Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Central cause of bushfires is climate change

    Statement by Geoffrey Heard to the Greenleap list 

    The very first statement that the Commission needs to make is that these fires were not the result of “prolonged drought” or a “ten year drought”, which implies exceptional departures from the norm. Nor were they “once in 100 year events”. Instead, they are the result of climate change. We are not in drought, we are not experiencing weather as exceptional as “once in 100 year event” suggests. We are in a well forecast and well documented general drying of the south-east of our country due to climate change. We are in times that are normal for the future or even relatively moderate compared with future forecasts.

    To respond to the bushfires, then, we must respond on a massive scale to climate change.

    So the major macro level change would be:

    *  Take all appropriate steps to to attack the causes of climate change and ameliorate its effects.

    As I see it, one of the major macro problems highlighted by the fires is the threat to our water supply. Our water catchments are just too damned small. A major fire IN CLIMATE CHANGE CONDITIONS can wipe significant parts of our catchments out in a couple of days.

    So it is an absolute necessity that we act to safeguard water:

    *  Enlarge all water catchments immediately (aim: double them within next 10 years, treble within 15 years).

    — Buy more abandoned farmland and plant to mixed forest.

    — Make private landholders ‘water farmers’ by paying them to plant and grow mixed forest in catchment areas.

    *  Move immediately to fully recycling of water.

    *  Move immediately to harvest high quality water at source in cities, ie. support the installation of LARGE tanks to harvest water from every roof.

    *  Move immediately to retain water that falls to the ground in cities, i.e. instead of draining Melbourne out to sea, drain it to wetlands, holding basins, existing aquifers, and in the sandbelt areas, straight into the ground.

    *  Stop all logging of native forests immediately. (There is more than enough plantation wood available.)

    The desalination plant? Relying on brown coal? We must attack the sources of global warming. We don’t need it anyway if we take all other steps.

    And, of course, the emissions trading scheme must be abandoned forthwith and a proper emissions reduction taxation system put in place.

    In the micro area, brave stuff needs to be said about house sizes, the building code, and so on.

    Geoffrey Heard is the Publisher, Editor & Business Writer for The Worsley Press

  • Global economy is in China’s hands

    Our new recession risk flows from the US car industry crisis in Detroit, to the stunning collapse in Japanese industrial production to the slump in Australian exports of iron ore and coal that feed global steel furnaces and electricity generation.

    The official statistics now reveal a jaw-dropping contraction in world trade and industrial production following the explosion of the global financial crisis in mid-September last year.

    Fears that this “real economy” shock will feed back into a weakened global banking system have stirred a new bout of share market jitters. On Thursday night, Wall Street broke through the crisis lows plumbed in November, revealing little hope in President Barack Obama’s new measures to pump-prime the US economy, repair bank balance sheets and stem the flow of housing mortgage foreclosures.

    “We are currently right in the midst of the biggest decline in industrial demand on record,” says Goldman Sachs JBWere chief economist Tim Toohey.

    Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens yesterday rehearsed a possible recession response to the growing likelihood that the Australian economy contracted in the December quarter along with those in most of the rest of the developed world.

    “The deterioration in international economic conditions was so rapid that no policy response would prevent a period of near-term weakness in the Australian economy,” Stevens told the House of Representatives economics committee in Canberra.

    Stevens pointed to the automobile sector as the industrial epicentre of the global financial shock. Global demand for new motor vehicles has dropped 20 per cent since August. Car sales in the major developed economies have reversed to early 1980s levels. In January, US car sales were down 37 per cent on a year before. General Motors this week again put out its hand for US taxpayers’ help as it announced 47,000 global retrenchments.

    The global shock has hit even harder in Japan, which this week revealed that its economy shrank by 3.3 per cent in the last three months of 2008, the third quarterly decline in a row. Industrial production caved in by 20 per cent. In Tokyo for the fundraising, the ANZ’s head of Australian economics Warren Hogan tells Inquirer that Japan’s economy is likely to shrink further in the first quarter of 2009, pointing to Toyota’s production cuts. “It is quite profound the extent to which the export shock is starting to ricochet through industrial northeast Asia,” he says, pointing to the number of empty taxis in the streets of Tokyo at night.

    Stevens noted that the Australian economy did not fall as much as 3 per cent from peak to trough over the entire recession of the early 1990s. “That is a very major contraction and it happened in three months,” he said of Japan’s slump. “So there is a very large global event going on.”

    The US economy appears to have gone backwards by 1 per cent in the December quarter and is losing half a million jobs a month after declining by 0.2 per cent through the course of 2008. The British and euro economies were down 1.5 per cent or so in the December quarter. South Korea and Taiwan fell more than 5 per cent. The Reserve Bank estimates that Australia’s major trading partners, weighted for their share of Australian exports, contracted 1.75 per cent in the same three months. This is quickly hitting Australian iron ore exports, which fell an estimated 25per cent in volume terms in the quarter, along with a significant weakening in manufactured exports.

    The Rudd Government now forecasts that the volume of Australian exports will inch 0.5per cent higher in 2008-09 and 2009-10, supported by the competitive stimulus from the sharply lower Australian dollar. That would leave the economy barely idling.

    But Goldman Sachs JBWere forecasts that export volumes will fall 4 per cent in 2009 while export revenues — which will be further hit by price reductions — will by down 25 per cent by the end of the year.

    And Toohey is struck by what he estimates is an 8 per cent fall in global industrial production in the year to the December quarter. Strip out China and that becomes a 10.5 per cent slide. Outside China, East Asia could be down 13.9 per cent on the year, double the fall during the Asian financial crisis.

    “Without a clear turn in industrial production, Australian export growth will almost certainly fall by more than we currently predict,” Toohey warns.

    This would hit an Australian economy that most likely already is in recession, despite the big injections of budget stimulus from Canberra and the Reserve Bank booster shot of lower interest rates.

    Official figures this week revealed that the volume of retail turnover rose a less than expected 0.8 per cent in the December quarter, buoyed modestly by the Government’s $8billion-plus of pre-Christmas cash bonuses to families and pensioners. ANZ economists clipped their forecast for December quarter economic growth from zero to -0.1 per cent. Goldman Sachs JBWere tips -0.4 per cent.

    The minutes of the Reserve Bank’s February 3 board meeting released this week suggest the December quarter gross domestic product result would be “broadly flat”. In the face of “very strong” headwinds from abroad, the fiscal and monetary policy stimulus would have only a “modest effect” in the short term. Retail sales had “weakened again” in 2009. That is, the Reserve Bank is girding for a GDP fall when figures are released on Wednesday, March 4.

    The bigger issue is that the global downturn has been so abrupt and synchronised that no one is confident about it will play out.

    Harold Sirkin, the Chicago-based head of the Boston Consulting Group’s global operations practice, points to global supply chains, tight inventory management and the new era of internet-facilitated international business for quickly transmitting the US-centred financial shock around the world. “It really is one world now,” he told Inquirer this week.

    Given the slump in industrial production, it’s no surprise that the car and steel industries are generating most protectionist pressure around the world, such as Washington’s subsidies to Detroit and its proposed “Buy American” provisions that mandate only US-made steel can be used in infrastructure financed by Obama’s $US787 billion ($1.23trillion) fiscal stimulus.

    But Sirkin suggests US protectionism will be mild and the international economic downturn will maintain the pace of globalisation as businesses and customers scour the world for lower cost supplies.

    With Japan and the US going backwards, that leaves China as the big hope for cushioning Australia’s export slump. The Reserve Bank’s Stevens yesterday pointed to “tentative indications of a turn for the better in China in some of the most recent data”.

    “China is the best placed country in the region to cope with this crisis,” the World Bank’s chief economist for East Asia and Pacific, Vikram Nehru, added yesterday.

    Nehru suggested that the World Bank might not cut its 7.5 per cent Chinese growth forecast for 2009 much below 7 per cent, given the stimulus from Beijing’s $US586 billion fiscal expansion.

    “And this is in an environment in which global GDP is going to be stagnant or shrinking,” he told Inquirer.

    “China has an incredible capacity to mobilise economic agents — companies, banks, local governments.”

    One statistic stands out from the current global slump in industrial production. For the first time, China is producing more cars than the US. The question is whether China can pull the world economy out of its worst downturn since the 1930s.

  • Mercury faces international ban

    The White House said it would press hard for a legally binding treaty when negotiations get under way later this year.

    “The United States will play a leading role in working with other nations to craft a global, legally binding agreement that will prevent the spread of mercury into the environment,” said Nancy Sutley, chair of the White House council on environmental quality.

    The Bush administration had blocked international efforts to limit mercury – although such protections are in place in America.

    Mercury, which can travel thousands of miles from its original source, damages the central nervous system, and is especially dangerous to pregnant women and babies.

    The treaty will include measures to reduce the supply of mercury and its use in products, such as thermomenters, and processes, like paper making. It will also seek to cut back on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants, which are responsible for about half of the world’s mercury pollution.

    The new-found consensus in Nairobi, which saw the US, India and China lifting their resistance to a binding global mercury treaty, raised hopes for progress later this year at the crucial UN meeting in Copenhagen on an international climate change deal.

    “There was a seismic shift from the American government from its previous position,” said Nick Nuttall, the spokesman for the UN environment programme. “It was clear from the beginning of this week that the US negotiators had been given a clear line from Washington, and indeed the White House, to come together with the rest of the world and do something.”

    “The US has taken a leadership role that will chart a new course on mercury protections around the world. We have set a strong example that is already influencing others to do the same,” said Susan Egan Keane, an analyst at the US National Resources Defence Council.

    Barack Obama had earlier taken a number of steps at home to break with the George Bush legacy on the environment – most notably restoring the power of government agencies to regulate carbon dioxide from power plants.

    The strong push from the US side in Nairobi this week evidently helped wear down resistance from governments such as China and India. China is heavily dependent on coal-fired power plants, while Indian manufacturers still use many processes that depend on the metal.

    The eight-point plan agreed on Friday calls for reduction in mercury emissions from power plants, and in its use in thermometers and other household products, as well as in plastics production and paper-making. It would cut down on the use of mercury in gold panning, a process that results in huge quantities of the heavy metal being washed into streams.

    Mercury is a naturally occurring element, but pollution has caused levels to rise sharply in many fish species, increasing the danger to humans that eat them.

    “Today the world’s environment ministers, armed with the full facts and full choices, decided the time for talking was over – the time for action on this pollution is now,” said Unep’s director, Achim Steiner.

    Formal treaty negotiations will get underway later this year, with a view to reaching a final agreement in 2013.

  • The Australian Senate Condemns Japanese Violence

    Senator Siewert:

    I move:

    That the Senate-

    (a) notes that:

    (i) on 25 November 2008, the Senate urged the Australian Government to set a timeline for legal proceedings in an international court to stop illegal Japanese whaling if Japan does not commit to stop whaling by 8 December 2008, (ii) Japanese whaling operations continued past this deadline, and (iii)no such legal action has been undertaken by the Government;

    (b)urges the Government to:

    (i)strongly oppose the proposal in the document, ‘The Future of the IWC’, currently before the International Whaling Commission, which seeks to legitimise Japanese whaling operations, and

    (ii)explain why it has not yet commenced international legal action to stop illegal Japanese whaling; and

    (c)condemns the violent actions of the Japanese whaling fleet, who have reportedly thrown metal balls at environmental activists, and used acoustic weapons to send out painful high frequency waves.

    Question agreed to.

    Senator Ludwig

    I seek leave to make a short statement about the motion.

    Leave granted.

    The Australian government’s position on the issue of commercial whaling, including so-called scientific whaling, is clear: we remain absolutely opposed to it and have taken unprecedented steps to see it end, including through high-level diplomatic engagement and advancing reform proposals through the International Whaling Commission. The chairs of the International Whaling commission released a document this week entitled “Chairs’ suggestions on the future of the IWC”. As the chairs make clear, this document represents their suggestions on how to make progress at the commission. It is not a proposal for action and it does not reflect any agreement between those nations involved in discussions, including Australia.

    The Australian government will continue to pursue our objectives diplomatically as we head towards the IWC annual meeting this June. We will continue to review progress, including through the IWC, and maintain the act of consideration of potential international legal action. The government calls on all vessels in the Southern Ocean to exercise restraint and conduct their activities peaceably and responsibly in accordance with the decisions of the International Whaling Commission and relevant domestic and international law.

  • Australian government betrays Sea Shepherd

    From Sea Shepherd

    The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society ship Steve Irwin arrived in Hobart, Tasmania at 1700 Hours on February 20th. The ship was met at dockside by a party of Federal Australian Police officers who boarded the Steve Irwin with a warrant.

    The warrant authorized the seizing of “all edited and raw video footage, all edited and raw audio recordings, all still photographs, producer’s notes, interview transcripts, production meeting minutes, post production meeting minutes as well as the ship’s log books, global positioning system records, automatic radar plotting aid, purchase records, receipts, financial transaction records, voyage information and navigational plotted charts.”

    The Animal Planet series Whale Wars was very embarrassing to the Japanese government and the Japanese whaling industry in 2008. Japan does not wish to see the airing of the second season of Whale Wars and is putting as much diplomatic pressure on Australia as they possibly can to prevent further exposure of their illegal whaling operations in the Southern Ocean.

    “I wish that the Australian government would apply the same “diplomatic” pressure on Japan to end their illegal whaling operations,” said Captain Paul Watson. “The Rudd government was elected on a promise to take the Japanese whaling industry to court for their illegal whaling activities. Now they seem to be more interested in taking Sea Shepherd to court for our efforts to intervene against illegal whaling operations.”

    Captain Paul Watson said he would welcome a trial.

    “We have to start somewhere so it may as well be by taking me to court. Let us get the evidence on the table and although a trial against Sea Shepherd and myself may not allow the introduction of evidence about Japan’s illegal whaling operations, it at least will give us the forum to present our evidence. Let’s see the Australian government bring the Japanese whale killers to Australia to bear witness against Sea Shepherd and Animal Planet and let’s see them appear as witnesses for the government of Australia that professes to be against whaling.”

    “It’s a very one-sided affair,” continued Captain Watson. “The Japanese ships have not been boarded by the Australian Federal Police; they have not had their video and navigational data confiscated. They have not been questioned nor will they be, yet they violently attacked my ship and crew in the Southern Ocean. Does the law only go to bat for those who destroy nature’s creation? Are we about to see the ultimate kangaroo court where Sea Shepherd will be legally crucified because the Australian government has not lived up to their promise of taking the whale killers to court? The truth is that we would not have to be in the Southern Ocean defending the whales if the governments of the world would simply enforce the international conservation treaties they once so proudly signed into law. Without enforcement there is no law – just ecological anarchy.”

    Captain Watson said he had no complaints about the Australian Federal Police.

    “They were very professional and polite and they were doing their job in carrying out the orders of the government.”

    “We have quite the year ahead of us,” continued Captain Watson. “We need to repair damages to the Steve Irwin, we need to secure a second and faster vessel, and we need to be prepared to return to the Southern Ocean again at the end of the year to defend whales. If need be we will be in court to answer to charges of defending endangered whales in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary and to this we proudly plead guilty.”

  • Farmer cops big fine for destroying wetlands

    A FARMER has been fined more than $400,000 for bulldozing a wetland near Moree that was a breeding ground for rare birds.

    In one of the state’s biggest land-clearing cases, John Hudson was found guilty of clearing 486 hectares on his property, Yarrol Station, in 2006 and 2007. The site, one of a handful of places in NSW where rare species of ibis, herons, ducks and egrets could breed, was flattened by bulldozers linked by chains.

    The offence was “self-evidently done for the purpose of making more land available for agriculture”, Justice David Lloyd found in a decision handed down in the Land and Environment Court yesterday.

    “The penalty should properly reflect the deliberate nature of the offence, which was committed despite the express instructions given to Mr Hudson that native trees were not to be cleared.

    “The clearing was carried out as part of the agricultural activities on the land and in that sense the offence was part of a commercial operation – that is, it was motivated by commercial considerations.”

    The offence fell within “the upper range of seriousness”, Justice Lloyd said.

    According to the judgment, Hudson’s case was based on the belief that legislation to protect native vegetation was unconstitutional and that, because he and his wife owned the land, “the trees were their trees”.

    Hudson had also claimed he had received permission to bulldoze the wetland area from the Catchment Management Authority, but the court decided this was not the case. A local catchment officer had written to Hudson in 2004 forbidding him from clearing “native trees and shrubs of greater than 10 years of age”.

    Hudson, who now lives in Queensland, did not attend the court and could not be contacted for comment yesterday. He had argued that he was clearing the land of invasive lippia weed.

    The land clearance could have a big impact on breeding, an expert from the University of NSW, Professor Richard Kingsford, said. “What’s critical about this particular area is that the birds went there in their tens of thousands. It was an optimal site. The impact is much greater than just clearing part of the flood plain because we don’t know if these birds are coming back if it floods, and if they do, they won’t have any nesting areas to go back to.”

    The wetland was a rookery for straw-necked ibis, night herons, royal spoonbills and various rare duck species, options for which are limited. The Hudson property was part of the Gwydir wetland, one of the largest inland wetlands in NSW, which has declined by 90 per cent in recent decades.

    The judgment, with fines totalling $408,000, was a warning to people engaged in land clearing, the NSW Government said.

    “It shows that the system has teeth,” a spokesman for the NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change, John Dengate, said. “The Government has said it aims to close down broad-scale land clearing, and this case demonstrates that.”