admin /17 May, 2007
Like the topsie twins, Prime Minister John Howard and Opposition leader Kevin Rudd both initially declared they would not meet with the Dalai Lama during his Australian tour in June. But the Government came under fire for deciding not to hold an official reception. So on Wednesday, both Mr Howard and Mr Rudd said they might reconsider, following accusations of kowtowing to China, which is Australia’s biggest trading partner. Mr Howard is now checking his diary to see if he has time to meet with the Buddhist leader, while calling Mr Rudd a `hypocrite’ for attacking the Foreign Affairs Minister, Alexander Downer, for not meeting the Dalai Lama some years ago.
Greens leader Bob Brown says he was baffled by Mr Rudd’s choice not to plan a meeting with the Buddhist leader.
"It’s an inexplicable makeover," he said.
"Kevin Rudd should be standing by his own words of four or five years ago and meeting the Dalai Lama."
Following the lack of credibility his hapless Minister for the Environment, Peter Garrett, has been enjoying since backflipping on his long standing opposition to uranium mining and US military bases on Australian soil, Mr Rudd is looking, politically speaking, very much like his opponent for the top job in the country,
To complicate matters further for Mr Howard and Mr Rudd, China today issued a thinly veiled warning to all Australian political leaders not to meet the Dalai Lama during the Tibetan spiritual leader’s visit next month.
"We hope that relevant governments and parties can stay on high alert to the actions and words of the Dalai Lama aimed at splitting China and do not give support to the Dalai clique," a foreign ministry spokeswoman said in Beijing.
Labor backbencher Michael Danby told the ABC’s AM that both Mr Rudd and Mr Howard should defy political pressure from China on the issue.
"I would hope that we could have good relations with China both economically and politically, but at the same time not pre-emptively kowtow to them on human rights whether it’s in Tibet or China more generally," he said.
"We must be able to enjoy good political and economic relations with China, after all we have large amounts of natural resources they desperately need, without having to give away our views on human rights."