Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Solar Trackers: Facing the sun

     

    Whatever the case, in any solar application the conversion efficiency is improved when the modules are continually adjusted to the optimum angle as the sun traverses the sky. As improved efficiency means improved yield, use of trackers can make quite a difference to the income from a large plant. This is why utility-scale solar installations are increasingly being mounted on tracking systems. (Left: A 4-MW tracking solar PV plant, Spain. Credit: Poulek Solar Co Ltd)

    The development of feed-in tariffs and other similar support measures that reward PV producers per kilowatt hour delivered to the grid, has stimulated this growing interest in maximizing output from a given area, along with the relatively high prices for silicon-based PV modules that have been witnessed over recent years. With key economic drivers dictating that developers maximize system output, interest in tracking technology has soared.

    Indeed, Paula Mints, principal PV analyst at Navigant Consulting, has reportedly forecast that between 2009 and 2012, tracking systems will be used in at least 85% of PV installations above 1 MW.

    In Spain, for example, which has seen its solar market surge in response to government policy initiatives, tracker projects went from making up an insignificant part of the market in 2006 to perhaps 25%–30% of new projects in 2008, estimates Maria Lahuerta Antoune, international marketing manager for ADES – a tracker manufacturer based in Zaragoza, Spain. ADES reportedly saw a 40% increase in production in 2008 as the country installed a total PV capacity estimated at around 2.5 GW.

    As with other technologies, increasing the complexity inevitably introduces additional possibilities for malfunction and failure. However, while tracker technology may be perceived as inherently more risky than extremely simple fixed angle systems, growing market exposure is boosting developers’ confidence in the reliability of tracking technology.

    Tracker types

    There are two basic types of tracker system. Single-axis trackers simply rotate about one axis, azimuthally moving from east to west over the course of a day. Double-axis trackers rotate both east to west and zenithally (vertically).

    The numbers are latitude-dependent, but compared with modules fixed at the optimum angle, single-axis trackers typically increase electricity output by between 27%–32%. Meanwhile, dual-axis trackers typically add a further 6% on performance and see a 35%–40% improvement in output when compared to fixed panels. (Right: By tracking the sun throughout the day, tracker systems will boost daily energy production; this system is in Puertollano, Spain.)

    Such figures are particularly impressive considering the lengths that the solar PV industry goes to in order to improve cell conversion performance by just a percentage point or less.

    With the economics apparently clear, the choice of what type of tracker to use is largely a decision concerning the extra investment and the cost of maintenance over time, in relation to the increased energy (and financial) yield delivered by the system.

    One of the first decisions is the choice between active or passive tracking systems. Active trackers, which use motors, gear trains or hydraulics to move the module, consume energy, while passive trackers use a low boiling point compressed fluid to move the system. Driven by solar heat creating gas pressure in the system, passive systems do not consume any energy, but they are also less precise than driven systems which rely on light-sensing technologies.

    A further type of actuator responds to the motion of the earth relative to the sun through a simple mechanical geared system which rotates the module at an equal speed, but in the opposite direction. Theoretically such a system would complete one revolution per day, though in practice the module is likely to be reset to the start position at night.

    Single-axis trackers

    Single-axis tracking is one of the most straightforward ways to improve the potential performance and economics of a commercial solar installation. By using relatively simple equipment, considerably more performance can be expected. Tracking system manufacturer RayTracker, for example, says its systems have been proven to improve energy yield over fixed angle modules by up to 23% and over flat modules by 38%. (Left: Trackers adapt to both the daily passage of the sun and potentially the changing seasons, too. Credit: Concentrix Solar)

    Manufacturers of the simpler, single-axis devices have claimed that the additional net energy yield delivered by a dual-axis system over a single-axis system is frequently lost as a result of additional installation, permitting and on-going maintenance costs. And, such systems are at greater risk of failure, having more moving parts than a single-axis tracker. Furthermore, single-axis trackers tend to have a lower profile, sometimes half the height of dual-axis trackers, and are therefore more likely to receive planning permits.

    The commercial opportunities represented by single-axis tracking technology are clearly not lost on the market.

    For instance, RayTracker Inc. was recently formed in a move by Energy Innovations, Inc., which spun off the group to further expand, develop and capitalize on the growing demand for its RayTracker GC product line, which the company says was included in more than 2 MW of solar installations in 2008. ‘The RayTracker business unit has seen, and continues to see, tremendous demand from customers looking for a cost effective way to maximize the return on their solar PV installations,’ commented Bill Gross, founder of Energy Innovations, in announcing the decision.

    The company says the machine’s precision, a shadow avoidance algorithm, no scheduled maintenance and low cost installation, are the key selling points for the design, adding that RayTracker, Inc. – an operating company of Idealab – was founded with the belief that ‘trackers provide a clear opportunity to increase the return on investment of every new commercial and utility solar installation.’

    SunPower’s big deal

    One of the world’s largest single-axis manufacturers is California-based SunPower Corp, which signed a number of significant deals during April 2009.

    FPL Group, one of the largest renewable developer utilities in the United States, has inked a solar power supply agreement with SunPower – which has in turn said it will establish a Florida R&D centre with up to 50 employees if the state continues to pursue a ‘robust’ solar programme. SunPower will work with FPL and the state to identify a suitable location for such a research facility and the company adds that continued strong demand in Florida could also lead to manufacturing and distribution centres for solar panels and tracking systems being located there too.

    The FPL supply agreement for SunPower’s solar modules and its tracker technology begins in 2010 and runs through to 2012 with deliveries to FPL Group subsidiaries Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) and NextEra Energy Resources.

    FPL Group president and COO Jim Robo said: ‘For NextEra Energy Resources, this agreement will further advance our solar development efforts in key markets such as Colorado, California, Arizona, and New Jersey. In addition, assuming continued support by Florida’s legislative and regulatory leadership for the deployment of solar power in Florida, this agreement benefits the state through the creation of more clean energy jobs and will help to ensure that our utility customers in Florida will get the best pricing and technology available for solar projects.’

    The latest move from FPL follows a deal with SunPower for the 25 MW DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center. The plant, currently under construction, will be the largest PV facility in the United States when it is completed at the end of this year, using 90,000 modules across 180 acres (72 ha) of land and providing more than US$2 million in annual tax revenues by the end of 2010.

    A similar development, the Space Coast Next Generation Solar Energy Center, will also use SunPower’s latest solar panel technology and the projects are two of three solar developments from FPL in the state that will produce some 110 MW combined.

    ‘FPL Group is the leader in providing renewable energy, having invested nearly $10 billion in growing that business. It’s already the world leader in deploying utility-scale solar and we believe that it will continue to be a driving force in the industry,’ noted SunPower CEO Thomas H. Werner.

    Meanwhile, close to 1000 miles (1600 km) north in Chicago, Exelon and SunPower have revealed plans to develop America’s largest urban tracking solar power plant, a 10 MW installation on a South Side brownfield site. The $60 million power plant at a former industrial site is scheduled for completion by the end of this year, contingent upon Exelon receiving a federal loan guarantee for up to 80% of the project cost, under the recently passed federal stimulus legislation bill – the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Utility group Exelon plans to lease 39 acres (15.6 ha) of the West Pullman Industrial Redevelopment Area from the City of Chicago for the project and will own and operate the plant, which will feature 32,800 modules.

    Late last year SunPower also announced that it is to build a 505 kW solar tracking installation for Australia’s Horizon Power, a government-owned company. The ground-mounted development on two sites in Marble Bar and Nullagine, in the east Pilbara region of Western Australia, will be the largest solar tracking system in Australia. Construction is expected to be complete by September 2009.

    And, in perhaps the company’s best known development, North America’s largest solar photovoltaic system at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada, SunPower was part of a joint project of the US Air Force, MMA Renewable Ventures LLC, and Nevada Power Company, to develop the 14 MW system at the site, which was commissioned in December 2007.

    This development is expected to generate more than 30 GWh annually and supply approximately 25% of the total power used at the base from its 140 acre (56 ha) site.

    SunPower designed and built the 72,000 module plant using its proprietary single-axis T20 Tracker system while MMA financed and is operating the facility, selling electricity to the base at a guaranteed fixed rate for the next 20 years.

    On the other side of the Atlantic, in Spain, the 18 MW Olivenza solar power plant in Badajoz, was completed by SunPower just prior to the Nellis project commissioning. Again, using its T20 Tracker system and covering a total of approximately 70 ha, SunPower says it has now completed construction of more than 165 MW of Spanish power plants, out of a worldwide portfolio of over 400 MW.

    New market interest in single-axis

    It is the perhaps the high profile of such headline projects that continues to excite interest in single-axis trackers, not just among developers and consumers, but also from manufacturers too. For example, Solon AG, which already manufactured its dual axis Mover system, expanded its product range late last year with the launch of its single-axis model. It began offering this newly developed complete single-axis photovoltaic system for large-scale projects early in 2009. The standard unit consists of 12 module rows containing 32 large Solon modules each, and the system is tracked hydraulically along the horizontal axis. In addition, automatic backtracking corrects the position of the units as needed to prevent the modules from shading one another. Depending on latitude, the company says its device can increase output by up to 25%. The system is designed for wind speeds of up to 80 km/hour in operating position and up to 130 km/hour in storm position.

    Meanwhile, Mecasolar has expanded its product range with a new single-axis tracker that will join the dual-axis solar systems currently designed and manufactured by the company at its production plants in Spain and Greece, as well as plants that are due to come online in Italy and the US in late 2009. The company says its ground mounted single-axis Azimuthal seasonal tracker increases production by 5% compared to similar traditional trackers, and by 28% compared to fixed structures. (Right: Rear aspect of a tracker mounted module. Credit: Sun Surfs)

    As with other designs, a key advantage of this new product is that it allows manual adjustment from 25° to 35° of the tilt on the polar axis in response to seasonal changes. Mecasolar says it will present its new product as this goes to press (early May) and in 2010 expects to reach a production capacity of 200 MW a year for its mounting systems, including fixed structures and trackers, both single and dual-axes, in 2010.

    The tracker allows a maximum of 12 kWp to be positioned on its 90 m2 mounting surface and can withstand winds exceeding 130 km/hour. Each tracker carries its own automatic tracking device with astronomical programming, as well as a three-phase electrical tracker, with consumption not exceeding 40 kWh/year.

    Moving larger still, Germany’s a+f – a subsidiary of Gildemeister – recently presented its new ‘SkyCarrier’ for the first time. With a module surface of 247 m2, 30.5 metres high and 8.1 metres across, the group notes that depending on the type of module used, more than 33 kWp can be installed on a single SkyCarrier unit.

    This tracking system for open-space solar installations is designed for use between the equator and latitudes of 30°. In some places, the angle of the sun here can be up to 90°, the company says. The rotational axis of the tracking system ensures that the pitch angle of the module surface moves at an angle of +/-30° relative to the horizontal plane, and the modules are therefore always precisely aligned with respect to the sun. The system guarantees an additional yield of up to 25% compared with conventional fixed solutions available in the market, says a+f.

    The drive system is provided by two electrically synchronized motors with a planetary gear and a steel chain, which the company says requires virtually no maintenance. The device joins its existing product, the single-axis SunCarrier tracking system, launched in 2006. With a module mounting surface of up to 287.5 m2, depending on the type of module used, an output of up to 40 kWp can be installed on the device, which uses an average of about 3500 kWh per year.

    Late last year a+f GmbH concluded a €12 million order that will see its SunCarrier devices installed in Italy for the first time. In the Apulia region in southern Italy, solar parks will be constructed with a total output of about 2 MW.

    Double-axis trackers

    Dual or double-axis trackers are also attracting considerable market interest, for example, since its market launch in 2005, more than 10,000 Solon Movers have been installed worldwide, the company says. Meanwhile, along with Mecasolar, Solon, Titan and so on, ADES is another of the larger manufacturers of such systems, with some 150 MW already in service.

    As manufacturers of double-axis machines are launching products into the single-axis sector, double-axis manufacturers are also pursuing new product developments.

    Titan Tracker SA, for instance, has developed two new models of solar trackers with an adjustable maximum height, specifically designed in order to reduce the visual impact of solar installations.

    These models are aimed at solar parks located in areas with environmental restrictions, such as visual impact, and are rated for a wind speed of 125 km/hour at any position. With a maximum surface area of 124 m2 for modules, Titan claims energy production of up to 45% more than fixed systems at 40° north latitude, together with reliability similar to fixed systems, and cost-effectiveness over the life cycle of the solar installation.

    The company has also just signed a strategic alliance with Jiménez Belinchon, licensing the manufacture and marketing of its dual-axis trackers in Europe and Central America.

    Titan, which specializes in the manufacture and marketing of dual-axis solar trackers, high concentration PV (HCPV) and thermal (CSP) tower and dish Stirling systems, saw more than 15 MW of its devices installed in Spain in the first year of launch. Several major projects followed, including the biggest solar park in Catalonia under the terms of an agreement with Flix Solar, from Finances Personals Group, to supply 128 two-axis solar trackers and which was commissioned in August 2008. Located in Flix, the 12 MW installation is one of the largest double-axis tracking solar parks in Spain.

    Meanwhile, earlier this year ADES announced a first project using its dual-axis technology in Greece, with machines installed in early March. The company says that height limitations of trackers on the Greek market have led to the sale of a new elliptical model, which allows a higher power density of 1 MW per 3.7 ha and is adjustable in height to the requirements of the Greek legislation. The project will feature three solar trackers each holding 33 kW of modules for a total power of 100 kWp for developers Mechanodomiki, based in Thessalonica.

    The largest dual-axis tracking system currently operating in the US was commissioned in February this year by Solar Power Partners (SPP), an independent power producer which sells the output from its owned and operated facilities to consumers through long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), in this case 20 years.

    With 89 units producing 1 MW at the West County Wastewater District (WCWD) in Mill Valley, Richmond, California, Premier Power was SPP’s EPC contractor on the 5 acre (2 ha) project. ET Solar trackers, measuring approximately 22 by 36 feet each (7 metres by 12 metres), are used at the site and the arrays contain 56 modules with a total peak power of about 11.24 kW each. The system produces approximately 1900 MWh annually, replacing some 35% of WCWD’s electricity usage.

    Of the trackers installed on the site, 28 rise above the potential high-water line of a storm-water storage pond and all of the tracking towers are designed to withstand flooding and submersion while meeting all seismic restrictions and solving soil engineering challenges.

    President of Premier Power, Dean R. Marks, observed: ‘Our engineering team discovered this large-scale tracker solution out of our European operations and felt that their design and capabilities provided the best option for meeting the site challenges and production needs of WCWD and SPP.’

    Market development

    Despite the prospects for growth of the tracking sector, inevitably, tracker developments are impacted by the wider economics of the PV sector, and this has clearly been hit hard by the on-going financial crisis. The higher capital costs of such installations, together with a residual perception of lower reliability and therefore greater project risk, are potentially making tracker developments more difficult to finance in the current risk-averse economic climate. On-going operations and maintenance costs also are higher.

    There are a number of other influences at work too. As the costs of silicon-based modules fall in response to expanded production, a key driver for the installation of trackers – maximizing their output to improve return on investment – becomes less critical. If the site is large enough, it may be as cost-effective to simply cover a larger area with fixed modules. Furthermore, the growing strength of the thin-film segment may also potentially erode the tracker market. The logic is that with a lower overall efficiency, thin-film modules require more tracker units for a given level of output, increasing their relative cost in a project’s development.

    However, these potentially negative factors may be outweighed by forecast growth in the concentrating solar PV (CPV) and the concentrating solar power (CSP) sectors, where precise alignment is critical.

    Although still a relatively small market, the impact of CPV and CSP installations on the tracking sector is clearly becoming influential. For instance, Spanish engineering company SENER Ingenieria y Sistemas, S.A., is to supply 2650 dual-axis electromechanical drives for a CSP facility that is being built in Fuentes de Andalucia, Seville, Spain. The biggest contract awarded to date for two-axis drives for heliostats, the deal will see SENER supply the units for the Gemasolar central tower project belonging to Torresol Energy and due for completion in 2011.

    SENER says it has specifically designed, developed and patented its high accuracy two-axis drive to cover the needs of Central Tower Receiver, dish-Stirling and CPV plants.

    Titan, meanwhile, has just finished commissioning a CPV system using its dual-axis tracker units at Spain’s Institute of Concentration Photovoltaics Systems – the Instituto de Sistemas Fotovoltaicos de Concentración (ISFOC) in the Castilla-La Mancha Region. The company says the units installed at the site provide accuracy of better than 0.01°, and it is possibly the most accurate and reliable solar tracker around the world.

    ISFOC is also the location for the installation of a new tracking system by Abengoa Solar which was customized for use with FLATCON concentrator modules from Concentrix Solar, which has now qualified tracking systems from two different manufacturers. In November 2008 Concentrix installed a system at the Abengoa test field in Seville. At the site in Puertollano some 38 Concentrix are installed, 27 of which use trackers from the company Pairan. Concentrix Solar’s installation for the ISFOC project in Puertollano is now complete with a total capacity of 300 kW. The company says that ISFOC confirmed a nominal power of 13.3 kW for each of the new tracking systems in March 2009.

    Looking to the US market, José C. Martin, director of SENER Engineering and Systems Inc., the SENER subsidiary based in San Francisco, noted: ‘The US market has big opportunities for developing CSP plants and we are closing agreements with local companies for the construction of projects in the short term, the first of which could start in 2010.’ It is clear that Martin’s words apply just as well to other concentrating solar technologies and other regional markets.

    Elsewhere, the production gains available from the installation of tracking technology simply cannot be ignored by developers and, as concerns over reliability and operating and maintenance costs subside, the use of tracking technology in the solar sector is anticipated to become far more prevalent. After all, the resources are there and it seems a shame not to use it.

    David Appleyard is associate editor of Renewable Energy World. e-mail: rew@pennwell.com.

  • Revealed: Rudd’s $500m coal compo reserve

     

    The Government has already offered the coal export industry a $750 million compensation package over five years, after refusing its demand to be part of the free permits scheme for big greenhouse emitters.

    The executive director of the Coal Association, Ralph Hillman, says the offer on the table is inadequate.

    “The industry’s made it very clear that that does not meet the competitiveness problems posed for the industry by the CPRS (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme),” Mr Hillman said.

    The Coal Association has warned 10,000 jobs will go and 16 mines will be forced to close over the first decade of carbon trading, and has not accepted the Government’s offer.

    Now AM understands the Government has left the door open to offer the industry more compensation instead of the free permits coal producers argue they are entitled to.

    Climate Change Minister Penny Wong’s office is saying little, except that the $750 million assistance on the table is “substantial” and “appropriate”, and the Government is talking to industry about how best to target that money to the “gassiest” or highest-emitting coal mines.

    Mr Hillman and senior industry representatives will discuss coal’s treatment under the carbon scheme with Parliamentary Secretary for Climate Change Greg Combet tomorrow.

    Mr Hillman says nothing extra has been offered at this stage, but another $500 million would not be enough.

    “We estimate the industry’s going to have to buy $13.5 billion worth of permits in the first 10 years of the scheme. Now you can see that the $750 million on the table is worth about 4 per cent of that; whereas the LNG industry for example is getting 66 per cent,” Mr Hillman said.

    “You can see the inequity and the unfairness of the treatment of these two industries, or coal versus other trade exposed emissions intensive industries.

    “So even if you were to double the $750 million, it would bring the assistance level from 4 per cent to say 8 per cent. Still not serious, not significant.”

    Debate on the scheme began in Parliament last night and is expected to continue well into this evening before a vote is taken on the legislation tomorrow.

    But it will almost certainly be defeated when a vote is taken in the Senate in coming weeks.

    The Greens regard the current blueprint as a “dud” and are poised to vote it down.

    As the Senate debate and vote approach, the Penny Wong is meeting the Greens today in a bid to find common ground.

    Greens leader Bob Brown warns any more assistance to the coal industry would be unacceptable.

    “It would be very strange for the Government to be approaching the Greens when there’s such a gap between their inaction and the appropriate action we want to see on climate change,” Senator Brown said.

    “With a story about that at the same time they’re going with a big cheque to the coal industry, which is unwarranted, unnecessary and should be going to renewable energy – the green economy.”

  • This silent suffering

     

    This publication, from the Global Humanitarian Forum, of which I am a board member, constitutes the most plausible estimate of the human impacts of climate change today. The scale of devastation is so great that it is hard to believe the truth behind it, or how it is possible that so many people remain ignorant of this crisis.

    Four main factors have contributed to the silence. First, while the world has been coming to terms with the ­science of climate change, the problem has moved from being a future threat to a current danger. Climate change is an evolving concern, affecting people now.

    Second, 99% of the casualties linked to climate change occur in developing countries. Worst hit are the world’s poorest groups. While climate change will increasingly affect wealthy countries, the brunt of the impact is being borne by the poor, whose plight simply receives less attention.

    Third, and worse, climate change hides its influence among a wide range of today’s key global problems. It impacts heavily on nutrition and diseases such as malaria, and increases poverty. But that impact can be lost among the many contributing factors.

    That is why a fourth major challenge is the current inability to separate the impacts of climate change in specific situations. It is impossible to say, for example, how much the severity of any hurricane is due to climate change.

    It is time, however, to break the silence. It may not be possible to pin-point specific situations, or to achieve unequivocal global consensus. It took the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 19 years to accomplish a consensus on the science in its 2007 report. But the general changes in the global climate system are clear: the number and intensity of extreme weather events, such as major floods and storms, has increased steadily in the last 30 years. Temperature changes show similar patterns, as do cyclone trajectories and rainfall patterns. From these changes it is possible to make good estimates about their global impacts on people.

    That tells us who is worst affected: the poor, who are largely unprepared, and unable to cope with climatic change. Of course, wealthy countries are affected: long-term drought in Australia has caused certain crop yields to plummet. But the poor lack the resources to prevent disasters or adapt to changed conditions. Many already subsist on the mere threshold of survival.

    Next week a series of UN talks will take place in Bonn – one of the last stepping stones in the effort to reach international agreement on how the world should tackle climate change, at the Copenhagen summit in December. Any post-Kyoto agreement must take into account the tremendous scale of suffering already being caused today.

    There is a great responsibility for major polluters to protect the poorest populations from a problem for which they cannot be held responsible. Their silent suffering must serve as a warning signal of the greater suffering that lies in store for the rest of us if we fail to tackle climate change together.

     

  • China, Japan on collision course over rare-earth metals

    One mining company president told The Times that governments that had promised a way out of economic turmoil with bold schemes to subsidise green cars, solar panels and other environmental technology had “spoken without understanding the upstream of modern products”.

    Don Burbar, the chief executive of Avalon Rare Metals, said: “The crux of the matter is that there are now a lot of technologies that can’t work without rare earths, and China is currently in effective control of the global supply. China has positioned itself to retain control, and meanwhile politicians around the world do not appreciate how the supply side of green technology works.”

    In Japan, the world’s biggest importer of rare-earth metals, more than 10,000 tonnes per year about a fifth of the country’s total annual consumption are thought to enter the country through a thriving black import network without which Japan would already be in a severe supply crisis, a senior government official said.

    China has been lowering its export quotas for rare-earth metals by about 6 per cent annually since the start of the decade, with Japan expected to be allotted only 38,000 tonnes in 2009. Toyota and Honda alone will consume about that quantity and experts in Australia have predicted a wider global supply crunch within three years as demand surges beyond existing refinery and extraction capacity.

    But rare-earth specialists at two of Japan’s largest trading houses said that loopholes and smuggling substantially raise the quantities of rare metals that enter Japan each year. Kazunori Fukuda, deputy director of the non-ferrous metals division at the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, said: “If the Chinese export quota limits were the reality of what comes into Japan each year, we would be even more worried than we already are. All green technology depends on rare-earth metals and all global trade in rare earth depends on China.”

    Ginya Adachi, from the Japanese Rare Earth Association, said that China’s dominance of rare earths would serve the developed world with a rude shock about global trade: Japan, America and Europe must now realise that some markets are not real, but political. But he added: “The Chinese Government wants full control but it doesn’t have it. It is not in control of the rare-earths market in the same way that OPEC is in control of oil. Local miners will sell even if the government tries to control the price or the quotas.”

    The Japanese Government has begun looking for alternative supply sources in Vietnam and elsewhere; rare earths are not as rare as the name suggests. There are potential supplies around the world, but prospective miners in Australia and the US are experiencing financing difficulties and as soon as new facilities have emerged in Asia and elsewhere, Chinese companies have quickly become majority investors.

  • Rudd’s target slammed at global meeting

     

    “It is not enough to aim for any kind of agreement at Copenhagen. We
    must work for an agreement which will actually give the world a decent
    chance of preventing climate crisis.

    “An agreement to fail is worse than a failure to agree.”

    The “Fossil of the Day” award is agreed by representatives of over 450
    NGOs on each day of each global climate negotiation. That Australia was
    awarded the first “Fossil of the Day” at the Bonn conference shows how
    unhelpful the Rudd Government’s target is.

    The award language reads:

    Australia was awarded First Place, for announcing its target which puts
    unreasonable conditions on other countries. Australia will adopt an
    inadequate 24% target by 2020 with the following and particularly
    obnoxious provisos that include, all countries (including developing
    countries) contribute finance and that developing countries slow growth,
    take a 20%  (against BAU) reduction by 2020 and nominate a peaking year
    for their emissions. It is worth noting that Australia’s emissions have
    yet to peak and they are yet to commit any additional money to
    adaptation.

    “The Greens have consistently called for the Government to put 40% cuts
    below 1990 levels by 2020 on the table in the context of a global
    agreement, and to commit to an unconditional offer of 25% cuts as a
    gesture of good faith for the global negotiations.

    “The Rudd Government refusing to do anything like what is necessary
    while demanding that everybody else works harder can only encourage
    other rich countries like Japan and Canada to also behave badly, drive
    China and India away from the table and undermine the chances of strong
    global action.

    “Making a good faith offer of 25% unconditional cuts will encourage
    countries like China and India to come to the table and increase the
    likelihood of a strong global agreement.”

    Tim Hollo
    Media Adviser
    Senator Christine Milne | Australian Greens Deputy Leader and Climate
    Change Spokesperson
    Suite SG-112 Parliament House, Canberra ACT | P: 02 6277 3588 | M: 0437
    587 562
    http://www.christinemilne.org.au/| www.GreensMPs.org.au
    <http://www.greensmps.org.au/>

     

  • Mist over Uluru, but heat heralds another El Nino

     

    “The risk of an El Nino is significantly elevated from the long-term average,” Dr Trewin said.

    Autumn was dry across southeastern and southwestern Australia, with Melbourne and Perth coming within millimetres of setting a record low for rainfall between January and May.

    Melbourne, for the first five months of the year, had the third-lowest rainfall on record with just 101mm. The lowest was 1967 with 98mm for the five-month period, followed by 1923 with 99mmm.

    Perth also missed setting a five-month record low by a couple of millimetres.

    All the six states and the Northern Territory had below normal rainfalls for autumn.

    “For the Murray-Darling Basin, we have now had below-normal rainfall in each of the last nine autumns, and 17 out of the last 19,” Dr Trewin said.

    In Victoria, only three of the past 19 autumns have had above-average rainfall, “and the last nine have all been below normal”, he said.

    Most of inland eastern Australia had rainfall that was between 40 and 60 per cent below normal this autumn, while most of the western half of Western Australia was at least 40 per cent below normal.

    “Over quite a bit of the west coast (there was) anything from 60 to 90per cent below normal,” Dr Trewin said.

    But there were exceptions: the east coast between the Hunter Valley and Fraser Island had well above average rainfall; and there was above average rainfall in southwest Tasmania, parts of the Nullarbor and parts of inland Western Australia.

    Southeast Queensland had an autumn rainfall that was well above average, with several daily and monthly records set for May, particularly in the Sunshine Coast and Brisbane areas, where flooding occurred.

    The wettest site in Queensland was Bellenden Ker Top Station, in the northeast of the state, which received 2348mm for autumn. The wettest single autumn day occurred at Godwin Beach on May 20, when 332mm fell.

    In central Australia, the past week has been wet and cold, with substantial rain over the weekend. Yulara, near Uluru, had 17mm for May, and a maximum of 13C over the weekend, while Alice Springs got 21mm across the weekend and endured a record low for May of just 9.6C on Saturday.

    Across Australia, Dr Trewin said daytime maximum temperatures were above normal for autumn and overnight temperature right on normal.

    “Daytime maximum temperatures averaged over Australia were 0.53C above normal and minimum temperatures 0.2C below normal – so warm days but near-normal nights,” he said.