Category: Uncategorized

  • Julia Gillard-led Labor told to work together in harmony to avoid defeat

    Julia Gillard-led Labor told to work together in harmony to avoid defeat

    Lanai Scarr
    News Limited Network
    March 11, 201310:29AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email

    40 comments

    • Labor needs to focus on good governance, says Gary Gray
    • Voters need to see a united front, minister says
    • Party needs to listen to voters to avoid massacre at next election
    •Gillard should have come to WA: Barnett
    •PM fumes over Smith’s comments on WA result

    Labor voters don’t accept Prime Minister Julia Gillard as their leader, says Alannah MacTiernan. Picture: Don Arnold/Getty Images Source: Getty Images

    Related Coverage

    .

    PM denies Smith rebuke after WA wipe-out

    .

    .

    Voters fail PM’s Sydney sleepover

    .

    ONE of Julia Gillard’s most senior ministers says federal Labor needs to put end to the “backbiting” and “undermining” rife within the party if it is to avoid a similar electoral wipeout suffered by its state WA counterparts at the weekend election.

    Special Minister of State Gary Gray this morning said it was important his colleagues remained calm in the face of future party polling likely to be dismal for the Gillard government.

    Distract KRudd with a new job: Latham

    Mr Gray, one of three West Australian federal Labor MPs, said WA Premier Colin Barnett was returned to victory on the weekend in a landslide because he was able to keep his party focused on policy, rather than internal matters.

    He said he agreed with Defence Minister Stephen Smith’s comments on Saturday about federal Labor’s woes filtering through to the WA election.

    “Premier Barnett the Liberal party and the National party were able to work together in harmony by not sniping internally by not backbiting, by focusing on good governance and focusing on that rather than on themselves,” Mr Gray told ABC radio.

    “I am not to suggest that there can be no implications for both us federally and also implications on a state result from federal behaviours but also I think what both Stephen (Smith) and (Immigration Minister) Brendan (O’Connor) identify is the core the core of the reason for Colin Barnett’s ascendency is that is that he has been able to manage a caucus and his parliamentarians have behaved towards each other and towards the political objectives of the government in a unified and harmonious way.”

    Labor lost at least seven seats in the weekend state election, as Mr Barnett celebrated the Liberals’ performance in winning enough seats to govern on its own.

    The WA Liberals and the Nationals will form a coalition with a predicted 40 seats of 59, while Labor could slide from 27 to 19.

    MPs believe the state disasters point to an expected massacre at a federal level in September, when a 7 per cent swing would potentially wipe 30 seats from Labor.

    School Education Minister Peter Garrett said there was “no doubt you do get some spill over” to the federal government from state polls, but that Ms Gillard was working hard to put substantial policies in place.

    “People will put their views out there, what is important is to maintain complete focus on the policies this government wants to deliver right up until the election,” Mr Garrett told ABC News 24.

    Federal opposition frontbencher Michael Keenan, a WA Liberal MP, said Labor should note the message from the state poll.

    “If I was one of the three sitting members for Labor in Western Australia, I would be very worried about the implication of this election for me,” he told ABC radio.

    This morning’s commentary follows a rebuke by Ms Gillard to Mr Smith to tone down his comments on the WA election.

    The Prime Minister was reported to be furious with Mr Smith who conceded the Gillard government had been a “drag” on WA Labor leader Mark McGowan.

    Former WA Labor candidate Alannah MacTiernan slammed Ms Gillard, saying she was to blame for the party’s woes and should immediately step down.

    Ms MacTiernan, now the mayor of the city of Vincent, said the overwhelming sentiment from doorstops and shopping centres in Labor’s heartland was that voters supported state Labor but not federal Labor and Julia Gillard.

    Julia Gillard: Hanging on by a thread

    June 24, 2010

    Gillard becomes Australia’s first female Prime Minister after challenging Kevin Rudd. The incident becomes known as the ‘knifing’ of Rudd.

    August 2, 2010

    The PM says it’s time voters had a chance to see the “real Julia”. The move backfires when people ask: if it’s now time to see the real Julia, who was she before?

    December 15, 2010

    At least 30 asylum seekers die when their ramshackle boat breaks up after being tossed against cliffs in rough seas off Christmas Island. The incident reignites debate about boat arrivals in Australia.

    January 2011

    Gillard visits flood-ravaged Queensland, and is criticised by some commentators for lack of warmth. Her one-off flood levy to help Queenslanders recover is highly controversial.

    February 24, 2011

    Gillard breaks an election promise in announcing a carbon tax. Tony Abbott slams the announcement as “an utter betrayal of the Australian people”.

    March 21, 2011

    Gillard cops flack when she reveals she is opposed to gay marriage and, despite being an atheist, that she thinks it’s important for people to understand the Bible.

    March 23, 2011

    A carbon tax protest rally led by Tony Abbott in Canberra turns personal when anti-government demonstrators start chanting “ditch the bitch”. Placards at the rally read “Ju-Liar” and “Bob Brown’s bitch”.

    May 7, 2011

    The Gillard Government announces it is close to signing the “Malaysia Solution”. Issues surrounding human rights and unaccompanied children then dog the government.

    May 18, 2011

    The Prime Minister flicks the switch on the National Broadband Network on mainland Australia. Many commentators and the Opposition call it waste of money but Gillard says naysayers are out of touch.

    May 30, 2011

    The government suspends live exports after Four Corners exposes brutal mistreatment of Australian cattle in Indonesian slaughterhouses. Pastoralists’ livelihoods suffer as their cattle remain in limbo.

    June 15, 2011

    Newspoll shows support for Julia Gillard has crashed to a record low of just 30 per cent. The figure is lower than Kevin Rudd’s was when she replaced him.

    September 27, 2011

    Kevin Rudd adds fuel to leadership speculation when he makes a gaffe on ABC Radio: “I’m a very happy little vegemite being prime minister … being foreign minister of Australia.”

    November 23, 2011

    The mining tax is passed after parliament sits late into the night. The Opposition vows to repeal the tax if elected and accuses the Government of secretive “backdoor deals”.

    November 24, 2011

    Canberra is stunned by a deal installing Peter Slipper, a member of the Queensland Liberals, as Speaker of the House of Representatives. It shores up the government’s numbers but the ousting of Harry Jenkins, a popular and effective Speaker, is seen has harsh.

    December 2, 2011

    Gillard is widely criticised for “airbrushing” Kevin Rudd from ALP history at the party’s National Conference in Sydney.

    January 22, 2012

    Gillard reneges on a deal with key independent Andrew Wilkie to introduce measures to tackle problem gambling. Wilkie pulls his support from the government in retaliation. The move puts a new complexion on the installation of Slipper as Speaker.

    January 26, 2012

    One of Gillard’s key advisors is forced to resign after admitting he tipped off Aboriginal activists to incorrect reports that Tony Abbott wanted to close the tent embassy.

    February 24, 2012

    Kevin Rudd announces he will contest the leadership, saying Gillard has lost the confidence of the Australian people.

    February 27, 2012

    Gillard retains the top job after winning the challenge 71-31, but it comes at a cost as Mark Arbib resigns.

    March 26, 2012

    Queensland Labor is stunned with a landslide state election reducing the party to a rump in the parliament. Gillard says she respects the “shouted” message from voters, but rejects claims it serves as a warning to her own Government.

    April 23, 2012

    The PM is forced to defend her decision to appoint Peter Slipper as Speaker after allegations he abused his Cabcharge account and sexually harassed a former adviser.

    April 29, 2012

    Gillard accepts Craig Thompson’s resignation and stands Peter Slipper aside indefinitely. She says the scandals have “crossed a line”, but some commentators see it as another complete U-turn.

    May 8, 2012

    Voters were unconvinced by Gillard’s 2012 Federal Budget offering $5 billion in cost-of-living offset measures to counteract the impact of the Carbon Tax.

    May 9, 2012

    Gillard said she was “deeply disturbed” that a three-year investigation by Fair Work Australia found suspended Labor MP Craig Thomson had spent almost $500,000 of union members’ funds on prostitutes, fine dining, hotels, cash withdrawals, air travel and electioneering.

    May 10, 2012

    Gillard declared that US President Barak Obama’s support for same-sex marriage would not change her own view on the issue.

    June 21, 2012

    About 90 asylum seekers were lost at sea after a boat capsized north-west of Christmas Island. Rescue attempts successfully pulled 109 out of the water.

    June 28, 2012

    A second asylum-seeking vessel sank, claiming the lives of at least four people. Merchant and naval vessels rescued 125.

    August 12, 2012

    Gillard was forced into a major back-down by announcing the Government would nominate Nauru and Manus Island to be reopened as offshore processing facilities for asylum seekers.

    August 18, 2012

    It was revealed Julia Gillard had been under investigation when she resigned from her law firm Slater and Gordon in 1995. Questions had been raised about work she had done for her then boyfriend, a union boss accused of corruption.

    August 23, 2012

    The Australian reveals that Gillard admitted that the entity she set up for Wilson was a slush fund to raise cash for the re-election of union officials. Gillard breaks her silence, denying any wrongdoing and declaring the story is part of a sexist internet smear campaign.

    October 9, 2012

    A fiery speech by Prime Minister Julia Gillard slamming Opposition Leader Tony Abbott for being a misogynist gains global attention.

    November 11, 2012

    Wayne Hem swears in a statutory declaration that he made the Gillard payment and other payments after being instructed to do so by Bruce Wilson.

    November 15, 2012

    The Australian reveals that former AWU official Helmut Gries, who first raised concerns that union money may have been spent on Gillard’s renovations, now doubts that version of events.

    January 28, 2013

    First bloke Tim Mathieson attracts the wrong sort of attention for the following comment: “We can get a blood test for (prostate cancer), but the digital examination is the only true way to get a correct reading on your prostate, so make sure you go and do that, and perhaps look for a small Asian female doctor is probably the best way.”

    January 30, 2013

    Prime Minister Julia Gillard announces a September 14 election date, initiating one of the longest campaigns in Australian history.

    January 31, 2103

    Former Labor MP Craig Thomson is arrested at his electoral office on the NSW Central Coast and is charged with 150 offences relating to allegedly fraudulent use of union funds at the Health Services Union.

    February 2, 2013

    Ministers Nicola Roxon and Chris Evans announce their resignations ahead of the election.

    February 19, 2013

    Greens leader Christine Milne announces the end of her party’s minority government agreement with Labor over its failed mining tax. The Greens will continue to offer supply until the September election.

    February 26, 2013

    A Newspoll published in The Australian shows a five-point drop in support for Julia Gillard as preferred Prime Minister, giving Opposition Leader Tony Abbott a four point lead of 40 to 36 per cent. Last November, Ms Gillard enjoyed a 14-point lead in the preferred PM stakes.

    “That was very strong,” she said, adding that she would be very concerned if the federal members in WA were viewing Labor’s good results in some areas and believing they were safe.

    “That’s not what people were saying. It’s pretty simple and it’s pretty brutal and they are saying they don’t like Julia Gillard and they don’t believe her,” she told ABC television.

    Ms MacTiernan said she took no pleasure in saying this as Ms Gillard had tried exceptionally hard, putting absolutely everything into it.

    “But at the end of the day, the Labor voters have said we don’t accept her as our leader. If we do not take note of this, there is going to be an absolute massacre in the federal election,” she said.

    Federal election 2013

    Watch












    .

    .

    .

    Ended

    0:00 / 3:25

    Scrubber

    mute

    Share

    Fullscreen.

    Former leaders call for Labor reform

    The anti-Labor swing in WA has sent a jolt through the party at the federal level, with calls for a reform.

    11 March 2013Sky News

    Watch More Video

    Tony Abbott was disappointed by his own comments

    Fresh start for re-elected WA Premier

    Abbott to put faith aside to govern

    Gillard should have come to WA: Barnett

    The public wants Labor to reform: Gallop

    Paul Kelly’s View

    Unwanted endorsement

    Kevin Rudd defends PM’s Rooty Hill stay

    Post-election policy audit ‘welcomed’

    Gillard backlash

    Gillard’s brave face

    Blistering attack on Swan as Treasurer

    Labor is all about workers, Gillard says

    Ministers call for unity after bad poll

    Rudd denies interest in leadership push

    Hockey scoffs at Rudd’s denial

    Australia unhappy with Gillard and Abbott

    Is Tony Abbott ‘Fair Dinkum’

    Former leaders call for Labor reform

  • Amplified Greenhouse Effect Shifts North’s Growing Seasons

    News Topics

    Space Station
    Solar System
    Universe
    Aeronautics
    Earth
    Technology
    NASA in Your Life
    NASA History & People

    News Releases

    Latest Releases
    Media Alerts
    Press Release Archives
    Search Press Releases

    Media Resources

    General Information
    Media Contacts
    Transcripts & Documents
    News Audio
    NASA Audio File
    Press Kits
    Fact Sheets

    Speeches

    Administrator’s Speeches

    Deputy Administrator’s Speeches

    Budgets & Plans
    Reports
    People Who Read This Also Read…

    NASA-NOAA Satellite Reveals New Views of Earth at Night
    International Space Station
    Mars Science Laboratory, the Next Mars Rover
    Image Gallery
    NASA’S Hubble Provides First Census of Galaxies Near Cosmic Dawn

    News Releases

    Text Size
    Grow Text SizeShrink Text Size
    Steve Cole
    Headquarters, Washington
    202-358-0918
    stephen.e.cole@nasa.gov

    Kathryn Hansen
    Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
    301-286-1046
    kathryn.h.hansen@nasa.gov

    Ruth Marlaire
    Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
    650-604-4709
    ruth.marlaire@nasa.gov
    March 10, 2013

    RELEASE : 13-069

    Amplified Greenhouse Effect Shifts North’s Growing Seasons

    WASHINGTON — Vegetation growth at Earth’s northern latitudes increasingly resembles lusher latitudes to the south, according to a NASA-funded study based on a 30-year record of land surface and newly improved satellite data sets.

    An international team of university and NASA scientists examined the relationship between changes in surface temperature and vegetation growth from 45 degrees north latitude to the Arctic Ocean. Results show temperature and vegetation growth at northern latitudes now resemble those found 4 degrees to 6 degrees of latitude farther south as recently as 1982.

    “Higher northern latitudes are getting warmer, Arctic sea ice and the duration of snow cover are diminishing, the growing season is getting longer and plants are growing more,” said Ranga Myneni of Boston University’s Department of Earth and Environment. “In the north’s Arctic and boreal areas, the characteristics of the seasons are changing, leading to great disruptions for plants and related ecosystems.”

    The study was published Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change.

    Myneni and colleagues used satellite data to quantify vegetation changes at different latitudes from 1982 to 2011. Data used in this study came from NOAA’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometers (AVHRR) onboard a series of polar-orbiting satellites and NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instruments on the Terra and Aqua satellites.

    As a result of enhanced warming and a longer growing season, large patches of vigorously productive vegetation now span a third of the northern landscape, or more than 3.5 million square miles (9 million square kilometers). That is an area about equal to the contiguous United States. This landscape resembles what was found 250 to 430 miles (400 to 700 kilometers) to the south in 1982.

    “It’s like Winnipeg, Manitoba, moving to Minneapolis-Saint Paul in only 30 years,” said co-author Compton Tucker of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

    The Arctic’s greenness is visible on the ground as an increasing abundance of tall shrubs and trees in locations all over the circumpolar Arctic. Greening in the adjacent boreal areas is more pronounced in Eurasia than in North America.

    An amplified greenhouse effect is driving the changes, according to Myneni. Increased concentrations of heat-trapping gasses, such as water vapor, carbon dioxide and methane, cause Earth’s surface, ocean and lower atmosphere to warm. Warming reduces the extent of polar sea ice and snow cover, and, in turn, the darker ocean and land surfaces absorb more solar energy, thus further heating the air above them.

    “This sets in motion a cycle of positive reinforcement between warming and loss of sea ice and snow cover, which we call the amplified greenhouse effect,” Myneni said. “The greenhouse effect could be further amplified in the future as soils in the north thaw, releasing potentially significant amounts of carbon dioxide and methane.”

    To find out what is in store for future decades, the team analyzed 17 climate models. These models show that increased temperatures in Arctic and boreal regions would be the equivalent of a 20-degree latitude shift by the end of this century relative to a period of comparison from 1951-1980.

    However, researchers say plant growth in the north may not continue on its current trajectory. The ramifications of an amplified greenhouse effect, such as frequent forest fires, outbreak of pest infestations and summertime droughts, may slow plant growth.

    Also, warmer temperatures alone in the boreal zone do not guarantee more plant growth, which also depends on the availability of water and sunlight.

    “Satellite data identify areas in the boreal zone that are warmer and dryer and ¬¬other areas that are warmer and wetter,” said co-author Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif. “Only the warmer and wetter areas support more growth.”
    Researchers did find found more plant growth in the boreal zone from 1982 to 1992 than from 1992 to 2011, because water limitations were encountered in the latter two decades.

    Data, results and computer codes from this study will be made available on NASA Earth Exchange (NEX), a collaborative supercomputing facility at Ames. NEX is designed to bring scientists together with data, models and computing resources to accelerate research and innovation and provide transparency.

    For more information and images associated with this release, visit:

    http://go.nasa.gov/12Amv2s

    – end –

    text-only version of this release

    NASA press releases and other information are available automatically by sending a blank e-mail message to hqnews-subscribe@mediaservices.nasa.gov. To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a blank e-mail message to hqnews-unsubscribe@mediaservices.nasa.gov.

    Back to NASA Newsroom | Back to NASA Homepage

    › Back To Top

  • Activists mar Australian Pope idea

    Activists mar Australian Pope idea
    Updated: 10:14, Monday March 11, 2013
    Activists mar Australian Pope idea

    Cardinal George Pell reportedly has no chance of becoming Pope after his Australian opponents filled in the media and cardinals about the Sydney archbishop’s history of dealing with sex abuse allegations.

    Australian commentator, Paul Collins, says progressive Catholics have lobbied overseas journalists and voting cardinals to make sure they are aware of a 2002 inquiry into allegations against the Sydney archbishop.

    The inquiry, headed by independent commissioner, Alex Southwell, QC, cleared Dr Pell of allegations he molested a boy, in 1961, during a camp at Phillip Island, in Victoria.

    But Dr Collins, a former priest, has told Fairfax: ‘He has no chance.’

    Dr Collins said another problem for the Cardinal is that his patrons, the former Pope and other influential cardinals, have lost power.

    ‘In Italy, without patrons, you’re gone.’

    Cardinal Pell was last week named at Number Five on a so-called dirty dozen list, compiled by the US-based Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, or SNAP.

    The group cited a dozen cardinals from the United States, Mexico, Honduras, Italy, Australia, Czech Republic, Canada, Argentina and Ghana accused of protecting pedophile priests or making offensive public statements.
    SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

    Twitter
    Digg
    Delicious
    Buzz
    Reddit
    StumbleUpon

    More Stories

    Two charged over cash van hold-up
    Carr and Iemma clash over Obeid
    Activists mar Australian Pope idea
    Payroll probe hears first witnesses
    Murder charge after body found in Hunter
    Big voter turnout for Qld councils poll
    Fake prince belongings fetch top prices
    Three men drown at Vic beaches
    Two women sexually assaulted near Manly
    Budget will pay for Gonski reforms, Swan

    Latest Stories

    10:31 AM:
    ‘Fat Australian’ ruling overturned
    10:29 AM:
    Tiger wins Florida golf
    10:22 AM:
    Two charged over cash van hold-up
    10:22 AM:
    Ancient ritual of the Papal conclave
    10:21 AM:
    Murder charge after body found in Hunter

    News
    Top Stories
    Local
    National
    World
    Politics
    Sport
    Showbiz
    Health
    Tech
    Eco
    Offbeat

    Business
    Business
    Finance
    Economy

    Weather
    National
    Radar
    Satellite
    Synoptic
    Warnings
    Weather News
    Marine
    Surf
    Snow
    World

    Programs

  • ‘Gillard factor’ blamed for Labor’s election loss

    ‘Gillard factor’ blamed for Labor’s election loss

    ABCUpdated March 11, 2013, 8:50 am

    tweet2

    Email
    Print

    A senior Western Australia Labor figure is calling on Julia Gillard to resign as prime minister, warning Labor faces an “absolute massacre” in the federal election if she stays on.

    Alannah MacTiernan, who has been involved in West Australian politics for decades, made her comments after Labor suffered a resounding loss at the weekend’s state election.

    The ABC’s election computer predicts Labor, led by Mark McGowan, will hold just 19 seats in the 59-seat WA legislative assembly.

    Some ALP figures have said the unpopularity of the Federal Government contributed to the loss, with Defence Minister Stephen Smith admitting that federal Labor was a “drag” on its state counterpart.

    “Our federal difficult period, which coincided with the campaign, was clearly a drag on Mark. It wouldn’t have affected the substantive outcome,” he said.

    “We’ve got a range of tough political issues to work through between now and September. I’ve always been of the view when we have that election in September, it will go down to the wire.”

    Ms MacTiernan has warned that the party can expect worse results at the federal election unless Ms Gillard stands aside.

    “It doesn’t cause me any pleasure to say that,” she said.

    “I really feel deeply for her because I know she’s trying exceptionally hard.

    “But at the end of the day the Labor voters have said we don’t accept her as our leader, and if we do not take note of this there is going to be an absolute massacre in the federal election.”

    Ms MacTiernan says voters in Labor’s WA heartland told her that while they voted for the ALP yesterday, they will not support the party federally.

    “They’re saying they don’t like Julia Gillard, they don’t believe her,” she said.

    “The only way that we can dig ourselves out, [or] have got any hope of digging ourselves out of this Greek tragedy, is for the Prime Minister to stand down.”

    Ms MacTiernan’s comments and the WA election result will ensure a fresh round of leadership questions when federal Parliament returns this week for another sitting fortnight, the last before the May budget.

    Special Minister of State Gary Gray, who represents a WA seat n Canberra, says: “I think it’s unreasonable to suggest that there are no federal implications of the West Australian poll.

    “Premier [Colin] Barnett, the Liberal Party and the National Party were able to work together in harmony by not sniping internally, by not back-biting, by remaining focused on good governance and good government and focusing on that, rather than on themselves.”

    One Labor MP has told AM the question of leadership change is now becoming more urgent.

    Mr Gray is urging his federal colleagues to view a Newspoll due out this week with calm and perspective.

    “Let’s not get too diverted by the week-to-week, day-to-day opinion polling that will happen on a regular basis between now and September 14,” he said.

    Ms Gillard released a statement on Sunday afternoon congratulating Mr Barnett on his re-election, and WA Labor for their hard-fought campaign

    “The Gillard Government looks forward to continuing to work with the Barnett Government on a range of important initiatives which will benefit the people of Western Australia and recognise the importance that WA plays to the national economy,” she said.
    Counting will resume today, with the seats of Kimberley, Collie-Preston, Eyre, Warren-Blackwood, Belmont and Midland yet to be decided.

  • Premiers clash over Obeid rise

    Premiers clash over Obeid rise

    Date March 11, 2013 218 reading now

    Read later

    Sean Nicholls, Leesha McKenny

    inShare.
    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    Clash: Morris Iemma, left, and Bob Carr. Photo: James Alcock, Dominic Lorrimer

    Former Labor premiers Bob Carr and Morris Iemma have gone to war over who was responsible for the rise of Eddie Obeid amid warnings that corruption hearings involving the notorious powerbroker will have dire consequences for the party at the federal election.

    Senator Carr, now the Foreign Affairs Minister, has accused Mr Iemma, his successor as premier, of a serious error by allowing Mr Obeid ”special status” in his government.

    ”I’m sure that Morris Iemma, a very decent – decent and honest figure – would reflect that it was a cardinal mistake to allow Obeid that special status and privilege,” Senator Carr says in comments that will go to air on Monday night on the ABC program Four Corners.

    Accused of corruption: Eddie Obeid. Photo: Jon Reid

    ”And people who then ran the state ALP machine were making a terrible mistake to confer some special status on him. For what reason? What could he deliver? What qualities could he bring?”

    Advertisement

    Mr Iemma rejected Mr Carr’s assessment, insisting he had no special access. ”He had a status all right: cabinet minister, conferred on him by Bob Carr,” Mr Iemma said of Mr Obeid.

    ”I don’t know what special status he’s referring to. He was a cabinet minister in Bob’s government. He was a backbencher in my government.”

    Mr Obeid’s influence over the former Labor government has been outlined recently at hearings of the Independent Commission Against Corruption.

    The commission has been examining allegations that Mr Obeid’s family conspired to make millions of dollars by rigging a 2008 tender process for coal exploration licences issued by his former colleague and then mining minister Ian Macdonald.

    Mr Iemma has given evidence that Mr Obeid was a leader of a powerful subgroup of the dominant Right faction of the NSW party, called the Terrigals, a position that allowed him significant influence over government decision making.

    When asked about Mr Obeid, Senator Carr has been at pains to say that he sacked him from cabinet in 2003, comments he repeats in his interview with Four Corners.

    But Mr Iemma said that, if anything, Mr Obeid’s influence grew under Mr Carr after he

    removed him as minister for fisheries and mineral resources. ”I have a distinct recollection of Bob standing up in caucus and saying he wanted Obeid to focus on being a ‘good caucus manager’,” he said.

    Mr Iemma said Mr Obeid’s position in the party did not change after Mr Carr’s retirement as premier in 2005. ”Eddie ran the largest group in the Right under Bob, me, Nathan Rees and Kristina Keneally,” he said.

    After initially declining to elaborate on his interview with Four Corners, Senator Carr issued a written statement on Sunday night: ”I’m proud to have expelled Eddie Obeid from my cabinet,” he said. “Everyone knows he had no access or influence with me or my office while I was premier.”

    At a news conference earlier, Senator Carr refused to answer questions about Labor’s defeat in the West Australian election on Saturday, or say whether the ICAC inquiry would hurt Labor’s chances at the federal election. But party elder John Faulkner told Four Corners Labor’s standing in NSW had been ”very significantly damaged by the revelations at ICAC and it would be very surprising if that didn’t have an impact federally”

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/premiers-clash-over-obeid-rise-20130310-2fu7f.html#ixzz2NBAzs83X

  • Australia links ‘angry summer’ to climate change – at last

    Australia links ‘angry summer’ to climate change – at last

    Government advisers unequivocally link the country’s extreme weather and global warming, and say the worst is yet to come
    Share218

    inShare.8
    Email

    Map of extreme weather events that hit Australia during summer 2012/2013. Click on the image for a larger view. Photograph: Australia Climate Commission

    The hottest summer on record. The hottest January on record. The hottest day on record for Australia as a whole. Bushfires in every state and territory. Daily rainfall records and major flooding. Over a period of 90 days, these were some of the 123 extreme weather records broken during Australia’s “angry summer”.

    Despite the dramatic headlines and “flame-seared images” that documented extreme weather over the summer, the Australian media largely failed to make the link to climate change. Of 800 articles published on the heatwave over a period of five days in January, fewer than 10 also discussed global warming. In the US and the UK, by comparison, the relationship between global warming and extreme weather events such as hurricane Sandy and the UK’s second wettest year on record became a major talking – and election – point.

    But a report by Australian government advisers this week unequivocally and directly links the summer’s extreme weather to climate change, and should make the link harder to ignore in future. Climate scientists have been historically reluctant to link the two – particularly in a country like Australia which has naturally occurring cycles of drought and floods and is naturally a land of weather extremes.

    But the report “Angry Summer”, released by the Australian government’s independent Climate Commission, argues that this summer’s conditions were different due to their record-breaking intensity and duration, and “were all influenced to some extent by a climate that is fundamentally shifting”.

    Author Prof Will Steffen wrote:

    “Australia’s angry summer shows that climate change is already adversely affecting Australians. The significant impacts of extreme weather on people, property, communities and the environment highlight the serious consequences of failing to adequately address climate change.”

    Fellow commissioner Tim Flannery said:

    “I think one of the best ways of thinking about it is imagining that the baseline has shifted. If an athlete takes steroids, for example, their baseline shifts, they’ll do fewer slow times and many more record-breaking fast times. The same thing is happening with our climate system. As it warms up, we’re getting fewer cold days and cold events and many more record hot events.”

    Angry summer shows that 2012-13 was Australia’s hottest summer since records began in 1910. Temperature records were set in every state and territory, and the national daily average temperature rose to unprecedented levels. Meteorologists were even forced to add two new colour categories to Australia’s weather prediction maps as the heat rose.

    In early January, major bushfires burned in the states of Tasmania, New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria. “Climate change is aggravating bushfire conditions and thus increasing the risk of fire,” said the report. It also cited the introduction of a new category – “catastrophic” – for ranking bushfire risk following Australia’s devastating 2009 Black Saturday fires, as “concrete evidence of this increasing risk”.

    Some 26 daily rainfall records were broken at weather stations across Australia over the 2012-13 summer. Five river-height records were broken and there was major flooding throughout south-east Queensland and northern NSW. “Extreme rainfall is consistent with the type of events scientists expect to see more often in a warming climate,” the report says.

    Despite some of the staggering records set, the worst is yet to come, the report suggests:

    “Looking towards the future, it is virtually certain that extreme hot weather will continue to become even more frequent and severe around the globe, including Australia, over the coming decades. It is also likely that the frequency of heavy rainfall will increase over many areas of the globe … In Australia and around the world we need to urgently invest in clean energy sources and take other measures to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. This is the critical decade to get on with the job.”