Daily update: World’s ‘biggest’ wave energy project sinks without trace
|
Inbox
|
x |
|
2:54 PM (11 minutes ago)
![]() |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Inbox
|
x |
|
2:54 PM (11 minutes ago)
![]() |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Updated 15 days ago

The radio-controlled model of a P-51 Mustang red-tail is just a couple feet long and draws its power from a simple two-stroke engine. Yet this small replica of a legendary World War II fighter could prove something big — that it’s possible to power enormous modern naval vessels using the seawater that’s all around them, a potential breakthrough for the U.S. Navy.
Photo: U.S. Navy
— By Janet Fang on April 10, 2014, 9:05 PM PST
“There’s enough methane at the bottom of the sea to meet the world’s energy needs for 1,000 years, at current energy usage,” asserts Brian Rosen, a post-doctorate at Tel Aviv University’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering.
That sounds like good news, given reports about the world having passed peak oil – most projections put global reserves at 40 or 50 years. The rub is that this methane locked in gas pockets beneath the seabed is expensive to access and tricky to get back to shore where it can be refined and utilized as fuel, says Rosen, who will be starting as a senior assistant professor at the beginning of 2015.
If the methane could be harvested near the coast, that would be one thing. Most of it isn’t. Long deep-sea pipelines are no solution. They’re expensive to lay down – about $3 million per kilometer in shallow water, and $6 million per kilometer in the deep sea. In deep water, the pipes have a nasty tendency to buckle and there are leaks and other breakdowns in the pitch-black depths, which is a harsh, corrosive environment if ever there was one.
Maintenance, in short, costs a fortune and improvements to deep-sea pipeline technology, from how pipes are laid to the materials comprising them, don’t solve these core difficulties.
Another method is to liquefy the gas where it’s found and ship the cooled fluid. But methane liquefies at -164 degrees Celsius. Then the sub-zero liquid has to be shipped to shore by tankers specially equipped to handle such cold stuff. The liquid methane gets converted back into gas on shore, or gets transported inland by tricked-out trucks. It’s all very difficult and expensive.
Rosen, a chemical engineer who made aliyah from Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, in the spring of 2013, is working on a different, win-win solution: developing new catalysts to take carbon dioxide and combine it with methane, creating a liquid fuel precursor at low cost. “His idea is original at both the academic and international levels,” says Prof. Noam Eliaz, head of the Materials department.
A catalyst is a material that can drive a reaction faster without being consumed in the process.
Huge upside: both carbon dioxide [CO2] and methane are greenhouse gases. The fuel precursor is a mix of CO and hydrogen, from which liquid fuels can be synthesized.
Converting CO2 from greenhouse gas to boon
“Basically, the entire chemical industry emits carbon dioxide as a waste product into the atmosphere, because there’s nothing else to do with it. It has no market value,” says Rosen.
Not that engineers haven’t been trying. But present methods to convert CO2 into something useful require too much energy.
Rosen’s doctoral research involved cracking the secret of reducing the energy needed to convert CO2 into CO (one of the components of the liquid fuel precursor) by an economically sensible process. Now he’s working on the methane element.
His secret is to find catalysts that don’t get choked up with carbon deposits, a process called coking, which renders the catalysts useless.
Not only could he change the world: for Israel his inventions are of keen interest following the discovery of massive amounts of oil and gas in the Mediterranean seabed – the deep-sea Leviathan and Tamar fields.
Many remote fields like those found in the Mediterranean are being drilled for oil, and any methane found there gets uselessly burned off (those are the flames one sees in pictures of oil rigs), because the fields are so far from land and there are no existing technologies to utilize it economically. Yet the two fields are believed to have 27 trillion cubic feet of methane, says Rosen.
Rosen has begun testing his catalysts, and big business has noticed.
“Oil may be running out,” Rosen says. “Big companies like Shell and Sasol are investing billions in gas-to-liquid plants, projecting this will be the technology that replaces oil drilling. Our hope as scientists is to develop new technologies to support these projects.”
When it comes to the oil and gas industry, Israel never had the resources to be a major player, he points out. “It had to rely on others for technologies and catalysts. Now we have the resources – and Israel needs to develop its own technology in-house for the sake of national security due to the dynamic political topography of the region.”

Over the past decade, German power firms made considerable investments in new conventional capacity. At the same time, German SMEs, energy cooperatives, and ordinary citizens made considerable investments in renewable generation capacity. The result is excess capacity. Craig Morris takes a look at some of the country’s energy experts who did not see this outcome coming.

The lights at the nuclear power station Grafenrheinfeld and other conventional power plants in Germany might go out faster than planned. One of the reasons: excess capacity. (Photo by MarcelG, CC BY-SA 2.0)
In our recent study entitled German Coal Conundrum, my colleague Arne Jungjohann and I show how Germany and the EU incentivized new power plant construction – including coal power – in the 2000s. We also reviewed some of the main studies from that decade to see what advice they would have heeded. Here’s the overview chart:
Clearly, business leaders were reading about the need for considerable new builds and the risk of Germany becoming dependent on power imports. Instead, we got record power exports in 2012 and 2013, and German wholesale prices are now consistently lower than those in neighboring countries. These experts underestimated the growth of renewables, especially the boom in solar. This month, German journalist Dagmar Dehmer focused on Stephan Kohler’s recommendations as head of the German Energy Agency (dena). The table above mentions dena’s Grid Study from 2005, but Dehmer focuses on Kohler’s warnings about “power shortfall” from 2008. At the time, she quoted two independent energy experts who disputed Kohler’s concerns and argued that power firms may have been building so many new plants in order to get carbon emission certificates allocated for free.

As recently as August 2012, dena produced completely inaccurate estimates of future peak and base power prices. By 2020, base power was to cost 46.91 euros per megawatt-hour, equivalent to 4.69 cents per kilowatt-hour. In reality, wholesale prices are falling, and the average base price in May was around three cents per kilowatt-hour, a third lower than dena forecast less than two years ago. Power prices futures up to the end of this decade are also down. Source: dena.
The result of the extremely low wholesale power prices resulting from surplus capacity is that new investments do not pay for themselves, so firms are delaying and canceling new builds to the extent possible. The chart below from the German Coal Conundrum illustrates this outcome well.
Nonetheless, experts continue to warn of a shortfall in generation capacity, this time related specifically to southern Germany – and this time, they may be right. The table below is taken from the German Network Agency’s analysis (PDF in German) of the need for backup capacity in the winter of 2015/16 published last September. It shows that roughly 6 GW of capacity will be switched off in the south, while approximately 6.3 GW will be added in the rest of the country. There is no overall change in dispatchable capacity, but there is a major shift in regional availability.
This shift is the result of the nuclear phaseout of 2011, which specifies which plants have to go off-line when. In contrast, the original nuclear phaseout of 2002 (abandoned at the end of 2010 just a few months before Fukushima) gave power plant owners some leeway in deciding which plant went off when. One way of solving this problem would be to implement that old idea of allowing nuclear plant operators some flexibility in scheduling the phaseout themselves. But this idea is not even being discussed. Perhaps it wouldn’t work anyway. The next nuclear plant to be decommissioned does not have to shut down until the end of 2015, but the owner (Eon) recently announced plans to switch it off next spring ahead of schedule. It was further proof of the surplus generation capacity on the market, but the plant is located in Bavaria – in southern Germany. The market is now moving – predictably – in an undesired direction. With tweaking the nuclear phaseout not being discussed, policymakers will have to think of something else. Craig Morris (@PPchef) is the lead author of German Energy Transition. He directs Petite Planète and writes every workday for Renewables International.
top notifications for Gmail. Learn more Hide
|
Why this ad?
InternationalEnergyCentre – internationalenergycentre.com/ – Through partnership we can achieve a low carbon economy
|
|
Inbox
|
x |
|
2:48 PM (19 minutes ago)
![]() |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There may now be as many as 6.5 million direct and indirect jobs in renewable energy, according to updated data from the International Renewable Energy Agency (Irena).
Earlier assessments had put the global estimate at 2.3 million jobs in 2008 (United Nations Environment Programme) and at 5 million jobs in 2012 (International Labour Organisation).
Although these estimates suggest a strong expansion in employment in renewable energy, the figures also represent successive efforts to broaden data collection across countries and sectors, reads the Worldwatch Institute’s latest Vital Signs Online trend.
The overall upward trend in renewable energy jobs has been accompanied by considerable turmoil in some industries.
Nowhere are the upheavals more noticeable than in the solar photovoltaic (PV) sector, where intensified competition, massive overcapacities, and tumbling prices have caused a high degree of turbulence in the last two to three years, but they have also triggered a boom in installations.
Global PV employment is thought to have expanded from 1.4 million jobs in 2012 to as many as 2.3 million in 2013.
Solar PV has bypassed biofuels (ethanol and biodiesel) as the top renewable energy job generator.
Most of the 1.45 million biofuels jobs are found in the growing and harvesting of feedstock such as sugar cane, corn, or palm oil.
This involves physically demanding manual work, and workers often contend with oppressive workplace conditions.
Processing of the feedstock into fuels offers far fewer jobs, but the ones created are higher skilled and they pay better.
Employment in the next-largest renewables sector, wind power, is estimated to run to some 834,000 jobs.
Uncertainty about the future direction of policies in several countries weakened job creation in this field in 2013, leading to a sharp drop in new installations in the United States and to weak markets in large parts of Europe and in India.
In contrast, developments in China and Canada were more positive.
Countries that are home to half of the world’s population-China, members of the European Union, Brazil, the United States, and India-account for the bulk of renewable energy employment: 5.8 million direct and indirect (supply chain) jobs out of 6.5 million worldwide.
Better information is necessary for a range of countries to generate a more complete and accurate renewable energy employment picture.
Attention is also needed on the question of whether development of renewable energy leads to job loss elsewhere, including in the conventional energy industries.
All in all, available information suggests that renewable energy has grown to become a significant source of jobs. Rising labour productivity notwithstanding, the job numbers are likely to grow in coming decades as the world’s energy system shifts toward low-carbon sources.