June 11, 2012 Compiled: 12:57 AM
By NELSON D. SCHWARTZ (NYT)
Facing bad publicity, big banks are highlighting what has quietly become a hot growth area in recent years — backing so-called green companies and renewable energy projects.
|
|
By NELSON D. SCHWARTZ (NYT)
Facing bad publicity, big banks are highlighting what has quietly become a hot growth area in recent years — backing so-called green companies and renewable energy projects.
|
|
|
||
| Dangerous, illegal policy Spartanburg Herald Journal For almost 30 years, the government has been collecting a tax on the power bills of consumers who use electricity from nuclear power plants. The money is supposed to fund a permanent method of disposing of nuclear waste. But after collecting billions … See all stories on this topic » |
||
| Fukushima forum: Arnie Gundersen compares U.S. and Japanese nuclear reactors Examiner.com The first guest was Arnie Gundersen who appeared on the show to share his expertise in the area of nuclear engineering and to make the American public more aware of the potential danger hiding in their own backyard. Gundersen, who holds a master’s … See all stories on this topic » |
||
| Court Says Regulators Must Evaluate Dangers of Nuclear Waste Truth-Out If the government continues to fail in its quest to establish one, then SNF (spent nuclear fuel) will seemingly be stored on site at nuclear plants on a permanent basis. The Commission can and must assess the potential environmental effects of such a … See all stories on this topic » |
This once a day Google Alert is brought to you by Google.
A violent storm has left more than 160,000 homes and businesses without power in WA, as its trail of destruction continues to sweep through the southwest.
By late Sunday afternoon, Western Power had reported more than 100,000 homes in Perth and more than 50,000 in regional areas had lost power, as a dangerous weather warning remained in place for the entire southwest – an area the size of Victoria.
Emergency services had received more than 300 calls for help across Perth and regional areas, as rains and winds of up to 140kmh caused road closures and significant damage to buildings and infrastructure.
Western Power said more than 150 power lines and more than 50 poles had been brought down across metropolitan Perth, while its network was still being damaged by high winds in the southwest region.
The utility said homes and businesses could be without power for days, due to the widespread nature of the destruction.
In Perth’s northeast suburbs, a roof had collapsed on a two-storey block of flats, forcing residents to evacuate, while a crane collapsed on a corner of the Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre in the western suburb of Nedlands, also causing significant damage.
Sky News television showed dozens of boats, including large motor launches and at least one ketch, washed onshore in coastal areas and the Perth Now online site said shipping containers has been blown off their stacks in Fremantle harbour.
Power lines and wooden poles were down in most Perth suburbs, while there were reports of homes being damaged by falling trees and branches, as well as dangerous debris flying.
Parts of Perth’s Swan River had flooded and about 50 sets of traffic lights had been blacked out across the metropolitan area.
A spokeswoman from Perth Airport confirmed some inbound and outbound flights had been delayed, while ferries to Rottnest Island, 12km west of Fremantle, had been stopped.
There was also an unconfirmed report of a marina jetty being swept away with boats still moored to it in the coastal city of Mandurah, about 80km south of Perth, with other reports of shipping containers being blown around at Fremantle Port.
The Bureau of Meteorology said the storm was caused by a deepening offshore low-pressure system off the coast of Geraldton earlier in the day that had moved rapidly south and inland.
The bureau had issued a dangerous weather warning from Kalbarri on the midwest coast to Kalgoorlie in the east, and Israelite Bay on the south coast.
While the warning has been cancelled in northern parts, it remains in place for the southwest and is predicted to cause more damage, particularly around coastal areas.
Along with birds and their habitat, the hidden traces of Hoo peninsula’s previous eras of industry will be buried by railways and runways

I’m not sure I fully understand the term “psychogeography”. To me, it means the exploration of an unlikely place or a hidden aspect of a place, and whenever I hear it I think of Sunday walks in my childhood, when we would follow an overgrown and neglected path and sometimes scrape away the turf to discover a square stone with bolt holes drilled through it. As beetles hurried this way and that across its surface, my older brother would explain that the stone had once held an iron rail and that the path had once been a wagon-way, built in the 18th century to take coal from the Fife pits to a harbour on the Forth.As nobody else seemed to know or care about these facts, I felt I was sharing a historical secret. There were several of them close by: dark, deep ponds that had once been quarries; a ruined slipway built to take seaplanes; steel rings that had tethered barrage balloons; an abandoned railway tunnel where bats flew. Like a great many people in what was at that time an industrial country, I grew up in a landscape that was interestingly pockmarked with successive eras of exploitation, and all of it so commonplace that beyond a mention of its origins, Watt’s engine or Crompton’s spinning mule, it never found a place in the history books.
Almost all of that Fife landscape has now been buried without ceremony by motorways and housing estates, but equivalents can be found elsewhere, none of them grander and stranger than that part of Kent known as the Hoo peninsula, which lies between the Medway and the Thames and which, if Norman Foster and Boris Johnson have their way, could become the most vital stretch of land in Britain. As the location of Foster’s proposed Thames Hub, the Hoo peninsula will be paved with new railways and docks and the four-runway airport with which Johnson wants to replace overcrowded Heathrow. A new Thames barrier will generate electricity from the currents and tide. Passengers who land there will take ongoing flights and containers ongoing trains.
The scheme is so ambitious – Foster says it requires us “to recapture the foresight and political courage of our 19th-century forebears” – that estimating the cost beyond dozens of billions is pointless. Nevertheless, David Cameron has included it among the options to be considered when the government decides how the UK can continue to provide a hub airport for Europe: pledges to the voters of west London having ruled out Heathrow’s expansion.
If Hoo were chosen, which isn’t unlikely, the question then becomes: what would be destroyed to make way for it? The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has, as usual, the quickest and simplest answer – the wetland habitats of visiting species – but beyond that the losses are less definable, and not so easy to raise a fuss over. Since Dickens’s day, the creeks and marshes of Hoo have had a bleak form of celebrity as the spot where Pip first met Magwitch, and where prison hulks (Magwitch had just escaped from one of them) could be occasionally glimpsed through the mist on the Medway. In fact, the countryside is prettier and hillier than you expect. On a hot day last week, workers from Poland and Bulgaria were spreading straw across fields of strawberries while the knapped flint of Hoo’s several 13th-century churches shone in the sun. There is also a 14th-century castle owned by Jools Holland and a workaday marina, about as far from Cowes in its social atmosphere as it’s possible to get.
The main impression is of tremendous utility. Power lines sag west towards London to take electricity from the power stations at Kingsnorth and Grain, whose chimneys stand solid against the sky. A diesel rumbles along a single-track freight line with a train of containers from the dock near the peninsula’s tip. And beside this present activity lies the evidence of older industries come and gone. A good guide will point out the hollows in the tidal reaches that were dug out in the 19th century when Medway mud was loaded into sailing barges by labourers called “muddies”, taken to kilns and mixed with chalk to provide the London building boom with cement. What he needn’t point out are the barges, which rot as nicely shaped timbers where the highest tide has left them and are in their way picturesque.
This is also a place of blighted ambition. The railway, for instance, was built for a glamorous purpose it only briefly fulfilled. Trains would take cross-Channel passengers to a pier with a hotel attached called Port Victoria, where they could catch steamers to Belgium and cut a few minutes from journey times offered by rival companies. But only Victoria, the monarch, found much use for it and long before the second world war the Hoo line had become a little-used byway. It last saw a passenger 50 years ago. Port Victoria has been buried under oil pipelines and mud.
Then on Hoo’s northerly coast, there is Allhallows-on-Sea, the Ozymandias of seaside resorts. Developed by the Southern Railway, which built a branch to it in the 1930s, Allhallows was intended to have 5,000 houses, several hotels, a zoo and Britain’s largest swimming pool with a wave-making machine. Then the war intervened. Postwar Londoners failed to return as holidaymakers and the railway closed. Today a big, echoing 1930s pub, the British Pilot, stands at the end of a cul-de-sac, beyond which is a park of holiday chalets and a sea wall with views across the estuary to Southend. Retired couples spend their summers there and winters in Goa or Cyprus, dividing the money released by the sale of their old homes between a chalet in Allhallows and a flat in the sun. “We don’t do cold,” says a tanned woman in her 60s, talking of these annual switches; while another wonders what will happen if her husband dies before her and she, a non-driver, is left alone in this inaccessible place.
Would it matter to the world beyond, other than to birds and ornithologists too, if Hoo became a giant airport and dock, clustered with warehouses, freight yards and car parks? It looks no more than a fitting next step for a peninsula that has for centuries been so ruthlessly used. Really, unless you live there, would you care?
And yet something important will go: wreckage, the traces of a previous era that have no official curator and are therefore delightful to find. High up one of Hoo’s creeks sits a motorised barge, built in 1915 and long defunct, but still cared for by her last skipper, Cliff Pace, who turns the pages of his old logbook smiling at what he and his barge once achieved. “We took 3,237 bags of prunes from Albert Dock to Whitstable … 5,385 cartons of corned beef from the Victoria Dock to Stroud … 163 bundles of pick-axe handles from West India Dock to Otterham Quay.” Even in the 1970s, the estuary was busy with lighters and lightermen – lovely times, says Mr Pace, but all gone. I look at his entries in the logbook and feel, just for a second, the same sensation of discovery that came when a carpet of moss was peeled from a square stone, the beetles scattered and my brother said, “Look…”
Implementation of the carbon tax is now just 20 days away, and still the surprises continue about just how wide-ranging the new tax will be.
One reason for the carbon tax’s unpopularity is that the electorate rightly feels kept in the dark over where and how the tax will apply.
Carbon confusion reigns. The government’s messages have been mixed, to say the least, beginning with Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s pre-election promise that there would be no such tax under her leadership.
The government moved on from that stance a little too quickly for public tastes.
Now we have government ads that promote compensation to cover the increased costs of living that the carbon tax will bring about, yet the ads decline to mention the tax itself.
It’s more than slightly worrying. So, too, is the exclusive news in today’s Daily Telegraph that Sydney hospitals and schools will face extensive carbon tax bills. This doesn’t fit at all with the government’s rhetoric about punishing so-called big polluters.
According to NSW Treasury analysis, our public health system could be hit with carbon tax bills of $120,000 per hospital per year. Public schools are warned to expect annual carbon tax bills of about $9000. The list of beneficial things that schools and hospitals could do with this money is probably infinite, and almost all of them would have a more positive effect than sending those funds to Canberra.
Consider, too, the pointless and expensive extent of financial “churn” involved.
State hospitals and schools are funded by taxes. They then return some of those taxes to cover their carbon tax debt, at which point a segment of those taxes is redirected to certain households as part of the government’s compensation plan.
It appears to be a massive amount of effort in order to achieve very little at all, apart from hostility throughout the electorate.
On that score, and that score alone, the carbon tax has been an extraordinarily efficient device.
***************************
The adults started it
Children have at least two profound innate skills. One is to rapidly absorb information about the world around them, particularly in the area of communication.
The other is a powerful awareness of just how to get the attention of parents.
Combine these two abilities and it’s no wonder that swear words are so irresistible to even the very youngest of children.
Incredibly, after listening to an adult conversation that may include thousands of words, a child will effortlessly detect and then repeat the one word that is “naughty”. Perhaps they pick up on the clear use of these words to provide emphasis.
As for a solution, even the least profane household would be hard-put to conceal a child from language heard on television, in schoolyards and at sporting events. Especially, and regrettably, at sporting events featuring rugby league teams from Queensland.
Language happens.
Thankfully, children are also quick to pick up on parental instructions. If you can’t stop the bad words, you can still have your say on why they are bad.