Category: Archive

Archived material from historical editions of The Generator

  • Organic produce booms in China

    A fair for green produce from the Great Northern Wilderness, held in Beijing this month, was a hit with consumers. Some 20 tonnes of organic rice was sold during the five-day event.

    ”We banked on our reputation of being far away from pollution and working a land that hasn’t been treated with chemicals for 60 years,” says Sui Fengfu, director of the Agricultural Reclamation Bureau of the northeastern Heilongjiang province.

    For years, China pursued chemical input-heavy farming to increase yields and ensure enough food for its enormous population. Chinese leaders see food self-sufficiency as a political imperative and have invested millions in GM crop research in order to secure ever-higher yields.

    Nevertheless, recent years have seen a surge in organic farming, which advocates the use of traditional farming methods without use of fertilizers or pesticides. The demand is driven by an explosion of organic food sales overseas. China’s organic food exports totalled 142 million US dollars in 2003 and 200 million US dollars in 2004.

    While these overseas sales account for only a fraction of the 27 billion US dollar global market for organic foods, they are increasing at a rate of 50 percent annually.

    ”There was virtually no domestic market for organic products in the early 1990s," says Li Debo, deputy-director of the Organic Food Research Center under the State Environmental Protection Agency. "But now big cities like Beijing and Shanghai have many specialized shops for organic food, selling vegetables, tea, rice, honey and fruits."

    An estimated two million hectares of farmland are under organic cultivation, while some 1,400 companies and farms have been certified organic. Exports are the main driving engine behind the sector’s growth. Chinese organic products are exported mostly to Europe where they dominate the supply of pumpkin, sunflower seeds, and kidney and black beans. The U.S. and Japan are also major buyers.

    Growth in domestic demand has been spurred by rising urban incomes, the emergence an affluent middle class and also because recent years have seen an increasing number of food safety scandals.

    In 2004, transparent ‘glass’ noodles were banned in major Chinese cities after certain brands were found to be using a lead-based whitener. In 2003, 78 primary school children in the southern town of Beihai were poisoned after drinking contaminated soya milk. Such food scares have prompted calls for the expansion of the organic food sector.

    The government has heeded those calls, recognising the global and domestic market potential. Unlike in many countries, where organic farming has emerged spontaneously as a response to environment and health concerns, in China most conversion initiatives have been driven by the government.

    This year, the National People’s Congress adopted a new five-year blueprint for the country’s economic development, whose main tenet is to boost the incomes of the 800 million people living in the rural areas. The plan calls for a "new socialist countryside" and redress of the uneven distribution of wealth between the cities and the country, which has seen rural living standards lagging far behind those of their urban counterparts.

    Renowned agricultural economist Wen Tiejun has described the creation of organic farming trial zones around big cities as "Noah’s arks" that could avert social disorder by providing employment for migrant workers and laid-off people.

    Du Xiangge of the Beijing Agricultural University says promoting organic farming fits nicely with the government’s greater environmental sensitivity. The shift to certified organic methods requires a three-year conversion period during which no chemical fertilizers, pesticides or herbicides are used on the land.

    In the past, farmers have tried to increase yields with modern nitrate-based fertilizers, but this has had damaging side-effects on soil health. ‘’The return to more natural farming methods for organic production would allow the land to recover and would be a plus to the environment," says Du.

    But the rapid growth of the sector in a country where only 15 percent of the land mass is arable, has led to concern among some experts.

    Recently, scholars of the Chinese Academy of Sciences pointed out that if China were to adopt organic food strategy on a large scale, the size of the cropland would have to be expanded significantly, which is not an option for the land-scarce country.

    They argue that China is only able to feed one-fifth of the world’s population on one-seventh of the world’s arable land because some 75 percent of the crop nutrients are now supplied by chemical fertilizers, compared with only 22 percent in 1965.

    But Du dismisses the idea of organic farming going mainstream in China. "Only ten percent of the organically certified land is currently planted with grain," he says. "The big mass is planted with fruits, vegetables and tea.”

    Despite its vigorous growth, Du says the organic sector remains a tiny niche market, accounting for just one percent of total food sales.

    With the sector growing so fast, many fear for the quality control of the produce, given China’s enormous size and reputation for lax law enforcement. The country has over 200 individual food safety laws, regulations and standards, which apply at national and regional level, according to official media.

    Yet there have been reports of pesticide residues being found in organic-labelled spinach exported from China to Japan, prompting foreign buyers to begin dispatching their own food controllers.

    © Copyright 2006 IPS – Inter Press Service
  • Iraqi massacre worse than Abu Ghraib

    In Britain, the chief of the defence staff, Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, said yesterday that the “appalling” reports of the massacre could undermine British support for the war. “This sort of accusation does make that harder to achieve,” he said.

    The pictures of the dead, which are being closely guarded by the US naval criminal investigation service, were taken by a military photographer who is believed to have arrived on the scene moments after the shootings.

    Many American forces are accompanied by photographers to gather intelligence and to shield soldiers from false accusations of torture, intimidation and violence. In this case, the evidence points fatefully to a murder spree by marines.

    The stain on the American military could prove harder to erase than the photographs of sadistic prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib.

    Comparisons are being made to the My Lai massacre in 1968 in Vietnam, in which American soldiers slaughtered up to 500 villagers.

    Up to a dozen marines may face criminal charges including murder, which carries the death penalty, dereliction of duty and filing a false report. Three marine commanders were suspended last month.

    The naval inquiry is focusing on the actions of a sergeant who may have been the leader of a four-man “fire team”.

    Miguel Terrazas, 20, a lance-corporal from El Paso, Texas, was travelling in a convoy of four Humvees in Haditha just after 7am on November 19 last year when a roadside bomb struck his vehicle, killing him and wounding two others.

    The events that followed are the subject of two military inquiries due to report soon: one into the facts, the other into a cover-up.

    One witness, Aws Fahmi, heard his neighbour, Yunis Salim Khafif, plead for his life in English, shouting: “I am a friend, I am good.”

    “But they killed him, his wife and daughters,” Fahmi said.

    It is clear the marines lied by blaming the deaths of 15 civilians on the roadside bomb and alleging that a further eight Iraqis were insurgents who died in a gun battle.

    Asked last week how many Iraqis were killed by the roadside bomb, a Pentagon official said: “Zero.” The marines never came under hostile fire, a spokesman added.

    Investigators have established that the killings unfolded over three to five hours. “This was not a burst of fire, but a sustained operation,” a Pentagon official said.

    The Sunday Times has reconstructed the events with the help of Abdul Rahman al-Mashandani, of the Hammourabi human rights group in Iraq. It appears the first killings took place when a taxi carrying four students pulled up at a checkpoint set up by the marines.

    Abu Makram, 50, had been awakened by the roadside bomb and watched from his window as the terror unfolded. The car’s occupants were all ordered out and shot.

    The marines then stormed three nearby houses. “They blew open the front door of the first house,” Makram recalled, “Once they were inside, we heard another explosion followed by a hail of gunfire.”

    It was the home of 76-year-old Abdul Hameed Ali Hassan, whose leg had been amputated because of diabetes. “He was a blind old man in a wheelchair,” Makram said.

    Hassan’s granddaughter, Iman Waleed, 10, was in her nightclothes. “About 10 marines entered the house,” she said. “They threw hand grenades and began firing in all directions. Grandpa was sitting close to the hall and they shot him dead.”

    In a nearby room, her father was reading the Koran. “The American soldiers went into the room and killed him too,” Iman said. “They gathered all of us into one room ­ my grandma, my mama, my brothers and my uncles. They threw in two handgrenades and started shooting at us.”

    The adults tried to protect the children with their bodies, but were slain. When Iman dared to look, she saw that “everyone was dead around me except for my brother and my uncle”.

    Both were injured and Iman was hurt in the leg. The rest of the family, including her brother, Abdullah, 4, died.

    Iman fled next-door, where her other grandfather Yunis lived, only to find everybody there appeared to have been killed too. There was in fact one survivor, Safa Yunis Salim, 12.

    “My daddy tried to open the door to let the Americans in, but he was immediately shot in the head and body,” Safa said.

    “I managed to hide under the body of my brother Mohammed. His blood covered me and protected me as I pretended to be dead.” They also killed her four sisters including Aysha, 4, and Zainab, 2.

    Five hours passed before Safa managed to escape. “I was the only one who survived. I watched them kill my entire family. I am all alone now,” she said, crying.

    When the marines stormed the third house they changed tactics. The men were separated from the women and stuffed into a large cupboard, according to Yussef Ayed Ahmad, the brother of the dead men, who lived next-door.

    “They placed my four brothers into the wardrobe and proceeded to shoot them as they were inside,” he said. “My mother and sister told me later how they died.”

    The marines found an AK 47 in the house ­ the only gun found in all three homes ­ but there is no evidence it was fired.

    The marines’ cover story quickly began to unravel. In March, Time magazine revealed the existence of a video shot the day after the attack by an Iraqi student journalist. It showed the victims still in their nightclothes, a trail of blood and shrapnel and bullet marks on the walls.

    At the local morgue Waleed al Obeidi, who received the corpses 24 hours after the killings, also disputed the marines’ account. “Two bodies were completely charred,” he said. “The others, including women and children, had all been shot at close range.”

    According to some reports, American warplanes dropped 500lb bombs on the houses.

    The marines paid $2,500 (£1,350) in compensation for each of the 15 victims who were shot in their homes. They refused to pay for the four brothers and five occupants of the taxi, claiming they were insurgents. Officials now say those men were innocent.

    General Michael Hagee, the US Marine Corps commander, flew to Baghdad last week to prepare his troops for the grim findings of the investigation. Many marines had witnessed the deaths of friends, he said. “The effects of these events can be numbing. There is the risk of becoming indifferent to the loss of a human life, as well as bringing dishonour upon ourselves.”

    The conclusions are likely to provoke widespread revulsion.

    President George W Bush said last week that the abuse at Abu Ghraib was one of his greatest regrets about the Iraq war. If the photographs from Haditha surface, they could provide a set of images that would be every bit as shocking.

  • Consumption is 50% of the equation

    I suspect that many of us believe we will be able to transition to new forms of energy without reducing our onsumption or making significant changes in how we live.

    This is going to be one of the biggest hurdles for us. For those who are trying to promote a gentler, slower, simpler way of life. And those who havent even considered this as an adaptation they need to make. I fear this latter group are going to suffer the consequences of this self-imposed blindness at levels that may end up being debilitating, the more they put off this inconvenient reality.

    James Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 7:11 pm  on Transition Culture article on Urban Wind Farms – coming to a town near you …

  • Teenagers prescribed psycho-drugs

    TeenScreen is a very controversial so-called "diagnostic psychiatric service" aka suicide survey; done on children who are then referred to psychiatric treatment. The evidence suggests that the objective of the psychiatrists who designed TeenScreen is to place children so selected on psychotropic drugs.

    "It’s just a way to put more people on prescription drugs," said Marcia Angell, a medical ethics lecturer at Harvard Medical School and author of "The Truth About Drug Companies." She said such programs will boost the sale of antidepressants even after the FDA in September ordered a "black box" label warning that the pills might spur suicidal thoughts or actions in minors. (The New York Post, December 5, 2004)

    TeenScreen is based on the thoroughly discredited "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders".

    … more  

  • Water exchanges take shape

    In a scenario outlined in The Australian (19 May 2006 p.7) a typical dairy farm would hold water rights to more than 400 megalitres – worth about $480,000 with water priced at about $1200/ML.

    Constraints on water allocation and saleability: But under market rules only 4 per cent of the total water in any irrigation district can be sold and there can be no increase in the overall amount of water allocated to irrigation, to ensure environmental flows are preserved.

    Pro rata flow-through of limitations: Moreover traded water rights will only be as good as the conditions in the catchment of origin. This means, for example, that if a Victorian farmer buys a water right from a farmer alongside the Darling River and the overall Darling water allocation is halved during a drought, then so, too, is the right that the Victorian purchased.

    Vic-SA trial pays dividends: A trial water-trading scheme has been operating along the Murray in northwest Victoria and South Australia and has been credited with creating the massive expansion in horticulture in the Sunraysia and Riverland regions.

  • The Great Iraq Oil Grab

    By Joshua Holland, AlterNet
    http://www.alternet.org/story/36463/

    There’s a story, perhaps apocryphal, that Pentagon planners wanted to name the invasion of Iraq, "Operation Iraqi Liberation." Only when someone realized that the acronym — O.I.L. — might raise some uncomfortable questions, was "Operation Iraqi Freedom" born.

    Supporters of the Iraq war airily dismiss chants of "no blood for oil" as a manifestation of the antiwar crowd’s naïveté. They point out that Iraq’s government still controls its oil and argue that we could have simply bought it on the open market.

    Both of those claims are true on their face, but bringing Iraq’s vast oil wealth under the control of foreign multinationals — with U.S. firms the best positioned to develop it — was always central to U.S. plans for Iraq. That Iraq’s oil will continue to be "owned" by the "Iraqi people" is what differentiates classical 19th-century colonialism practiced by British officers in pith helmets from the neocolonialism the United States perfected in the second half of the 20th century. The newer brand can be summed up like this: We’ll respect your sovereignty and abide by your domestic laws — as long as we can help you write those laws to guarantee our firms’ profits.

    That’s the central tenet of corporate globalization. Trade deals like NAFTA — and the agreements implemented by the WTO — are designed to "harmonize" countries’ domestic laws regulating everything from capital flow to food safety to the environment in order to make them friendly to international investment. In Iraq, that philosophy was taken to an extreme, at gunpoint and with disastrous consequences.

    … more