Author: admin

  • Renewables baseload ready says energy boss

    Professor Andrew Makers, director, ARC Centre for Solar Energy Systems Australian, National University argued that "Contrary to the assertions of Peter Lang (Letters, July 31, August 27), a renewable energy future was eminently feasible and no more costly than other low-emission technologies", in a letter to The Canberra Times (30/80/07, p. 24).

    Management of renewable energy: The intermittency of some (but not all) forms of renewable energy could already be managed at modest cost by:

    • demand management (shifting loads from night to day);

    • wide geographic dispersal (to minimise the effect of local cloud);

    • technology diversity (photovoltaics, solar thermal, wind and wave);

    • dispatchability (biomass. hydro and geothermal can generate at any time);

    • storage (hot water, hot rocks, pumped hydroelectric storage etc); and

    • the judicious use of natural gas.

    It would be several decades before renewables dominate energy markets, allowing time to develop additional solutions.

    Renewables competitive: The solar and wind energy industries were doubling in size every two years and costs were falling. Wind, hydro, solar heaters and biomass from waste were already fully competitive with both nuclear energy and the predicted future cost of zero-emission fossil fuel. The cost of photovoltaics on building roofs would soon fall below the retail price of electricity in many countries.

    Solar 100 times cleaner than fossil fuel or nuclear: The mass of mined material and waste per unit of energy produced was 100 times smaller for solar than for fossil and nuclear energy systems. Widely dispersed renewable energy generation was of low utility to terrorists. There were minimal impacts from accidents, no energy resource wars and no risks of nuclear weapons proliferation. Renewable energy was a good solution" he argued.

    The Canberra Times, 30/8/2007, p. 24

  • Tow views of DiCaprio’s Eleventh Hour

    Leo’s film is a departure from the hip, edgy, narrative-driven docs that have been so hot the past few years, and that have been widely credited with resurrecting a largely ignored sector of American cinema. Don’t go to The 11th Hour expecting to see Super Size Me, Sicko, This Film Is Not Yet Rated or the latest from the brilliant Errol Morris. The 11th Hour has a traditional, “serious” structure of interviews and footage that plays like a PBS or Discovery Channel special, albeit one that is very well made.

    Leo takes viewers through a sober, hard-hitting journey of the ravages of climate change, and touches on other human-induced threats facing our world. The film plays as sequences of dramatic, tightly edited vignettes of environmental damage and hope, intercut with sit-down interviews with leading green thinkers, the roster of which reads like the speakers at a Bioneers conference (included is Bioneers founder Kenny Ausubel). The interviews are intimate, with stark backgrounds in a style that calls to mind Charlie Rose (which, incidentally, now has a great amount of material from past shows archived online).

    Ominous, ambient tones play through most of The 11th Hour, heightening the sense of foreboding and seriousness. In this way the soundtrack is similar to the recent nonfiction masterpieces The Corporation and In the Realms of the Unreal.

    What Is The Message?

    Not content with merely addressing climate change (as if that issue weren’t big enough!), The 11th Hour brings together experts on sustainable design, biomimicry, consumption, air and water quality, environmental justice, renewable energy, species loss and even religious thought.

    For example, it was pointed out by leading green thinker David Suzuki that human beings are directly responsible for 55,000 species going extinct every year. “There isn’t one living system that is stable or improving,” said green author and entrepreneur Paul Hawken.

    Author and talk radio host Thom Hartmann argued that humanity could never have exceeded a global population of one billion (it’s more than six billion today) without heavy, and unsustainable, use of fossil fuels. In a fascinating, and poignant, interview, former CIA head (and Iraq war supporter) James Woolsey explained that one third of what the U.S. borrows is used for oil imports. “That’s about a billion dollars a day, or at least every working day,” said Woolsey, who also has an attention-getting presence in the doc Who Killed The Electric Car? Woolsey has recently gained acclaim among environmentalists for his efforts to promote conservation and renewable technologies in the name of energy security.

    The connections to energy run deep in The 11th Hour. In fact, anthropologist and historian Joseph Tainter went so far as to say, “Energy is the key to everything we do.” It was also pointed out that ExxonMobil is worth more than all auto companies in the world combined! One of the central themes, stated by psychologist and author James Hillman, was that we can’t live separately from nature. Why so many of us think we can is the fundamental cause of our abuse of the planet, according to Hillman, and it seems, DiCaprio.

    What About That Other Global Warming Movie?


    Of course, it is impossible to view The 11th Hour without thinking of An Inconvenient Truth. The two works obviously have a great deal in common in terms of subject matter, tone and even those ambient background sounds.

    Ominous music is paired with majestic imagery.
    © Warner Brothers

    The connections to energy run deep in The 11th Hour. In fact, anthropologist and historian Joseph Tainter went so far as to say, “Energy is the key to everything we do.” It was also pointed out that ExxonMobil is worth more than all auto companies in the world combined! One of the central themes, stated by psychologist and author James Hillman, was that we can’t live separately from nature. Why so many of us think we can is the fundamental cause of our abuse of the planet, according to Hillman, and it seems, DiCaprio.

    When I first saw an Inconvenient Truth, I was struck by how popular it had become, given that pretty hefty doses of scientific explanation are doles out, and not much action "happens," as American moviegoers tuypically demand. But the overall effect is quite stunning and profoud, and Al Gore’s substantial, and seemingly growing charisma, pushed the film into the stratosphere.

    Is Leonardo’s charisma enough to vault The 11th Hour beyond the green choir and the art theater crowd? One concern is that the celebrated actor appears on screen much less than Gore did, and his brief addresses serve more to bookend the main content than truly live with it. On one hand, An Inconvenient Truth may have primed the public’s appetite for more green information.

    But on the other hand, are we expecting a lot for Americans to go out for another movie that seems to be about impending doom?

    Many in right-leaning circles will accuse The 11th Hour of trying to scaremonger, or of flirting too heavily with New Age thought. Many of those in the know will be energized by its raw power and its reinforcement of what they’ve suspected for some time. The big question remains, will the film reach and affect many in the middle, who represent both the largest swath of society, and who arguably have the greatest ability to make a difference?

    In the film, professor and sustainable design guru David Orr of Oberlin College called these days “all hands on deck time.” Leading conservation biologist Stuart Pimm called it an “enormously challenging time.” For his part, Leo said our response to the threats facing our only home planet depend on the “conscious evolution of our species.”

    BRIAN CLARK HOWARD, former managing editor of E, is now the Home & Tips Editor for www.thedailygreen.com, where this review first appeared.


    Thumbs Halfway: The 11th Hour Is a Scattershot Success

    By Dan Shapley

    The 11th Hour, Leonardo DiCaprio’s statement about the state of the environment, is an optimistic apocalyptic march across the decaying globe, narrated at the pace of a heartbeat, with each beat a snippet of wisdom from a leading scientific or cultural personality.

    The voice that emerges from the film is DiCaprio’s.

    It is designed to leave the audience emboldened and empowered — feeling that the 11th hour, the one before the collapse, will be “our finest hour,” as the star narrates near the end. The movie succeeds despite a virtual mirroring of that formula — 11/12ths doom and gloom, and 1/12th can-do problem-solving optimism, and despite some other flaws that will turn off some audiences.

     
    The movie opens with that heart beat metronome, timed to coincide with a string of images—the beautiful, the biological, the political, the cultural, the spiritual and the industrial. (As a comment on the zeitgeist, it is telling: A simple car tailpipe and a thick slab of red meat feel as ominous as a towering industrial smokestack or the requisite clubbing of a baby seal.)

    The movie’s brisk pace, as it attempts to tie together these various concepts into a cohesive web, is both its strength and weakness.

    As authoritative as the cast is, none are given time enough to fully make any one argument, as the movie bounces from voice to voice.

    The scientific facts are mashed up with mystical and cultural assertions in an approach that can leave the viewer at times feeling that the global environmental crisis has less to do with the abundance of carbon in the atmosphere, the collapse of ecosystems or toxic pollution—and more to do with the scarcity of love in our hearts. And some concepts — did you know that mushrooms are being primed to save the earth?—seem to be given extraordinary weight, given the pace of the movie as a whole. DiCaprio even suggests near the conclusion that “conscious evolution”—a phrase that if taken literally would offend any scientist worth her salt—is the path toward a clean green future.

    But this is Hollywood, after all, not science class. (The writer/producer/narrator, unlike his cast, can get by on three little letters in media headlines.)

    The scattershot firing of statements by scientists about the sorry state of the world and its industrial causes, and of statements by cultural thought-leaders about its spiritual causes, has the potential to hit the mark with a variety of audiences. Urbanites who feel disconnected with nature, suburbanites feeling anxiety about “consumerism Democracy,” lefties disheartened by “corporate economic globalization,” terrorism hawks concerned about global warming’s effect on national security, multicultural lovers concerned about the global community—every type is represented.

    Because no one speaker lays out his or her own full argument, the voice that emerges from the film is Leo’s. It’s his statement, spoken through many voices.

    And in its Hollywood-esque documentary style, it succeeds the way great post-modern speeches succeed—not necessarily by careful point-by-point argument, but by sound bite-by-sound bite persuasion about the need to care, the need to act and the availability of solutions. The film’s test will be whether or not the filmmaker’s sense of possibility infects his audience.

    CONTACTS: The 11th Hour; The 11th Hour Action

    DAN SHAPLEY is the News Editor for www.thedailygreen.com, where this review first appearedDid you enjoy this article? Subscribe to E/The Environmental Magazine!

  • Renewables passes $US20b in North America

    Faced with rising oil imports and mounting concerns over the environment, the study predicts these initiatives will likely provide new direction for the future growth of the North American renewable energy markets. Furthermore, U.S. state renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and the renewable fuel standard (RFS) mandates will likely propel the market’s growth.

    Keeping with these mandate’s objectives, California has set a target of 12 percent of its total electricity to be generated from wind and geothermal energy. New York State will make efforts to increase its total electricity generated from renewable energy sources from 19 percent in 2006 to 25 percent by 2013.

    Nevertheless, increasing raw material costs, high initial capital outlay and raw material availability pose notable challenges for market participants and could hamper market growth.

    "Raw materials supply constraints are being noted in the solar energy segment, where the manufacturers face a shortage of silicon, the key raw material for solar energy generation," notes Frost & Sullivan Research Analyst Saranya Sundaram. "The growth of the wind turbines sector could also be impacted by the short-term price increases caused by the high steel costs and shifting currency valuations."

    Addressing these challenges, the study notes that solar companies will increasingly invest in R&D aimed at finding a suitable substitute to silicon feedstock. Companies such as Nanosolar and Miasolé have begun to use copper alloy and copper-indium-gallium-selenide, which are easier and flexible to use. Use of such technologies will also reduce solar energy cost.

  • Greens keen to cage Bush, not Sydney

    Sunanda Creagh, Urban Affairs Reporter, August 27, 2007

    A GIANT banner saying "Cage Bush. Not Sydney" could be slung from the top of Town Hall, under a proposal to be voted on by the City of Sydney tonight.

    A mock-up of the banner on the Deputy Lord Mayor's websiteThe Deputy Lord Mayor, Chris Harris, from the Greens, has called on councillors to support his motion calling for such a banner, to take a stand against crackdowns on protest at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum next month.

    "As a city councillor, I am appalled that we are allowing our government to gate off our city from the people who live, work and pay rates here," he said.

    "That we would spend $600,000 on a water cannon to be used against our citizens should they exercise their democratic right to demonstrate.

    "That we have converted 31 State Transit buses into mobile holding cells, and that during the APEC summit it will cost the city of Sydney hundreds of millions of dollars in lost economic activity that we will never recover.

    "While I agree that we should do all we can to protect visiting leaders, it should never be at the expense of the community’s democratic rights or the economic wellbeing of our businesses and workers."

    Erecting a cage around the US President, George Bush, would ensure his safety without disrupting Sydney, he said.

    Cr Harris is asking council to "take a stand for its citizens by demonstrating its disapproval of the lockdown of Sydney and the loss of the democratic rights of its citizens by erecting a banner on the Town Hall of Sydney that says ‘Cage Bush. Not Sydney"’.

    The Lord Mayor, Clover Moore, would not say if she would support the motion.

    "Sydney, as a global city, should be able to take meetings such as these in its stride," a spokesman for Cr Moore said yesterday. "The City of Sydney is investigating ways to alleviate the impact on residents, and that’s what we’ll be concentrating on."

    Residents who find their parking spots have been turned into clearways during the summit may be able to park free in the Domain car park, the spokesman said. "We are certainly investigating it."

    Source: SMH  

  • APEC: you’re not invited to the party

    Edmund Tadros, August 27, 2007

    Sydney is about to host Australia’s most exclusive party.

    Janette Howard and, inset, the star guest who's waved off coming to Sydney, Laura BushYou’re paying for it but as the organisers of the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation summit and the state government made clear at the weekend, you are definitely not invited.

    In addition, the most important invitee has thrown the agenda for the $177 million (and counting) party into disarray and his wife has been forced to send her regrets.

    This morning US first lady Laura Bush announced she would not attend next week, citing a a pinched nerve.

    The news will come as a blow to prime mininster John Howard’s wife Janette, who will host a Spouse’s Program during the summit that will involve seeing native animals and a visit to Bondi.

    A media release from the APEC Taskforce made much of how this would "showcase Sydney’s unique heritage" but made little mention of the disruption it would cause to Bondi on Sunday, September 9.

    Clearways will be implemented along Bondi on the Sunday, a security operation around the Icebergs Dining Room and Bar will cut off members from their club until 4pm and the tens of thousands expected at the annual Festival of Winds kite carnival on Bondi Beach are likely to encounter delays.

    Bush to leave early

    This comes after Mrs Bush’s husband confirmed he is arriving and leaving the APEC summit early so he can be present when a progress report on the war in Iraq is presented in Washington and for the sixth anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on America.

    The change in plans for the most important world leader at the summit has meant the early implementation of widespread clearways and security measures that, in the words of Deputy Premier John Watkins, meant organisers had to go back to the drawing board after two years’ worth of planning.

    The early arrival means that CBD workers will be affected by APEC-related disruptions during three working days – from Tuesday, September 4, until Thursday, September 6 – and not just the APEC long weekend.

    The disruptions include a 5 kilometre, 2.8-metre fence that will lock up sections of the CBD, declared APEC security areas throughout the city, road closures and special event clearway signs in suburbs up to 11 kilometres from the city centre. This is not to mention the disruption that a large scale protest planned for Saturday, September 8, is likely to cause.

    Source: SMH  

  • APEC 2007

    Security fence, SydneyPhoto: Part of the 5 kilometre, 2.8-metre `security’ fence in Darling Harbour in Sydney, erected for APEC. Photo: AP

    Related news stories:

    APEC Ghost town – audio slideshow 

    Let us dissent – audio slideshow 

    Shady character loses his lunch watching activists

    Foreign invasion, yet lots of room at the inns

    APEC: you’re not invited to the party

    Greens keen to cage Bush, not Sydney

    APEC leaders’ outfits – a pictorial history

    Sydney’s Water Cannon 

    Protesters fired on by water cannon NSW Premier, Morris Iemma, announced that the State Government has bought a $600,000 water cannon for the riot squad in time for APEC. The Premier admitted the cannon could cause "serious injury". The black truck with a fire hose on top  eventually managed to knock over 120-kilogram pylons when demonstrated for the television cameras.

    One group who will not be knocked off their feet by the device during protests will be unionists. The NSW Police Association has done a deal with the Government, its acting secretary, Greg Black, confirmed yesterday, that the cannon would not be turned on striking protesters on picket lines.

    The outgoing Police Commissioner, Ken Moroney, said in 2005 after the Macquarie Fields riots that if NSW police looked at water cannons, it would show authorities had "lost the plot’.

    The NSW Greens MP John Kaye said yesterday that demonstrating the device could act as a needless provocation to APEC protesters, which could increase the risk of violence during the summit.