Author: admin

  • Bugs to listen in on wildlife’s most wanted

    Bugs to listen in on wildlife’s most wanted

    John Stapleton | May 03, 2009

    Article from:  The Australian

    VERY few people have ever seen Australia’s extremely rare Eastern Ground Parrot, noted for its beauty. They are found only in dense thickets of bush on a few patches of heath country along the eastern seaboard.

    Shy and secretive, making their tunnels and nests in the undergrowth, Ground Parrots are almost impossible to find.

    Until now. Traditionally the only way to find a ground parrot or to monitor their density has been to listen at dusk for their calls or have a line of a dozen or more people beating through the scrub to flush them out. Even then, they only fly briefly before scurrying back into their hiding places. They would much rather walk than fly.

    But Australian scientists are forging the use of new technology which will allow them to map the numbers and whereabouts of some of Australia’s most threatened wildlife _ referred to as “cryptic” species because they are so hard to see and so little is known about them.

    The Barren Grounds Nature Reserve on the Illawarra escarpment south of Sydney is one of the only places where the Eastern Ground Parrots, which resemble giant green budgerigars with black and yellow flecking and a red bar on their forehead, are found in any significant numbers. Even then visitors and bird enthusiasts are very hard put to find them.

    Dr Elizabeth Tasker from the NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change is pioneering the use of a new machine known as the Song Meter, sophisticated listening devices which can be left in the bush for months at a time and pre-programmed to record at specific times of the day. The machines can be programmed to automatically adjust to the shifting seasons, so at Barren Grounds for instance, the Song Meter will record for about an hour at sunset.

    The project, known as the Automated Acoustic Monitoring of Threatened Fauna study, is being funded by the Foundation for National Parks and Wildlife. It builds on a previous study with the UNSW, University of Wollongong and Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment Management Authority.

    The Song Meters were developed in the US and have only begun to be used around the world over the past year. Australian scientists are among the first to use it as a monitoring tool for rare and endangered species.

    The key advance on previous audio monitoring is that the new equipment is compact and lightweight and the call recognition software is easily adaptable to identify new species.

    By placing several of the Song Meters in an area, the data received can be triangulated to identify exactly where the birds are and their likely numbers. Software being developed at the University of Wollongong will allow signals from multiple stations to be combined to help locate the animals.

    Ultimately the technology could have many different uses; including expanding the hunt for the mysterious Night Parrot of Central Australia, closely related to the Eastern Ground Parrot but feared extinct. Like the Ground Parrot, its rarity and shy and secretive behaviour in remote areas has until now made it extremely expensive to research. “Ornithologists have been searching for the Night Parrot for years, but it is just so rare the chance of being in the right place at the right time is very small,” Dr Tasker said. “It may turn out not to be extinct; and these units are our best chance to find out whether it has survived.”

    Disputes between conservationists and developers over whether threatened species exist on a particular site could also be resolved through its use.

    Dr Tasker said if the Ground Parrot study proved successful, the technology had great potential to be used across a range of species, particularly birds and frogs because of their distinctive calls. The even rarer Eastern Bristlebird, said to look and behave more like a bush rat than a bird, is likely to be next.

    But all that is in the future. The Ground Parrots at Barren Grounds, where their calls can be heard at dawn and dusk, are the first species to be monitored in this manner.

    Dr Tasker said the power of the power of this tool is that it greatly broadened their ability to study rare and cryptic species. “In studying rare animals you are really limited to where and how often you can get access, so surveys tend to be along roads,” she said. “But a lot of habitats, such as for the Ground Parrot, have no ready access.

    “Another beauty of the technology is you can leave these passive listening devices out for weeks or months. The software can sift through months of recordings in minutes, giving you a much better idea of how many birds are there.”

    The old fashioned method of counting Ground Parrots by flushing them out or by listening for them has already indicated there has been a steady decline in numbers since the last fires swept through Barren Grounds in 1983. The birds are fire sensitive, increasing rapidly in number after a fire because of the diversity of vegetation that thrives after a burn.

    It was Dr Tasker’s work as a fire ecologist which led to her interest in Ground Parrots. She said knowing the fire thresholds for threatened species was essential for their management and survival, with the relationship of many frogs to fires being particularly poorly known.

    “There are a whole bunch of these cryptic species threatened by fire; either they need fire for maintenance of diversity of vegetation, or they are easily damaged by it. How often bushland is burnt makes a real difference to what species survive.

    “This research can help us determine, for instance, when conducting a controlled burn how much of an area should be burnt at any one time.”

    Research assistant Jessica Bryant, who did her Honours degree in science on the impacts of walking dogs on birds, said there had been very little work done on the impact of fire on Australian animals. “The only way we can determine the appropriate fire regime is to know more about the populations. There is a big gap in our knowledge of threatened species.

    “Traditional techniques were very labour intensive.”

    Funder of the project, Leonie Gale, CEO of the Foundation for National Parks and Wildlife, said the project could revolutionise the way threatened species were monitored, located and protected.

    “There is really very little money around for scientific research and remarkably little is known about Australias rarest critters,” she said. “Government will often not fund these sorts of projects because they are high risk, they aren’t proven and might not work. We fund the iffy stuff, the catalysing projects. I was inspired by the credentials of those proposing the project. This is a real first. It is not being done anywhere else in the world.

    “Other organisations set aside land for these species that they fence off to keep the animals safe and study them in what resembles their original native environment, but rather than looking at animals like specimens in a petri dish our focus is on learning about the animals in the wild, where they have to cope with many threats and changed habitats.

    “By using acoustic monitoring we can find out where these animals are without intrusion and can work out how many are present in any particular location.

    “Australia will lose many species in the next 30 years; this is a remote management tool for threatened species which could help stop that happening.”

  • Maude mad about Murray damage

    Advisor to the United Nations on water, Maude Barlow, last week announced a ban on the sale of bottled water from municipal facilities during the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver. Bottled water has recently been implicated in increased levels of estrogen in the human population but it is the commodification of water that has made Maude mad. In Australia to address the Australian Water Summit last month, Ms Barlow flew over the mouth of the Murray River and spoke vehemently about the environmental destruction she saw there. “Until we understand that water is a fundamental right of the environment as well as present and future humans, we cannot live in harmony,” she said. Ms Barlow is spearheading campaigns across Canada to prevent damage to ground water as well as lakes and streams.

  • Rudd lacks courage and vision says ex ALP president

    Speaking at Eco Forum in Sydney last week, Australia’s longest service Science Minister and long term federal president of the Australian Labor Party, Barry Jones, said that the Rudd government showed no signs of taking the necessary steps to combat climate change. He commended the analysis of Liberal whistle-blower Guy Pearce as explaining why Australian governments rule for vested interests and said, “observers could be forgiving for not being able to distinguish the Rudd government from Howard’s [in term of its position on global warming]” Jones addressed 300 local government and engineering professionals on the future prospects for Australia. Describing the developed world generally, he said, “Our governments lack the leadership and vision necessary to discard the systems that got us into this mess. Political parties have become increasingly irrelevant. They are basically job placement agencies for an ailing membership.”

  • Solar thermal baseload comes on line

    In the high desert of southern Spain, not far from Granada, the Mediterranean sun bounces off large arrays of precisely curved mirrors that cover an area as large as 70 soccer fields. These parabolic troughs follow the arc of the sun as it moves across the sky, concentrating the sun’s rays onto pipes filled with a synthetic oil that can be heated to 750 degrees Fahrenheit. That super-heated oil is used to boil water to power steam turbines, or to pump excess heat into vats of salts, turning them a molten, lava-like consistency.

    The salts are just fertilizers – a mix of sodium and potassium nitrate – but they represent a significant advance in the decades-old technology of solar thermal power production, which has traditionally used mirrors to heat water or oil to generate electricity-producing steam. Now, engineers can use the molten salts to store the heat from solar radiation many hours after the sun goes down and then release it at will to drive turbines. That means solar thermal power can be used to generate electricity nearly round-the-clock.

    The plant in southern Spain, known as Andasol 1, began operating last November and now provides 50 megawatts of power, enough electricity to supply 50,000 to 60,000 homes year-round. Andasol 2 will come online later this summer, with Andasol 3 already under construction. When the entire Andasol complex is completed in 2011, it is expected to generate enough electricity to power 150,000 households – about 600,000 people.

    In the face of mounting concern about climate change, developing alternatives to coal and natural gas

    Seville
     

    Wikimedia
    At this 11-megawatt power tower outside Seville, Spain, sunlight reflects off 624 moveable mirrors to heat water pipes atop the 40-story tower, creating steam that drives a turbine.

    combustion has taken on a new urgency, and the construction of utility-scale solar thermal power plants in deserts and arid areas is looking like an increasingly promising option. In the United States alone, solar thermal power projects are now being built near fast-growing centers of electricity consumption, such as Las Vegas, Los Angeles, and Phoenix. The first major solar thermal plant to be completed in decades, dubbed Nevada Solar One, started providing 64 megawatts of power to the neon lights of Las Vegas in 2007, although it lacks the latest molten-salt technology. Across the globe, utilities are currently building or planning solar thermal projects in North Africa, Spain, and Australia, among other regions.

    Some of the recent claims for solar thermal power have been stunning. Researchers at the German Aerospace Center have estimated that 16,000 square kilometers of solar thermal power plants in North Africa – paired with a new infrastructure of high-voltage, direct-current transmission lines – could provide enough electricity for all of Europe. And scientists have estimated that constructing solar thermal power plants on less than 1 percent of the world’s deserts – an area roughly the size of Austria – could meet the entire world’s energy needs.

    Of course, solar thermal has been here before, experiencing a boom in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Its progress then was stalled by collapsing fossil fuel prices, as well as a lack of government support. Today, some critics of the technology fault it for taking up acreage in fragile deserts.

    The case for solar thermal power hinges on economics. The sun bathes the Earth with an average of 6 kilowatt-hours of power per square meter over the course of a day, and a concentrated solar power plant like Andasol is the cheapest way to harvest a portion of that. Photovoltaics – semiconductor panels that convert sunlight to electricity – deliver power at roughly 40 cents per kilowatt-hour, while conventional solar thermal power plants can do so for around 13 cents per kilowatt hour, according to the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. This is only marginally more expensive than the average U.S. price for coal-generated electricity in 2008 of 11 cents per kilowatt hour. The cutting-edge technology of using molten salts to store solar-generated heat is considerably more expensive, but experts expect that price to fall steadily as the technology improves and is mass-produced.

    “One of the great things about molten salt technology is that you can get more energy out of the same facility,” says Barbara Lockwood, manager for renewable energy at Arizona Public Services.

  • Suburbanites flock to Farmday

    Hundreds of Australian families will leave the city on the last weekend of this month to spend time on a farm and learn more about where their food and fibre come from. National Farm Day is an annual event organised by the National Farmers Foundation which has seen enthusiastic response from city dwellers keen to find out more about life on the land. The relatively tiny number of farmers in Australia and currently tough times on the land mean that there are currently more visitors than available hosts. Farmers willing to participate are encouraged to register at the Farmday website.

  • Brits wake up to palm oil blitz

    One of the stories from this week’s Independent

    It’s an invisible ingredient, really, palm oil. You won’t find it listed on your margarine, your bread, your biscuits or your KitKat. It’s there though, under “vegetable oil”. And its impact, 7,000 miles away, is very visible indeed.

    The wildlife-rich forests of Indonesia and Malaysia are being chain-sawed to make way for palm-oil plantations. Thirty square miles are felled daily in a burst of habitat destruction that is taking place on a scale and speed almost unimaginable in the West.

    When the rainforests disappear almost all of the wildlife – including the orangutans, tigers, sun bears, bearded pigs and other endangered species – and indigenous people go. In their place come palm-oil plantations stretching for mile after mile, producing cheap oil – the cheapest cooking oil in the world – for everyday food.

    It’s not that people haven’t noticed what is going on. The United Nations has documented this rampage. Environmental groups have warned that what we buy affects what is happening in these jungles. Three years ago, Britain’s biggest supermarket, Tesco, was persuaded to join the only organisation that just might halt the chopping, the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil.

    In his globe-trotting Tribe series two years ago, the TV explorer Bruce Parry was visibly moved by the sad fate of the Penan, a forest-dwelling tribe in Borneo. Most recently, the BBC’s prime-time Orangutan Diary showed the battle to create fresh habitats for “red apes” orphaned by deforestation, principally for palm oil.

    But if there’s plenty of evidence of the devastating environmental effects of palm-oil, little of it can be seen on the products in Britain’s biggest supermarkets.

    Until now, the best estimate of the number of leading supermarket products containing palm oil (Elaeis guineensis) has been one in 10, the figure quoted by Friends of the Earth in its 2005 report, “The Oil for Apes Scandal”. After a two-month investigation, The Independent has established that palm oil is used in far greater quantities. We can reveal for the first time that it is confirmed or suspected in 43 of Britain’s 100 bestselling grocery brands (see box, right), representing £6bn of the UK’s £16bn annual shopping basket for top brands. If you strip out drinks, pet food and household goods, the picture is starker still: 32 out of 62 of Britain’s top foods contain this tree-felling, wildlife-wrecking ingredient.

    It’s in the top three loaves – Warburtons, Hovis, and Kingsmill – and the bestselling margarines Flora and Clover. It’s in Special K, Crunchy Nut Cornflakes, Mr Kipling Cakes, McVitie’s Digestives and Goodfella’s pizza. It’s in KitKat, Galaxy, Dairy Milk and Wrigley’s chewing gum. It’s in Persil washing powder, Comfort fabric softener and Dove soap. It’s also in plenty of famous brands that aren’t in the top 100, such as Milkybar, Jordan’s Country Crisp and Utterly Butterly. And it’s almost certainly in thousands of supermarket own brands. Yet none of these manufacturers can prove their supply is “sustainable”.

    What, then, is “unsustainable” palm oil? Step one: log a forest and remove the most valuable species for furniture. Step two: chainsaw or burn the remaining wood releasing huge quantities of greenhouse gas. Step three: plant a palm-oil plantation. Step four: make oil from the fruit and kernels. Step five: add it to biscuits, chocolate, margarine, soaps, moisturisers and washing powder. At breakfast, when millions of us are munching toast, we’re eating a small slice of the rainforest.

    From outer space, borneo and sumatra resemble giant emerald stepping stones between Thailand and Australia. Reaching the heart of their still-massive jungles takes days of boat trips and trekking. Gibbons hoot and long-tailed macaques squawk. Mongooses and pangolins scamper through the undergrowth. Large-beaked rhinoceros hornbills soar above the forest. The huge green and black Rajah Brooke’s butterfly flutters by.

    These rainforests are honeypots for flora and fauna, among the most biodiverse places on Earth. Consider the figures. Sumatra – the size of Spain, owned by Indonesia – has 465 species of bird, 194 species of mammal, 217 species of reptile, 272 species of freshwater fish, and an estimated 10,000 species of plant. Borneo – the size of Turkey and shared between Indonesia and Malaysia – is even richer: 420 birds, 210 mammals, 254 reptiles, 368 freshwater fish and around 15,000 plants.

    All these species evolved to live in this unique forest environment. The Sumatran rhino is the smallest, hairiest and most endangered in the world; the Sumatran tiger is the smallest tiger. The black sun bear, with its U-shaped patch of white fur under its chin, is the smallest bear. Some of them are curious in the extreme: the bug-eyed western tarsier; the striped rabbit; the marled cat; and the tree-jumping clouded leopard, which feasts on pygmy squirrels and long-tailed porcupines.

    Of all the animals, though, the most famous by far is the orangutan (or “man of the jungle”). With its orange hair and long arms, the orangutan is one of our planet’s most unusual creatures. And one of the smartest, too. The Dutch anthropologist Carel van Schaik found that orangutans could perform tasks which were well beyond chimpanzees, such as making rain hats and leakproof roofs for their nests.

    The primatologist Dr Willie Smits estimates that orangutans can distinguish between 1,000 different plants, knowing which ones are edible, which are poisonous, and which cure headaches. In her book Thinkers of the Jungle, the psychology professor Anne Russon recalled that one orangutan keeper took three days to solve the mystery of who’d been stealing from the fridge. It turned out that an orangutan had been using a paperclip to pick the lock of its cage, then hiding the paperclip under its tongue.

    Along with chimpanzees, gorillas and bonobos, orangutans are great apes, sharing 97 per cent of their DNA with humans, having split from us a mere 13 million years ago. They exist only in these forests of Borneo and Sumatra, and it is their arboreal nature that leaves them so vulnerable to deforestation. Between 2004 and 2008, according to the US Great Ape Trust, the orangutan population fell by 10 per cent (to 49,600) on Borneo and by 14 per cent (to 6,600) on Sumatra. As the author Serge Wich warned: “Unless extraordinary efforts are made soon, it could become the first great-ape species to go extinct.”

    Native people too, known in Borneo as Dayaks, are under threat. About 10,000 members of the semi-nomadic Penan tribe survive but their traditional lifestyle – which includes harvesting the starchy sago tree – is being felled.

    A researcher with Survival International, the London-based human-rights organisation, returned to the UK last month with transcripts of interviews with the Penan conducted deep in the jungle. According to one headman, called Matu, hunters were increasingly returning empty-handed. “When the logging started in the Nineties, we thought we had a big problem,” he complained. “But when oil palm arrived [in 2005], logging was relegated to problem No 2. Our land and our forests have been taken by force.

    “Our fruit trees are gone, our hunting grounds are very limited, and the rivers are polluted, so the fish are dying. Before, there were lots of wild boar around here. Now, we only find one every two or three months. In the documents, all of our land has been given to the company.”

    “There were no discussions,” said another Penan. “The company just put up signs saying the government had given them permission to plant oil palm on our land.”

    Indonesia is trying to crack down on illegal foresting, but corruption is rife hundreds of miles from Jakarta. Satellite pictures show logging has encroached on 90 per cent of Borneo’s national parks – and according to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): “New estimates suggest 98 per cent of [Indonesia’s] forest may be destroyed by 2022, the lowland forest much sooner.”

    In its 2007 report, “The Last Stand of the Orangutan”, UNEP warned that forest rangers were outnumbered and outgunned by logging guards with military training and automatic weapons – and faced “high and sometimes lethal risks” in confronting them. The programme’s executive director Achim Steiner wrote: “The driving forces are not impoverished farmers, but what appears to be well-organised companies with heavy machinery and strong international links to the global markets.”

    In its own way, palm oil is a wonder plant. Astonishingly productive, its annual yield is 3.6 tonnes a hectare compared with half a tonne for soy or rapeseed. Originally found in West Africa, palm oil is uniquely “fractionable” when cooked, meaning its properties can be easily separated for different products. Although high in artery-clogging saturated fat, it is healthier than hydrogenated fats. For manufacturers, there is another significant benefit. At £400 a tonne, it is cheaper than soy, rapeseed or sunflower.

    Some 38m tonnes of palm oil are produced globally, about 75 per cent in Malaysia and Indonesia. Borneo’s 11,000 square miles of plantations produce 10m tonnes a year while Sumatra’s 14,000 square miles yield 13m tonnes.

    Since 1990, the amount of land used for palm-oil production has increased by 43 per cent. Demand is rising at between six and 10 per cent a year. China’s billion-plus population is the biggest consumer, importing 18 per cent of global supply. About 16 per cent arrives in the EU.

    In the UK, almost every major food manufacturer uses palm oil, among them Kellogg’s, Cadbury, Mars, Kraft, Unilever, Premier Foods, Northern Foods and Associated British Foods (ABF). Companies typically say they are working to source sustainable supplies – and insist their use is “small”, “very small” or “minute”.

    The US household giant Procter & Gamble, which uses palm oil in detergents, shampoos and soaps, says: “P&G uses very little palm oil – about 1 per cent of a worldwide production of palm and its derivatives.” One per cent of global production is 380,000 tonnes a year. P&G says it hopes to source a sustainable supply by 2015 – six years’ time.

    Right now no multinational can vouch that its supply is sustainable. The Anglo-Dutch household giant Unilever, the world’s biggest user of palm oil, is swallowing up 1.6m tonnes a year, 4 per cent of global supply. It admits the product causes huge damage, but believes it has a solution. Together with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Unilever set up the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in 2004. For its first four years – to the frustration of green groups – the RSPO talked, devising eight principles and 39 practical criteria designed to protect native peoples, plantation workers, small farmers and wildlife.

    Forty per cent of palm-oil suppliers are now members of the RSPO and it hopes all of them will eventually join. Members promise not to chainsaw any virgin forest; but they are still allowed to chop down “degraded forest” – where some trees have been felled – preventing other trees from re-growing and animals from returning.

    Palm-oil plantations are barren places. When vast blocks of palms are planted in straight lines, stretching for mile after mile, 90 per cent of the wildlife disappears. In the words of Junaida Payne, of WWF Malaysia’s Sabah office, they are “biological deserts”.

    Jan Kees Vis, Unilever’s director of sustainable agriculture and chairman of the RSPO, says it is “not realistic” to halt palm-oil expansion, but believes much growth can be achieved by raising yields. The best plantations currently yield 10 tonnes per hectare, but in the future this could hit 18 or even 50 tonnes, he says.

    The best plantations can obtain RSPO certification for sustainability – but only 4 per cent of global supply (1.5m tonnes) is currently certified sustainable. The first shipment arrived in Rotterdam last November and costs about 35 per cent more than normal supplies. Another scheme, Green Palm, is already bringing prices for RSPO supplies down further, adding just 5 per cent to the cost.

    Unilever has publicly committed to sourcing only certified palm oil by 2015. Premier Foods has a date of 2011, United Biscuits 2012. Most companies, however, including Cadbury, Kellogg’s, Nestlé, Mars and Heinz, have given no commitment to switch to an RSPO-certified supply. They merely say that their suppliers are members.

    As Vis puts it bluntly: “The volume of certified palm oil traded is disappointingly low so far; the reason for this being that many companies are not prepared to pay a premium for certified oil.”

    Environmentalists fear that the RSPO is itself greenwash, cover for a programme of vicious and unrelenting deforestation. Even the RSPO concedes that its members have subsidiaries who plant palm oil, and who are not bound by – and do not abide by – its rules.

    As if this were not enough, in the rush to replace diminishing fossil fuel, palm oil is being mixed into petrol. The EU Biofuels Directive aims to put biofuels in 5 per cent of all fuel pumps. Destroying peat forests for palm oil is especially bad for the climate, as these semi-saturated soils are dense “carbon stores” which release colossal quantities of C02 when they are burnt to make way for palm oil.

    In its “Cooking the Climate” report, Greenpeace calculated that the burning of South-east Asia’s peat forests – largely for palm-oil plantations – spewed 1.8bn tonnes of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere: 4 per cent of global climate-change emissions from 0.1 per cent of Earth’s land. According to Greenpeace forest campaigner James Turner, “The destruction of these forests is a really serious cause of climate change, but some companies are still trying to look the other way. It’s time for them to cancel contracts with the worst suppliers, because purchasing power is a highly effective tool in changing this industry.”

    Conservationists are increasingly wondering whether the wholesale destruction of rainforests to make margarine is the most striking of all examples of environmental lunacy. It isn’t just destroying one of the last great wildernesses, its rare animals and some of the remaining people whose ways are at odds with modern living. It also threatens to damage our own lives in the West.

    Deforestation causes 18 per cent of Co2 emissions, according to British government figures – a key element in the rising temperatures that in coming decades will alter our world for ever. No one can be exactly sure what climate change will bring but, in Britain, we can expect more flooding and winter gales, drier summers, water shortages, and more food poisoning and skin cancer. The sea will not just sweep over Bangladesh and the Maldives, but possibly threaten low-lying parts of Britain, such as London, too. Meanwhile, millions of people in developing countries with failing agriculture could migrate to northern Europe.

    The wealthy Western countries who have already felled their own forests (woods once covered Britain from Cornwall to Caithness) may have to pay more and more to protect those that remain in other parts of the world. At the Copenhagen summit in December, Britain and other countries will press for REDD (Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Degradation) – essentially a scheme for funding jungles in developing countries.

    In the meantime, forest campaigners hope that big companies will come under increasing scrutiny over palm oil. The Unilever-backed RSPO wants them to commit to a sustainable supply. Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace say palm-oil use should be reduced or phased out altogether. A few have already done so – PepsiCo, for instance, is phasing out palm oil from its remaining two products. United Biscuits says it has reduced palm oil in Digestives by 65 per cent and in McCoys by 76 per cent since 2005.

    So far, companies have managed to avoid much scrutiny over the havoc palm oil is wreaking. For now, it is “only” the native peoples, the orangutans and the other animals of the rainforest who have experienced the most profound changes. They are losing the habitat that they thought would be around for ever.

    “When I was a young girl I used to be so happy walking in the forest,” one Penan woman told Bruce Parry after trekking overnight to pass on her message. “I used to sing while I was looking for sago. I loved to hear the sound of the wild peacocks, the hornbills and the gibbons, and when I looked at the forest it was lovely.”

    Palm oil facts

    90 per cent of Sumatra’s orangutan population has disappeared since 1900. They now face extinction

    90 per cent of wildlife disappears when the forest is replaced by palm, creating a biological desert

    98 per cent of Indonesia’s forests may be destroyed by 2022 according to the United Nations

    43 of Britain’s 100 top grocery brands contain or are thought to contain palm oil