Category: Sustainable Settlement and Agriculture

The Generator is founded on the simple premise that we should leave the world in better condition than we found it. The news items in this category outline the attempts people have made to do this. They are mainly concerned with our food supply and settlement patterns. The impact that the human race has on the planet.

  • Vinnies council suspended ‘over bullying’

    “We are an organisation that has social justice at its heart so this was something that could not be overlooked or swept under the carpet – there is a real desire to address these problems.”

    Mr Falzon said he could not give further details of the complaints because they were the subject of an investigation.

    The Australian Services Union, which represents community workers, said it has been hearing complaints from workers at the society for several years.

    It alleged problems followed “changes at the top” nearly five years ago when a new chief executive and human resources manager were appointed.

    “From that time we’ve been at constant war with St Vincent de Paul,” ASU NSW branch secretary Sally McManus said.

    “They adopted a corporate style of management.”

    Ms McManus said the ASU successfully fought an unfair dismissal case of two workers from the NSW branch two years ago and last week it won a back pay claim for $250,000 for members who had not been paid the right rates.

    She said the union was “extremely pleased” that the NSW council had been suspended.

    “It’s rare that you see decisive action taken and I welcome it.”

     

  • Polls show Labor ahead of coalition

     

    Labor had a 10-point lead – 55 per cent to 45 per cent – over the Coalition in the Neilsen poll taken immediately after Ms Gillard’s elevation to the leadership.

    The polls published today take in Ms Gillard’s performance on the asylum-seekers issue, with her announcement last week that she was planning to establish a regional processing centre in East Timor.

    Today’s Nielsen poll finds that 44 per cent of voters thought the coalition would better handle the boats, while 42 per cent favour Labor’s approach.

    “That’s a bit closer than I expected and probably the Coalition expected or Labor expected,” Mr Stirton said.

    A separate Galaxy poll, published in News Limited newspapers, shows Labor trailing 39 to 42 per cent on the primary count.

    According to Galaxy, 63 per cent of voters approve of Ms Gillard’s tougher stance on asylum-seekers, while 26 per cent disapprove and 11 per cent remain undecided.

    The polls come as federal cabinet prepares to decide on a climate change policy to replace the abandoned emissions trading scheme.

    An interim carbon tax is likely to be ruled out with some ministers considering it too politically risky so close to an election.

    Ms Gillard is reported to be considering tough restrictions on all new coal-fired power stations and a national energy-efficiency target.

    But a decision not to proceed with a move to a price on carbon has raised concerns that investment in existing power plants will be deferred due to uncertainty.

    A survey by the Energy Supply Association of Australia has revealed spending on new and existing power stations is set to plunge by $10 billion because of uncertainty over the government’s carbon policy.

    Climate Institute chief executive John Connor said electricity prices for households could rise by an extra $60 a year.

    “The work that the Climate Institute’s done with our climate partners shows that in 2020 the economy will be paying more than $2 billion more than necessary and that equates to $60 a year for households,” he told ABC radio.

    “A decision to delay is a decision that doesn’t avoid the cost, doesn’t avoid the impacts on electricity prices. We need a system that puts a limit and a price tag on pollution so investors can know with certainty where they need to be investing.”

    With AAP

  • Confusion rules for assessors over Green Start program

    Not surprising with the Federal Labor Govt.
     
    Neville Gillmore.
     
    Confusion rules for assessors over Green Start program

     

    ENVIRONMENTAL assessors are demanding answers from the government about its new Green Start program.

    They want to know how much work will be available and whether it will pay compensation to those left with no work.

    The new program was announced this week to replace the Green Loans scheme, which was axed after three damning reports uncovered widespread compliance breaches, budget blowouts, poor management and possible staff kickbacks.

    Asked yesterday whether the government would respond to opposition demands to call in the Australian Federal Police to investigate alleged staff corruption under the dumped scheme, a spokeswoman for the Climate Change Department said the issue was being examined by the department.

    If necessary, “follow-up action” would be taken.

    Association of Building Sustainability Assessors chairman Wayne Floyd said environmental assessors had been badly affected by the Green Loans scheme, and there was much confusion about how the new program would work.

    Mr Floyd said he did not know how much funding would be made available for grants under the new Green Start scheme, how many assessors would be needed and how much work would be available.

    He said he supported the new scheme, which would fund household energy assessments in a more rigorous way than the dumped Green Loans program.

    Mr Floyd said thousands of assessors, who had paid for training and accreditation to participate in the Green Loans program but then missed out on any work, also wanted to know whether they would receive compensation

  • Army of volunteers encourage youth to vote

     

    It is an approach borrowed from United States president Barack Obama’s successful 2008 get out the vote campaign.

    Around 40 volunteers including students, public servants and retirees were trained at the Australian National University in Canberra on Sunday.

    Carbon pollution, refugees and mental health are the key policies targeted by volunteers.

    Sarah Stringer, 45, is one of the volunteers, who are being encouraged to share personal stories with strangers during door knocking, to inspire voting and first time enrolment.

    “I am one of many Australians who suffer from mental health issues. So it is about standing up despite the stigma of mental illness,” she said.

    Field organiser Tom Swann says there are up to 40,000 unenrolled voters in the national capital.

    “Especially young voters or what would be first time voters,” he said.

    “So we are really keen to make sure that young people get on the electoral role.

    “Fulfil their right and their responsibility to have a say this election.

    “That’s things like door knocking, and fun events and stunts, a candidate forum in the final stages of the campaign to really get people engaged in the campaign.”

    Tags: government-and-politics, elections, activism-and-lobbying, federal-elections, australia, act, canberra-2600

    First posted 3 hours 44 minutes ago

  • Gillard under pressure to reveal post-election portfolios

     

    Gillard under pressure to reveal post-election portfolios

    Posted 9 minutes ago

    The Federal Opposition says Prime Minister Julia Gillard will be taking Australian voters for “mugs” if she does not reveal her preferred candidates for the foreign affairs, defence and finance portfolios before the election.

    There is speculation former prime minister Kevin Rudd is keen to take the foreign affairs post if Labor wins another term.

    Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner is about to quit politics and Defence Minister John Faulkner is moving to the backbench.

    Opposition frontbencher Christopher Pyne says Ms Gillard should end the uncertainty about her senior team.

    “We now have a Foreign Minister who can’t confirm if he will continue as Foreign Minister because he has Kevin Rudd looking over his shoulder,” he said.

    “We have a Defence Minister who is retiring and we have a Finance Minister who is retiring, so three of the most important jobs in the Government, and the public have no idea who will fill those roles.”

    Mr Pyne says voters have a right to know who is in the leadership team.

    “Julia Gillard owes it to the Australian public to say who will be Foreign Minister, Defence Minister and Finance Minister in a Gillard Government,” he said.

    “And if she doesn’t then she’s basically taking the Australian voters for mugs and assuming she can get reelected on the back of a team that is quite frankly dysfunctional.”

    Foreign Affairs Minister Stephen Smith says the decision is in Ms Gillard’s hands.

    Mr Smith says she is under no obligation to reveal who will serve in his portfolio if Labor wins the election.

    “She has made it perfectly clear that I’ll be the minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade up to the election and after the election it will be a matter for her to allocate portfolios,” he said.

    “It is a very important portfolio, which is why I apply myself to assiduously and diligently.”

    Tags: government-and-politics, federal-government, australia

  • New PM is a dud like Rudd(Ackerman)

     

    The Sydney Morning Herald’s Phillip Coorey wrote last Saturday: “Julia Gillard has done in a week what Kevin Rudd was unable to achieve in two months.”

    As Gillard modestly said: “I deliberately brought a new approach … and that new approach has seen us make the breakthrough agreement we made last night.”

    Swan was there, too, nodding like a circus pony, just as he did when he stood beside Gillard’s assassinated predecessor Kevin Rudd, cheering on the deal and new leader.

    “Her intervention changed the tone of this debate and led to the breakthrough,” Swan said. “She gets things done.”

    Nonsense. Far from getting things done, she had, as Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said, been “moving seamlessly from debacle to debacle”. Gillard has, in the past two weeks, performed infinitely worse than anyone could ever have predicted.

    Hailed as a great communicator on her rise to the PM’s office, her attempts to appropriate former prime minister John Howard’s Pacific Solution and co-opt East Timor into accepting a huge regional refugee processing centre have revealed her to be as lacking in diplomatic skills as Kevin Rudd.

    Though she plucks embattled MPs from marginal seats to use as handbags as she dashes from state to state and interview to interview, her policy performances have revealed an individual with far less of an intellect and far weaker management skills than she was reputed to be gifted with.

    In a humiliating blizzard of contradictory statements in the past four days Gillard claimed to have discussed the establishment of the regional refugee centre with the East Timorese, then protested she had never suggested a specific location, then agreed she had had a brief talk about the matter with Jose Ramos Horta, the East Timorese president, who holds no real authority.

    Having had her own remarks flung back at her, her office then charged that Brisbane’s 4BC interviewer Mike Smith was unfair, disrespectful and unprofessional.

    Utter codswallop, but Gillard probably expected Smith to roll along with her mendacious claims to adequacy as the majority of the Canberra press gallery has.

    She has tried to bluster her way over her blunders but in reality she had no discussion with the public servants in the relevant section in Foreign Affairs before trying to bluff the nation into believing she had achieved a coup through discussions with the titular head of East Timor and Prime Minister John Key, of New Zealand.

    Just when it was thought that Rudd had sunk Australia’s regional reputation to an all-time low, Gillard has managed to trash it even further with her inflammatory and ignorant attempts to cauterise the boat people issue before the looming election.

    To show how ridiculous Gillard has been on illegal people-smuggling operations it is worth remembering that she was once a champion of turning the boats back, as Rudd was, in the lead-up to the 2007 election.

    In 2002, at a press conference with then Opposition leader Simon Crean, Gillard said: “We think that it is important, important from a humanitarian perspective and important from a security perspective, that we do everything we can to disrupt people-smuggling. And we think turning boats around that are seaworthy, that can make the return journey, and are in international waters, fits in with that.”

    Last Tuesday, she was trying to vilify the Opposition for suggesting the same process. “The Opposition is trying to sell the Australian community a fairy tale in which all you have to do is go out to an asylum-seeker boat and turn it around and everything will be fixed – but this fairy tale is not the facts,” she said.

    “The facts are the boat will be scuttled and start to sink. The facts are that this nation would then be confronted with a stark choice: either we could leave the scene in the certain knowledge people including children would drown or we could rescue the asylum-seekers from the water.

    “Let me say one thing loud and clear: our nation would not leave children to drown. We are Australians and our values will never allow us to embrace this kind of evil.”

    To imply, as Gillard does, that the Opposition would endorse drowning children at sea because of a policy which she so recently championed demonstrates nothing but her own total lack of propriety.

    We should have known after the laughable Medicare Gold, the wasteful BER, the Green loan fiasco and the deaths of more Australians killed while installing dodgy insulation than there were in the Iraq war.

    Rudd was a dud, Gillard is showing herself in less time to be far worse.