Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Lead the charge EV Vehicles on the way

     

    Electric cars Click for more photos

    Electric cars

    Electric cars

    • Electric cars
    • Electric cars

    All-electric plug-in cars are a different breed to petrol-electric hybrids, which use electric motors to supplement a petrol engine and don’t require a power outlet.

    All-electric cars run entirely on batteries and hence need to recharge regularly.

    Electric cars aren’t new – they’ve been around in some form for almost as long as motor vehicles have been on the road. But recent improvements in battery technology have made them a more realistic alternative to their petrol-engined cousins.

    There are still big question marks over the charging infrastructure, long-term battery life, safety and resale value of electric vehicles.

    But none of this matters to Hobbs; she’s happy to have adopted EVs early and faces those challenges head on.

    “I’ve been rabbiting on about the environment for 10 years,” she says. “When my old car started getting the shakes I thought, ‘I don’t want to commit to buying petrol for another 10 years.’ So I’ve put my money where my mouth is.”

    She admits she considered getting rid of a car altogether and joining a car-sharing program but decided to commit to the Blade and join the electric-car revolution.

    “For me, part of the reason I’m doing this is because, with my work, I get to talk about it,” she says. “It’s normalising the idea of electric cars.”

    It came at a price, however – $48,000 to be exact – substantially more than a Hyundai Getz with a petrol engine.

    But she says it’s easy to justify that extra expenditure.

    “For me $48,000 is a shitload of money to spend on a car,” she says. “But I’m paying for my fuel upfront with the battery pack. So if I keep it for 10 years like my last car, that’s $5000 a year. In 10 years I’ll probably just give it to my nephew.”

    For critics of electric cars, Hobbs has switched her energy provider to get “green” energy instead of relying on coal-fired power.

    “If you’re going to use coal fire you’re doing no good, you just have a feel-good car,” she says.

    “[Switching to green energy] takes you from three tonnes of CO2 per year to none.”

    She’s not the only Australian driver ditching petrol power for electricity. The managing director of Adelaide-based internet service provider Internode, Simon Hackett, not only has a Blade parked in his garage but also just took delivery of the first right-hand drive Tesla Roadster in Australia.

    To call Hackett a passionate believer in electric vehicles is an understatement. He has been a fan ever since he drove the GM EV1 in the mid-1990s while working in the US.

    He ordered a left-hand-drive Tesla in 2006 but had to wait until 2008 for it to arrive. Last year he set a world record by driving the Roadster more than 500 kilometres on a single charge during the Global Green Challenge.

    Hackett bought the Blade Electron as his daily driver because he couldn’t register his left-hand-drive Tesla for road use. But with the new Tesla able to be driven on the road, it will replace the Blade as his daily commuter car.

    It may have cost Hackett more than $250,000 but as far as he’s concerned, it’s better than buying a traditional sports car such as a Porsche or Ferrari.

    “People say, ‘How can it be a sports car if it doesn’t go vroom vroom?’ You get used to it really quickly,” he says.

    Home on the range

    The first mass-market electric car into Australia, the Mitsubishi i-MiEV, has an official range of 100 kilometres to 160 kilometres before it needs a full recharge (the Hyundai Getz-based Blade claims 100 kilometres).

    The challenge for Mitsubishi and its fellow car makers is to convince consumers that 160 kilometres is enough for them to live with.

    The Drive team logged its driving habits for a week and found that all of us could comfortably use an electric car with a range of 100 kilometres each day.

    But we found on the weekends that range might not be enough to satisfy us all.

    Factors such as the weather, driving style and use of the heater and airconditioning all have an impact on the range; just like the fuel consumption in a traditional petrol- or diesel-powered car.

    But, unlike a traditional car, topping up the battery of an electric car isn’t as simple as ducking into your local service station. Charging an electric car can take up to eight hours and requires a special power outlet.

    Both Hobbs and Hackett believe “range anxiety” won’t be an issue for most people, providing they live close to their work.

    “For the first few days I was shitting myself,” Hobbs admits. “But I realised I really never drive more than 100 kilometres.”

    She does also admit to having a back-up plan.

    “I carry a 30-metre extension cord,” she says. “That gives me a bit of confidence.” Hackett believes it is only a matter of time before electric cars boast a range to match a petrol car. He says he can get more than 300 kilometres from his Tesla regularly and the company’s next variant, the Model S, will claim a range of more than 480 kilometres.

    “There’s this tendency with people to focus on what happens if you run out of electricity. Well, the same thing that happens if you run out of petrol: your car stops,” he says. “But what people need to realise is that range, of 100 kilometres or 300 kilometres, is available every day.”

    Give it a plug

    Infrastructure for electric cars is very much a case of the chicken and the egg. Car companies have the cars but there isn’t any significant infrastructure in place yet. Not surprisingly, no one is interested in installing expensive public charging points for a handful of cars.

    Unlike the Blade, some electric cars can’t be charged using a regular household outlet – they require a 15-amp plug, the same type used for large airconditioning units.

    You can get one installed in your garage or office car park for a few hundred dollars but there are a growing number of operators selling specialised charging points.

    ChargePoint Australia is one of the first companies to install a commercially operated roadside outlet, in conjunction with car-sharing company GoGet.

    The outlet, in inner-city Glebe, is not available for public use, though; only members of GoGet are able to charge the company’s converted Toyota Prius EV.

    The joint managing director of ChargePoint, Luke Grana, says the rollout of infrastructure will be a gradual process that will be tied to the amount of EVs on the roads.

    “We really see it working with the early adopters like local councils, state governments and fleets,” he says. “We won’t be rolling out a network until 2013 and we’ll be growing with the market.”

    He believes the most likely scenario will see shopping centres and parking stations emerge as the power provider for electric cars, potentially replacing petrol stations.

    In theory, drivers will be able to take their EV to the shops, plug in while they doing their shopping and come back to a fully recharged car.

    The first signs of this transition have emerged.

    Special parking spaces with power outlets are beginning to pop up around major cities but they are few and far between. So far, shopping centres in Hornsby, Dural and Blacktown have become some of the first to offer electric-car drivers a place to recharge while shopping.

    “I think it really needs to be led by the car-consumer marketplace,” a spokeswoman for Westfield, Julia Clarke, says.

    There are exceptions, though. A new multi-storey structure in downtown Perth has 12 parking spots hard-wired for charging.

    To ensure the electricity is sustainable, it’s sourced from roof-mounted solar panels.

    The car park is overseen by the director of business units for the City of Perth, Doug Forster. He says it will serve as a test ahead of further charging points being set up. The council owns 30 parking stations across the city.

    Crucially for the rollout of infrastructure and EVs, federal and state governments have so far shown little tangible support for electric cars. Overseas, governments have offered free parking, access to transit lanes or cash incentives to support early adopters of EVs.

    The all-important question, however, is: will car fans miss the vroom of a petrol engine?

    “I thought I would but I don’t,” Hackett says. “I’ve got an old Ferrari, a 1985 308, that’s a real work of art. But I can’t get motivated to drive it. Once you drive an electric car, you realise you are in a generational-changing vehicle. And I don’t miss the generation I’m leaving.”

    Electric cars on the way

    City cars, hatchbacks, sedans and even supercars; there is an electric car suited to almost every need under development somewhere in the world.

    • Mitsubishi i-MiEV
    • NissanLEAF
    • TeslaRoadster
    • Tesla ModelS
    • SmartED
    • MiniE
    • Holden/ChevroletVolt
    • Renault Fluence Z.E.
    • VolvoC30Plug-In Hybrid
    • Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid
    • VolkswagenEup!
    • BMWMegacity
    • CitroenC-ZERO
    • Peugeot iOn
    • Ford Focus BEV
    • Audi e-tron
    • Mercedes-BenzSLSE-Cell
  • Iran plans to build nuclear fusion reactor

     

    The United States and its European allies suspect Iran is trying to build an atomic bomb, and have imposed sanctions on it in a drive to convince it to drop sensitive nuclear work. Tehran says its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only.

    Iran’s nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi said Iran was ready to cooperate with the international community over the country’s National Fusion Energy Project, the Students News Agency ISNA reported, without mentioning the plan to build the reactor.

    “The scientific phase of the fusion energy research project is being launched with no budgetary limitation,” Mr Salehi said.

    Commercial nuclear reactors rely on nuclear fission, a process that generates energy from splitting atoms.

    Reuters

    Tags: environment, nuclear-issues, world-politics, iran

  • Greens’ plan for 100% renewable energy

    Greens’ plan for 100% renewable energy

    The Australian Greens today launched a policy to plan Australia’s transformation into a 100% renewable energy powerhouse over the coming decades.

    “Australia can harness our tremendous resources of the sun, wind, ocean, earth and human ingenuity to replace our reliance on coal with 100% renewable energy within decades,” Australian Greens Deputy Leader, Senator Christine Milne, said.

    “But, to make that transformation rapidly and efficiently, we need a plan: we need to know where our biggest and best renewable energy resources are; we need streamlined consultation and approvals processes that bring communities together instead of dividing them; and we need jobs and infrastructure in the right place at the right time.

    “The Greens are proposing that we start working on that plan immediately so we can have a 100% renewable Australia as soon as possible.”

    The Planning for 100% Renewable Energy policy would task Infrastructure Australia with:
    · mapping Australia’s renewable energy resource;
    · bringing together governments, communities and developers in streamlined consultation and approvals processes;
    · creating renewable energy development zones, funding necessary grid infrastructure; and
    · preparing a scoping study for achieving 100% renewable energy powering Australia by 2030, 2040 and 2050.

    This policy would work in conjunction with a gross national feed-in tariff, giving certainty to investors in all forms of renewable energy, and an increased renewable energy target.

    “We need policies to drive renewable energy and an infrastructure plan to enable the expansion to 100%. We need a plan, not ad hoc grants cobbled together for an election.

    “Right now, Australia’s renewable energy policies are uncoordinated and directionless as well as unambitious. Unless this changes, renewable energy will always stay on the sidelines even though global experience shows it is already technically capable of replacing coal and gas.

    “If new power lines are built to a new wind farm before we work out if other developments will happen in the area, either the power lines will have to be duplicated at great expense or the later developments won’t happen.

    “If we have the 100% renewables goal in mind as we go, and we have done the grunt work of mapping and consultation in advance, we can avoid these expensive mistakes and instead find the synergies that will make the transformation easier, cheaper and faster.

    “Renewable energy development zones have been tremendously popular and effective in parts of the USA and Europe, cutting red tape and bringing communities, governments and developers together instead of setting them at loggerheads.

    “We know already that some of our best resources for baseload solar power match up with both huge geothermal energy reserves and wind. As well, some of our best wind resources are in the same place as great potential ocean power resources. We need a proper mapping exercise to overlay this with the existing grid and reasonable access to population centres.

    For more information phone Tim Hollo 0437 587 562

    _______________________________________________
    GreensMPs Media mailing list
    Media@greensmps.org.au

  • Investors call for clear policy on carbon

     

    The Investor Group on Climate Change, representing fund managers holding more than $600 billion, said yesterday’s changes would only ”marginally” affect future investment decisions until there was a clearer policy on carbon.

    “In terms of driving significant investment into low-carbon technologies, or allowing investors to price emissions risks into their portfolios, clearly we are still in a period of waiting,” the group’s chief executive, Nathan Fabian, said. The big listed utilities, Origin and AGL, echoed their previous calls for greater clarity through an emissions trading scheme.

    Broader-based business groups welcomed the chance for further discussion, but stressed the need for greater certainty in carbon policy. Katie Lahey, chief executive of the Business Council of Australia, said while elements of Labor’s policy were ”useful”, the party needed show leadership and provide lasting solutions.

    “The ALP’s commitment to building community consensus is constructive,” she said. “However, in this complex policy area, long-term solutions that balance Australia’s economic and environment considerations will only come through strong political leadership.”

    Brad Page, the chief executive of the Energy Supply Association, said the measures, including $1 billion over 10 years to connect remote renewable energy projects, was ”sensible policy”.

    But Mr Page said without both of the major parties aligned on climate business would continue to flounder in uncertainty.

    ”That is really why we welcome the new consultation measures,” he said. ”They must lead to bipartisan policies and measures because if you don’t get those you still can’t make those large capital, intensive, long-life investment decisions,” he said.

    However, the ANU climate change economist Professor Warwick McKibbin, said the Gillard government had adopted an ”asylum-seeker approach to climate policy”. Climate uncertainty would be felt ”right across the economy”.

    ”Business wants to know what the framework is and they want to know if there is a way that they can hedge the very large risks that they need to make on very large capital investments over the next decade or two and this doesn’t provide any of it. This creates more uncertainty. It puts everything under the carpet for another year,” he said.

     

  • Obama blocked on climate

     

    Some in the administration still hope to revive the legislation this year, although the preoccupation of congress members has already shifted to election campaigning.

    Forced to accept political reality, Democrat Senate majority leader Harry Reid yesterday said that his party would instead pursue a more limited energy bill this year that concentrated on combating the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and improving efficiency standards.

    Expressing his disappointment at dropping the broader bill, Senator Reid said: “We don’t have a single Republican to work with us. We don’t have the votes.”

    Mr Obama’s White House director of energy and climate change policy, Carol Browner, said: “Everyone is disappointed.”

    Democrats needed a “super-majority” of 60 votes out of 100 in the Senate to pass a proposed climate change bill with an emissions scheme — but fell at least two short and possibly more if their party fragmented.

    Many Democrats have been under pressure from voters working in high carbon emission industries to reject greenhouse gas limits.

    The House of Representatives, where the Democrats have a resounding majority, passed its own version of a climate change bill last year that was still to be merged with Senate legislation.

    Mr Obama has staked much political capital on winning Senate support for legislation backing a 17 per cent reduction on 2005 carbon emissions by 2020.

    Just as Kevin Rudd did, Mr Obama took his position to the UN climate change summit in Copenhagen in December, only to see no common agreement.

    Mr Rudd wanted a 5 per cent emissions cut on 2000 levels by 2020 and also pushed to introduce a cap-and-trade scheme, but he dropped his government’s legislation this year when it was blocked in the Senate by the Coalition.

    The push for US climate change legislation had been in doubt for months. The main prospect of success rested on a senior Republican, Lindsey Graham, joining a coalition with Democrat John Kerry and independent Joe Lieberman, and possibly luring some Republicans to go with them.

    Senator Graham bowed out last month, saying he could no longer back a joint plan.

    Without legislation, Mr Obama’s opportunity to curb emissions relies on the US Environmental Protection Agency using its powers to control dangerous pollutants.

    The blow to Mr Obama’s climate change agenda yesterday came as the US Senate agreed, after resistance, to pass an extension of emergency unemployment benefits.

    Mr Obama also signed into law new financial regulations to limit the behaviour of banks, following the passage of legislation by the Senate.

  • Court battle looms over Snowy River flows

     

    Eight years ago the Commonwealth, New South Wales and Victorian governments agreed to spend $375 million to improve the dwindling river’s flow.

    The deal included a target environmental flow of 15 per cent below the Jindabyne Dam by mid-2009, but it is still only at 4 per cent.

    Louise Crisp, from the Snowy River Alliance says the New South Wales Government is most to blame.

    “It’s been a case of misinformation, obstruction, basically simple lack of cooperation between the three governments the whole way,” she said.

    “New South Wales has been particularly recalcitrant. Really no beneficial outcomes from the licence review were delivered to the Snowy River and yet still the Snowy River is in a desperately poor state.”

    Tags: environmental-management, states-and-territories, environmental-impact, australia, act, nsw, jindabyne-2627, sydney-2000, vic

    First posted 1 hour 10 minutes ago