Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • CODE RED A Dark Victory: How vested interests defeated climate science

    climate code red


    Climate News

    Posted: 04 Aug 2012 08:09 PM PDT

    Week ending 5 August 2012

    Arctic sea-ice volume (red line is 2012) from 
    https://sites.google.com/site/arctischepinguin/home/piomas

    Arctic Death Spiral Continues: Record Low Sea Ice Volume Appears Likely
    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/08/04/634901/arctic-death-spiral-continues-new-record-low-sea-ice-volume-appears-likely
    Neven, Climate Progress, 4 August 2012
    I think it’s pretty safe to say that we’re going to have a new record volume low, although the difference with 2010 and 2011 has become smaller. Right now it’s 1249 and 730 km3 respectively.

    More Arctic charts
    https://sites.google.com/site/arctischepinguin/home/piomas


    PICKS OF THE WEEK

    Climate policy and our sphere of influence
    http://inside.org.au/climate-policy-sphere-of-influence/
    Fergus Green, Inside Story, 2 August 2012
    Our policies have focused on the small portion of emissions that we account for within Australia. It’s time to start thinking about how we can influence emissions beyond our borders.

    Victory declared for the climate denialists
    http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/4169648.html
    Graham Readfearn, The Drum, 2 August 2012
    A victory has been declared in the field of climate change, but the lap of honour is not being run by research scientists or renewable energy bosses, or by coral reefs, drought-stricken farmers or the citizens of low-lying countries.
    ESSAY
    A Dark Victory: How vested interests defeated climate science
    http://www.themonthly.com.au/how-vested-interests-defeated-climate-science-dark-victory-robert-manne-5853
    Robert Manne, The Monthly, August 2012
    As greenhouse gas emissions have continued to rise, as evidence of global warming has continued to grow, as the unwillingness of the world to act to curb emissions has become increasingly clear, a determination not to notice the looming catastrophe has taken hold of large parts of the population.

    Sustainability: the word you shouldn’t use
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/sustainable-business/sustainability-word-you-shouldnt-use
    Tony Calandro, Guardian, 3 August 2012
    A new study shows that understanding a company’s business objectives and avoiding sustainability jargon is the secret to successful sustainability leadership

    Farmers: Biofuels Quota Exacerbating ‘Food Crisis’
    http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/07/31-0
    Suzanne Goldenberg, The Guardian, July 31, 2012
    Some of the largest farmers in the US are warning the government that the mandated biofuels provisions that demand grain crops to be converted into ethanol for gasoline will make an impending “food crisis” much worse

    Visualising climate change
    http://talkingclimate.org/visualising-climate-change/
    How can some­thing that is largely ‘invis­ible’ be com­mu­nic­ated using visual tools? This is the ques­tion that Professor Stephen Sheppard asks in this guest blog post, sum­mar­ising some of the research in his new book ‘Visualizing Climate Change‘.

    FOCUS ON EXTREME WEATHER AND CLIMATE CHANGE

    Climate Change Study Ties Recent Heat Waves To Global Warming
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/04/climate-change-heat-wave-global-warming_n_1742653.html
    Seth Borenstein, Huffington Post, 4 August 2012
    The relentless, weather-gone-crazy type of heat that has blistered the United States and other parts of the world in recent years is so rare that it can’t be anything but man-made global warming, says a new statistical analysis from a top government scientist.

    Chronic 2000-04 Drought, Worst in 800 Years, May Be the ‘New Normal’
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/120729142137.htm
    ScienceDaily, July 29, 2012
    The chronic drought that hit western North America from 2000 to 2004 left dying forests and depleted river basins in its wake and was the strongest in 800 years, scientists have concluded, but they say those conditions will become the “new normal” for most of the coming century.

    Perth on track for driest July on record
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-07-30/perth-on-track-for-driest-july-on-record/4164674
    ABC News,  July 31, 2012
    Perth is on track to record its driest July since records began more than 100 years ago. The city has received just 30 millimetres of rain this month, well below the 170 millimetre average

    1988 vs 2012: How heat waves and droughts fuel climate perception
    http://www.eenews.net/public/climatewire/2012/07/30/2
    Nathanael Massey, ClimateWire, July 30, 2012
    A crop-searing drought grips the Midwest and Southeast. In the Rocky Mountains, extraordinary “superfires” rip through thousands of acres of high-elevation pine. The Mississippi River runs so low that barge traffic must be slowed, at times suspended. Across the country, roads buckle under the heat.

    Juiced by Climate Change: Extreme Weather On Steroids
    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/08/01/622111/juiced-by-climate-change-extreme-weather-on-steroids
    Stephanie Hanson Damassa and Noreen Nielsen, CAP, 1 August 2012
    The brutal summer of 2012 is what climate change looks like. It’s only the beginning of August, and yet nearly every corner of the United States has suffered through extreme weather such as oppressive heat waves, damaging storms, and devastating droughts and wildfires

    When It Rains, It Pours: New Study Finds Extreme Snowstorms And Deluges Are Becoming More Frequent And More Severe
    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/07/31/616441/when-it-rains-it-pours-new-study-finds-extreme-snowstorms-and-deluges-are-becoming-more-frequent-and-more-severe
    Climate Progress, July 31, 2012
    As our climate warms, wet areas will generally get wetter (and dry areas drier). One of the consequences of global warming is the severity and frequency of rain and snow storms – fueled by the increase moisture in the atmosphere as the air warms.

    Climate change the cause of summer’s extreme weather, Congress told
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/aug/01/climate-change-extreme-weather-congress
    Suzanne Goldenberg, Guardian, 1 August 2012
    IPCC scientists tell Senate committee drought, wildfires and hurricanes are becoming normal because of climate change.

    ‘When It Rains, It Pours’: Global Warming Brings Increased, Heavier Storms
    http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/07/31-4
    Common Dreams, July 31, 2012
    The impacts of human-caused global warming are being felt across the U.S. as increased and heavier storms — predicted by climate scientists — are confirmed in a report released Tuesday.

    ENERGY AND INNOVATION

    Project’s woes raise questions about brown coal’s future
    http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2012/s3557214.htm
    Simon Lauder, TWT, July 31, 2012 
    The apparent failure of a brown coal power plant has cast doubt over Victoria’s plans to become a major coal exporter.

    Smelling a leak: Is the natural gas industry buying academics?
    http://grist.org/natural-gas/smelling-a-leak-is-the-natural-gas-industry-buying-academics/
    Tim McDonnell. Grist, 30 July 2012
    Last week, the University of Texas provost announced he would reexamine a report by a UT professor that said fracking was safe for groundwater after the revelation that the professor pocketed hundreds of thousands of dollars from a Texas natural gas developer. It’s the latest fusillade in the ongoing battle over the basic facts of fracking in America

    National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Solar Has The Most Potential Of Any Renewable Energy Source
    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/07/30/606271/national-renewable-energy-laboratory-solar-has-the-most-potential-of-any-renewable-energy-source/
    Climate Progress,  July 30, 2012
    A recently released study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, estimates that the technical potential of photovoltaic cells and concentrated solar power (CSP) in the United States is as much as 200,000 Gigawatts, enough to generate about 400,000 TWh of energy annually.

    Shale gas extraction on the rise in Australia
    http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2012/s3559469.htm
    ABC PM, 2 August 2012
    The shale gas revolution that’s causing huge controversy in the United States is gathering pace in Australia. Some proponents say shale gas production could be bigger than the coal seam industry. 

    Utility scale PV market in Australia “about to take off” – First Solar
    http://.com.au/2012/utility-scale-pv-market-in-australia-about-to-take-off-first-solar-96881
    Giles Parkinson, reneweconomy, 3 August 2012
    US solar PV manufacturing giant First Solar has made a bullish assessment of the Australian market, saying the utility-scale sector is about to take off. But it may have more attractive options in markets such as Chile.

    Devil in detail of Renewable Energy Target Review
    http://www.climatespectator.com.au/commentary/devil-detail-renewable-energy-target-review
    Tristan Edis, Climate Spectator, 3 August 2012
    The Climate Change Authority is due to provide an issues paper this month outlining the kinds of things it will consider in its review of the Renewable Energy Target.

    Australian energy cost estimates: experts respond
    http://theconversation.edu.au/australian-energy-cost-estimates-experts-respond-8562
    Andrew Blakers and Kenneth Baldwin,The Conversation, 31 July 2012
    Renewable energy sources such such as solar photovoltaic and onshore wind could generate the lowest electricity costs in Australia by 2030, according to a report released today by the Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics.

    Record Efficiency for Next-Generation Solar Cells
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/120729142319.htm
    ScienceDaily, July 29, 2012
    Researchers ave made a breakthrough in the development of colloidal quantum dot (CQD) films, leading to the most efficient CQD solar cell ever.

    POLITICS AND POLICY

    Baillieu back-pedals on environmental protection
    http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/baillieu–backpedals-on-environmental-protection-20120729-235r1.html
    Kelly O’Shanassy, the Age, July 30, 2012
    Bipartisan efforts to safeguard the environment appear to be over with the Baillieu government taking environmental protection backwards faster than any Victorian state government since the 1950s.

    The new environmentalism: where men must act ‘as gods’ to save the planet
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/01/neogreens-science-business-save-planet
    Paul Kingsnorth, Guardian, 1 August 2012
    For the neogreens, science and business will provide while nature can adapt. It is a messsage gaining traction

    We Can Reforest the Earth
    http://www.earth-policy.org/book_bytes/2012/wotech10_1
    Lester R. Brown, EPI, 31 July 2012
    Protecting the 10 billion acres of remaining forests on earth and replanting many of those already lost are both essential for restoring the earth’s health.

    Climate Emergency Action Plan
    http://www.yesmagazine.org/blogs/sarah-van-gelder/climate-emergency-action-plan-5-ways-we-can-still-avert-catastrophe
    Sarah van Gelder, Yes, July 20, 2012
    We can still avoid a devastating climate crisis. But we’ll need a World War II-level mobilization. And we’ll need to stand up to Dirty Energy

    Carbon price gloom eases
    http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/carbon-price-gloom-eases-20120729-236jx.html
    Michelle Grattan, the Age, July 30, 2012
    A majority of Australians say the carbon price’s introduction has made no difference to them, according to an Age/Nielsen poll that shows Labor slightly narrowing the opposition’s two-party lead.

    SCIENCE AND IMPACTS

    Tightened constraints on the time-lag between Antarctic temperature and CO2 during the last deglaciation
    http://www.clim-past.net/8/1213/2012/cp-8-1213-2012.html
    We show that the increase in CO2 likely lagged the increase in regional Antarctic temperature by less than 400 yr and that even a short lead of CO2 over temperature cannot be excluded. This result, consistent for both CO2 records, implies a faster coupling between temperature and CO2 than previous estimates, which had permitted up to millennial-scale lag

    Nature soaks up more greenhouse gases, brakes warming
    http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL6E8J18R120120801
    Alister Doyle, Reuters, 1 August 2012 
    Oceans and land have more than doubled the amount of greenhouse gases they absorb since 1960 in new evidence that nature is helping to brake global warming, a study showed on Wednesday.

    Greenland Meltdown Driven by Collapse of Glaciers at Ocean Outlets
    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=greenland-glacier-meltdown-at-outlets-slideshow
    David Biello, Scientific American, August 2, 2012
    The interactions between the island’s glaciers and the surrounding seas may be driving ice loss, according to aerial photographs

    Climate Change’s Costs Hit the Plate
    http://www.homerdixon.com/2012/07/24/climate-change%E2%80%99s-costs-hit-the-plate/
    Thomas  Homer-Dixon, Toronto Globe and Mail, July 24, 20
    In the past few years, agricultural scientists have shown that crops critical to humankind’s caloric supply – including corn and soybeans – are extremely sensitive to even short periods of high temperature. Output of these crops increases as the temperature rises to about 30 Celsius, but then it falls sharply as the temperature keeps rising.

    Study Shows Planet Keeping Pace With CO2 Emissions
    http://www.climatecentral.org/news/new-study-shows-planet-keeping-pace-with-co2-emissions/
    Michael D. Lemonick, Climate Central, August 1st, 2012
    Climate change is a serious enough problem, but it could be a lot worse. About half of the carbon dioxide we’ve pumped into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels has been absorbed by plants and oceans, rather than staying in circulation to drive up temperatures.

    Atmospheric CO2 Drove Climate Change During Longest Interglacial
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/120731200630.htm
    ScienceDaily, July 31, 2012
    Known as the marine isotope stage 11 (MIS 11), the interglacial period centered around 400,000 years ago was the longest and possibly the warmest interglacial in the past 0.5 million years.

    You are subscribed to email updates from Climate Code Red
    To stop receiving these emails, you mayunsubscribe now.
    Email delivery powered by Google
    Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
  • Drought-stricken American corn should feed people, not cars

    Drought-stricken American corn should feed people, not cars

    It is wrong to use scarce corn crops in the US for ethanol, but at least higher food and gas prices may boost sustainable farming

    Corn plants struggle to survive on a drought-stricken field in Oakland City, Indiana

    Corn plants struggle to survive in Indiana during the worst US drought in more than 50 years. Photograph: John Sommers Ii/Reuters

    The drought that has been parching the American midwest has brought growers to their knees. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has officially stated that half of the nation’s corn crop is in poor or very poor condition. The cable news reports, with their panning scenes of acre upon acre of dead corn, are even worse. It looks like the setting of a post-apocalypse movie, not the breadbasket of a nation created by farmers. The few corn crops that are actually surviving are so rare that on Monday, prices sky rocketed to an all-time high of $8.20 a bushel, and counting.

     

    There’s a US government mandate that our unleaded fuel going into vehicles has to be approximately 13% ethanol. Regardless of supply, that currently remains the law. Which means if you are feeding hogs or steers, you’d better start stepping up to the bidding war for what remains – because the factories turning that same field corn into ethanol are not only buying it up, they are legally required to do so. And now a country lousy with corn is debating where to direct this year’s humble harvest: should the corn go into the SUV, or the burgers its passengers are waiting for?

     

    Livestock farmers and ranchers are fervently urging President Obama to stop allowing what little corn there is this season to be diverted into ethanol. I could not agree with them more. Not because I am worried about the availability or even the price of food, but because I find it inherently immoral to be turning edible calories poor people can’t afford into energy calories the wealthy can use to drive to the movies. Cars shouldn’t be eating better than your neighbours.

     

    It’s easy to get jaded when it comes to talking about food and farming in America. Corn and soy are the staples of modern conventional agriculture. They are a part of nearly every processed food (or the food’s packaging) in our fluorescent-lit aisles. But since corn is the ghostwriter behind the novel, prices will soar in places the public may not expect. Meat and milk, for example. If you are wondering why animals that eat grass are jumping up in price, you probably aren’t aware of how much corn is in your coffee creamer. A lot.

    At its heart and on paper, ethanol isn’t a horrible idea. But we all know that cheap oil is a thing of the past. There’s no doubt that alternative fuels should be utilised – but using food for fuel is an impossible idea for a sustainable future. It’s the acme of decadence and arrogance to think you can use the same crop that runs the food economy to run the motorised one as well.

     

    There is a silver lining: the chance for your local, sustainable farmers to step up to the plate and finally have a chance to compete with King Corn. If factory-farmed meat and dairy become significantly more expensive, farmers working with rotational grazing and other non-commercial methods of production might not only have the greener alternative, but the cheaper one. After all, a farm 30 minutes outside your city only has to deliver a handful of miles and used little inputs, if any, in their product. Will people start reaching out to sustainable farms as a financial choice instead of a value-based choice? I think they will. And when they taste their first bite of hand-kneaded hamburger on the grill, they may never go back. For the sake of our societal sanity – and for the animals whose welfare is far better on pasture than in a feedlot – I hope so.

     

    Perhaps the law will change, or even be revoked if the outcry is loud enough. If not, expect higher prices and a lot more veg stir fry than stroganoff. Perhaps then people will understand what the sustainable part in “sustainable farming” actually means. In the meantime, fill the ice box with T-bones and pray for rain.

  • We need to act urgently on global warming

    News 2 new results for PEAK-OIL
    National View: We need to act urgently on global warming
    SouthCoastToday.com
    Barring state intervention and environmental activism, industrial civilization will not rethink its oil addiction, any more than a shark can be talked into going vegetarian. What peak oil means is that the quest for oil will become more nasty, violent 
    See all stories on this topic »
    We need to act urgently on global warming
    The Olympian
    Back in 2009, British environmental polemicist George Monbiot warned that the peak oil disaster was upon us. But in a July 2 London Guardian column he did an about-face. “We were wrong on peak oil,” he said. “There is enough to fry us all.” While other 
    See all stories on this topic »
  • HANSEN Are we experiencing more extreme hot weather due to climate change? The evidence is in.

    climate code red

     


     

    Are we experiencing more extreme hot weather due to climate change? The evidence is in.

    Posted: 03 Aug 2012 05:06 PM PDT

    By James Hansen, Makiko Sato and Reto Ruedy (available at PDFhere)

    The greatest barrier to public recognition of human-made climate change is probably the natural variability of local climate. How can a person discern long-term climate change, given the notorious variability of local weather and climate from day to day and year to year?

    Figure 1: Fire fighters battle the Taylor Creek blaze, one of several fires which have burned over 75,000 acres in southeastern Montana in summer 2012. Image credit: USFWS/Gerald Vickers via InciWeb.org.

    The question is important because actions to stem emissions of gases that cause global warming are unlikely until the public appreciates the significance of global warming and perceives that it will have unacceptable consequences. Thus when nature seemingly provides evidence of climate change it needs to be examined objectively by the public, as well as by scientists.
    Therefore it was disappointing that most early media reports on the heat wave, widespread drought, and intense forest fires in the United States in 2012 did not mention or examine the potential connection between these climate events and global warming. Is this   reticence justified?
    In a new paper (Hansen et al., 2012a), we conclude that such reticence is not justified. The paper attempts to illustrate the data in ways that properly account for climate variability yet are understandable to the public.
    We show how the probability of unusually warm seasons is changing, emphasizing summer when the changes have large practical effects. We calculate seasonal-mean temperature anomalies relative to average temperature in the base period 1951-1980. This is an appropriate base period because global temperature was relatively stable and still within the Holocene range to which humanity and other planetary life are adapted (note 1).
    We illustrate variability of seasonal temperature in units of standard deviation (σ), including comparison with the normal distribution (“bell curve”) that the lay public may appreciate. The probability distribution (frequency of occurrence) of local summer-mean temperature anomalies was close to the normal distribution in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s in both hemispheres (Figure 2). However, in each subsequent decade the distribution shifted toward more positive anomalies, with the positive tail (hot outliers) of the distribution shifting the most.

    Figure 2. Temperature anomaly distribution: The frequency of occurrence (vertical axis) of local temperature anomalies (relative to 1951-1980 mean) in units of local standard deviation (horizontal axis). Area under each curve is unity. Image credit: NASA/GISS.

    An important change is the emergence of a subset of the hot category, extremely hot outliers, defined as anomalies exceeding +3σ. The frequency of these extreme anomalies is about 0.13% in the normal distribution, and thus in a typical summer in the base period only 0.1-0.2% of the globe is covered by such hot extremes. However, we show that during the past several years the global land area covered by summer temperature anomalies exceeding +3σ has averaged about 10%, an increase by more than an order of magnitude compared to the base period. Recent examples of summer temperature anomalies exceeding +3σ include the heat wave and drought in Oklahoma, Texas and Mexico in 2011 and a larger region encompassing much of the Middle East, Western Asia and Eastern Europe, including Moscow, in 2010.
    The question of whether these extreme hot anomalies are a result of global warming is often answered in the negative, with an alternative interpretation based on meteorological patterns. For example, an unusual atmospheric “blocking” situation resulted in a long-lived high pressure anomaly in the Moscow region in 2010, and a strong La Niña in 2011 may have contributed to the heat and drought situation in the southern United States and Mexico. However, such meteorological patterns are not new and thus as an “explanation” fail to account for the huge increase in the area covered by extreme positive temperature anomalies. Specific meteorological patterns help explain where the high pressure regions that favor high temperature and drought conditions occur in a given summer, but the unusually great temperature extremities and the large area covered by these hot anomalies is a consequence of global warming, which is causing the bell curve to shift to the right (Fig. 2).
    Yet the distribution of seasonal temperature anomalies (Fig. 2) also reveals that a significant portion (about 15 percent) of the anomalies are still negative, corresponding to summer-mean temperatures cooler than the average 1951-1980 climate. Thus people should not be surprised by the occasional season that is unusually cool. Cool anomalies as extreme as -2σ still occur, because the anomaly distribution has broadened as well as moved to the right. In other words, our climate now encompasses greater extremes.
    Our analysis is an empirical approach that avoids use of global climate models, instead using only real world data. Theories for the cause of observed global temperature change are thus separated as an independent matter. However, it is of interest to compare the data with results from climate models that are used to simulate expected global warming due to increasing human-made greenhouse gases.
    Indeed, the “climate dice” concept was suggested in conjunction with climate simulations made in the 1980s (Hansen et al., 1988) as a way to describe the stochastic variability of local temperatures, with the implication that the public should recognize the existence of global warming once the dice become sufficiently “loaded” (biased). Specifically, the 10 warmest summers (Jun-Jul-Aug in the Northern Hemisphere) in the 30-year period (1951-1980) were used to define the “hot” summer category, the 10 coolest the “cold” category, and the middle 10 the “average” summer. Thus it was imagined that two sides of a six-sided die were colored red, blue and white for these respective categories. The divisions between “hot” and “average” and between “average” and “cold” occur at +0.43σ and -0.43σ for a normal distribution.
    Temperatures simulated in a global climate model (Hansen et al., 1988) reached a level such that four of the six sides of the climate dice were red in the first decade of the 21st century for greenhouse gas scenario B, which is an accurate approximation of actual greenhouse gas growth (Hansen and Sato 2004; updates are provided by a Columbia Univ. webpage). Observed summer temperature anomalies over global land during the past decade averaged about 75% in the “hot category”, thus midway between four and five sides of the die were red, which is reasonably consistent with expectations.
    The relation between the bell curve and climate dice is illustrated in Figure 3. Extremely hot outliers already occur more frequently than unusually cold seasons. If the march of the bell curve to the right continues unabated, within a few decades even the seasons that were once considered average will cease to occur.

    Figure 3. Frequency of occurrence (vertical axis) of local June-July-August temperature
    anomalies (relative to 1951-1980 mean) for Northern Hemisphere land in units of local standard deviation (horizontal axis). Temperature anomalies in the period 1951-1980 match closely the normal distribution (“bell curve”, shown in green), which is used to define cold (blue), typical (white) and hot (red) seasons, each with probability 33.3%. The distribution of anomalies has shifted to the right as a consequence of the global warming of the past three decades such that cool summers now cover only half of one side of a six-sided die, white covers one side, red covers four sides, and an extremely hot (red-brown) anomaly covers half of one side..

    We have shown that the increased frequency of “hot” seasons is a result of global warming. The cause of global warming is a separate matter, but observed global warming is now attributed with high confidence to increasing greenhouse gases (IPCC 2007a).
    Both attributions are important. Together they allow us to infer that the area covered by extreme hot anomalies will continue to increase in coming decades and that even more extreme outliers will occur. Indeed, we conclude that the decade-by-decade shift to the right of the temperature anomaly distribution (Fig. 2) will continue, because Earth is now out of energy balance, with more solar energy absorbed than heat radiation emitted to space (Hansen et al., 2011); it is this imbalance that drives the planet to higher temperatures. Even an exceedingly optimistic scenario for fossil fuel emissions reduction, 6%/year beginning in 2013, results in global temperature rising to almost 1.2°C relative to 1880-1920, which compares to a current level ~0.8°C (Hansen et al., 2012b).

    Figure 4. Wildfire frequency and spring-summer temperature in the western United States.
    Image credit: Westerling et al. (2006).

    Practical effects of increasingly loaded climate dice occur mainly via amplified extremes ofEarth’s water cycle. The broadening of the “bell curve” of temperature anomalies is related to interactions of warming with the water cycle. Hot summer anomalies occur when and where weather patterns yield an extended period of high atmospheric pressure. This condition is amplified by global warming and the ubiquitous surface heating due to elevated greenhouse gas levels, thus increasing the chances of an extreme anomaly. Yet global warming also increases atmospheric water vapor overall, causing, at other times or places, more extreme rainfall and floods, consistent with documented changes over Northern Hemisphere land and the tropics (IPCC 2007b).
    The (Northern Hemisphere) summer of 2012 is still unfolding. A global map of the anomaly distribution will be provided on a Columbia Univ. webpage once the data are complete; the data so far suggest that parts of the United States and Asia likely will be in the extreme (+3σ) category. One of the consequences of extreme summer heat anomalies is increased area and intensity of wildfires, as shown in Fig. 4. Updates of these data and other climate impacts after the 2012 data are complete will be useful for assessing impacts of continued global warming.

    Related Articles
    NASA News: How Warm was Summer 2010?
    NASA Earth Observatory: Image of the Day, Aug. 9, 2010: Heatwave in Russia
    NASA Earth Observatory: Image of the Day, June 29, 2012: Heat Wave Fuels Wildfires in the Rockies
    NASA Earth Observatory: Image of the Day, July 17, 2012: Drought Grips the United States

    Footnote
    1 In contrast, we infer that current global temperature is above the Holocene range, as evidenced by the fact that the ice sheets in both hemispheres are now rapidly shedding mass (Rignot et al., 2011) and sea level is rising (Nerem et al., 2006) at a rate (more than 3 mm/year or 3 m/millennium) that is much higher than the rate of sea level change during the past several millennia.

    References
    Hansen, J., I. Fung, A. Lacis, D. Rind, Lebedeff, R. Ruedy, G. Russell, and P. Stone, 1988: Global climate changes as forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies three-dimensional model. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 9341-9364, doi:10.1029/JD093iD08p09341.
    Hansen, J., and Mki. Sato, 2004: Greenhouse gas growth rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 101, 16109-16114, doi:10.1073/pnas.0406982101.
    Hansen, J., Mki. Sato, P. Kharecha, and K. von Schuckmann, 2011: Earth’s energy imbalance and implications. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13421-13449, doi:10.5194/acp-11-13421-2011.
    Hansen, J., Mki. Sato, and R. Ruedy, 2012a: Perception of climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., in press. Early draft posted as “Public perception of climate change and the new climate dice”, arXiv.org:1204.1286.
    Hansen, J., P. Kharecha, Mki. Sato, F. Ackerman, P.J. Hearty, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, S.-L. Hsu, F. Krueger, C. Parmesan, S. Rahmstorf, J. Rockstrom, E.J. Rohling, J. Sachs, P. Smith, K. Steffen, L. Van Susteren, K. von Schuckmann, and J.C. Zachos, 2012b: Scientific case for avoiding dangerous climate change to protect young people and nature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., submitted.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007a: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Solomon, S., et al. eds., Cambridge University Press, 996 pp.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007b: Climate Change 2007, Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., Van Der Linden, P.J., and Hanson, C.E. eds., Cambridge Univ Press, 996 pp.
    Nerem, R.S., Leuliette, E., and Cazenave, A., 2006: Present-day sea-level change: A review. C. R. Geosci., 338, 1077-1083, doi:10.1016/j.crte.2006.09.001.
    Rignot, E., Velicogna, I., van den Broeke, M.R., Monaghan, A., and Lenaerts, J., 2011: Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05503, doi:10.1029/2011GL046583.
    Westerling, A.L., Hidalgo, H.G., Cayan, D.R., Swetnam, T.W., 2006: Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science, 313, 940-943, doi:10.1126/science.1128834.

    Contact
    Please address all inquiries about this research to Dr. James Hansen.

    You are subscribed to email updates from Climate Code Red
    To stop receiving these emails, you mayunsubscribe now.
    Email delivery powered by Google
    Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 6
  • Updating the Climate Science (HANSEN)

    Updating the Climate Science

    What Path is the Real World Following?

    Makiko Sato & James Hansen

    Columbia University
    web page maintained by Makiko Sato (mhs119@columbia.edu)


    Our aim is to help people understand global climate change — and how the factors that drive climate are changing.

    We start with climate diagnostics — people are usually most interested in climate change itself. But cause-and-effect analysis requires also data on climate forcings (which drive climate change) and feedbacks (which amplify or diminish climate change).

    We update graphs of “Storms of My Grandchildren.” Yet the greatest insight about processes discussed in “Storms” is often provided by other quantities, for example, the rate of ice sheet disintegration. We include some data from other scientists or their web sites, as indicated.

    Continual updating of data curves, whether global temperature, the Greenland ice sheet mass, the sun’s brightness, Keeling’s carbon dioxide record, or other more obscure quantities, is a most interesting aspect of science. Sometimes data curves follow an expected path, sometimes not, but we usually learn something. As Richard Feynman said, there is a pleasure of finding things out.

    That pleasure is now mixed with concern. Humans are altering the measured curves. But whether climate change will be moderate — something humans and most species can adjust to — or whether climate change accelerates and spins out of control, with devastating consequences for future generations — that depends.

    Future climate depends on how climate forcings change — human-made greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, and forcings that are not yet well measured, especially aerosols. The speed and degree of climate change also will depend upon how fast amplifying feedbacks, such as Arctic sea ice, the large ice sheets, and methane hydrates come into play.

    Construction of this web site is just beginning. But already there are interesting new data.

    “Storms of My Grandchildren” by James Hansen

    Critical Climate Diagnostics and Feedbacks

     

    Climate Forcings


    Recent Publications

    Target CO2 (2008)

    Global Temperature Change (2010)

    Earth’s Energy Imbalance (2011)

    Paleoclimate Implications (2012)

    Perceptions and Dice (2012)

    • “Perception of Climate Change” will be published in PNAS Plus online in the week of August 6.
    • Figures Only (last modified 2012/07/31)

    Case for Young People (2012?)

    • “Scientific Case for Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change to Protect Young People and Nature” submitted to Proc Nat Acad Sci USA in February 2012, and posted on arXiv on 2012/03/23.
    • Figures Only (last modified 2012/02/03)

    Climate Sensitivity (2012?)

    • “Climate Sensitivity Estimated from Earth’s Climate History” submitted to Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A in May, 2012.
    • Figures Only (last modified 2012/05/08)
  • Real battles lie within Abbott’s own camp

    Real battles lie within Abbott’s own camp

    Date
    August 4, 2012
    • 20 reading now
    • 26

    TONY Abbott and his team are living in the straitjacket of ambition. Like those (mostly) disciplined Olympic athletes, their eyes are on victory. Everything has to be tailored to winning, which means staying ”on message”, stomping around the stunt route of meat and fish markets, and managing controversial issues and restless colleagues with a minimum of headlines about splits and divisions.

    This week we have seen Abbott squaring away the internal problem of foreign investment policy and continuing to stare down the Liberal industrial relations radicals. And, if anyone cares to ask, he’ll say he’s very happy with his frontbench team, never mind that his good friend and former colleague Mal Brough, having won preselection at the weekend, is headed to Canberra with his eyes on securing a ministry ASAP.

    The opposition’s good polls and Labor’s woes mask, much of the time, the opposition’s policy and personality conflicts. The Nats, the Liberal ”dries”, periodic tensions within his own economic team, the odd party room outbreak, and keeping the Young Turks occupied all test Abbott, and would do so in government.

    The mild-mannered Warren Truss heads the Nationals but their Senate leader and wannabe future leader, Barnaby Joyce, is their spear carrier. It was Joyce who led the charge on foreign investment, being openly critical of Chinese investment by state-owned enterprises; the Nationals generally ramped up the concern about overseas designs on agricultural land.

    Free-market Liberals such as shadow treasurer Joe Hockey battled to rein in the Nats’ influence. Abbott’s confusing comments in Beijing last week, which were interpreted as being more anti-foreign investment than they were, perhaps reflected the squeeze he has been in. The discussion paper Abbott released yesterday gave ground to the Nationals by lowering the threshold for Foreign Investment Review Board examination of bids for agricultural land and agribusinesses (all those made by foreign state-owned enterprises are already scrutinised). But it retained the policy on foreign investment in other areas. Some in the Nats (whose members include both economic ”dries” and ”wets”) would have liked to go further. But they they won’t be pushing it. The Nats believe Abbott is the best Liberal leader they could have. Malcolm Turnbull wasn’t on their wavelength, and if Hockey had won the top job, he wouldn’t have been either.

    In government, things would get really interesting between the Liberals and the Nationals if Joyce, expected to move to the House of Representatives at the election, became deputy prime minister. This would not happen in the short term. But assuming Truss later retired, Joyce would probably get the numbers.

    Abbott and Joyce have more in common than a quick glance suggests. Both were educated at Sydney’s top Catholic school, Riverview, and each has been deeply influenced by Catholic social values. They are centrist, pragmatic and populist. Joyce recognises in Abbott a congenial leader; Abbott can persuade Joyce when he needs to.

    While the foreign investment policy is now more or less settled, the Coalition’s industrial relations blueprint will continue to develop until it is released. Abbott is caught between the hardline stance of business and some Liberals, and his determination to give the government minimum room to flail him. After saying that businesses would have to make the case for change, Abbott is now confronted by them shouting that case from the rooftops. If an election were called tomorrow, the Coalition’s policy would be different from the one it would have produced a year ago.

    But Abbott insists he will be cautious. The policy will promote flexibility, aim to enhance productivity, and limit what the Coalition sees as growing union militancy. But retention of the ”better off overall test (BOOT)” will be a core commitment.

    One issue will be how specific the policy is. Abbott is very aware – having watched the experience of Julia Gillard – of the cost of breaking promises, so if he says he won’t change some aspect of the IR law, he can be believed. Those wanting to push for a bigger overhaul would prefer a more general policy. ”The key thing is having enough room to do what is necessary in government to create prosperity,” one Liberal says. But everyone can play that game: Abbott will be under political pressure not to leave too many gates open. He will also have to convince business, especially small business, that there is a distinction between ”prudence” (which he promises) and ”wimpishness” (which is how they might see it) – although some business disappointment might also reassure the public that his policy is indeed cautious.

    It seems bizarre that an abundance of talent could be a problem for a leader. But this has already brought tensions – some backbenchers have been frustrated that Abbott has not been willing to shake up his frontbench – and after the election will present a dilemma. Abbott’s attitude is that reshuffles cause trouble and make enemies; he is also loyal to colleagues. The up-and-comers now reluctantly accept that, barring something unexpected, Abbott won’t change his team this side of the election. But he will have to do so, to a certain extent at least, if he wins.

    For example, the idea that Arthur Sinodinos, John Howard’s talented former chief-of-staff, would not be in the ministry – and indeed the cabinet – is ludicrous. But in what spot? Logically, finance, but Abbott has guaranteed that Andrew Robb will still hold that.

    Backbenchers such as Kelly O’Dwyer and Jamie Briggs would be looking for a post-election step up. Now, however, there are also some high-profile candidates who will walk through the parliamentary door armed with frontbench credentials – notably Brough and former West Australian treasurer Christian Porter. You would have to be a brave leader to tell Brough, who sat in John Howard’s cabinet, that he could not have an immediate and reasonable portfolio.

    Some Liberal sources think that Abbott would basically stick with his existing team, with a few unavoidable changes, and then use later opportunities to make others. But a PM is in a very strong position at the start and should go for the best possible team initially. Government is hard; all available talent is needed on its front line. Abbott would say all this is getting ahead of ourselves. His focus is on the nearer term.

    And, of course, there is the spectre of Kevin Rudd. If Labor changed leaders, and its vote jumped, Abbott would suddenly be having to manage a more nervous and critical bunch. That would be a real challenge.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/real-battles-lie-within-abbotts-own-camp-20120803-23kw1.html#ixzz22X9r6vOR

    Date
    August 4, 2012
    • 20 reading now
    • 26

    TONY Abbott and his team are living in the straitjacket of ambition. Like those (mostly) disciplined Olympic athletes, their eyes are on victory. Everything has to be tailored to winning, which means staying ”on message”, stomping around the stunt route of meat and fish markets, and managing controversial issues and restless colleagues with a minimum of headlines about splits and divisions.

    This week we have seen Abbott squaring away the internal problem of foreign investment policy and continuing to stare down the Liberal industrial relations radicals. And, if anyone cares to ask, he’ll say he’s very happy with his frontbench team, never mind that his good friend and former colleague Mal Brough, having won preselection at the weekend, is headed to Canberra with his eyes on securing a ministry ASAP.

    The opposition’s good polls and Labor’s woes mask, much of the time, the opposition’s policy and personality conflicts. The Nats, the Liberal ”dries”, periodic tensions within his own economic team, the odd party room outbreak, and keeping the Young Turks occupied all test Abbott, and would do so in government.

    The mild-mannered Warren Truss heads the Nationals but their Senate leader and wannabe future leader, Barnaby Joyce, is their spear carrier. It was Joyce who led the charge on foreign investment, being openly critical of Chinese investment by state-owned enterprises; the Nationals generally ramped up the concern about overseas designs on agricultural land.

    Free-market Liberals such as shadow treasurer Joe Hockey battled to rein in the Nats’ influence. Abbott’s confusing comments in Beijing last week, which were interpreted as being more anti-foreign investment than they were, perhaps reflected the squeeze he has been in. The discussion paper Abbott released yesterday gave ground to the Nationals by lowering the threshold for Foreign Investment Review Board examination of bids for agricultural land and agribusinesses (all those made by foreign state-owned enterprises are already scrutinised). But it retained the policy on foreign investment in other areas. Some in the Nats (whose members include both economic ”dries” and ”wets”) would have liked to go further. But they they won’t be pushing it. The Nats believe Abbott is the best Liberal leader they could have. Malcolm Turnbull wasn’t on their wavelength, and if Hockey had won the top job, he wouldn’t have been either.

    In government, things would get really interesting between the Liberals and the Nationals if Joyce, expected to move to the House of Representatives at the election, became deputy prime minister. This would not happen in the short term. But assuming Truss later retired, Joyce would probably get the numbers.

    Abbott and Joyce have more in common than a quick glance suggests. Both were educated at Sydney’s top Catholic school, Riverview, and each has been deeply influenced by Catholic social values. They are centrist, pragmatic and populist. Joyce recognises in Abbott a congenial leader; Abbott can persuade Joyce when he needs to.

    While the foreign investment policy is now more or less settled, the Coalition’s industrial relations blueprint will continue to develop until it is released. Abbott is caught between the hardline stance of business and some Liberals, and his determination to give the government minimum room to flail him. After saying that businesses would have to make the case for change, Abbott is now confronted by them shouting that case from the rooftops. If an election were called tomorrow, the Coalition’s policy would be different from the one it would have produced a year ago.

    But Abbott insists he will be cautious. The policy will promote flexibility, aim to enhance productivity, and limit what the Coalition sees as growing union militancy. But retention of the ”better off overall test (BOOT)” will be a core commitment.

    One issue will be how specific the policy is. Abbott is very aware – having watched the experience of Julia Gillard – of the cost of breaking promises, so if he says he won’t change some aspect of the IR law, he can be believed. Those wanting to push for a bigger overhaul would prefer a more general policy. ”The key thing is having enough room to do what is necessary in government to create prosperity,” one Liberal says. But everyone can play that game: Abbott will be under political pressure not to leave too many gates open. He will also have to convince business, especially small business, that there is a distinction between ”prudence” (which he promises) and ”wimpishness” (which is how they might see it) – although some business disappointment might also reassure the public that his policy is indeed cautious.

    It seems bizarre that an abundance of talent could be a problem for a leader. But this has already brought tensions – some backbenchers have been frustrated that Abbott has not been willing to shake up his frontbench – and after the election will present a dilemma. Abbott’s attitude is that reshuffles cause trouble and make enemies; he is also loyal to colleagues. The up-and-comers now reluctantly accept that, barring something unexpected, Abbott won’t change his team this side of the election. But he will have to do so, to a certain extent at least, if he wins.

    For example, the idea that Arthur Sinodinos, John Howard’s talented former chief-of-staff, would not be in the ministry – and indeed the cabinet – is ludicrous. But in what spot? Logically, finance, but Abbott has guaranteed that Andrew Robb will still hold that.

    Backbenchers such as Kelly O’Dwyer and Jamie Briggs would be looking for a post-election step up. Now, however, there are also some high-profile candidates who will walk through the parliamentary door armed with frontbench credentials – notably Brough and former West Australian treasurer Christian Porter. You would have to be a brave leader to tell Brough, who sat in John Howard’s cabinet, that he could not have an immediate and reasonable portfolio.

    Some Liberal sources think that Abbott would basically stick with his existing team, with a few unavoidable changes, and then use later opportunities to make others. But a PM is in a very strong position at the start and should go for the best possible team initially. Government is hard; all available talent is needed on its front line. Abbott would say all this is getting ahead of ourselves. His focus is on the nearer term.

    And, of course, there is the spectre of Kevin Rudd. If Labor changed leaders, and its vote jumped, Abbott would suddenly be having to manage a more nervous and critical bunch. That would be a real challenge.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/real-battles-lie-within-abbotts-own-camp-20120803-23kw1.html#ixzz22X9r6vOR