Author: admin

  • University backs 9/11 processor

    Farrell rejected those calls, saying "We cannot allow political pressure from critics of unpopular ideas to inhibit the free exchange of ideas."

    "There is no question that Mr. Barrett holds personal opinions that many people find unconventional," Farrell said in a statement. "These views are expected to take a small, but significant, role in the class. To the extent that his views are discussed, Mr. Barrett has assured me that students will be free _ and encouraged _ to challenge his viewpoint."

    Farrell launched a review after Barrett spoke on the talk show about his views that the terrorist attacks were the result of a government conspiracy designed to spark war in the Middle East. Barrett is active in a group of scholars who believe, among other things, the twin towers were blown up by U.S. government operatives.

    His remarks prompted calls from state Rep. Steve Nass, R-Whitewater, and Republican gubernatorial candidate Mark Green for his immediate dismissal. Gov. Jim Doyle, a Democrat, joined the critics in questioning whether Barrett was competent to teach.

  • Iraq Freezes Union Assets

    Wave of anti-union activity by government

    The Iraqi regime’s decision comes in the wake of a series of anti-union measures, including the disbanding of the council of the lawyers’ union, freezing the writers’ union accounts and the September 2005 decree making all trade union activity illegal.  For that anti-union act the regime used the pretext of promising the promulgation of a future law to ‘regulate’ trade union organisations and their activities.

    This action follows in the footsteps of US administrator Paul Bremer In 2004 Paul Bremer, the occupation’s then pro-consul in Iraq, declared trade union activity in the state sector illegal.  That decision re-enacted Saddam Hussain’s 1987 decree banning workers’ unions in the state sector by declaring them to be ‘civil servants’ rather than ‘workers’.

    Hamstringing opponents of oil rip-off

    Iraq’s enormous oil wealth is being groomed for Production Sharing Agreements, which would transfer effective control over all aspects of oil policy, production and marketing to multination oil companies.  The oil workers’ union is one of the most effective opponents of this policy, organising an anti-privatisation conference last year and another one to come this year.

    More information here.

    Where is the coverage? Where is the outrage?

    Why isn’t this being covered by the mainstream media? Over 2,500 American troops have died for this government, and we must not let them die for a Pinochet-esque regime that represses the most basic rights of workers rather than a genuine democracy.

    Below is a list of links to contact information for the US’ most prominent news organizations. It is our duty as progressives to ask them why they are not covering this story of utmost importance.

    Associated Press
    Reuters
    Agence France Presse
    New York Times
    Washington Post
    Los Angeles Times
    USA Today
    McClatchy/Knight-Ridder (under "SITE SERVICES")
    Christian Science Monitor

    Also, here’s some background information on the plight of Iraqi labor unions:

    Pinkertons at the CPA
    Iraqi Labor Leader: We Will Defend Our Oil
    Murdered Iraqi Trade Unionist Trapped Between U.S. and Insurgents

    And here are the official web sites of the Iraqi labor unions. They deserve our support for facing off against the theocratic and fascistic insurgency and the heavy-handed, neoliberal occupation.

    Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq (FWCUI) & Union of the Unemployed
    Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions
    General Union of Oil Employees/Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions

  • George Bush is dead to me

    Everyone I know has had enough. Everyone I know is just about done. There is this threshold of happy deadened disgust, this point where the body simply resigns itself to the pain, a point where the disease, the poison has seeped so deeply into the bones that you just have to laugh and shrug it all off and go for a drink. Or 10.

    I was having cocktails recently with a group of people, among whom were two lifetime Republicans, each in his 60s, corporate businessmen, one admittedly slightly more moderate than the other (to the point where, after once hearing a senator read off a long list of Bush’s hideous environmental atrocities, actually let his conscience lead his choice and ended up voting for Kerry) but nevertheless both devoted members of the party.

    Bush came up, as a topic, as a cancer, as a fetid miasma in the air. They were both shaking their heads. They were sighing heavily. They were both, in a word, disgusted. The more staunchly conservative of the two even went so far as to say he was so embarrassed and humiliated by this president, by this administration, so appalled at all the war atrocities and the wiretapping and the misuse of law, the fiscal irresponsibility and the abuse of the lower classes and the outright arrogance, that if the Dems could somehow produce a decent moderate candidate with a brain, he’d have zero problem switching allegiances and voting for him. Or her.

    It may not sound like much. It may not seem like a major shift. But it is, in its way, sort of massive. For thoughtful Repubs with a conscience (they actually exist, I have seen them), there is little left to defend. There is little this administration has done among all categories of ostensible GOP values that they can look to with any sort of pride. Medicare? Shrinking the budget? Smaller government? Less intervention in our lives? Reduced spending? Increased respect in the international community? Responsible international citizen? Ha. Name your topic, BushCo has failed. Spectacularly. Intentionally.

    Indeed, countless Dems were disappointed with Clinton’s behavior during Monicagate. Many were ashamed that he would cheapen the office so badly by such trashy moral behavior.

    But that was just a cheap little affair (our allies never understood all the fuss anyway). This was never the attitude toward Clinton’s politics, his capacity to understand complex issues, his astounding political savvy. No one anywhere doubted he made the country richer, more environmentally conscious, more stable, more respected and admired. Clinton was globally adored not only for his charisma but for his contributions to world peace. Plus he could actually point to Afghanistan on a map.

    What a difference a handful of years makes. Now, overseas, we are a joke. A threat. A toxin. We are considered reckless and arrogant and ignorant, dangerous not just to the rest of the world but to the overall health of the planet. No one anywhere understands how a man like Bush can be the leader of the Free World, stolen election or no.

    Sure, smarter Europeans know full well that the United States is deeply divided between the pseudo-religious right-wing warmongers who control a tiny cadre of the powerful elite, and, well, everyone else. It does not matter. America’s reputation as a powerful and respected diplomatic peacekeeper, as the nation that sets the standards for human rights and economic freedom and choice, is hobbled. Crippled. Is very nearly dead. How quickly can we recover? How much damage has been done? History will tell, and it will be ugly indeed.

    Interesting feature interview with Al Gore in Rolling Stone recently. Gore mentions two amazing things: one is the discussion he’s had with generals regarding Iraq, with one coming right out and admitting that Bush’s disastrous Iraq war will go down as the worst invasion in American history, our greatest misstep, our most costly and debilitating mistake. Among top brass in the know, of this there is little question.

    The other was about the discussions Gore’s had with various major corporate CEOs about Gore’s pet issue, global warming, and how obvious it is that 15 minutes after BushCo leaves office, we will have a radically new global warming policy. In other words, Bush won’t do a thing about it in the next two years, despite how obvious it shall become that we are in crisis, simply because he can’t risk finally coming out and admitting yet another enormous policy disaster. Not to mention how nearly six years of enviro policy abuse, from air quality to water to forestry to pollution deregulation on all his industrial pals, can’t be undone with a smirk and a prayer.

    Which is just another way of saying we are currently stuck. We are swirling around the bottom of the drain, clinging on to anything that might hold us from going under for just a little while longer. We have to let the neocon disease run its course, and just pray that at the end of it all the scarring and the pain and damage will not be so permanent, and so hideous, that we can’t be seen in public for a decade.

    This is where it stands: Bush can in no way risk alienating the ultra-right-wing bonk-job contingent that put him in office (they are, considering Bush’s 32-percent approval rating, the only ones left even remotely supporting him — even though, according to many estimates, they’re starting to abandon him, too), and hence all policy and all agenda items from here on out will be even more vicious and desperate in an attempt to shore up the base. Hence trying to mutilate the Constitution to ban gay marriage. Hence attacking the New York Times and claiming newspapers are endangering American lives.

    In other words, Bush’s latest nasty, Rove-designed salvos and upcoming attacks to save a sliver of power and pride and sneering GOP control are just the beginning.

    However — praise Jesus and pass the scotch — they are the beginning of the end.

  • Energy efficiency comes cheap

    A recent report by the Australian Glass and Glazing Association (AGAA) shows householders how to acheive five star energy efficiency for less than $2,000. Such an investment will save around $800 per year on energy bills, paying for itself in two and a half years. Energy efficient houses use 60 per cent less energy than the average suburban house.

    Given that the median price for first home buyers has fallen 4.2 per cent in the December quarter, the AGGA says that governments should encourage buyers to invest the difference in energy efficiency. "Should the proposed energy efficiency requirements not be adopted, you have to ask, ‘Who shoulders the burden?’" said ian Koochew, executive director of the Association.

  • UK Conservatives lead anti-nuclear charge

    The British Conservative Party believes that nuclear energy should be the "last resort" for electricity generation. UK Conservative Leader, David Cameron, told the local government association in Britain last week that energy generation should be decentralised to allow communities to become independent and increase the options for power generation. The UK Labour Party had announced that it would overrule local councils who ban nuclear power plants in their jurisdiction, but in the last week Prime Minister Tony Blair has said he has "changed his mind" on nuclear energy and that he now believes UK energy needs can be met without it.

  • Asian aerosols make Aussie rain

    An article submitted to the Journal of Geophysical Research reports that the enormous aerosol haze from Asia is responsible for the observed shift in monsoonal weather patterns increasing rain across the North West of Australia as far south as Alice Springs. Climate change models which include the effect predict this increase in rainfall, those that do not predict decreased rain in North Western Australia. Residents from Broome to Alice Springs and north have experienced much more humid summers resulting in extended grass lands and the failure of evaporative air conditioning that relies on dry air.