Author: admin

  • Coal boss concedes clean coal unlikely

    Australian Greens climate change spokesperson, Senator Christine Milne, today called on the Rudd Government to focus its Budget priorities on existing climate solutions such as energy efficiency and renewable energy as the National Generators Forum joins those wavering on coal geosequestration.

    Senator Milne said "The window dressing for the coal industry is now in tatters. Comments from John Boshier on the 7.30 Report last night, that coal with geosequestration is failing to live up to the industry’s hype are yet another warning to Governments banking on "clean" coal and failing to prioritise the real, clean alternatives of energy efficiency and renewable energy.

    "Mr Boshier echoed concerns that cost and timeline blowouts are deeply troubling, with little progress in years. In recent years, renewable energy technologies have been moving in leaps and bounds, increasing their efficiency, reducing costs and developing better energy storage technologies, whereas "clean" coal has stagnated."

    "Mr Boshier also raised the fundamental problem that we would need to find enough ideal sites to store at least 200 million tonnes of CO2 every year in Australia alone. That is a mammoth engineering problem and could easily lead to the use of less-than-ideal storage sites, increasing the risk of leakage which would render the whole exercise pointless.

    "What Mr Boshier did not note is that, even if the technology did show promise, the polluter pays principle tells us that the companies that have profited from polluting for so long should be the ones to shoulder the burden of cleaning up their act, not the taxpayer.

    "The coal sector is old, polluting and well entrenched. Even if climate change were not an issue, it would be outrageous that our governments add billions every year to the coffers of the rich multinational corporations that run the sector. When you add climate change considerations to the mix, ongoing fossil fuel subsidies become one of the most perverse and destructive government decisions imaginable.

    "With the Rudd Government searching for budgetary savings, surely subsidies to rich and polluting corporations should be the very first place to start, rather than further undermining scientific research by cutting the CSIRO’s budget.

    "The Greens have proposed that a portion of the billions that would be saved by cutting fossil fuel subsidies should be channelled towards further research, development and commercialisation of renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies through a Sun Fund, and to pay for the early stages of a systematic and systemic retrofit of Australia’s housing stock for energy efficiency set out in our EASI policy.

    "I will be watching the Government’s first Budget carefully to see if its priorities follow Martin Ferguson’s industry-fuelled hype, or a sensible, realistic path to clean energy."

  • South Africa faces food riots

    Manuel calls for calm, while Vavi warns of looming crisis in South Africa.

    “Don’t panic,” Finance Minister Trevor Manuel urged yesterday as food riots spread around the world.

    While global financial leaders have declared an international food emergency, South African labour federation, Cosatu, planned country-wide protests against price collusion and rampant inflation in the country’s food industry. The ruling ANC has also called on the Competition Commission to investigate the causes of high food prices. The price of a loaf of bread in September this year is likely to be at least 25% higher than it was a year ago.

    Speaking to Business Times from the annual spring meeting of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in Washington, Manuel branded the behaviour of some richer countries who subsidise farmers to produce cereals for biofuel rather than for food as “criminal”.

    He urged Opec, the oil producers’ cartel, to slash the incentive to divert food to fuel by pumping more oil.

    He said the current economic squeeze, which has forced the Treasury to lower the growth forecast to 4% of GDP this year, would not interfere with the social safety net on which at least one in five South Africans rely to stay alive.

    But he said poor South Africans should be encouraged to protect themselves by resuming the subsistence agriculture that was a part of the country’s heritage.

    “The food crisis was triggered by the shift of food into biofuels, especially in the US, where about a third of the maize is being converted into bio-ethanol,” he said.

    First World farm subsidies, based on the current record cost of oil, price staple grains out of the reach of the world’s poorest people. Rich motorists outbid the world’s poor so that maize goes to fill empty fuel tanks rather than empty tummies.

    “What’s happening with subsidies in some countries is just criminal,” Manuel said, without naming the US, where subsidies are highest. The IMF released a map showing the countries that benefit from the food price escalation. SA is amongst those moderately affected, but most of Africa is in the most affected category.

    Western nations benefit from the higher prices as trade balances swing in their favour.

    Cosatu general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi said the labour federation would begin a series of protests outside Eskom and Pick n Pay premises on April 17 to press for negotiations on food prices. “We’re moving towards a food crisis in this country because people cannot afford it.

    “We want to force negotiations between the farmers, the food processors, the retailers and the government on this issue. They say the prices are because of the rising price of oil, but we want to see the figures,” Vavi said.

    He said Cosatu supported the expansion of Competition Commission investigations beyond the milk and bread industries, where collusion has already been proven to other food sectors and would press for jail sentences for company directors responsible for price-fixing.

    Manuel declined to say whether he would back prison terms for price fixers, but said he was strongly in favour of tougher competition regulation.

    He said he supported the right of workers to engage in legal protest, but cautioned that campaigns such as Cosatu’s needed to be focused on credible goals and should not undermine the economy on which everyone depends.

    “We’re in this together and I think the premature identification of enemies would be costly to the economy,” he said. “There are huge panic reactions in respect of countries who are now deciding to ban imports and exports of various crops. There is a lot of panic reaction and panic tends to drive prices up further,” he said.

    Manuel insisted there was no immediate alternative to the globalised market economy that sets the prices of fuels and foods and cautioned that attempts to isolate small countries behind tariff and other barriers would backfire.

    “To merely suggest right now that whatever is happening is because of some evil plot by these terrible capitalists is not the most useful of issues,” he said.

    IMF and World Bank leaders have made the food price crisis the main feature of their Washington meeting this week, saying the price spiral has set the fight against poverty back at least seven years. Official figures showed that the price of wheat had more than doubled in the past year and the African and Asian staples — maize and rice — are up nearly 80% in the same period.

    While there is no crisis facing people in the rich G-8 nations, including Britain, Japan and the US, millions in the developing world are having to spend up to four-fifths of their total family income on food. The World Bank estimates that 33 countries around the world face social unrest because of food and fuel price rises. Deadly food riots have already broken out in Egypt, Indonesia, Cameroon, Peru and Haiti.

    Manuel said he hoped SA would not go down that road, but stressed that firm and swift international action was needed to break the price spiral.

    ANC spokesman Jessie Duarte said while the party understood that food prices were influenced by exogenous factors, it did not understand how some prices went up exponentially in a country where those items were grown and manufactured locally.

    Cooking oil has increased almost fourfold in 18 months, for example. “Our concern is how this impacts on the urban poor, in particular those who cannot do subsistence farming,” she said.

    Standard Bank group economist Goolam Ballim said SA had the money to help should things deteriorate further, but he added that the country had never been as globalised as it is now, and it was as vulnerable to global successes as it was to global threats. The food price issue was an example.

    Nico Hawkins, economist at Grain SA, said some prices, including those of wheat, had doubled in a year.

    Hawkins added that the higher price of wheat was based on import parity pricing. South Africa produces a crop of about 1.6 million tons but requires about 2.8 million tons. Grains grown locally are priced the same as the imported ones.

  • Faith Popcorn predicts end of consumerism

    Trend analyst Faith Popcorn believes that many people are shifting away from consumption as the basis of happiness and there will be a trend towards thrift. Here are the actual statements from her web-site

    Reactions to Cashing Out:

    Lagom: From the Swedish, most commonly translated as “just enough”, it’s an approach to both design and consumption that explains the essence of brands like Ikea and Volvo. We see notions of “minimalism” and “sustainability” taking on significant currency, as even Americans reject hyper-consumption as not just excessive, but actually damaging to themselves, others and to the planet.

    KarmaCapitalism:

    As “Cashing Out” rises to this level of prominence, we’ll see a basic shift in the identity/mentality of people, as they make the transition from “consumer” to “citizen”—recognizing that every act of consumption has cost and consequence beyond the transaction, and that every transaction is a “vote” in favor of the offering entity, and against the options not chosen. To compete, Companies are going to have to weave “goodness” as a fundamental intent into their corporate culture. Bringing on a dash of “corporate social responsibility”; whether the mere monetary commitment to a cause, or some other symbolic gesture, will not suffice to curry favor with the citizen. In a world of transparency, where every corporate practice is knowable, they will be watching and exercising that all important vote of the purse.

    Activism is now the new narcissism. People will go from wearing their ‘cause’ bracelets on their wrists to posting their causes and beliefs on their resumes and business cards. Employers and prospective hires will court their perfect (cause) match.

  • Indus dries up with Tibetan glaciers

    “India is named for the Indus River, along whose fecund banks a great urban civilisation flourished more than 4,000 years ago,” writes American historian Stanley Wolpert in his well-know book A New History of India. But the 3,000-kilometre-long river that is the lifeline of Pakistan’s economy is dying a slow death due to thinning of Tibetan glaciers and building of dams and barrages upstream.

    The glaciers of the Tibetan plateau are vanishing so fast that they will be reduced by 50 per cent every decade, according to The Independent. Citing the leading Chinese scientists, it says the glaciers have been receding over the past four decades, as the world has gradually warmed up, but the process has now accelerated alarmingly. “The melting threatens to disrupt water supplies over much of Asia. Many of the continent’s greatest rivers-including the Yangtze, the Indus, the Ganges, the Brahmaputra, the Mekong and the Yellow River rise on the plateau,” the report says.

    The Indus also has great heritage value and many fascinating names. In Tibet it is the Lion River issuing from the mouth of the Lion, in the gutter between the Karakoram and the Himalayas people call it ‘The Eastern River’, because it comes to them from the sunrise. It is also called ‘Abasin’, the Father of Rivers. In ancient times, says historian Jean Fairley, it was called ‘Sindhu’, meaning divider, keeper or defender, the name was gradually changed to Indus.

    However, the grandiose of the River Indus is melting fast and points to a creeping emergency because it happens to be the main source of water supply to Pakistan’s major cities, including Karachi, besides irrigation. The situation can be gauged from the fact that freshwater availability in Pakistan has fallen from 5,200 cubic metres per capita in 1947 to less than 1,000 cubic metre currently, making it one of the most parched nations in the world.

    The damming of the River Indus has further deteriorated the situation. “Before dams and barrages were built in the Indus Valley, the delta area was criss-crossed by the distributaries of the Indus. The discharge from the river was large enough to affect the ocean currents up to over a hundred miles from the shore. Due to this “an enormous quantity of freshwater and silt the river were brought with it and the delta lands became the richest in the area that constitutes Pakistan,” says noted town planner and architect, Arif Hasan.

    The gradual but disastrous cut in the flow of freshwater to the Indus Delta has not only affected the lives and livelihood of the inhabitants of the once fertile delta, it has also led to sea intrusion up to 54km (36 miles) upstream along the main river course of the River Indus. “Nearly 1.6 million acres of agricultural land has been destroyed by sea intrusion,” says Mohammad Ali Shah, Chairman, Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum (PFF). As a result, tens of thousands of inhabitants of Indus Delta have been forced to migrate to greener pastures, including Ibrahim Hyderi, a fishing village in the suburbs of Karachi.

    The lack of fresh water (down stream Kotri Barrage) has also badly affected the mangrove forests that happen to be the nurseries of shrimp and fish species. This indirectly affects the fishing industry of Pakistan that fetches $200 million per annum in terms of exports. “Studies have shown that some 60 per cent to 80 per cent of world’s commercial fisheries catch are mangrove dependent species,” says Tropical Rainforest Portfolio 1996-2001, a report prepared by the World Wide Fund (WWF) for Nature and the Netherlands government.

    The precarious situation has been an outcome of the non-availability of freshwater downstream Kotri Barrage. This is amply demonstrated by the fact that the average annual and seasonal discharge downstream Kotri Barrage was 150 million acre feet (MAF) in 1880-92 but was merely 10MAF in 1992 due to building of dams and barrages upstream.

  • Humanity’s 24-Month Hourglass

    Why We Must Reduce U.S. and Global CO2 Emissions 80% by 2025
    by David Merrill

    The period from December, 2007-December, 2009 is perhaps the most important 24 months humanity has ever faced.
    The Kyoto Protocol is the current operating plan for addressing global warming.  It expires in 2012 and has long been considered only a first small step in tackling this enormous environmental challenge.  Dramatically deeper cuts in emissions are urgently needed.  And in order for a successor treaty to come into force on time, a global emissions reduction deal will need to be agreed upon no later than Dec. 31, 2009.  The 193 countries attending the U.N.-sponsored climate negotiations held in Bali, Indonesia in December, 2007 have committed to this timetable.
    With a deadline set for a global emissions deal to be finalized, we now face a much more daunting challenge:  agreeing upon a plan that reduces greenhouse gas emissions fast enough to truly address the global warming crisis.
    An Hourglass of Ice
    Before we consider what the emissions reduction target should be, let’s consider just how serious the global warming threat has become.   We need not look any further than the largest hunks of ice on earth:  the Greenland and West Antarctica ice sheets. 
    "Å not much additional global warming is needed to cause loss of Arctic sea ice, the West Antarctic ice sheet, and part of the Greenland ice sheet." 
    –Dr. James Hansen, NASA, March, 2007
    Catastrophic melting of the West Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets would flood every coastal city in the world, ravaging civilization.  The policy implication is clear:  we must phase out fossil fuels as fast as possible, the position of GlobalWarmingSolution.org since its founding in 2003. 
    What is a Climate-Safe Atmospheric CO2 Level?
    Atmospheric CO2 concentration is currently at 385 parts per million (ppm).
    In December, 2007 leading U.S. climate scientist Dr. James Hansen made a startling statement.  In contrast to earlier assessments that 450 ppm CO2 was a safe level, he now believed that it was no more than 350 ppm, a level passed in the 1980’s.
    In comments published in the British newspaper the Guardian earlier this week, Hansen said that a target of 450 ppm was a "guaranteed disaster."   (The 450 ppm target, long dismissed by GlobalWarmingSolution.org as reckless, is the target of every major national environmental group).
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/apr/07/climatechange.carbonemissions
    So is humanity in a hopeless situation?
    Not yet, according to Dr. Hansen.
    Climate Science and Humanity’s Deliverance
    In the fall of 2007 Dr. Hansen confirmed to me that currently 43% of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are absorbed by natural systems (mostly oceans and forests).  The other 57% remains in the atmosphere, increasing its heat-trapping capacities.  But our climate salvation lies in this dynamic as well.
    Dr. Hansen also confirmed that once emissions are reduced more than 57%,  CO2 concentrations would actually start to fall,  diminishing the atmosphere’s heat-trapping capacities.
    Consistent with this urgency, GlobalWarmingSolution.org advocates that global carbon dioxide emissions be reduced 80% below 1990 levels by 2025.  Our report, Rosie Revisited:  A U.S.-Led Solution to Global Warming, released in July, 2007, demonstrates how this could be done.
    www.GlobalWarmingSolution.org
    It is the most aggressive emissions reduction proposal of any national environmental group and is our way of defining "phasing out fossil fuels as fast as possible."   
    By employing energy conservation and efficiency measures and aggressively deploying existing renewable energy technologies, humanity would dramatically transform the global energy system in the period 2010-2025.  By implementing our emissions reduction proposal, we would pass the 57% threshold in 2021, turning the corner towards cooling the earth.
    Decision Time:  for the World’s GovernmentsÅ and for You
    Now let’s go back to Bali and the U.N.-sponsored climate negotiations.
    The strongest proposals on the table call for:

    • reducing emissions of wealthy countries 25-40% by 2020.
    • reducing global emissions 50% below 1990 levels by 2050.

    If this becomes the plan for addressing global warming, when will atmospheric CO2 concentrations start to go down?
    The answer:  Never.  (they would never reach the required 57%+ reduction threshold)
    Ponder for a moment the children of the world, perhaps even your own.  The only home they will ever have is planet Earth.  In December, 2007, on the brink of environmental catastrophe, the world’s governments gathered for an urgent international climate meeting, and decided to work towards an agreement that guarantees that global warming will continue to spin out of control, that our children will be left on a ruined planet.
    As with surgeons and airline pilots, when it comes to the question of preserving a livable planet, what is most crucial is performance, not intention,.  And as the responsible citizens of the decisive country in the international climate negotiations, we must now look beyond official words of concern and consider the actual agreement they are reaching.  In the time remaining from now until Dec. 31, 2009 we need to change the goal from cutting global emissions 50% by 2050, to cutting them 80% by 2025.
    But of course no such dramatic political shift will occur without an enormous upwelling in grassroots citizen pressure on the federal government.  That is to say, the success of this emergency plan rests on you, the American citizen.  Be confident that any significant change in the global warming conversation in the United States would immediately transform the international negotiations.
    The two strongest bills in both houses of the U.S. Congress call for reducing U.S. emissions 80% by 2050.  No chance that will do the job.  Therefore we need bills in both houses of Congress that would commit the U.S. to reducing emissions 80% by 2025, and that include a provision calling for the President to make that the U.S. negotiating position for global emissions reductions as well.
    The start date should be 2010.  Even if all the details of treaty implementation can’t be worked out by then, the emissions reductions could, and should begin then.  Conservation and efficiency measures could certainly make up the needed 5.5% per year reductions for 2010 and 2011.  The reductions would then continue until emissions are reduced 80% by 2025.
    How You Can Apply Pressure
    Join us in emailing your member of Congress and tell them you want them to pass legislation that commits the U.S. to reducing CO2 emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2025, and that the legislation must include a provision stipulating that the President make that the negotiating position of the United States in the current U.N.- sponsored climate talks.
    Email your U.S. Representative:
    https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
    Email your U.S. Senator:
    http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
    Make sure you get a prompt response from them (no more than two weeks).  Then please forward it to us at info@globalwarmingsolution.org .  This will enable us to use this valuable information in our Congressional lobbying campaign.
    Epilogue:
    Certain urgent facts are clear at this point:

    • Human civilization is in grave danger.
    • Our governments are refusing to mount an adequate response.
    • The habitability of our children’s only home now rests in our tender hands.

    If we want to retain any prospect of passing on a livable planet to them, it is imperative that the global warming conversation in the United States shifts from contemplating a gradual transformation of our energy system, to phasing out fossil fuels, here and globally, as fast as possible.
    The 24-month hourglass is now down to less than 21 months.
    David Merrill

  • Uganda: A Simple Way to Get Safe Water

    The product is designed to address the need of more than one billion people who lack access to safe and clean drinking water by allowing them to have a stable and reliable source of water for home consumption.

    While launching the Life Straw water purifier manufactured by Vestergaard Frandsen, a European-based company, Thomas Hansen, the company’s regional director for East Africa, said the purifier comes when more than 11 million Ugandans lack access to safe and clean drinking water and water borne diseases are on the increase.

    "The product is portable and user friendly. Its container is not used to store drinking water but only for instant purification.

    That makes it safer than the drinking water that is stored in containers and may get contaminated. With the Life Straw, one purifies what they are going to take at the time," Hansen explained.

    He says it is estimated that 4,000 children die from diseases caused by drinking unsafe water. He added that water borne diseases also reduce quality of life and perpetuate poverty by impacting education and productivity.

    Hansen explained that the process of purication begins when dirty water is poured in to the pre-filter bucket at the top of the product where gravity forces the it through a tube and into the purification cartridge, which contains millions of tiny pores that remove contaminants.

    Clean and safe water is then ready to flow from the attached tap. Dirt accumulated in the membranes can be released from the bottom of the device by pressing the squeeze bulb after use.

    "The need for safe and clean water is especially acute for children under five and people living with HIV/AIDS as chronic diarrhea remains a lead cause of death and morbidity," Dr. Sam Okware, the commissioner for community health at the Ministry of Health said. "Products like Life Straw Family can make a huge difference."

    The water and lands minister, Maria Mutagamba said: "Today, rural water coverage is about 60% and urban 70%. If we move at the same pace, we are likely to meet the urban target which is 85% by 2015 while in the rural areas the target is 75%."

    Hansen says the purifier has been extensively tested in the US at the University of Arizona and complies with the US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for microbiological purifiers. It removes 99.9% of all known bacteria, viruses, and parasites.

    He says safe water interventions have vast potential to transform the lives of millions of people. "Water filtration tool not only provides safe drinking water but also has a positive health impact on the most vulnerable populations," Hansen says.
    Under the Uganda Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP), government set a target of having each Ugandan access to safe drinking water by 2015.

    The purifier filters about 10 litres of water an hour depending on the height at which it is hang.It will be marketed through NGOs with donor funding.

    The product requires no spare parts or maintenance other than cleaning.