Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • No political bias in grants scheme: Albanese.

     

    Federal Infrastructure Minister Anthony Albanese denies there were any injustices and says funding decisions were based on departmental advice following independent assessments.

    Mr Albanese says the four biggest grants went to projects held by Coalition or independent MPs.

    “There’s no political bias in this program,” he said.

    “Secondly, there’s no wastage in this program and thirdly, by funding through local government what we haven’t done is fund private projects like the former regional partnerships program, where money simply went missing, where we had funding for ethanol plants that didn’t exist or funding for cheese factories that had closed down.”

    He says the discrepancy is nothing to do with Labor bias.

    “When you’re talking about economic stimulus through large community infrastructure projects, then larger councils will tend to receive the funding, whether they be larger councils in regional cities or in urban communities,” he said.

    But the Coalition’s infrastructure spokesman Barnaby Joyce says the auditor’s report tells a different story.

    “It sounds like Mr Albanese hasn’t read the auditor-general’s report,” he said.

    “The approval of projects in ALP held seats was 42.1 per cent, compared to 18.4 per cent in Coalition-held seats.

    “They’ve headed back towards the process of find your seat, get the white board out and approve the projects regardless of their own guidelines, the guidelines that they set up for themselves.

    “This is nothing more than a dirty Labor Party stack, a dirty Labor Party approach to bribing the electorate to vote for them again.”

    But the Government says a lot of money went to projects in electorates held by Coalition or independent MPs.

    In the beachside suburb of Manly there is a new plaque by a popular walking path, which says upgrades to the promenade were made possible by the Federal Government’s Regional and Local Community Infrastructure Program.

    Manly Council chief executive Henry Wong says the funding paid for landscaping and facilities for children along the beach front, which sees about eight million visitors a year.

    He says he was not worried that the fact that Manly is in the electorate of current Opposition Leader Tony Abbott might mean the project would not be funded.

    “Not at all. The Rudd Government at right outset indicated that applications for funding will be assessed on their merits and we believe that and certainly it comes through as that,” he said.

    Tags: industry, building-and-construction, government-and-politics, elections, federal-government, political-parties, labor-party, liberal-party, nationals, federal-elections, australia, nsw

     

  • Greens call for national rural land and water register

    July 28th 2010

    Greens call for national rural land and water register

    Speaking in Orange, NSW today Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown called
    for a national register of foreign purchases of land or water in rural
    Australia.

    “In the coming century food and fibre production will be a huge issue as
    the world population soars to 10 billion people or more,” said Senator
    Brown.

    “It is important Australians know who owns the productive farmlands and
    water rights of our country.

    “Currently there is no register except in Queensland nor any vetting of
    foreign ownership by the Foreign Investment Review Board except for
    purchases in excess of $231 million.

    “New Zealand has had a register since 1988 and Australia should catch
    up.

    “Ownership can lead to control of markets for food and therefore food
    prices so it’s important we know who owns what,” Senator Brown said.

    Yesterday Deputy Leader Christine Milne also called for the ACCC to
    assess the impacts of food processor mergers and takeovers and called
    for an inquiry into National Competition Policy.

    Media contact Peter Stahel 0459 133 597
    www.greensmps.org.au

    Erin Farley
    Media Adviser
    Senator Bob Brown | Leader of the Australian Greens
    Suite SG-112 Parliament House, Canberra ACT 
    P: 02 6277 3577 | M: 0438 376 082| F: 02 6277 3185
    http://bob-brown.greensmps.org.au/| www.GreensMPs.org.au
    <http://www.greensmps.org.au/

  • Labor tells us in NSW-drop dead

     

    And it appears the struggles of the State Government may be to blame for NSW missing out again on funding for key projects to tackle the city’s worsening congestion.

    In a sign federal campaign officials are terrified by the toxicity of the NSW Government, Labor’s best asset in NSW, Kristina Keneally, has been put on ice for the first two weeks of the campaign. So far Ms Gillard has campaigned beside Queensland Premier Anna Bligh and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has appeared alongside WA Premier Colin Barnett.

    But Ms Keneally was forced to make the announcement of $6.3 million in federal funding for medical equipment and beds for Concord Hospital with the federal Labor Member for Lowe John Murphy.

    Some state MPs have been deliberately kept away from federal candidate functions for fear of association with the most unpopular government in the country. “You’d have to be pretty dumb to lump your lot with the crew on the Titanic,” one senior Labor source said.

    The source said it was also hard to justify federal funding for state infrastructure projects when NSW had been ranked so lowly by the Federal Government’s Infrastructure Australia.

    The State Government is desperate to announce either the $4.5 billion M5 duplication or $10 billion M4 East by the end of the year.

    Ms Keneally has said the projects would be possible with federal funds.

    Yesterday, Ms Gillard directed $742 million to a new rail line in Brisbane’s northern suburbs, while earlier this month Infrastructure Australia instead selected as priorities a $4.9 billion Melbourne metro train project, an Adelaide freight rail line and a Federal Highway road upgrade in the ACT.

    State Labor figures said Federal Infrastructure Minister Anthony Albanese did not want the M4 East because it would go through his electorate.

    A spokesman for Mr Albanese said last night the federal government was already investing more than $1 billion in separating rail and freight lines in NSW and $300 million on the Moorebank Intermodal to take trucks off the M5.

    A spokesman for Ms Keneally said of the lack of appearances involving Ms Gillard and Ms Keneally: “It’s only day eight of the campaign.”

    It’s understood a joint Federal and State announcement is planned next week.

     

     

  • All hope, no real action on filthy campaign lucre

     

    The Greens’ Democracy4Sale research project – which tracks many of these donations – is frequently asked for examples of the dirty deeds. Instances of direct favours are light on, the Wollongong developers scandal being a notable exception.

    But over the past decade significant changes were made to laws and regulations for industries which gave significant sums, and those changes brought considerable benefits to donating industries.

    Representatives of property, pharmaceutical, hotel and resource companies are among the most generous donors. They attend party fund-raisers and hand over cheques.

    An insight into this world of money politics was provided by John Thorpe, a former NSW president of the Australian Hotels Association. On Stateline in 2004 he famously said: ”Democracy isn’t cheap.”

    He went on: ”Everybody’s involved with assisting political parties because at this stage we need to keep these people in place to have the democracy we have today.

    ”Look, what helps is this – you attend as an observer, as I did at the ALP national conference. Yes, it costs money. But we did get interviews with ministers, we did get interviews with staffers, and that does help us in our policies and our regulations.”

    The trends in political generosity suggest the money often follows the party in power. Under the Howard government, the resource and pharmaceutical industries favoured the Coalition federally, while in the life of the current NSW government, developers favoured the Labor Party.

    These arrangements have come at a cost to Labor and the Coalition parties. In recent years some key figures within those parties have responded to the growing public disquiet about the corrupting influence of political donations by backing electoral funding reform.

    Malcolm Turnbull, before he became the leader of the opposition, called for political donations to be limited to those from individuals. Senator John Faulkner, when special minister of state, became one of the key voices for change. He championed the federal government’s green paper on electoral funding, an initiative seen as providing the road map for reform.

    In NSW, scene of many political donation scandals, the state Labor and Coalition parties appeared to recognise it was time to overhaul funding laws. Two parliamentary inquiries gave some hope for an end to the corrupting influence of corporate political donations as their recommendations were, in the main, agreed to by all.

    NSW Labor, in the latest parliamentary inquiry, agreed to limit donations from unions and restrict the role of union affiliation funds. Union donations and fees had been a stumbling block for the Coalition so with this commitment from Labor it looked like the last obstacle had been removed.

    But reform has gone off the boil, both in NSW and federally. No legislation has come before either Parliament. What went wrong? How did we get so close to reform only to revert to another round of money politics? Why will companies and rich individuals again be able to buy access and political influence in this election? Is it really too hard to find the right public funding model for political parties and candidates? Or is the problem the lack of a leader with the necessary courage to hold out for far-reaching reform?

    Whatever the reason, the public wants reform.

    It will be a sorry state of affairs if reform comes only after more Wollongong-style developer donation scandals. If that’s the only way our political leaders find the courage to follow through on their promised reforms that will be a poor reflection on our democratic process.

    Right now the Prime Minister is keen to paint a fresh face for her government, and she is in the box seat to announce changes to electoral funding laws. She would be wise to ensure electoral funding reform does not fall away in the manoeuvring of this campaign.

    She could increase her popularity before the federal election by committing to a major clean-up of how parties and elections are funded.

    This is one promise she could easily keep because after the election the Greens and Labor may well have the numbers in the Senate to ensure such legislation passes.

    Lee Rhiannon is a Greens Senate candidate for NSW.

     

  • ALP factions no match for squabbling libs

     

    People still talked about the socialisation of the means of production, distribution and exchange The realities of government killed off Labor’s socialist objective.

    To have your voice heard in the Hawke and Keating governments, you had to be an economic rationalist. No room for old commos there.

    The objective remains in Labor’s platform as a reminder of the halcyon days of the party being on the Left. It’s not worth getting rid of because most ALP members have forgotten it exists.

    What distinguishes the average rank-and-file ALP type or even those who have risen to great heights is they want to see the country run efficiently with an eye to helping the weakest first.

    It’s more of a trickle-up theory of economics as against the trickle-down theory much loved by the Liberals. They believe, for example, if you make Clive Palmer even richer, the rest of us mortals will be better off.

    In the Labor Party, socialism’s demise makes it hard to work out the differences between the Labor factions.

    These days it depends on personalities and who you mixed with when you were young. Old personal loyalties count for a great deal when choosing a faction.

    But Labor factions have been around for a long, long time. They love to have the odd stoush but they know who the real enemy is. When election time comes around, they pull together. The party organisation, whichever faction may be running it in any given state, is always ready to fight.

    Not so in the NSW Liberal Party. The factional war there is more bitter than any the Labor Party has witnessed. And it’s not about political extremism, it’s about which brand of extreme Catholicism will come out in front. It’s about whether the left or right-wing factions of Opus Dei will control party preselections. When this lot fight, they know who the real enemy is.

    It’s not Julia Gillard, it’s Alex Hawke or David Clarke.

    The Liberals can’t use the faceless men tag about Labor faction chiefs any more; they have their own brand.

    While Gillard’s elevation may have taken the Liberals by surprise, the fact that an election was in the offing was obvious. If Kevin Rudd had stayed on, an election would probably have been held in October or November.

    The media has focused for six months at least on Labor’s decline in the polls. You had to be living under a rock not to know that Queensland and western Sydney were Labor’s weakest links.

    If your organisation was in any way effective, candidates would have been selected in western Sydney seats a year ago. They would have been doorknocking for months. Their names would by now be recognised in these suburban centres.

    In NSW, federal Labor is inhibited by the damage to the Labor brand by an unpopular state government. Just a few weeks ago a by-election was held in the seat of Penrith. The biggest anti-Labor swing — 25 per cent — was recorded. Penrith is within the federal seat of Lindsay, a seat the Liberals could win with a swing of 6.3 per cent. The Liberals didn’t select a candidate there until July 13.

    In 40 years of elections scrutiny, I have never seen a stuff-up of this magnitude. The selected candidate is one Fiona Scott. She may in fact be a genius, but if so she is a hidden genius. Her party minders have kept her under wraps so well that no one has yet been introduced to her. A hell of a way to campaign, you might say, but the situation in the nearby seat of Greenway is even worse.

    The candidate there was selected on July 17, the day the election was announced. The swing required here is 5.7 per cent but the Liberals, so intent on the factional war, couldn’t get a candidate selected until the second half of July.

    Labor’s vote in western Sydney is very soft. The voters are unhappy about boatpeople, they are bewildered at Labor’s lack of a climate change policy. It is a giant mortgage belt where interest rate increases really hurt.

    Labor’s faction wars can be pretty nasty affairs but candidates get selected on time and nothing gets in the way of campaigning.

    In the NSW Liberal Party, the machine has stopped working. The warriors have taken aim at internal targets with unerring success. It will not save the state Labor government but it might allow Gillard to scrape home.

    4 comments on this story

  • Plan to pipe water from PNG to Queensland

     

    “There’s a huge demand for [water] in Australia and there’s a huge supply up here which is untapped,” he said.

    Despite the huge construction costs, Mr Ariel believes it would be cheaper than desalination plants and water recycling.

    “The advantage that this project has is the sheer volumes of water available,” he said.

    “It’s available all year round. It doesn’t require expensive dams.”

    Mr Ariel says the pipeline could provide six gigalitres a day to be used for consumption, irrigation or pumped into the Murray-Darling river system.

    He says he is confident he would be able to reach agreements with the thousands of PNG landowners who would be affected by the pipeline.

    Tags: business-economics-and-finance, environment, water, water-management, water-supply, qld, brisbane-4000, papua-new-guinea

    First posted 1 hour 36 minutes ago