Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Aboriginal fire management cuts CO2 in Australia

    Aboriginal fire management cuts CO2 in Australia

    From Our World, part of the Guardian Environment Network 

    A bushfire burns in the Kiewa valley towards the town of Dederang, in Victoria.

    A bushfire burns in Australia in February 2009. Photograph: Torsten Blackwood/AFP/Getty Images

    Fire has been used by Bininj (Aboriginal) people for managing habitats and food resources across northern Australian over millennia. The secret of fire in our traditional knowledge is that it is a thing that brings the land alive again. So we don’t necessarily see fire as bad and destructive — it can be a good thing.

    Unfortunately, today fire is not being well looked after in many places in Northern Australia. However, it continues to be managed well around the outstations where people live all the time, such as at Kabulwarnamyo, where I live. To go forward, we need to encourage our children in the ways of the past. Fire must be managed and people must be living on their country (tribal land) to manage that fire.

    As a Bininj man from Nangark of the Gurrguni clan, I hold much knowledge regarding my people’s traditional use of fire and have a great responsibility to ensure that this knowledge is passed down to younger generations, and more importantly, that this knowledge is still used and practised into the future to keep our country alive and healthy.

    Bininj perspective on climate change
    Bininj people have experienced very dramatic climate changes that have been happening since long before Balanda (white people) settled in our country. In our beliefs, our ancestors have been here from the beginning, when the earth was still soft and when some animals were like people before they became the animals we know today.

    Our old people used to tell us dreamtime stories that happened a long time ago; stories about animals, birds and reptiles, and how they’ve gone through those processes of change.

    When our ancestors saw changes happening, they started to adapt to the changes by looking out for solutions of how to live and survive. They were hunters and gatherers that looked for food and good places to live and enjoy a new kind of life in changed circumstance. When walking about, they would cover the whole area as part of their role as land managers — looking after our country according to our traditional land management practices.

    Our people have lived through periods of great change. Knowledge of what they’ve experienced through those changes has been passed down from one generation to another.

    The Great Drought
    One story that is still talked about by our old people concerns a great drought. Balanda have their bible story about a great flood, but we have a story about a great drought.

    When springs and rivers dried up, the first people, or Nayiyunki, were desperately walking around looking for water when they came across a paper bark tree that had a hump like a camel’s, with drinkable water in it.

    So they used their stone axes to crack the humped side of the paper bark tree and out came the water to save their lives. We call the hump and the water that comes from it Djidjindok. Nayiyunki lived on that drinking water from the tree for long periods until water came back in springs and creeks.

    We don’t know exactly when this happened, but we do know that Balanda (white) scientists are able to tell us that this part of Australia went through very dry periods between about 35,000 and 18,000 years ago.

    Sea level rise
    Another story our people talk about is how Northern Australia was attached to Papua New Guinea. It was one big land and the Nayiyunki (first people) walked around managing the whole landscape, looking for better hunting places or lakes stocked full of fish.

    There are stories from Maningrida, now on the edge of the Arafura Sea that separates us from Papua New Guinea. Just off from Maningrida township is Entrance Island. It lies about 3 kms from the nearest land, at Ndjudda Point.

    Our people remember when the Island was connected to the mainland. In the middle, was a big billabong — a big wetland area full of fish and geese, water chestnuts and water lilies, and other game for hunting. It was a very well known wetland place for our past generations and today people still talk about this lost wetland. When the sea level rose, all that wetland went under the seawater.

    At Goulburn Island, the people there still have more stories about these times — stories about islands where people used to live that are there no longer.

    Human made climate change
    So we have been experiencing climate changes for long-long periods up until today’s generations. But the climate changes previously experienced were brought on by nature. They were not climate changes brought on by people, like in the situation we face today.

    Nayiyunki, our first people, watched the way nature worked. They looked at how things changed at the yearly scale and named six seasonal movements for the calender — Bangerreng, Yekke, Wurrkeng, Gurrung, Gunumeleng and Gujewek.

    These are the six calendar cycles of movement for our hunting and gathering purposes. People knew when the seasons changed by seeing the signs and signals in nature that marked those changes. We see changes in winds and clouds and rain; we read the changing seasons through the flowering of plants and grasses; we read the movement of birds and other animals.

    These seasonal calendars have been built up over thousands of years, but now our old people and even middle-aged people like me are seeing that the seasons start to look wrong. We see that things are not really happening when they should be.

    Our old people are confused. They don’t know what’s happening. These are the signals that tell us when we should be burning grass or when we can find the food we want. Scientists tell us the monsoon stopped for more than 10,000 years a long time ago. What would our world be like if we didn’t have the monsoon to give a regular annual cycle for growing, drying and burning grasses. What would tropical Australia be like if it had years of drought, like down south? It’s a scary thought.

    People move around to observe signs of what things are there and what things aren’t there. If things aren’t there then people know that something is going wrong somewhere.

    When changes happened before, the Nayiyunki knew the country very well through their observations. They would talk to spiritual beings and ask for their help and to show them in their dream, so that they could be ready for unexpected events.

    Nayiyunki were able to deal very well with the changes in their time because these were changes made by mother nature. These were natural climatic changes that happened from the first generation. But the changes we are looking at today are not natural changes — they are caused by human behaviour. People, not nature, are responsible.

    Our challenge, our contribution
    Our present generation, we hear media news about global warming. Changes are happening and everybody around the world is running around madly trying to figure out a way to tackle the problems.

    Though for us, the Bininj people, climate change is not new topic, since we have the stories about the changes that happened many-many years ago before our generation, we are very worried about what is affecting us today. Like sometimes we see that the wet season comes in at the wrong time.

    In recent years we have experienced strong cyclones — Cyclone Monica set a new mark for violent storms and we had unexpected floods hitting our communities. Sometime we hear our old people saying these things are happening because our sacred objects are not happy with us because of disturbances to the sacred land. Dynamite and mining, big machines and roads, these are all things that worry our people.

    Within Northern Australia our country has changed in a big way ever since I was born. These are the most visible symptoms that I see:

    (1) the human population has tripled since I was child;

    (2) our people have been losing our language and culture;

    (3) feral weeds and animals are entering our community;

    (4) establishment of towns and settlement;

    (5) mining happening in our country; and

    (6) changing weather, and more.

    Feral animals and weeds are changing our natural environment. Large animals like buffaloes are damaging our landscape and weeds are already within our communities and our home-lands.

    Traditional fire management has changed in a big way. Traditional practices, like travelling on foot, are not happening these days like they used to. People have changed in many ways because of the contemporary forces from outside.

    We all, Balanda and Bininj, have to look at what we can do to fix the damage that is being done to the climate by greenhouse gases and so on.

    Out there at Kabulwarnamyo, we are tackling climate change by bringing back and strengthening our traditional burning, the tools that we have used for thousands of years for managing our landscape.

    By bringing back our way of land management and making it strong for the future, we are doing our bit to help the world deal with climate change.

    • Dean Yibarbuk is Secretary of Warddeken Land Management Limited

     

  • White House action puts on hold dozens of mountaintop mining projects.

     

    The EPA said it had continuing concerns about toxic debris from the mine sites, and the loss of hundreds of miles of streams, which were choked off by the rubble.

    “The administration pledged earlier this year to improve review of mining projects that risked harming water quality. Release of this preliminary list is the first step in a process to assure that the environmental concerns raised by the 79 permit applications are addressed and that permits issued are protective of water quality and affected ecosystems,” the EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson, said in a statement.

    The decision was welcomed by some environmental organisations as a key break by the Obama administration with the policies set by George Bush.

    Appalachian Voices, a local activist coalition, said in a statement:

    “By recommending these permits not be approved, the EPA and the Army Corps has demonstrated their intention to fulfill a promise to provide science-based oversight which will limit the devastating environmental impacts of mountaintop removal mining.”

    But environmental organisations are still pressing the Obama administration for an outright ban on mountaintop removal, which environmentalists say is the most destructive method of extracting coal.

    Bush-era regulations had made it far easier for mining companies to win approval for mountaintop removal and to avoid regulatory control. The EPA, in Bush’s eight-year term, did not oppose a single permit for mountaintop removal.

    Jackson, in a recent interview, admitted the agency had grown “toothless”.

    The Obama administration signalled last June that it would take a tougher approach to enforcement. Earlier this week, the agency said it would halt West Virginia’s biggest mining project, spread over 2,300 acres, because of concerns over dumping debris.

    The agency now has two weeks to issue its final decision on the pending permits. Projects that do meet EPA environmental standards will move ahead.

  • CO2 is not the only cause of climate change

     

     

    The protocol explicitly aimed at phasing out substances such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) – found in products such as refrigerators, foams and hairsprays – in order to repair the thin, gassy shield that filters out the sun’s harmful ultraviolet rays. By 2010, close to 100 ozone-depleting substances, including CFCs, will have been phased out globally.

     

    Without the decisions taken 20 years ago, atmospheric levels of ozone-depleting substances would have increased tenfold by 2050. This could have led to up to 20m additional cases of skin cancer and 130m more cases of eye cataracts, not to speak of damage to human immune systems, wildlife and agriculture.

     

    But this is only part of the story that we celebrate on the international day for the preservation of the ozone layer (16 September). Over the past two years, it has been established that the Montreal protocol has also spared humanity a significant level of climate change, because the gases it prohibits also contribute to global warming.

     

    Indeed, a study in 2007 calculated the climate mitigation benefits of the ozone treaty as totalling the equivalent of 135bn tonnes of C02 since 1990, or a delay in global warming of seven-12 years.

     

    So the lessons learned from the Montreal protocol may have wider significance. Scientists now estimate that somewhere close to 50% of climate change is being caused by gases and pollutants other than C02, including nitrogen compounds, low-level ozone formed by pollution, and black carbon. Of course, a degree of scientific uncertainty remains about some of these pollutants’ precise contribution to warming. But they certainly play a significant role.

     

    Meanwhile, many of these gases need to be curbed because of their wider environmental impact on public health, agriculture and the planet’s ecosystems, including forests.

     

    Consider black carbon. A component of the soot emissions from diesel engines and the inefficient burning of biomass cooking stoves, it is linked to 1.6m-1.8 million premature deaths annually as a result of indoor exposure and 800,000 from outdoor exposure. Black carbon, which absorbs heat from the sun, also accounts for anywhere from 10% to 45% of the contribution to global warming, and is linked to accelerated losses of glaciers in Asia, because the soot deposits darken ice and make it more vulnerable to melting.

     

    One study estimates 26% of black carbon emissions come from stoves for heating and cooking, with more than 40% of this amount from wood burning, roughly 20% from coal, 19% from crop residues and 10% from dung.

     

    Some companies have developed stoves that use passive air flows, better insulation and 60% less wood to reduce black carbon emissions by around 70%. Mass introduction of such stoves could deliver multiple green-economy benefits.

     

    While CO2 can remain in the atmosphere for centuries, other pollutants, including black carbon and ozone, remain for relatively short periods – days, weeks, months or years – so that reducing or ending emissions promises almost immediate climate benefits.

     

    The international community’s overarching concern must be to seal a serious and significant deal at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in December to curtail CO2 emissions and assist vulnerable countries to adapt. If the world also is to deploy all available means to combat climate change, emissions of all the substances that contribute to it must be scientifically evaluated and urgently addressed.

     

    • Achim Steiner is UN under-secretary general and executive director of the UN Environment Program.

    Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2009

  • Australia’s methane gas could power the world: expert

     

    “These are large world scale projects, expect to see some consolidation,” he said.

    “But at the moment, we have got five projects, potentially 28 million tonnes within five years. That’s more than existing Australian northern production.”

    Mr Regan says that globally there are more reserves of coal methane than conventional natural gas reserves, and Australian reserves represent about 40 per cent of the world’s proposed new projects.

    “CBM [coal-bed methane] in Australia is very, very significant,” he said.

    “Australian energy development is hugely significant. Those projects there represent about 50 per cent of the total global proposed new capacity.”

     

  • Revelation that Australia is the worst polluter in the world

    Australia worse than the worst
    * Revelation that Australia is the worst polluter in the world

    Risk assessment company Maplecroft’s CO2 Energy Emissions Index has
    revealed that Australia has overtaken the United States as the worst per
    capita emitter of carbon pollution in the world. 

    Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown said: “Australia has overtaken the US
    on Kevin Rudd’s watch.”

    “David Spratt has warned that just two infrastructure projects announced
    in 2008 will alone result in destination emissions equal to 117 percent
    of our domestic emissions.”

    “With our coal export facilities expanding, things are getting worse.
    The government’s emissions trading scheme will not reverse this,”
    Senator Brown said.

    As reported in The Age newspaper today, Australia is responsible for
    19.78 tonnes of carbon per head every year.


    Another message from the Greens Media mailing list.

    Too many messages? Don’t unsubscribe – try switching to a daily digest.
    You can unsubscribe or change your subscription settings here:
    <http://lists.greens.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/options/media>
    Or send an email to <media-unsubscribe@lists.greens.org.au>

  • Decision opens door for legal action on Lithgow river

    Heavy metals and contaminants such as arsenic, copper, boron and very high levels of salt are thought to have been leaching out into a section of the Coxs River and killing aquatic life, based on a series of independent tests and regular monitoring by the company.

    Delta Electricity and the NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change have known about the discharges for at least two years. But the company has been operating within the boundaries of its environmental protection licence, which requires that Delta monitors its discharges but does not require that some of the pollution levels be reduced.

    The NSW Land and Environment Court decision, delivered by Justice Nicola Pain, marks the first time an environment group in NSW has been able to guard itself against escalating costs. Justice Pain ordered that any costs incurred at the end of the case be limited to $20,000, the maximum the conservation society says it can pay in the event that it loses the case.

    “This is a precedent which hopefully will be very encouraging for other environment groups,” said a society spokeswoman, Tara Cameron. “Now we are looking forward to pursuing the case and our main concern is back on stopping the pollution in the Coxs River. There are salts and heavy metals that we know don’t belong there and the Coxs River is dying.”

    Delta Electricity has maintained it operates within its license conditions and has provided the government monitoring authority with regular updates on discharges from its power station.

    The Department of Environment and Climate Change has recently reviewed Delta’s environmental protection license and believes it is appropriate. It says its licensing system is stringent and many prosec-utions have been carried out against companies that have breached licenses in the past two years.

    A report compiled by a University of Western Sydney researcher, Dr Ian Wright, found that arsenic levels downstream from the plant were “large and unnatural”, but were unlikely to pose a risk to human health. High levels of copper, boron, fluoride and salt “were likely to be toxic to aquatic ecosystems”.

    The Opposition spokesman on the Blue Mountains, Michael Richardson, said the case exposed flaws in the state’s system of controlling toxic discharges.

    “This case is not solely about the safety of Sydney’s water,” Mr Richardson said. “It’s about the Government’s environmental protection licenses not protecting the environment.”

    The Environmental Defenders of NSW, which is undertaking the case on behalf the society, said the decision was in the public interest.