Category: News

In the light of the piece run on Margot Kingston’s No Fibs and reproduced here, it is important to clarify my position. The decision not to stand as the candidate for the Greens in Griffith was mine and mine alone. Andrew Bartlett called me to let me know he was considering standing, and I stood aside to allow him to stand unopposed and maximize the energy and unity in the party behind one candidate.

Jan Bowman’s piece is based on an interview made in October and reflects on the general election and the state of Australian politics. It was not conducted in the context of a by-election. The most pertinent part of her piece is the opening paragraph. A year long campaign has been a serious drain on my finances and I am currently working to rebuild them. From that point of view the last thing I need right now is another stint as a political candidate.

I had not intended to comment on this prior to the ratification of the Greens candidate on Thursday evening at 8:00pm but have judged it is better to head off any potential for damage to the Greens and make this statement to clarify my position.

Declaration of interest I am fifty percent owner of Westender and currently supporting my media habit by selling document processing solutions and office equipment.

Less than a month after the September Federal election, Geoff Ebbs, former Greens Candidate for Griffith, posted a Facebook message which said: “I’m about to go into financial recovery mode, post-election, and take a job selling photocopiers unless anyone has a better way to earn some decent dollars for twelve months.”

This was a prompt for me to approach Ebbs and other candidates in Griffith for their ‘life after the election’ stories.

Ebbs was the only candidate who agreed to an interview. Apart from admitting to degrees of exhaustion, most of the other candidates I approached did not want to talk in detail about the campaign experience, and were undecided about whether they would stand again in any by-election. Because of this I did not use the Ebbs interview and abandoned the story idea.

However, on Friday, November 29, Geoff Ebbs announced to his supporters that he would not be contesting the Griffith by-election for the Greens. This came as a surprise for many, myself included. Geoff had indicated in our October interview that he wanted to stand again. I returned to this earlier interview material for clues.

In 2013 the Greens polled 10.18 percent of the vote in Griffith, a 5.21 percent swing against it on 2010 results. The negative swing was not unique to Griffith. Nationally there was a swing against the Greens of 3.11 percent, in QLD as high as 4.7 percent.

I asked Ebbs what is was like, as a minor party candidate, not to have won, and in his case, not to have achieved an increase for the Greens.

“People invest trust in you; you promise to represent them, expectations are built up, and it is a huge disappointment when you don’t succeed,” he said, then likened the experience to the post-adrenaline slump at the end of the run of a stage play.

“I was walking with one of my daughters after the election and came around a corner and saw a poster of myself, it was like a jolt to the back of the brain.”

Why did he put himself through it, when he knew he would not win the seat?

“You decide to run because you believe in the cause, but the only way to build the energy to actually campaign is to willingly delude yourself. It’s a form of ‘candidate’s disease’,” he said. “To inspire your followers, you have to believe you will win.”

Ebbs said the protest vote against the two old parties in September was the vote that many Greens had been waiting decades for, but it went to the minor conservative parties, and added this has been a huge topic of discussion within the party.

He believed the analysis falls into three camps: those who think the Greens were too conservative; those who think it was too extreme and “didn’t try hard enough to become a normal political party”; and those who think it was just a “bloody minded rabble”.

Also, criticisms of Christine Milne had been the same as criticisms of the party.

“She is either too extreme or not extreme enough. Some people just don’t like a female leader,” he said.

“If you are engaged with the electorate, you will know exactly where you stand, and the electorate will know exactly where you stand as a party, and I don’t think that clarity exists. It’s not any individual’s fault … but it’s about the whole movement. It’s about the Greens as a party, it’s about the Left, it’s about the environmental movement.

“Both major parties put in a huge effort to isolate and run down the Greens. We expected that: first they ignore you, then they attack you, then they get angry with you, then you win. Well we are well into the stage of making them angry.”

Asked if he would stand again, Ebbs said: “Should KRudd resign and there is a by-election, I would certainly stand again.”

Ebbs said there had been a personal Rudd factor in this electorate. “It didn’t swing to the conservatives as much as the rest of the nation, but the results of a by-election will depend on whether Bill (Glasson) decides to run. If there are two new candidates, probably the ALP would prevail.”

Ebbs gave up work during the election. “You can approach campaigning with whatever level of intensity you like, but there is always financial drain. The Greens is not a wealthy party. Palmer paid his candidates a wage.”

He is now working selling photocopiers, and, at only 55, considers he is over the hill as far as employment goes.

His energies are now on building the Greens into a broader movement, and said: “We need to be in more or less continuous campaign mode”.

“What we need to do now is articulate what a Green future will look like. For the mythical ‘ordinary voter’, a lot of whom, if they were disappointed and voted for Palmer in this election, did so because they didn’t have that clear vision of a Green future.

“If you look at a group like the Stable Population Party, which is, on the whole, ex-Greens, they are disappointed that the Greens didn’t articulate a population policy. But population policies are a political nightmare and it’s very difficult for a party the size of the Greens (with the broad range of elements that make it up), to reach an agreeable population policy … so you end up with a single issue party that stands outside the Greens.

“To succeed we have to build a broad enough church that you can include all of those views, you can’t keep splintering off the core believers because you can’t address their most passionate cause.

“It’s a mistake of the Left to assume that, ‘oh well our turn will come’. There is no reason for that to be the case. The whole of society could keep moving to the Right and this could be the distant dream of somebody’s grandfather. You only have to look to the USA to see how effectively the Left can be crushed.”

Ebbs added that as a society we face an energy descent problem.

“Last century we consumed more energy than is ever going to be available to society in the future, so life is going to get harder. As a party that recognises that as the fundamental fact driving every economic decision and every policy setting, essentially what you are trying to sell to the electorate is like an austerity measure. For our long term good, us as a society and a species, we need to calm down and stop consuming so much, and slow down our breeding program. It’s not a very palatable story, so we tend to avoid it.”

Grassroots campaigning is definitely the way of the future, Ebbs said.

“The internet has unleashed an understanding of how powerful distributed ideas are. The notion of open sourced software has led to open content programs, and the collapse of the exclusive nature of publishing companies both in print and film, has meant that new models are emerging for creative people to connect with their audiences, and the same thing is happening politically.”

Towards the end of the interview Ebbs told me he had put himself forward as a candidate for convener of the Greens in Queensland. The two candidates were to be Ebbs and the incumbent Andrew Bartlett.

Ebbs said his ‘elevator pitch’ to the membership would be that, “as a society we are at the crossroads, we either maintain the status quo or hit the wall very hard, or we manage society into a form that is sustainable in the full sense of the word.”

Ebbs did not offer any direct criticism of Andrew Bartlett, but said he considered that he (Ebbs) would be better at getting the Greens story across.

As it turned out, Bartlett won the ballot held on October 26, and retained his role as convener. Ebbs was appointed to the state management committee.

Ebbs’ recent decision not to contest the preselection as the Greens candidate for the by-election indicates a degree of disharmony within the Greens that Ebbs only alluded to when he spoke with me.

I understand that Andrew Bartlett will be the only Greens candidate for preselection. He advised me that he is not is a position to make any comment until after party endorsement of the candidate on Thursday, December 5, but he is happy to talk after that.

Now that Clive Palmer has announced that his party will not stand a candidate, the preselection processes for this by-election for both the ALP and the Greens may well prove to be as interesting as the election itself.

In the meantime, Bill Glasson has already hit the campaign trail and was seen out and about with the Prime Minister on the weekend.

– See more at: http://nofibs.com.au/2013/12/03/dumped-greens-griffith-candidate-whats-gone-wrong-jan-bowman-griffithelects-reports/#sthash.n7oIULu4.dpuf

Could an ethical self managed superannuation fund work for you?

Did you know that your superannuation does not need to be invested with big multinational fund management companies or in industry super funds with standard choice offers?  Investing in a Self Managed Superannuation Fund (SMSF) with specialist advice by an ethical investment adviser can create a financially rewarding and socially/environmentally positive retirement base.

Firstly, a Self Managed Superannuation Fund (SMSF) requires a reasonable account balance to justify the establishment costs and trustee obligations. Generally a minimum of $200,000 with regular contributions would be needed.

You should consider a self managed super if:

• You are not happy with the ethics and/or performance of your current superannuation fund.

• You want to be selective about the investments you will have in your super fund.

• You want a more ‘hands on’ approach.

• You want control over the assets that are bought and sold.

• You want to buy an asset like a residential property that cannot be bought through a standard super fund.

By having a SMSF you can buy shares that support businesses which reflect your ethical concerns and values. The standard superannuation investor will have the share component of their superannuation fund invested predominately in the largest 50 Australian share companies in a similar ratio to the size of those companies. Therefore companies such as BHP, Santos, Woodside Petroleum and Rio Tinto with significant Coal, Petroleum and Uranium interests would all be predominant shareholdings in a standard superannuation fund.

Within your SMSF you can invest in those international and Australian companies that display very positive corporate citizenship. These companies look after the community, their staff and the environment have strong brand loyalty and staff retention. Historically companies with good ethics tend to have strong consumer loyalty and staff retention. Ethical companies that look beyond the financial bottom line are generally forward thinking businesses that are reducing their financial risks by assessing the environmental and social costs of their businesses.

For the individual investor, it can be difficult to find out about these businesses in the sea of “greenwash”.  At Ethical Investment Advisers, we recommend investments which truly meet your ethical values and your financial needs.

Other investment choices for the ethical investor

There are bonds that provide capital risk management and security at a reasonable income return. These can be issued by companies with positive ethics including some banks as well as governments. Hybrid fixed interest/shares opportunities can provide attractive after tax income with growth prospects within companies that suit an investors risk and ethics profile.

The advantage of a SMSF is that you can invest your retirement savings your way and an ethical investment specialist can ensure that your risk and values are reflected within the choices recommended and you know where you money is invested and what it is doing.

A standard superannuation fund product is quite intangible and the underlying investments an unknown to most investors. Ethical investment within a SMSF is quite empowering for clients as well as financial rewarding.

Trustee responsibility

Having a SMSF has its downside, as Trustees you would be responsible for the investments and ensuring that the super is run according to the various rules and regulations set out by the Australian Tax Office (ATO). However you can enlist the services of your adviser or accountant to assist with the set up of the fund and the day to day running of the super.

Costs

There can be up-front costs of setting up the SMSF, including the establishment of the Trust Deed and registering for an ABN with the ATO, although in many cases there is little or no upfront fee for setting up a SMSF.

The cost of running a self managed superannuation is generally around the same cost as a public offer fund, but slightly more than an industry fund. Of course this depends on how much money you have in superannuation. As your superannuation grows, the more affordable a SMSF becomes and with large balances, a SMSF can actually be cheaper than an industry super fund.

Profits

Responsible Investment Funds have consistently outperformed average mainstream funds. The average responsible investment fund returned 11.34% per annum, compared to 8.18% per annum generated by the Large-Cap Australian Shares Fund Average, and 9.05% per annum performed by the S&P/ASX 300 Accumulation Index (over the last 10 years).  See the Responsible Investment Association Australasia’s Benchmark Report for more details: http://www.responsibleinvestment.org/riaa-research/

Find out more

At Ethical Investment Advisers we can provide you with the information and assistance you need to set up and run a self managed super fund which suits your personal financial needs and ethical values. We specialise in providing environmental and socially responsible investment advice for self managed superannuation funds.  Make your money count.  Start investing ethically.

Author: Karen McLeod, Ethical Investment Advisers AFSL 276544.

No more lies

As a passionate reader of other peoples’ work, I always liked the idea of being a writer, but I was never really sure how to make it happen. I certainly had the idea that it isn’t necessarily easy.

So when Margo Kingston put out a call on Twitter for citizen journalists to cover their electorate during the election for No Fibs, my interest was piqued. My immediate response, however, was that as I lived in a safe Labor seat (Kevin Rudd’s no less), I assumed she would probably not be interested.

Margo tweeted back: “Phone me”.

Twitter has its own hierarchy. There are ‘celebrities’ happy for you to retweet their stuff, but who rarely deign to reply. Not so Margo: when I followed her some months before, she followed back. This was delight for me, because I’d known of Margo for some years and respect what she is about. I listened to her on Phillip Adams’ Late Night Live and read her pieces, especially during the Pauline Hanson years.

It took me a day or so to work up the courage to call back. When we finally talked, Margo outlined her vision for the No Fibs election project. She wanted to provide an alternative news source, through which voters could read about the minor candidates who rarely get a voice in the mainstream (MSM) media. Contrary to my initial reaction, Margo said this approach is especially important in safe seats, because sitting candidates often get away with little scrutiny, and no-one gets to hear from their opponents.

I hesitated, but she reminded me that the other point of interest in Griffith was of course Kevin Rudd himself. He was still circling Gillard, and the future of the Labor leadership was becoming increasingly uncertain, while polls predicted the Labor Government was headed for a massive defeat.

Over the past few years I had become increasingly distrustful of the newspaper journalism available to me. I lived in Adelaide before I moved to Brisbane – both are ‘News Limited towns’.

As News Limited became more partisan, I went from having the daily papers delivered each day – I felt I couldn’t start the day without them – to not buying or reading newspapers at all. The experience was similar to giving up smoking.

Then I found Twitter (perhaps a new addiction?), and it made me feel a little like I could be a participant, and that was a completely new experience. I also found some fabulous online journalism. I started reading The Guardian, Crikey, The Global Mail, New Matilda, and The Conversation.

Joining the No Fibs project seemed to be a natural extension of my alternative media experience. It also offered an opportunity to get closer to what was happening in my community.

I was deeply disappointed, as I think many women were, when Rudd finally toppled Gillard. It felt almost personal to me, and I went into something of a funk.

In my disillusionment, the offer of participating in the No Fibs project was a helpful reminder that there are genuine people out there participating in the political process, and that politics is about more than what happens in Canberra and during election campaigns. So, I said “yes” to Margo, and was on my way.

My campaign

I had never written anything for publication before, apart from restaurant reviews (under a pseudonym) for a friend who runs an online food guide, and I was uncertain about how to proceed.

The first step, for me, was to prepare a profile of the electorate and to find out who the candidates were. Starting that task was easy enough: previous election results can be found on the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) website; statistical profiles are published by the ABS; and of course as a local, I was describing the place I live in.

I found it was important to marry the hard data with personal experience. The data can both confirm and challenge your assumptions about your own community.

The next step was to find the candidates and approach each of them for an interview: a much more daunting prospect. For the candidates I didn’t know about, I started with their party websites, and the social media. Independent candidates with no party were the hardest to find.

The two principle candidates, Kevin Rudd and Bill Glasson, were well known and already attracting national and local media. Feeling a little awkward, I telephoned each of their campaign offices, explained my task, and requested an interview. I was told politely that: “Someone will get back to you”. For good measure, I followed up the phone call with an email stressing that I was part of a citizen journalism project with a focus on local issues and candidates. To give some oomph to my request, I dropped Margo’s name.

After a few follow-up calls I did not hear back from Bill Glasson’s office. Kevin Rudd’s office did respond, but the answer was a clear: “Sorry, but no”. I hadn’t expected more.

I have studied anthropology and history and I believe there are overlaps with journalism.

Anthropology and oral history in particular involve listening to stories told by others (often very personal stories) and reporting on them, usually within a broader context. There is a tension for the observer/writer in these disciplines, and in journalism, that Janet Malcolm and Helen Garner frequently explore in their writings. It concerns the mutual need of the writer and their subject: each is in a sense using the other. One needs a story, the other needs their story to be told. Both want to manage the output.

I felt this tension acutely. I am not a member of a political party but I do have opinions on a range of issues and personalities. Because of this, I decided that I would not add any critical commentary to the candidates’ opinions. It was important to me that I remain impartial and objective, and I wanted candidates to speak for themselves even when they said things that were erroneous or that I considered personally offensive.

After my first story I felt miserable when my partner commented that my writing style is somewhat bland, but it was true, partly I think because I am an administrator, and also because I might have been too careful to be objective: there was nothing of me in the stories.

Because there were experienced journalists working on the project I felt even more embarrassed by my first attempts. A few weeks into the project Margo set up a Facebook page for those participating in the project. This was a great idea and much needed by some of us. Through it I got some good advice from others and some very necessary sub-editing assistance.

Margo and I discussed my style and she suggested when I cover a local candidates’ forum that I include some personal observations, and she said: “Observe the other media”.

Inside the press gang

The most positive feedback I received during this project was for a story I wrote about the candidates’ forum between Rudd, Glasson, Karin Hunter of the Palmer United Party (PUP), and Geoff Ebbs of the Greens, organised by the South East Brisbane Chamber of Commerce (SEBCC).

It was an amusing experience for me. Kevin Rudd had been PM for less than two weeks, and media interest was high. All the MSM media were in position outside the venue by the time I arrived. I watched the reporters practising their pieces-to-camera. I had turned up with my little Olympus Pen camera and tripod and somehow by then I had lost all self-consciousness.

I took some photos and proceeded upstairs, only to find I had to run the gauntlet of the check-in desk. There was nothing to be lost.

“Hello,” I said in my most confident voice, “I am from No Fibs and I am here to cover the forum”.

If they were cynical about my little camera and notebook, they didn’t show it, and I was allowed entry. I found what I thought was a good position, unfurled my tripod and stood guard. It hadn’t twigged that when the Prime Minister arrived, the MSM camera operators would hoist their oversize cameras onto their shoulders and follow him with lights and microphones into the venue. I and my camera were brushed aside in the melee.

Looking around I saw that the PUP candidate was looking as dismayed and sidelined as I was. We had spoken on the phone but so far I had not had a commitment from her to talk. Seizing the opportunity I introduced myself and we agreed to make a time for an interview.

In my article on the forum I described the candidates as follows: “I expected Rudd to be at ease with his audience, and he was. Given his relative inexperience I was surprised at how well Greens candidate Geoff Ebbs was able to hold the audience: he even had them laughing at times. Palmer United Party (PUP) candidate Karin Hunter stuck rigidly to script and for a party that wants to stand out from the mob, there was a disappointingly lacklustre and repetitive tone to her responses”.

When I did finally talk with Ms Hunter she finished our long conversation with reference to an upcoming forum engagement, and quipped: “I promise not to be so lacklustre next time”. I gulped – she had read my piece.

Working with the candidates

There were eleven candidates in Griffith, and I eventually talked with most of them except the two principle candidates, Rudd and Glasson, and the Independent. I initially thought it would be hard to get people to talk with me, but as no-one else was asking them, I was providing what was the only opportunity for some of them to get their profiles and ideas into the media. I am not sure if this process worked for the candidates, though I did notice that a couple reposted the stories on their Facebook sites.

I did find, much to my surprise, that I liked most of the candidates I spoke to, even those I did not agree with. I was struck by their commitment to their ideas, and to getting out there even when they knew their chances of getting elected were hopeless. A few said to me that the election provided a platform for them to get their ideas to a broader audience, but it was still tough work.

Some I liked more than others, and, as it turned out, the opportunity for direct engagement did change my usual voting pattern.

The Greens candidate, Geoff Ebbs, suggested I republish my No Fibs pieces in the local online community journal Westender. Margo agreed, and this added a more intimate connection between what I was writing and the electorate.

A scoop of sorts

I never expected that this process might lead to getting my own little scoop, but one did come late in the election campaign.

Things were getting tight in Griffith. Almost daily, local and national MSM were speculating that Rudd could lose his own seat, and it became evident that the minor party’s preferences may play a crucial part in the election.

I had asked all the candidates to send me their how-to-vote cards. The Katter’s Australia Party (KAP) candidate, however, said the party was holding off, and told me they had printed two versions of their cards.

Party leader Bob Katter had made a deal with the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association (ALAEA). The Griffith candidate and six other ALAEA members stood as KAP candidates. Finally, late talks between Katter and ALAEA boss Steve Purvinas led to the party’s unusual preference arrangement, and may have contributed to the poor showing by the party in the election.

Finally, on September 4, just two days before the election, the candidate contacted me again. KAP had finally settled their preferences. I tweeted: “Katter Party Candidate in #Griffith has told @nofibs that he will preference PUP 1st then Greens – Glasson 4th & Rudd 10th #ausvotes”.

To date there has been no serious commentary on the ALAEA/Katter alliance.

More questions than answers

Later in the campaign, the Brisbane Times (Fairfax’s online news site focussed on Queensland) organised the ‘House of Power’ candidates’ forums for several electorates, to be held on the same evening at Brisbane’s Powerhouse. Topping the bill was a debate between Kevin Rudd and Bill Glasson.

On August 22, the day of the event, Kevin Rudd pulled out. The already hostile media became even more entrenched. Dr Glasson was described the withdrawal as an insult to the people of Griffith.

Then the ABC’s QandA program announced that Mr Rudd would be doing a solo appearance on September 3.

Some months before, I had registered with QandA to be in the audience. As most episodes are broadcast out of the ABC’s Sydney studios I hadn’t heard back and I had forgotten about my registration, until an email arrived inviting me to join the Kevin Rudd Brisbane audience.

This was my opportunity, finally. I submitted my question and my seats were duly confirmed. I wouldn’t know until the day whether I would be one of the questioners, so Margo suggested: “Why don’t you live tweet?”

We arrived at the ABC’s Brisbane studio at least an hour in advance. People whose questions had been selected were identified and given their cue-cards. I wasn’t one of them.

When we finally got into the studio, we were relegated to seats in a dark corner next to a boom operator. “I could tweet from here,” I thought.

Then the warm-up person came out. She amused us as she explained proceedings for the night, then she said: “Please switch off all mobile phones”, so no question from me, and no live tweeting either.

Tony Jones was introduced to the audience and went through a rehearsal with the questioners. This was a surprisingly manual process. Questioners were asked to stand, camera and sound technicians noted the order and locations of questioners, and Tony Jones hand-wrote their positions on his cue-sheet.

When I received my invitation from QandA, a range of suggested questions came with it. I was curious to see if these questions turned up during the course of the night. I am pleased to report that they didn’t. The questions really were those proposed by the questioners.

More jollity ensued as we waited the appearance of the host and the PM.

I think we all sensed when Mr Rudd appeared that this really was his last ditch effort. He is a master of these situations, maintaining the appearance of relaxed confidence, but the first question was alarmingly hostile. He was asked how he could be trusted to be leader after having spent the two years “perniciously undermining the government from within”.

The question that was most reported from that night, the one most people will remember, was from a church leader who asked Mr Rudd why he had changed his views on same-sex marriage. Mr Rudd did not hold back, reminding the questioner that the Bible considered slavery to be a natural condition, and the audience erupted in applause. Rudd had finally won them over, at least in that forum, on that night.

I was amused to see, as we filed out of the studio, that a number of the audience had surrounded Rudd, switched on their phones and were taking selfies. Four days later it was all over for Mr Rudd.

The story continues

My final story focussed on the MSM coverage of the electorate and its candidates.

I observed that: “When I wrote my first profile of Griffith, Kevin Rudd was still a backbencher and the electorate was apparently the safest Labor seat in Queensland. By the time I submitted my second piece, he was prime minister again and Griffith was the focus of national media attention”.

“I could not have predicted that in this last week of the campaign, the media would not only be talking about a probable Labor loss in the national election, but the possible loss of Rudd’s own seat.”

Ignoring the polls, or perhaps attempting to influence them, the MSM, and not just News Limited papers, had been unrelentingly negative about Kevin Rudd throughout the election.

The tone was set by The Courier Mail, whose headline on Saturday, August 24, was “Poll shock, voters in Rudd’s own seat say ‘Time to Zip’,” and claimed Rudd was “on the verge of the ultimate political humiliation”.

In fact, Rudd won comfortably, with 53% of the two-party preferred vote.

The surprises on the night, and ones I had not predicted or pursued as closely as I could have, were the decline in the Greens vote, and the comparatively low vote for the PUP candidate in Griffith: only 3.3 percent compared with a Queensland result for PUP of over 11 percent.

As I completed this, my No Fibs 2013 election wrap piece, many already suspected this is not the end of the story for Griffith.

Now that Rudd has resigned and there will be a by-election, I have already donned my citizen journalist hat again.

It was about the time that I was shuffling around nervously just outside my share-house’s kitchen with a giant inflatable toothpaste tube that I wondered, ‘are possums really that cute?’

The novelty toothpaste tube in question was one that I had acquired at my supermarket job, a relic of an enormous dental hygiene display. It was the only thing big enough when held out in front of me to create a barrier between me and the possums that once again had gatecrashed my kitchen for some rubbish bin dinner. The possums were a real pair of jerks – a little furry two-member gang who found every possible way into my poor student household to feast on the wrappers that had already been licked clean by my housemates and I. They held their fuzzy reign of terror by scurrying around the house threatening a future of tetanus shots and trauma-stories if any of us got too close.

Now I don’t have anything against small furry animals; in fact I’m quite partial to anything with a cute nose and paws. But as an Australian living in a warm inner-city suburb – and I’m sure most of my similarly-situated readers will agree with me here – possums kind of suck.

Growing up on semi-rural property instilled in me an excitement about possums, as their visits were as much as a scurry along the verandah with a pause to show off their adorableness. I took this soft spot for the critters to the city with me when I left home, and even at first letting the possums clamber into the kitchen and warily munch a banana while I watched was enough to have me squealing in delight. But then came the mornings after a hot night when my housemates or I had left a window open, to find fruit strewn over the floor and not even a thank you note.

My love for possums began to especially decline after the night when my housemate woke up screaming with a possum at the bottom of her bed scoffing cat food – even the cat was too scared to get involved. A few months after that, the same housemate was scratched by a different possum when she got too close to its territory (her curbside bin), and not long after another friend told me of her brother who left his bedroom window open and woke up with a possum on his face. On his face. The idea of possums slowly began to become synonymous with the idea of terror incarnate.

My one defense when others told me of their anger at possums was always, ‘but they’re so freaking cute!’ But after all that I have just divulged to you, when it came to that night when I stood in my pyjamas, clutching a giant blow-up tube of Colgate Total and too terrified to walk into my own kitchen, it really got me to questioning everything I had stood for. Now, after years living in Brisbane spent locking my windows against the creatures, when others complain about possums I just nod and pat their backs in silent understanding.

On that night with the toothpaste tube particularly, I found myself thinking, ‘what can be done?’ When I visited New Zealand at thirteen I remember being horrified at a shop that sold possum-fur everything, from your average garden variety jackets, to furry nipple tassels. The idea of turning gorgeous little possums into clothing made me very sad when I was thirteen, but that night after cleaning up a knocked-over rubbish bin and broken plates from the torn-open cupboard, the thought of possums as nipple tassels was vaguely comforting. From a calmer perspective, I have realised that possums may be jerks but I’m not going to wear them on my private parts as revenge. Instead, I’m simply standing up for the right for myself and others to defend our homes and label possums, without guilt, as what they are – furry little douchebags.

Kaya Ra Edward’s writings are available at http://kayaraedwards.blogspot.com.au/

The Westender is now twenty-one years old.

Part of the community, we just keep getting younger as new journalists, designers and artists come on board to keep the flag flying. We are proud to work with local design house Text and Image who have produced our new look.

You don’t get to be this young, though, without a bit of a back story. Founding editor Kerrod Trott lets a few secrets out of the bag …

In 1992 I was running a desktop publishing and marketing bureau – Perfect Pitch, no less – in Thomas Street (and living at Rio Grande in Vulture St) when my business partner and I had the great idea of starting a local newspaper as a showcase for our design and writing skills. We had one John Jiggens (aka John Freemarijuana) as our founding editor.

I’d been involved with community publishing in the 80’s when I lived on a Multiple Occupancy outside Lismore, working on the Northcoaster and publishing my own title, Incredible Times.

Thus was the Westender born – before there was a Quest newspaper in the area, before Brian Laver started his Neighbourhood News, and long before the glossy West End Magazine.

Fast forward to 1999, when I returned back to West End after a lengthy pilgrimage to ashrams, temples and holy sites in India. Out of work, and at a loss for something to do. I know, I said to myself, I’ll start the Westender again!

This, the second incarnation of the Westender, ran for several years and dominated the market. We had a delightful newspaper war running with Brian Laver and his Neighbourhood News, swapping insults in print and spreading the most scurrilous gossip about each other.

I had to cease publishing the Westender for personal and financial reasons and get a couple of real jobs to pay off my bills.

Then, in 2009, I was persuaded by a business acquaintance to re-commence publication. The third incarnation of the Westender was as a colour magazine, with a print run of up to 43,000 and letterbox dropped to homes throughout inner Southern Brisbane. We briefly ran on a weekly schedule, before the 2011 Brisbane floods dealt a body blow to the local business community and advertising revenue dried up.

(The Westender has never received any funding, its sole source of income has always been the support of the local business community, and the support of the creative local community.)

We managed to bring out a couple of special editions – usually at election time – but never quite recovered.

Here we are now in 2013 and, with a new business partner in Geoff Ebbs, the Westender is back in print, incarnation number four.