Category: Archive

Archived material from historical editions of The Generator

Ships Ahoy! Coal ships queue off Newcastle

admin /9 March, 2007

Coal ships queuing off the port of Newcastle reached a record high on 4 March, just weeks after Hunter coal companies voted to reinstate an export quota system. When The Daily Telegraph flew along the coast on 4 March, the ships resembled a battle fleet as they lined up from just outside the port, stretching towards the horizon. Most of the ships are from Taiwan, Korea, China and Japan, where the coal will be used for power stations and steel mills.

coal ships at Newcastle

 

 

Ships anchored off the world’s largest coal port, Newcastle, Australia, must wait at least three weeks to load at the congested docks. The choke point is but one result of China’s growing demand for energy and raw materials. (Peter S. Goodman — The Washington Post)

 

 

 

 Three weeks anchored offshore; Each ship will wait an average of three weeks anchored offshore before it is brought in to be loaded. There were 70 ships moored off the coast at midday, the Newcastle Port Corporation confirmed. The corporation, controls the movement of the ships in and out of the port, said the reason for the queue rested in the hands of Port Waratah Coal Services (PWCS) which handles the coal for export worldwide. "It’s the most number of ships we’ve had," harbour master Tim Turner said on 4 March. "It was in the 60s for a while and it’s 70 now."

First in, first served basis: PWCS said it acknowledged the substantial vessel queuing and had made an urgent application to the ACCC for a reinstatement of the export quota. But it could take until April before the authorisation is granted. In the meantime, the line-up of ships is expected to grow past 70, a port spokesman said. Under the current system, coal companies jostle with one another for their share and ships are loaded on a first in, first served basis – which results in them arriving early to get the best position in the queue.

Quota system But if the quota system was reinstated, coal companies are allocated a set share of the almost 90 million tonnes of coal the port can handle each year.

Brits study Australian waste transfer

admin /9 March, 2007

A pioneering scheme from Australia can turn unrecyclable household rubbish into compost. So could it solve our landfill problems, too?

By Ian Herbert

The Lancashire town of Leyland is hardly a monument to cutting-edge technology. It is best remembered for the car plant that became a symbol to the industrial turmoil that plagued Britain in the 1970s. Perhaps that’s why the locals were none too impressed to hear, a few months back, that their locality had been earmarked for a plant where all Lancashire’s domestic waste would soon be processed. The county produces 775,000 tons of the stuff a year, so it certainly sounded as if Leyland was being dumped on from a great height in return for a few badly needed jobs.

But when Greenpeace celebrates the kind of technology that is to be used on the county’s rubbish in a report on "cool waste", and Friends of the Earth positively purrs about the prospect of the plant (which, despite the protests, has just been approved by Lancashire County Council) then something must be afoot.

UK builds 180MW wind-farm

admin /9 March, 2007

Construction on a 180-megawatt (MW) UK offshore wind farm development for the Lynn and Inner Dowsing sites in the Greater Wash is under way, marked by Centrica’s investment for 54 3.6-megawatt (MW) wind turbines from Siemens Power Generation. "This investment underlines our commitment to supplying British Gas customers with an increasing proportion of renewable electricity Continue Reading →

The Dire Strait

admin /8 March, 2007

By John Damien  03/07/07 "ICH" — — The most valuable piece of real estate in the world is not to be found in New York, London or Tokyo.  The world’s most valuable real estate is comprised of two imaginary boxes.  These boxes are two miles wide and twenty five miles long.  They are the international Continue Reading →

Coalition can’t answer Green questions

admin /8 March, 2007

Greens Senator Christine Milne (Tas) asked the Government whether its rejection of solar thermal technology was backed up by solid evidence, during Question Time in the Senate on 27 February 2007.

 Senator Christine Milne - Greens Tas

 

 

 Christine Milne relaxing out of Question Time.

 PM statements backed up by research? Milne said: "My question is to the Minister representing the Prime Minister, Senator Minchin. Given the Prime Minister’s statements that solar thermal technology cannot provide baseload power and, on the other hand, that the pre- and postcombustion carbon capture and storage of carbon dioxide from coal-fired power stations will provide baseload power and save jobs in the power stations in the Hunter Valley within 15 years, will the minister confirm that the Prime Minister or the government has research to underpin these statements?"

"No suitable geological storage structures" in Hunter Valley: "Will he make public the figures, plans or modelling that underpin where and how it is envisaged that pre and post carbon capture and storage will be implemented within 15 years in the Hunter Valley when no suitable geological storage structures exist?"

Nuclear option "clear": Minchin replied that "it is quite clear, and I am sure the Greens would acknowledge this, that baseload power to run factories around the country and homes and to provide on tap the sort of electricity which Australians now require is really only possible, without greenhouse gas emissions, from nuclear and clean coal".

Govt suppressed solar thermal research report? Milne added: "Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. I thank the minister for confirming that the government does not have any research or figures or modelling to underpin the claims about carbon capture and storage in the Hunter Valley. I ask the minister, and this probably goes to explaining why he does not understand the potential of solar thermal on baseload: why did the government suppress a research report from the CRC for Coal in Sustainable Development that said solar thermal could compete with coalfired power on baseload by 2013?"