritage listed asset.

    The report says the Reef could be listed as a World Heritage site in danger unless high-risk coastal developments including new ports are shelved.

    It also identifies water quality as among the most significant risks to the reef.

  • Woolworths now made in Australia

    All I can say is WOW!!!!

    Woolworths now made in Australia

    New branding for Woolworths

    Woolworths has changed its name to Australia’s Fresh Food People after 25 years.

    • Woolies’ revamp cost hundreds of millions
    • Customers concerned most food is imported
    • ‘Woolworths: The Australian Fresh Food People’

    STARTLING consumer research has shocked Woolworths into a nationwide store and image revamp costing hundreds of millions of dollars.

    The revelation that customers believe most food is imported will see supermarket walls ripped down to expose the behind-the-scenes operations of each store, allowing customers to see butchers and bakers at work on-site.

    The retailer will also change bakers’ work hours, roster bakery staff to work in daylight hours so that shoppers can see them at work and smell the aroma of baking bread wafting through the aisles.

    Expert butchers will be carving meat and serving customers directly when they take over front-of-counter duties.

    Woolworths’ director of supermarkets, Tjeerd Jegen, aims to fix his major gripes with the stores, including meat displays that are a “sea of red”, dim lighting that customers loathe, long checkout queues and lurid paint schemes.

    Plans also include iPhone apps for customers to self-scan goods as they shop, multi-sized stores open around the clock, and ready-to-cook fresh meat and vegetable packages for full meals such as a Sunday roast with all the trimmings.

    And the supermarket is altering its brand name for the first time in 25 years, with the word “Australian” inserted into its catchphrase to become “Woolworths: The Australian Fresh Food People”.

    The move comes amid a growing demand among shoppers to buy locally grown or organic produce because they perceive it to be better quality.

    It is also an acknowledgment of Coles’ success with the “Down Down” campaign and use of celebrity chefs to promote its fresh food lines, which initially saw Woolworths scrambling to catch up.

    The first stage of the overhaul starts today with the launch of a national television, print and radio advertising campaign featuring real Woolworths employees, including truck drivers, farmers and butchers.

    The changes are being driven by Woolworths CEO Grant O’Brien, who took over the helm in March last year, and Mr Jegen, who joined the company in October. The pair commissioned focus groups and customer research studies to create a profile of the typical Australian supermarket shopper. They found that shoppers think most produce is imported, a view probably caused by import stickers on fruit and vegetables when they are not in season in Australia.

    The overhaul will include providing shoppers with greater information about the seasonality of foods to explain why certain fruit and vegetables are at times sourced from overseas.

  • Govt urged to rethink cuts to reef program

    Govt urged to rethink cuts to reef program

    AAPJune 17, 2012, 3:23 pm
    A body which produces an annual report card on the Great Barrier Reef has had its funding cut.

    AAP © Enlarge photo

    A body which produces an annual report card on the Great Barrier Reef has had its funding cut as part of the Queensland government’s savings drive, the opposition claims.

    The Newman government last week outlined $186.5 million in spending cuts since its election in March.

    Among them was an item from within the Department of Premier and Cabinet listed as “Reef Water Quality”.

    Opposition environment spokeswoman Jackie Trad says the $503,000 cut was made to the Reef Water Quality protection plan secretariat, which produces an annual report card on the reef’s health.

    It also provides the co-ordination and leadership needed to protect its World Heritage status.

    UNESCO is considering listing the reef as a World Heritage site in danger, and Ms Trad says it’s not the time to cut back such schemes.

    “With UNESCO poised to meet in less than 10 days to consider in full the UNESCO monitoring report, this decision will be met with disbelief,” she said.

    “With all the economic development happening in far north Queensland, the Great Barrier Reef needs more resources and protection, not less. “

    The opposition has called on the premier to rethink the decision.