Author: admin

  • Coal prices likely to drop due to competition

    Buyers set to benefit: Utilities that may benefit include Chubu
    Electric Power, Japan’s biggest coal buyer. Chubu Electric is now
    negotiating prices of annual supply contracts with Rio Tinto, BHP
    Billiton and other mining companies. The contracts that start on 1
    April cover coal burned in power stations and set a benchmark for world
    markets.

    US market the exception: While prices declined in Asia and
    Europe, US coal costs would stay high, according to Raymond James
    Financial coal industry analyst James Rollyson.

    Infrastructure at capacity: Utilities needed to rebuild
    inventories and import terminals, and railroads, were operating at
    capacity, preventing a surplus outside the US from entering the
    country, he said. Mr Rollyson forecasts eastern coal prices of about
    $US50 a tonne this year, 15 per cent higher than the five-year average,
    and western prices of $US20 to $US22 a tonne. The western average is
    about $US7.50 a tonne in the past five years.

    The Australian Financial Review, 11/1/2006, p. 14

    Source: Erisk – www.erisk.net 

  • How did we fair with electricity consumption in 2005?

    Queensland’s average electricity demand was highest in three
    summer months and up in all 12 months of 2005.

    SA average demand was down in 10 of 12 months in 2005, with two
    winter months and one summer month in three highest demand range.

    The three winter months continue to have highest average demand
    in NSW, with top month’s average 7.5pc higher than top summer
    month.

    Vic average demand was down in 7 of 12 months in 2005, but not
    surprisingly it was the three winter months that remain the
    highest.

  • Australian developers to generate power on site

    Building developers carving new
    suburbs out of semi-rural environments will spend $37billion on
    energy infrastructure in the nex
    t fifteen years, according to
    environment business magazine, WME. They can reduce this investment
    by generating electricity on site, using natural gas or alternate
    energy, the magazine reports.

    Australian company, GridX has developed
    a system that provides heating and cooling to homes in the locality
    as a byproduct of electricity production. Each unit feeds up to 12
    homes with a network of generators able to be strung together to
    service localities of up to 200 homes. Developers investing in the
    system can further offset their costs through the sale of electricity
    to the owners of the houses, effectively a captive market.

  • Energy Footprint Calculator available for your PC

    Research institute, Integrated Sustainability Analysis, at Sydney
    University has developed a software tool for calculating the
    ecological footprint of any organisation. The reports
    on Australia’s ecological footprint,
    Balancing Act, that
    was released last May in conjunction with the CSIRO
    used the
    same methods employed in the new
    software. The user-friendly software, known as the Footprint Machine,
    is aimed at local governments and small to medium enterprises.

    The
    tool has been used on Fraser Island’s Kingfisher report to rate each
    item on the menu according to its impact on the environment.
    Apparently beef is the most resource hungry food on the menu.

  • US wind companies spend nearly $3bn in 2005

    First venture sold to Enron: Dehlsen’s first entrepreneurial
    venture was Zond Corporation, which was sold to Enron Corp in 1997 and
    eventually ended up in the hands of General Electric Co. GE Energy was
    now the country’s leading wind power provider.

    150 Liberty turbines to be produced in 2006: Clipper Technology
    recently opened an assembly plant in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, where Dehlsen
    expected to produce five of his high-power Liberty wind turbines in
    2005 and 150 in 2006.

    Each Liberty turbine costs $2.5 million: Those turbines,
    designed to operate even when wind is low, cost about $2.5 million each
    and could generate enough electricity over a 30-year life span to power
    1250 homes.

    Wind power far less damaging to environment: Responding to
    complaints about the visual blight and noise of wind turbines, Dehlsen
    said wind power generation was far less damaging to the environment
    than fossil fuels, which produced high levels of greenhouse gases.

    Jobs for depressed farming and industrial areas: In addition,
    wind power could bring jobs to depressed farming and industrial areas.
    Germany, in less than six years, has installed enough wind projects to
    generate 14,000 megawatts (MW) of power and employ 75,000 people.

    Huge wind energy resource in US: “The US has a huge wind energy
    resource,” he said. “There are four states alone … that could supply
    all of the electricity needs of the country,” Dehlsen said.

    Aim to capture 15 per cent of global market: Dehlsen said he was
    negotiating deals in Eastern Europe, Latin America and China, with an
    eye on capturing 12-15 per cent of the global market.

    Reference: Digest of latest news reported on website of Climate
    Change Secretariat of United Nations Framework on Climate Change
    Control (UNFCCC). 2 January 2006.. Address: PO Box 260 124, D-53153
    Bonn. Germany. Phone: : (49-228) 815-1005, Fax: (49-228) 815-1999.
    Email: press@unfccc.int

    http://www.unfccc.int

    Erisk Net, 9/1/2006

  • Dutch and Norwegian scientists generate electricity by mixing sea and river water

    EU funding: It might seem like an exercise in scientific theory
    destined only for high-tech laboratories, but the creators and the
    European Union (EU), which funded the Norwegian research, believe the
    idea’s time might have come.

    Different methods used: The two projects used different methods
    to harness the electricity – the Dutch apply something called reverse
    electrodialysis while the Norwegians use a kind of osmosis.

    Reliance on membranes: However, both methods rely on membranes
    or thin films made of special material used for chemical separation. In
    the Dutch project, separation was done by membranes using an electrical
    current.

    Process like putting frankfurts in hot water: The Norwegian
    device applied pressure to force the water through membranes. Its
    inventors liken the process to making a hot dog. The skin of the
    frankfurt acted as a membrane, allowing more water in than the amount
    of salty water it let out. This increased the pressure inside and the
    hotdog burst.

    Still a long way to go: The two inventions still had a long way
    to go before they could be applied commercially. The Wetsus project,
    supported by a consortium of Dutch companies, had yet to be tested in a
    pilot plant.

    Norwegians have two small-scale plants: The Norwegian project
    was more advanced. It started in the 1990s and its creators had already
    installed two small-scale plants, but had yet to build a bigger
    demonstration plant to boost production.

    Reference: Digest of latest news reported on website of Climate
    Change Secretariat of United Nations Framework on Climate Change
    Control (UNFCCC). 27 December 2005. Address: PO Box 260 124, D-53153
    Bonn. Germany. Phone: : (49-228) 815-1005, Fax: (49-228) 815-1999.
    Email: press@unfccc.int

    http://www.unfccc.int

    Erisk Net, 7/1/2006