admin /22 September, 2007
The allocation of water to the Penola pulp mill had given a lot of concern to stakeholders, especially other users of the water resource in the surrounding region, said Independent MHA Kris Hanna in the South Australia House of Assembly on 11 September 2007. Therefore, Government would have the ability to reduce water allocation, to the mill, but not increase it
Slowly replenished aquifer: "Clause 8deals with the water allocation to the mill itself," Hanna said, "and recommendations 6 through to 10 of the select committee deal with this clause…The amount allocated to the mill is substantial, although it will not make the mill the biggest user of water in the South-East. It is important to note that;
• "the allocation of water to the mill was granted under the usual water allocation process. So, it was all duly done and above board, and that is under the current regime";
• "water allocation to the mill is that it is from the lower aquifer, not the aquifer closest to the forestry plantation and the surface. Under the first aquifer there is the lower underground aquifer, which is fed very slowly by water travelling underground, generally from the Victorian region toward the coast. Because it has a very slow recharge, and it is water that has probably been around for hundreds of thousands of years, the water allocation policy for the aquifer has always been extremely cautious. Although the mill proponents have secured just about all the water they could from the immediately surrounding area in respect of the underground aquifer, it has been within the cautious limits set by longstanding water policy".