Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Scientists warn time is running out to tackle climate change

    Scientists warn time is running out to tackle climate change

    Final AR5 IPCC report urges governments and businesses to work together to prevent temperatures rising beyond two degrees

    By Jessica Shankleman

    02 Nov 2014

    More from this author

    0 Comments

    Dr Rajendra Pachauri chairman of the IPCC

    Governments, businesses and consumers will need to work together to eliminate manmade greenhouse gas emissions by the end of this century, in order to have a good chance of preventing global warming of two degrees celcius – in an affordable way.

    That is a key finding from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scientists and officials, in a Synthesis report, which summarises the causes, impacts and solutions of rising temperatures.

    It has been termed as “the most important document on climate change”, combining the three studies from the IPCC’s AR5 assessment that have been produced during the past 13 months. It will also be the final document United Nations countries will use to formulate their pledges to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in a global deal on climate change, due to be signed in Paris next year.

    As such, scientists and governments have hotly debated the language of the Synthesis report during the past week, to ensure it paints a picture that will drive appropriate action on climate change.

    Today’s report concludes that warming of the climate “is unequivocal” and that its effects are already being felt around the world, causing ice caps to shrink, and sea levels to rise.

    It also argues with greater certainty than before that rising greenhouse gas emissions from industry, and other human activity, is to blame for the warming climate.

    However, it says that it is within our reach to limit temperature rises to below two degrees – the target that was set by governments in 2009 to avoid catastrophic climate change.

    “We have the means to limit climate change,” said Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC. “The solutions are many and allow for continued economic and human development. All we need is the will to change, which we trust will be motivated by knowledge and an understanding of the science of climate change.”

    He added that in order to have a good chance of staying below two degrees at a manageable cost, greenhouse gas emissions should drop by 40 to 70 per cent between 2010 and 2050, falling to “zero or below” by 2100.

    “We have that opportunity, and the choice is in our hands,” he added.

    Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and increase the risks to all economies and societies, but particularly poorer countries that lack the capacity to cope with impacts of extreme temperatures, flooding and drought, the report says.

    “Many of those most vulnerable to climate change have contributed and contribute little to greenhouse gas emissions,” Pachauri added. “Addressing climate change will not be possible if individual agents advance their own interests independently; it can only be achieved through cooperative responses, including international cooperation.”

    The report argues that limiting carbon emissions could delay the impacts of climate change, potentially by several decades, allowing more time for countries to adapt to the impacts.

    However, it argues that delaying new measures for cutting emissions until after 2030 would make it significantly harder to achieve the two degree target.

    “It is technically feasible to transition to a low-carbon economy,” said Youba Sokona, co-chair of IPCC Working Group III. “But what is lacking are appropriate policies and institutions. The longer we wait to take action, the more it will cost to adapt and mitigate climate change.”

    The IPCC predicts that ambitious efforts to reduce greenhouse gases would margially reduce economic growth. In business-as-usual scenarios, consumption would grow by 1.6 to 3 per cent per year over this century, but this would be reduced by 0.6 percentage points in tackling climate change.

    However, these economic estimates do not include the benefits of curbing climate change. “Compared to the imminent risk of irreversible climate change impacts, the risks of mitigation are manageable” said Sokona.

    The report was welcomed by a number of green businesses that have commited to reducing their greenhouse gases in line with, or exceeding government targets.

    Philippe Joubert, chairman of The Prince of Wales’s Corporate Leaders Group, which includes Skanska, Kingfisher and Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE), said the report underlined the need for politicians to act on tackling climate change.

    “This report, developed by thousands of scientific experts, drawing on over 30,000 scientific papers, has reaffirmed that human interference is the origin of climate disruption and that climate change is humanity’s greatest threat,” he said.

    “It also concludes that there are solutions within our reach, and this is a message that business leaders understand. Many businesses, such as those represented in the Corporate Leaders Group are already investing in a low-carbon future. But if we are to unlock the scale of change that we need, we must have a level of policy clarity equal to this scientific clarity.”

    Hubert Patricot, executive vice president and European group president at CCE, said the report showed that governments and businesses needed to work together on reducing emissions and adapting to the risks of temperature rises. “Climate change has significant impacts on our core business, and is something we are already factoring into our long-term strategy,” he said. “This report highlights the reality of climate change to all businesses, but we can’t make a meaningful change alone. Government and business need to work together to mobilize a concerted and coordinated response to address the most significant environmental issue of our time.”

    Nick Molho, executive director of the Aldersgate Group, said the report gave both a clear warning and a message of hope. “It has made it crystal clear that man-made climate change is a reality but has also shown that prompt, cost-effective and coordinated action by the world’s governments can help limit the detrimental impacts that unabated climate change would have on the natural environment and the world economy,” he said in a statement.

    “It is now time for governments to deliver a deal at the pace and scale required by climate science.”

    The report was also welcomed by the Obama administration in the USA. John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy, said the report is another wake-up call to the global community that the world must act “together swiftly and aggressively in order to stem climate change and avoid its worst impacts”.

    “These studies-the most comprehensive and detailed ever-confirm that climate change caused by human activities is having impacts on ecosystems and human well-being across the United States and around the world,” he said in a statement. “The new IPCC report underscores the need to fully implement President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, including continued engagement with other countries on ambitious emissions-reductions targets and the policies and technologies necessary to achieve them.”

  • IPCC report warns greenhouse gas levels at highest point in 800,000 years, identifies fossil fuels as cause of recent increases

    IPCC report warns greenhouse gas levels at highest point in 800,000 years, identifies fossil fuels as cause of recent increases

    Updated 19 minutes agoSun 2 Nov 2014, 11:19pm

    The world’s top scientists have given their clearest warning yet of the severe and irreversible impacts of climate change.

    The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has released its synthesis report, a summary of its last three reports.

    It warns greenhouse gas levels are at their highest point in 800,000 years, with recent increases mostly due to the burning of fossil fuels.

    “Continued emission of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and long-lasting changes in all components of the climate system, increasing the likelihood of severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems,” the report said.

    “Limiting climate change would require substantial and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions which, together with adaptation, can limit climate change risks.”

    One of the authors, Professor Jim Skea, said the document would be invaluable in future climate change negotiations.

    “The statements are much more powerful because they’re put together,” he said.

    “The inferences that you can draw are just very obvious for policymakers now and I think that’s what the achievement is.”

    Leaders must act, UN chief warns

    UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon said the report was the most comprehensive appraisal of climate change yet and that human influence was clear.

    “Science has spoken, there is no ambiguity in their message,” he said.

    “The report found that the world is largely very ill-prepared for the risk of changing climate, especially the poor and most vulnerable, who have contributed least to this problem.

    “Leaders must act. Time is not on our side.”

    Australian oceans expert John Church was in Copenhagen to negotiate the final wording of the report.

    Dr Church was the coordinating lead author of the sea levels chapter and said warming of the climate system is “unequivocal”.

    “There’s many components – increasing surface temperature, melting glaciers, increasing ocean heat content, ice sheets losing mass, sea level rising,” he said.

    “It’s very clear that there’s a human component that’s contributed significantly to that with rising impacts across many regions.”

    The document will be an invaluable summary for climate negotiations for emission reduction targets post-2020.

    Governments will meet in Peru this year as part of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change annual meeting.

    Targets are expected to be finalised at the 2015 negotiations in Paris, but the Peru conference will serve as an important step forward in setting the framework.

  • 9 significant scientific findings too recent to be included in the new IPCC

    1 of 3
    AdFlight Centre Onlineflightcentre.com.au – We’ll Beat Any Web Airfare Quote Or You Fly Free. Enquire Today.

    climate code red

    Inbox
    x

    Climate Code Red <noreply+feedproxy@google.com>

    7:38 PM (35 minutes ago)

    to me

    climate code red


    9 significant scientific findings too recent to be included in the new IPCC report

    Posted: 01 Nov 2014 05:16 PM PDT

    by C. Forbes Tompkins and Kelly Levin via World Resources Institute

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) releases its landmark synthesis report today. The report—which summarizes findings released in Assessment Reports over the past year—underscores three major facts about climate change: It’s happening now, it’s already affecting communities and ecosystems around the world, and the most dangerous impacts can still be avoided if we act now.

    The IPCC reports, released roughly every six years, are the most comprehensive, authoritative consensus on climate change among scientific experts. However, the cut-off date for literature for each Assessment Report was in 2013 , so it’s worth taking stock of recent scientific advancements and climate-related events that have occurred since then.

    Here we discuss research highlights around four areas: sea level rise, extreme weather and climate events, ecosystems, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and temperature. While by no means comprehensive, these findings illustrate how the trends documented in the IPCC continue to take a toll and in some cases, may be underestimated.

    Sea level rise

    • The Amundsen Sea portion of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) has reached a tipping point and is in the process of an irreversible collapse. Recent studies conclude that we are now committed to an additional rise in global sea level of more than 3 feet from the loss of this portion of the ice sheet alone.
    • The northeast portion of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS), covering 16 percent of the entire ice sheet, was considered stable for approximately the last quarter of the 20th century. Recent analysis, however, determined that regional warming has contributed to this portion of the ice sheet melting at an alarming rate over the past decade. Average annual ice loss in the region between 2006 and 2012 was more than 10 Gigatons, or nearly the equivalent weight of 500 Great Pyramids. Considering the GIS is one of the largest contributors to global sea-level rise—and many models have not considered this area of the ice sheet in projections of global sea-level rise —this latest finding suggests a likely underestimate of future sea-level rise.

    Extreme weather and climate events

    • While the link between human-induced global warming and specific droughts, heavy precipitation and storm events analyzed in 2013 remains uncertain, there was overwhelming evidence linking human-induced warming and the severity and likelihood of 2013 heatwaves in Australia, China, Europe, Japan and Korea. These findings were part of the analysis undertaken by 20 different groups of scientists, which furthered the science of attribution of extreme events to human-induced climate change.
    • The world experienced 261 weather-related disasters and a record 41 weather events that each caused at least $1 billion in damages in 2013, according to Climate Central.

    Ecosystem impacts

    • A study published this year shows that in dry years, the Amazon basin – which plays a critical role in absorbing greenhouse gas emissions– loses carbon. If recent drought and fire trends persist, the Amazon may shift to become a source of carbon dioxide, further amplifying climate change.
    • The National Audubon Society found that of 588 North American bird species studied, 314 will lose the majority of their current range by 2080 if global warming continues at its current pace.

    GHG emissions and temperature

    • According to data gathered at Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, the daily average atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide passed the 400 parts per million (ppm) mark in May of 2013 for the first time since measurements began. Before the Industrial Revolution, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide were 280 ppm.
    • Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel burning and cement production were the highest in human history in 2013, and 60 percent higher than in 1990.
    • Nine of the 10 warmest years on record have occurred since 2000. 2013 was the 37th consecutive year that annual global temperatures were above average, and so far the January-September period of 2014 is tied with 1998 as the warmest period on record.

    A time for action

    The global scientific consensus represented by the latest IPCC report and recent scientific developments like those discussed above should sound an alarm bell. The impacts of climate change have transitioned from a theoretical and distant threat to a problem already affecting communities around the world today.

    National leaders will be gathering in Lima, Peru in a few weeks to further negotiations towards a 2015 Agreement under the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The recent science underscores the need for this Agreement to be a far-reaching success, as today’s actions will dictate the risks that we are forced to accept.

  • John James Newsletter 24

    1 of 1

     

    Ad850% + Investment Returnsthe-best-investments-today.com – Invest In Alternative Investments. Huge Profits. Free Top-Pick Guide!

    The John James Newsletter 24

    Spam x

    John James

    6:00 AM (12 hours ago)
    to John

    Why is this message in Spam? It contains content that’s typically used in spam messages.  Learn more

    The John James Newsletter 24

    2 November 2014. 

    CO2 and mass extinctions of species – Andrew Glikson

    Some nine mass extinctions due to rapidly escalating levels of CO2 are recorded over the past 580 million years. As our anthropogenic global emissions of CO2 are rising at a rate for which no precedence is known from the geological record another wave of extinctions is unfolding.

    http://theconversation.com/another-link-between-co2-and-mass-extinctions-of-species-12906

    The Day Israel Attacked America

    Al Jazeera investigates the deadly Israeli attack on a US naval vessel.In 1967. At the height of the Arab-Israeli Six-Day War the Israeli Air Force launched an unprovoked attack on the USS Liberty, a spy ship that was monitoring the conflict from the safety of international waters in the Mediterranean. Was it a cover for Israel’s imminent attack to capture the Golan Heights from Syria? Why did the US not object? Why was aid to Israel trebled in the next year?

    http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/specialseries/2014/10/day-israel-attacked-america-20141028144946266462.html

    Victorian town aims to be 100% renewable by 2022.

    Yackandandah and surrounding villages already have a penetration rate of rooftop solar of 28.7 per cent, with 201 of the 700 dwelling buildings hosting a total of 600kW of solar. The Indigo Shire has the highest solar penetration of any council in the state.

    http://reneweconomy.com.au/2014/victoria-town-aims-100-renewables-2022

    Politics and aid (1)

    Israel allowed only 75 trucks full of reconstruction material to enter the strip in mid-October to rebuild shelters for the estimated 110,000 Palestinians left homeless by Israel’s massive assault

    http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=736421

    Politics and aid (2)

    Russian convoy delivers the fourth Russian humanitarian aid convoy to Ukraine. The previous three convoys have delivered  6,000 tons of food products, including cereals and canned food, as well as medicines, electricity generators, warm clothes and bottled drinking water.

    http://en.itar-tass.com/world/757574

    Ecological farming on the Maldives

    How to use our own wastes for the preservation of the planet.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1J59rPnXeQ&feature=youtu.be

    Hungary suspends internet tax plan after mass protests 

    Around 100,000 Hungarians attended a rally protesting against the centre-right government’s plan.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/hungary-suspends-internet-tax-plan-after-mass-protests-9830515.html

    Pentagon spending hits five-year high 

    The rate at which the United States economy grew last quarter from a surge in military spending that went up 16 percent. This is a five-year high not seen since the US was involved in wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Significantly, it has helped the economy overcome below-expectation consumer spending.

    http://rt.com/usa/200911-gdp-defense-spending-surge/

     

    Minnesota’s highways are poised to become renewable energy generators 

    The state is soliciting proposals for solar developers to lease unused land along highways with up to 1-megawatt solar panel arrays built on public right-of-way around the state.

    http://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2014/10/how-minnesota-s-highways-are-poised-become-renewable-energy-generators?

  • IPCC report is “roadmap” to Paris climate deal – Pachauri

    RTCC Respond Magazine 2014

    Most read
    Latest
    Recommended

    IPCC report is “roadmap” to Paris climate deal – Pachauri

    IPCC report is “roadmap” to Paris climate deal – Pachauri
    27 October
    Why you should bother to read the IPCC synthesis report

    Why you should bother to read the IPCC synthesis report
    29 October
    Ikea launches solar panels in the Netherlands

    Ikea launches solar panels in the Netherlands
    27 October
    US and UK call on UN science panel to stress climate risks

    US and UK call on UN science panel to stress climate risks
    26 October
    Antarctic sea ice reaches record high, as Arctic hits 2014 minimum

    Antarctic sea ice reaches record high, as Arctic hits 2014 minimum
    22 September
    Inconclusive Bonn climate talks leave a heavy Lima workload

    Inconclusive Bonn climate talks leave a heavy Lima workload
    24 October
    Climate change could create more Boko Haram extremists – study

    Climate change could create more Boko Haram extremists – study
    29 October
    Poland “won” EU 2030 deal – does the climate lose?

    Poland “won” EU 2030 deal – does the climate lose?
    29 October
    Naomi Klein: New York showed glimpse of climate justice movement

    Naomi Klein: New York showed glimpse of climate justice movement
    27 October
    Ambitious or weak? Reaction to the EU’s 2030 climate package

    Ambitious or weak? Reaction to the EU’s 2030 climate package
    24 October
    China, India set pace in global clean energy growth

    China, India set pace in global clean energy growth
    28 October
    Fracking may release cancer-causing air pollution – study

    Fracking may release cancer-causing air pollution – study
    30 October
    IPCC will abolish doubt in climate politics – Danish minister

    IPCC will abolish doubt in climate politics – Danish minister
    30 October
    Climate marathon: IPCC nears finish line for seminal report

    Climate marathon: IPCC nears finish line for seminal report
    29 October
    EU set to overachieve 2020 carbon emissions goal

    EU set to overachieve 2020 carbon emissions goal
    28 October
    Climate marathon: IPCC nears finish line for seminal report

    Last updated on 29 October 2014, 4:39 pm

    Scientists will need to sift through over 200 comments, ranging from grammatical errors to strategic concerns
    IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri and IPCC WG-1 Co-Chair Thomas Stocker confer in Copenhagen (Photo by IISD/ENB)

    IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri and IPCC WG-1 Co-Chair Thomas Stocker confer in Copenhagen (Photo by IISD/ENB)

    By Ed King

    An exquisite form of torture is taking place this week in Copenhagen.

    Over 500 delegates from 120 countries are working through a complex 100-page document that outlines the latest scientific understanding on climate change.

    Officials are checking each page, line by line, and discussing whether the findings make sense.

    Changes must be approved by consensus between government representatives and participating scientists. This is where politics and science collide.

    The result of these endeavours will be the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Synthesis Report, the final part of a mammoth six-year project.

    It is likely to be one of the most carefully analysed documents this year and could determine economic and energy planning for next 20 years.

    A final draft seen by RTCC says there is “unequivocal” evidence of change around the world, with potentially “irreversible” impacts if greenhouse emissions continue to rise.

    But with three days of debate to go, the draft may yet change. A deluge of government reviews seen by RTCC offers a sense of priorities in capitals around the world.

    Below is a taste of the variety of views from 181 pages of comments, which the IPCC is expected to address before Sunday. The comments have been copied directly, typos and all.

    They reveal fears the dangers of climate change are not clear enough, that politicians will find the report too hard to read and a reassuring consensus that grammar is still important.

    General feedback

    The text has improved much from the earlier draft. However, the SPM still falls short of an actual synthesis and it does not provide a very good integration of the assessments of the three IPCC Working Groups. Rather, it still gives the impression of largely a copy-paste composite. [Government of Sweden]

    The authors should take extra care to avoid complex and long sentences. In particular run-on sentences should be avoided. Preferably, long sentences should be broken up into shorter ones. [Government of Sweden]

    This document should be prepared so as to be effective for the people who will only read the gray boxes. This report is a story, of what happens if we don’t act, and what can happen if we do… it should be an effective story. [Government of United States of America]

    Clarity

    This number tells very little. Is 0.1 much or little? [Government of Finland]

    Does “unequivocal” mean “virtually certain”? If appropriate, defined uncertainty terminology should be used. [Government of United States of America]

    SPM 1.3 This sentence is too generic and sounds obvious. Needs to be more explicit [Government of India]

    What is the logical connection between the two sentences? [European Union] Headline 2.1

    THE WHOLE SECTION IS MISLEADING. [WGIII 1.3, 5.3] [Government of Bolivia]

    “unprecedented in at least 800,000 years”: Really? How certain? [Government of United States of America] Headline 1.2 SPM

    This would be good to write out in terms of what the information means, in less scientific language. [Government of Sweden]

    How long is “ever”? [Government of United States of America]

    Does “clear” mean “virtually certain”? [Government of United States of America]

    How is “unequivocal” defined? Is it “virtually certain”? [Government of United States of America]

    What is meant by “consequential impacts”? [Government of United States of America]

    What does “fractions of the global population” mean? Suggest considering whether there is a more clear way to state this. [Government of Canada]

    Misestimate is not a real word. Underestimate or mistake would be more accurate in this context. [Government of Ireland] SPM 3.1

    UK demands

    [SPM 3.4] This is a key section with information very relevant to policy makers. Clear information on:

    • The expected global temperature in 2100 without additional mitigation
    • What emissions need to do to have a likely chance of reaching 2C and how this compared to current
    • The scale of the challenge
    • The risks of delay and the likely co-benefits

    Should be provided and not hidden in supporting text and diagrams. The section is currently quite long and would better be split into two sections; the first on where we need to be to reach 2C and the second on where we currently are. The headline statements below could then reflect this new split [Government of United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland]

    SPM 4.5

    One of the important co-benefits of climate change mitigation action, e.g. on emissions from the transport sector, is improved air quality. I would suggest making this explicit: “Co-benefits arise when investments in adaptation or mitigation can be managed to yield increased welfare from improved economic growth, public health, air quality or infrastructure.” [Government of United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland]

    Saudi concerns

    Change ‘past 15 years’ to ‘past 17 years (1998-2014) [Government of Saudi Arabia] (RE warming pause)

    Add from WGI SPM). It is very likely that the annual mean Antarctic sea ice extent increased at a rate in the range of 1.2 to 1.8% per decade (range of 0.13 to 0.20 million km2 per decade) between 1979 and 2012 [Government of Saudi Arabia]

    There is low confidence in the scientific understanding of the small observed increase in Antarctic sea ice extent due to the incomplete and competing scientific explanations for the causes of change and low confidence in estimates of natural internal variability in that region. From WG1 SPM page 19 [Government of Saudi Arabia]

    This figure is for the period 1951 to 2010. Warming was lower during the more recent period 1998 – 2010. This should be clearly indicated in this graph. [Government of Saudi Arabia]

    Imponderables

    “Plants cannot move”: this may seem odd unless there is a qualifier such as “naturally” or “by themselves”? Please check whether such an addition would be appropriate. [Government of Belgium] PM 2.3

    SPM 2.3

    We suggest the phrase “climate change is expected to lead to … greater likelihood of death …” needs to be reworded to more clearly explain what is meant. Everybody dies somtime, ie the unqualified likelhood of death is always 1.0. Perhaps what is meant is “climate change is expected to lead to … greater likelihood of EARLY death …? [Government of New Zealand]

    Duplication

    Editorial correction: The phrase “take account of” should occur only once in this sentence. [Government of New Zealand]

    “take account of” is twice [Government of Finland]

    “take account of” is repeated [Government of Italy]

    Eliminate one of the two “take account of”. [Government of Switzerland]

    typo: delete “take account of” as it is written twice. [Government of Ireland]

    Referring to “of take account”: to delete. [European Union]

    Delete repetition “take account of”. [Government of Russian Federation]

    Editorial: delete “take account of” because these words have been repeated. [Government of Austria]

    “take account of” is dublicated, one of them should be removed. [Government of Turkey]

    Presentation

    I have zoomed 150% in the pdf and have a huge monitor. The figure has a low resolution which makes it hard to read on paper. The sea level has rised so there is an erosion impact on western Europe soft coast which is not shown [Government of Denmark]

    Table SPM.2: Please reconsider the use of colours in this table. [Government of Norway]
    Read more on: IPCC
    – See more at: http://www.rtcc.org/2014/10/29/climate-marathon-ipcc-nears-finish-line-for-seminal-report/#sthash.Z1X3nZRI.dpuf

  • Which Budget Measures will make it through the Senate

    2 of 6
    AdMaster of Public Healthtua.edu.au/Scholarships – Up to 30% Scholarships Available For 2015 Enrolment. Enquire Today!

    Which budget measures will make it through the Senate?

    Inbox
    x

    Mark – GetUp!

    1:29 PM (2 hours ago)

    to me
    Dear NEVILLE,

    A whole budget agenda stalled — how’d that happen?

    After a frantic fortnight of action by GetUp members, the Abbott Government remains unable to muster the numbers in the Senate to make headway on their key budget priorities. Legislation on university deregulation, Medicare, Newstart and Family Tax Benefits is effectively stuck in parliamentary limbo.

    But sudden, surprise deals with the crossbench (like last week on the Government’s ‘Direct Action’ climate plan) show the absolute necessity of keeping up the pressure — especially with just one voting session left this year.

    To get fired up for the last big push, take a few minutes to check out where key budget measures stand, what we’ve done together to stop them, and the threats that remain.

    UNIVERSITY FEES

    A key Senate report released Tuesday bore the mark of 2,801 GetUp submissions and dozens of members making their presence felt at public Senate hearings. The Government’s own senators called on Education Minister Christopher Pyne to rethink his much-despised plan to charge students interest on HECS debt.

    But despite noting considerable community concern about the impact on student fees, the report stopped short of ditching deregulation altogether. So with the legislation slated for debate, GetUp members drove in 6,843 emails and calls to the Senate crossbench. The outcome? This week, Clive Palmer reiterated PUP’s promise to vote against deregulation, telling ABC radio he considers himself the “last sentry to the gate to ensure [students] have a good future“.1

    With intel that Senators Muir and Wang are the weakest links on this issue, we’re looking at ways for GetUp members to speak with them directly in the lead up to the November sitting period. In addition, our new TV ad funded by over 2,300 GetUp members will start airing this Monday to key demographics, including Senator Muir’s Victoria and Senator Wang’s WA.

    If you’re yet to sign the petition to keep our universities affordable, add your name now: https://www.getup.org.au/higher-education.

    FAMILY TAX BENEFITS

    700,000 Australian families under threat of losing $3,000 per year? Undecided politicians? A critical vote scheduled just days away? It was a moment built for the magic that GetUp members bring to politics.

    The Abbott Government was trying to ram legislation through the Senate this week that would cut off family tax benefits for low- and middle-income families when their youngest turns 6. 10,304 GetUp members leapt into action, calling and writing their crossbench senator to highlight the impacts of this hidden budget nasty.

    Denied the crossbench votes they needed, the Abbott government (you guessed it) put off the vote. But with GetUp members reporting back that 6 of the 8 crossbench senators are undecided, we’ve got a big lift ahead to keep Australian families safe from this unfair new tax burden.

    If you’re yet to contact your senator to let them know that the job of a parent doesn’t stop at 6, you can do so here: https://www.getup.org.au/family-tax.

    NEWSTART

    We’re close. The finish line is in sight, the final sprint before us.

    In September, the Abbott Government exposed the weakness of their hand on social safety net cuts by splitting up the legislation based on what they could agree on with the ALP. That ‘struggling’ bit includes the drastic changes to Newstart — including a 6 month waiting period for young jobseekers — that GetUp members have been fighting tooth and nail.

    But we’re not counting our chickens before they hatch. As we head to the end of the year, GetUp members will continue to lift up the promises of the Palmer United Party, and hold them to their word to defend young jobseekers.

    If you haven’t already, add your name to the petition protect young job seekers: https://www.getup.org.au/newstart.

    MEDICARE

    The GP copayment, publically discredited and politically toxic, has no current path through the Senate — but continues to lurk in the shadows of the Coalition party room. In fact, suggestions emerged this week that the Abbott Government could try to sidestep the Senate and force the GP fee through as regulation.2

    What’s more, the Government’s furthered plans to Americanise our health system by opening up its new ‘Private Health Networks’ to be run by private insurance companies.3 That could mean insurance companies telling your GP what and who they can and can’t treat. We’re talking to peak health bodies right now about what this could mean and what can be done. Watch this space!

    SO, WHAT’S NEXT?

    As the budget continues to expose the Abbott Government as unfair and out of touch, GetUp members have been keeping energised and vigilant against sneaky horsetrading, and watching the crossbench’s every move. We’ve just one month left to drive our campaigns home and bolster the budget blockade before Parliament breaks for the year.

    But despite months of success by GetUp members holding pollies to account on this budget, this week’s surprise agreement on the Government’s climate package proved that lightening strike deals with the Senate crossbench can happen at any moment.

    Heading off bad deals before they happen means having the resources always on hand, which is made possible by the regular donations of GetUp’s core members.

    Click here to become a core member today, by making a weekly donation to support all the work GetUp members are doing to stop this brutal budget.

    BECOME A CORE MEMBER
    Thanks for being a part of it,
    Nat, Mark, Lily and Georgina, for the GetUp team

    References
    [1] ‘9 Things We Learnt From Clive Palmer’, Triple J, 28 October 2014.
    [2] ‘Government could sidestep parliament to introduce GP fee’, news[.]com, 30 October 2014.
    [3] ‘Private health insurers set to manage patients’ GP care’, news[.]com, 21 August 2014.