Author: admin

  • Penrith result highlights Labor’s struggle

     

    “It probably means that federally there is no way the Labor Party is going to hang off until the new year for an election,” he said.

    “Kevin Rudd wouldn’t want to face the polls anywhere near when NSW goes to the election.”

    NSW Premier Kristina Keneally says she is disappointed but not surprised by her party’s record defeat.

    But Ms Keneally does not think the Penrith result will be replicated when the whole state goes to the polls in March.

    “By-elections are very different creatures to general elections. By-elections are always fought within a specific context on a specific set of circumstances,” she said.

    She has blamed anger at the former Labor member for Penrith, Karyn Paluzzano, for the party’s poor result.

    “In this case the former member did not act with that integrity that the electorate expects and when I was out in the electorate I heard that over and over again,” she said.

    “People were disappointed that the former member had acted without that integrity that is expected by elected representatives.”

     

    Greens vote

     

    The Greens more than doubled their vote in the by-election.

    Greens candidate Suzie Wright received 12.6 per cent of the primary vote.

    At the 2007 state election the Greens only got 5.5 per cent of the vote in Penrith.

    Mr Green says the Labor Party should be concerned.

    “Labor has even finished behind the Greens in a couple of booths in Penrith which indicates that at the general election it is not only the Coalition that Labor has to worry about,” he said.

    “In some seats Labor is really going to struggle to stay ahead of the Greens and defeat the Greens in seats like Marrickville and Balmain.”

    Greens MP Lee Rhiannon says the Greens are hoping for a Lower House breakthrough in the federal election.

    “Our numbers people assess that Balmain is the seat where we have the best chance, with Marrickville not far behind,” she said.

    “But we’re aware that it’s very tough coming forward and being able to win a lower house seat in an election where there’s no proportional representation, so we’ll give it everything we’ve got.”

    Meawhile, Ms Wright is angry a non-Greens pamphlet was handed out at polling booths yesterday telling people to vote for her first, then Labor second.

    The material was authorised by a Labor councillor who also authorised the ALP’s how-to-vote cards.

    Ms Wright says Labor did not ask for permission to use her name on the pamphlet and she is writing to the Electoral Commission about to matter.

    “I would have liked to be consulted because I think it is a Green grab. They are trying to get the Greens preferences without actually talking about it to anybody,” she said.

     

    Hero’s welcome

     

    Stuart Ayres, 29, was given a hero’s welcome at a victory party last night after he was voted in.

    He says it is a privilege to be chosen to represent the people of Penrith.

    “I will make sure that I will dedicate every waking moment to making sure Penrith gets everything it deserves and making sure it stays on the map for the right reasons,” he said.

    “For someone who loves this city so much to be able to represent it in parliament is a huge privilege and I thank the people of Penrith for giving me that.”

    Labor’s candidate John Thain says he will run again at the March general election.

    “I always knew that it would be difficult but I am determined that I am still going to serve the people of Penrith and I’m ready to have another crack in 10 months,” he said.

    NSW Opposition Leader Barry O’Farrell told Liberal supporters in Penrith it is the first time the party has won a western Sydney seat in two decades.

    “So what we have seen tonight is Penrith and the lower Blue Mountains change itself,” he said.

    “Vote for politics that is about honesty and integrity, vote for politics that’s about focussing on the issues and getting results. Vote for new politics, not the old politics of Labor.”

    Tags: government-and-politics, elections, federal-state-issues, states-and-territories, australia, nsw, penrith-2750

  • Penrith By-election

    MEDIA RELEASE Penrith by-election: Greens vote surge, bad news for Labor in Balmain The doubling of the Greens vote in the Penrith by-election underlines the level of voter anger with Labor and indicates a likely Lower House breakthrough for the party in the NSW 2011 state election. With 60 per cent of the vote counted the Greens candidate Suzie Wright has received 12.6 per cent. At the 2007 state election the Greens received 5.5 per cent of the vote in Penrith. Labor’s vote has halved to 24 per cent of the vote. The Liberals won with a primary vote of 50.9 per cent. “Labor’s failure to address the needs of Penrith and western Sydney has resulted in the crash in the government’s vote,” Ms Wright said. “Although the Liberals have received a massive swing I believe this was a vote against Labor rather than a vote for the opposition. “The swing to the Liberals is more than 20 per cent on the two party preferred vote. “The collapse of Labor’s vote puts the government and the opposition on notice. This area needs a major upgrade of public transport services. Greens MP Lee Rhiannon said that today’s results for the Greens suggests a strong result at the 2011 state election. “The Greens beat Labor in all four lower Blue Mountains polling booths. “Penrith is not normally a strong seat for the Greens so the fact that we have more than doubled our vote is very encouraging. “These results will be unsettling for Labor in state seats like Balmain and Marrickville where they are under threat from an increasing Greens demographic. “These results are in keeping with recent polls that have had the Greens between 13 and 16 per cent of the vote. “The Greens have also received a strong result in the Hawkesbury City Council by-election with our candidate Danielle Wheeler gaining 23 per cent of the vote. This is up from 10 per cent in the last local council election,” said Ms Rhiannon. For more information – 0427 861 568 — Another message from the Greens Media mailing list. Too many messages? Don’t unsubscribe – try switching to a daily digest. You can unsubscribe or change your subscription settings here: Or send an email to

  • The fates of nation: A Biological Theory of History

     

    • Niches are professions, and have limited intake. “The squirrel is highly tuned to a very specialized profession. It cannot change its way of life. Squirrels, therefore, live only in times and places suited to the squirrel way of life, to the squirrel niche. [It follows that] the numbers of any kind of squirrel that may live are fixed.”[1]
    • Species are vehicles for niche discovery. Each niche establishes a limit on population; individuals compete for a slice of this pie by natural selection. A niche is not about survival but about lifestyle; children want to grow up in the lifestyle to which they have grown accustomed.
    • A crucial part of success in leaving behind descendants is to correctly estimate the optimum number of children to maximize one’s chances. Infanticide is one way to modulate this estimation, given the time taken for human babies to mature.
    • For the last 10,000 years man has been able to create new niches.
    • Man is an ice age species. The ice age wasn’t actually colder across the planet. Since the ice caps were larger, the oceans receded. The tropical savannahs were larger. Man has evolved to like broad open spaces, and to value choice.
    • Wealth and poverty are two extreme types of niche. The wealthy live lifestyles closer to those they were evolved to enjoy. The poor are poor because their constraints deny them various aspects of this lifestyle.
    • The poor have many children because more children don’t require much more to raise. The rich have few children because they can’t afford more in their lifestyle.
    • As a civilization grows, its poor grow in number. The rich feel first the pinch of narrowing niche spaces. These lead their children to trade.
    • A common pattern is for island nations to grow militarily, since trading ships are temptations to pirates and require armored defense, and provide the civilization with occasions to practice and perfect war.
    • As trade grows, life improves for all. Population grows in response. The rich, once again squeezed, eye neighboring lands.
    • If the neighboring lands have barbarians who live relatively ‘rich’ lives, they are conquered by large densities of poorer people. (See Prisoner’s dilemma) This explains the Roman conquest of Western Europe and Britain.
    • If the neighboring lands have another citified civilization, they must be conquered by technology. This explains the Roman subjugation of Carthage, and Alexander’s invasion of Persia. The modern European conquest of the new world is similar in many ways.
    • Wars of aggression are always caused by rising numbers. Wars of aggression are always popular wars.
    • Wars are not won by superior numbers but by superior technology and technique. All you need is a superiority of two to one or three to one at the point of contact of opposing infantry. Good generalship is about making this happen.
    • Aggressive war becomes a habit to nations that pursue it successfully.
    • Controlling birth rate is the primary way to transcend the pattern of history.

    Often depressing, this book helps understand human nature, poverty, politics and contemporary policy.

    [edit] References

    1. ^ Paul A. Colinvaux, The Fates of Nations: A Biological Theory of History. Simon & Schuster, August 1980. ISBN 0-671-25204-6
  • Kevin Rudd’s population policy already decided?

     
    “Kevin Rudd said on Saturday that the new Minister, Tony Burke, must be ‘acutely mindful’ of the positive implications of growth on the economy.
     
    “There are many other things Mr Burke could have been told to mind, such as the impact of increased population on biodiversity, or water, or shortage of infrastructure. 
     
    “The PM’s marching orders unfortunately tell Mr Burke to come out on the side of the development lobby, which has immediately skewed the whole debate.
     
    “The new portfolio being based in Treasury, rather than, for instance, Environment, further shows that the PM’s views on the matter are blinkered.
     
    “The new Minister was formerly a Shadow Immigration Minister and, given the Rudd Government’s shocking record of increasing immigration without telling the Australian public in the 2007 election that this was their intention, Mr Burke will be carrying a lot of baggage.
     
    “The former Shadow Environment Minister, Kelvin Thomson, has shown himself to be the only Federal Labor MP who understands that without an environmentally sustainable future there is no future. That Kevin Rudd has picked Tony Burke over Kelvin Thomson says far more about the PM’s politicking on this vital issue than about Kelvin Thomson’s deep understanding and commitment to a sustainable Australia” said Ms Kanck.
     
     
    Further comment: Sandra Kanck 08 8336 4114 or 0417882143
    Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 April 2010 10:25 )

     

    Comments  

     
    #1 Brian Sanderson 2010-05-07 09:49

    There is also a strong economic argument to be made in favour of limiting population to an optimal number. I highly recommend:

    Paul Colinvaux, 1980. The Fates of Nations: A Biological Theory of History.

    Colinvaux explains the associations between human population growth, warfare, and human suffering due to diminished economic opportunity.

    Quote

     
  • Cutting greenhouse gases will be no quick fix for our weather, scientists say

     

    The research suggests that increased floods and droughts could continue long after future efforts to stabilise temperature may succeed.

    Vicky Pope, head of climate change advice at the Hadley Centre, said: “We can’t say that if we manage to bring down our carbon dioxide emissions then we don’t need to worry any more. There will still be changes beyond that point.”

    A team led by Peili Wu used a computer model to analyse how the Earth’s water cycle could react to changes in future amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

    It found that once carbon dioxide levels rise to a high level, even sharp reductions fail to prevent longlasting impacts on snow and rainfall.

    This is down to accumulated heat in the oceans, which dissipates slowly and drives changes in the water cycle as it does so.

    Writing in a paper to be published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, the scientists say: “Our results suggest that relationships between precipitation and warming may significantly underestimate precipitation changes during periods of [greenhouse gas] stabilisation or reduction.

    “The inertia due to the accumulated heat in the ocean implies a commitment to changes long after stabilisation.”

    They add: “This effect must be taken into account when assessing the implications of various mitigation options for flooding, water supply, food production and human health.”

    The study simulated the effects of a steady rise in carbon dioxide levels until the equivalent atmospheric concentration topped 1,000ppm (parts per million).

    The current CO2 level is just over 390ppm, and most policies aimed at tackling climate change suggest the world should not exceed 450ppm-550ppm, though this would require significant curbs on carbon pollution.

    In the study, the scientists then rapidly brought the CO2 level back down to pre-industrial levels of around 280ppm.

    In practice, this would be impossible – without geo-engineering techniques that could actively remove it from the atmosphere – but the scientists wanted to see what would theoretically happen.

    The model showed that, while temperatures dropped sharply as CO2 was reduced, the disruption to precipitation continued for several decades.

    How the rainfall may change for a particular region is a more complicated question, though the scientists said their model suggested significant drying in South America, Southern Africa and Australia.

     

  • Rudd predicts poll thrashing over mining tax

     

    But Mr Rudd said that despite an election nearing, the Government is determined to introduce the tax.

    “This business of reform is a tough business, is a hard business. It’s never some sort of even and smooth trajectory,” he said.

    “I expect that we’re going to continue to take a whacking in the polls for some little time to come yet.

    “You can’t just dodge hard questions like tax reform – you’ve got to engage in it.”

    The Prime Minister appeared flustered when pressed by presenter Kerry O’Brien on the issue, but avoided a display of emotion like his last appearance on the show.

    Last month, a visibly angry Mr Rudd accused O’Brien of living in “7:30 Report land” after being questioned over his decision to shelve the emissions trading scheme.

    The Opposition seized on Mr Rudd’s performance in the interview, comparing him to former Labor leader Mark Latham.

    But this time round, Mr Rudd started the interview with smiles, saying he was “happy to be back in 7:30 Report land”.

    Mr Rudd appeared unworried by his recent thrashing in the polls, saying results were “up and down” for former prime ministers John Howard and Paul Keating.

    “Numbers are up and down … depending on the toughness of the fight,” he said.

    “These debates are always tough and that is why the Government is going through a tough time.”

     

    ‘Gang of four’

     

    Mr Rudd also defended the Government’s decision-making process against claims that power is too concentrated in a small group of senior ministers.

    Some in the Labor caucus are privately critical that key decisions are made by the so-called “kitchen cabinet” or “gang of four” of Julia Gillard, Lindsay Tanner, Wayne Swan and Mr Rudd.

    There have also been several reports that key ministers have been left out of the decision-making process.

    But Mr Rudd said he has a strong and capable cabinet.

    “It’s pretty easy to become fixated on one thing or another, but this list of reforms is impressive,” he said.

    “Those ministers are impressive ministers as are their colleagues and they’ve taken charge of these things themselves.”

    Tags: mining, government-and-politics, federal-government, tax, rudd-kevin, australia, wa

    First posted 1 hour 16 minutes ago