Category: Climate chaos

The atmosphere is to the earth as a layer of varnish is to a desktop globe. It is thin, fragile and essential for preserving the items on the surface.150 years of burning fossil fuel have overloaded the atmosphere to the point where the earth is ill. It now has a fever. Read the detailed article, Soothing Gaia’s Fever for an evocative account of that analogy. The items listed here detail progress on coordinating 6.5 billion people in the most critical project undertaken by humanity. 

  • Warmer seas put marine food chain at risk

     

    Marine ecology PhD student Daniel Boyce, one of the study’s authors, says phytonplankton are similar to plants like grass and trees.

    “Phytoplankton are basically like microscopic little plants. They require sunlight and nutrients in order to grow,” he said.

    “For phytoplankton in much of the ocean the nutrients are delivered to them from deeper ocean waters by mixing currents and turbulence.

    “So what happens is as the ocean continues to warm the ocean becomes more stratified and more stable which limits the amount of mixing and limits the amount of nutrients delivered to phytoplankton at the surface and negatively affects their growth.”

    He says phytoplankton are extremely important.

    “Changes in their abundance will ultimately affect everything in the ecosystem, from tiny little zooplankton all the way up to fish and whales and ultimately humans,” he said.

    “They can also have very strong climate affects, so they can affect the stability of our global climate and they can have affects on the sustainability of our fisheries.

    “I think we should all be very concerned that phytoplankton have declined over this long time period and we should be looking to the future, you know, continually monitoring our global phytoplankton levels to ensure they don’t continue to decline.”

     

    Biodiversity patterns

     

    Another Dalhousie University study, also published in Nature, reports marine species could potentially die because of human impact and global warming.

    The team of scientists mapped and analysed global biodiversity patterns for over 11,000 marine species, from tiny zooplankton to sharks and whales, living in “ocean hot spots”.

    These are regions most damaged by climate change, pollution and over fishing.

    The majority of hot spots were found in Indonesia, Japan, India, Australia and China.

    Lead author and marine ecologist Derek Tittensor says diversity in the ocean was strongly linked with temperature for every group his team looked at.

    “We looked at 13 different groups of organism, so there was really quite a consistent relationship there,” he said.

    “We found that diversity patterns were different for groups of coastal species and for oceanic species.

    “So whereas coastal species tended to have hot spots in around the tropics we found that oceanic species on the whole tended to have highest biodiversity in mid-latitude.

    “What’s likely to happen is that as the oceans warm, species may move away from the equator, northwards and southwards to maintain their water conditions.”

    He says a reorganisation of life in the ocean is likely, but depends on many factors.

    “For example, you may have a species that moves north or south to stay in cool water but it may encounter predators that it has never run into before, for example,” he said.

    “The consistent link with temperature suggests that we will see a reorganisation or a redistribution of marine diversity into the future as the oceans continue to warm.”

    Tags: environment, climate-change, oceans-and-reefs, science-and-technology, biology, microbiology, marine-biology, biological-diversity, canada

    First posted 3 hours 16 minutes ago

  • Climate check-up ‘screams world is warming’

     

    South Australia and New South Wales had their warmest year on record as La Nina conditions changed to El Nino.

    Maximum temperatures were generally above normal throughout Australia, adding up to the second hottest year since temperature started being record in 1910.

    Mr Arndt says the signs of global warming are undeniable.

    “Each of the last three decades has been substantially warmer than the decade before it,” he said.

    “On a decade scale, that is very clear. The 1980s was the warmest decade on record as of December 31, 1989, but every single year in the 90s was warmer than that decade’s average temperature.”

    Peter Thorne, of the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites, says the scientists were not swayed by the debate over climate data and whether it had previously been manipulated.

    “What this data is doing is screaming that the world is warming, and that cannot be driven by any single individual or even a small set of groups, because the evidence is there to see – there are lots of groups doing this stuff,” Mr Thorne said.

    The scientists say the warming is due to greenhouse gases and while there were signs of human fingerprints, the report was not designed to attribute blame.

    Tom Karl from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Service says the report does not try to make the link between the cause of global warming and what has been observed.

    “This is the basis for the next step, because without this data it’s impossible to take the next step,” Mr Karl said.

    The research is the first to gather all relevant data and update information from the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change released three years ago.

    Tags: bushfire, environment, climate-change, weather, australia, sa, vic, wa, united-states

    First posted 1 hour 47 minutes ago

  • Islanders plead for help as homes sink

     

    Charles Tsivi moved his family to Tinputz on Bougainville’s north-east coast last year and built a house on land donated by the Catholic Church.

    He says he is glad he made the move.

    “I saw the population was increasing as well as that strong winds blow the waves onto the land and spoils the food gardens,” he said.

    On a windy hill out the back of his new home at Tinputz, he has a large garden where he grows kaukau, banana, tapioca and cassava.

    He says he grows enough to comfortably live off.

    But planting a garden is something he could not do back at his old home 100 kilometres away on the Carteret Islands.

    Mr Tsivi says life is better on Bougainville but he is worried about his relatives back on the Carterets.

    “I’m very sorry – our mothers are there. With the food shortage we are worried about them,” he said.

    “But to help them, it is hard to go across the sea. We could help them if we had boats.”

     

    ‘Enough of talking’

     

    Ursula Rakova moved from the Carterets to Bougainville several years ago and set up the organization Tulele Peisa to raise money and campaign for her people.

    She says the situation is getting desperate.

    “Food scarcity; population has increased; there is fights over firewood,” she said.

    “There is also arguments over the little land that is available for food crops and just over bananas and coconut trees.”

    So far only two families out of a population of 2,300 have moved to Bougainville.

    Ms Rakova says they need more land and more money.

    “We plan to move, within the next three years, 83 families, so we are looking at 830 people,” she said.

    “Then within the next 10 years [we plan to] at least move 1,700 people.”

    The Carteret Islanders have made headlines around the world over the last decade.

    So many journalists have visited the islands that many locals are now sick and tired of having to accommodate them.

    Ms Rakova says the publicity has not translated into help from either the PNG government or the international community.

    “Enough of talking,” she said.

    “We’ve got to see some action in practical sense.”

    With predictions that Carterets will be largely uninhabitable by 2015, time is running out for help to arrive.

    Tags: disasters-and-accidents, relief-and-aid-organisations, environment, climate-change, papua-new-guinea

     

  • Voters reject climate citizens assembly

     

    With a new front threatening to open up for Ms Gillard on cost of living, the polling suggests that Labor could lose office on this issue alone, if even only a small proportion of voters switch from Labor to the Coalition on the issue.

    “It definitely could be a game changer,” Galaxy managing director David Briggs said. “It is a definite negative for the Government.

    “While the majority of voters, 86 per cent, say that a rate rise will not impact on their vote, as many as 11 per cent say that they would be less likely to vote for Labor, and in a tight election that could give [Opposition Leader] Tony Abbott just the break he needs.”

    As the nation heads into week two of the five-week campaign, the race appears to be tightening.

    The Galaxy poll commissioned by The Daily Telegraph and conducted over the weekend has again put Labor in front with a two-party preferred lead of 52 per cent to 48 per cent. However, this still represents a swing against the Government of almost 1 per cent from the 2007 poll and a loss of seats.

    The Greens have also recorded their highest ever vote in a Galaxy poll, surging from 12 per cent a week ago to 15 per cent following the release of Ms Gillard’s poorly received climate change policy.

    Primary support for the Coalition slipped from 42 per cent to 41 per cent following a horror start for Mr Abbott, who spent most of the week defending claims he would bring back WorkChoices.

    Labor’s primary support appears stuck at a low 38 per cent, almost five points down on its 2007 primary vote, meaning it would rely on the Greens preferences it secured in a deal to retain government.

     

    15 comments on this story

  • US Senate drops bill to cap carbon emissions

     

    Democrats have been trying to pass a plan that charges power plants, manufacturers and other large polluters for their carbon dioxide emissions, the leading contributor to global warming, for more than a year. But it ran into opposition from Republican senators, as well as Democrats eager not to jeopardise their chances in November’s midterm elections.

    Republicans said the bill would create a “national energy tax”, warning costs would be passed to consumers in the form of higher electricity bills and fuel costs that would lead manufacturers to take their factories overseas, putting jobs at risk.

    The failure to pass sweeping energy legislation is likely to weaken the US negotiating position heading into the international climate negotiations in Mexico at the end of the year.

    Democrats hope to instead pass a narrower energy bill next week that would increase the liability of companies for oil spills in the light of public anger towards BP over the Gulf of Mexico disaster.

    Senate majority leader Harry Reid said the reason for abandoning the attempt to pass a comprehensive energy and climate bill was simple: “We know we don’t have the votes.”

    He said no Republican senator was willing to back the bill but maintained that the narrower legislation would still be “a step forward”.

    “Number one, we’re going to hold BP accountable to ensure that they clean up their mess,” he said. “Hopefully, we can stop [accidents] from ever happening, but if they do, there will be a process to move forward.”

    The bill would also boost energy efficient homes and provide incentives to convert many of America’s large trucks from diesel to natural gas.

    Senator John Kerry, the Democrat who was lead sponsor of the now-abandoned climate bill, was hopeful that carbon emissions would eventually be capped. He noted that it took more than two decades for Congress to approve a health care bill championed by his friend and fellow Massachusetts senator, the late Ted Kennedy.

    “This is not going to take close to that long,” he said. “I am absolutely confident that as the American people make their voices heard, and as our colleagues go home and listen to them we’re going to grow in our ability to be able to pass this.” White House energy adviser Carol Browner said Obama still supported a comprehensive bill that included a cap on carbon emissions but also backed Reid’s decision to go forward with a narrower bill.

    Larry Schweiger, president and CEO of the National Wildlife Federation, warned that the country would pay a “high price” if the Senate failed to curb carbon emissions.

    “Too many senators are listening to polluters instead of the American public,” he said. “Too many senators have learned nothing from the Gulf disaster and the high price we pay when oil lobbyists dictate our energy laws.”

  • Obama blocked on climate

     

    Some in the administration still hope to revive the legislation this year, although the preoccupation of congress members has already shifted to election campaigning.

    Forced to accept political reality, Democrat Senate majority leader Harry Reid yesterday said that his party would instead pursue a more limited energy bill this year that concentrated on combating the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and improving efficiency standards.

    Expressing his disappointment at dropping the broader bill, Senator Reid said: “We don’t have a single Republican to work with us. We don’t have the votes.”

    Mr Obama’s White House director of energy and climate change policy, Carol Browner, said: “Everyone is disappointed.”

    Democrats needed a “super-majority” of 60 votes out of 100 in the Senate to pass a proposed climate change bill with an emissions scheme — but fell at least two short and possibly more if their party fragmented.

    Many Democrats have been under pressure from voters working in high carbon emission industries to reject greenhouse gas limits.

    The House of Representatives, where the Democrats have a resounding majority, passed its own version of a climate change bill last year that was still to be merged with Senate legislation.

    Mr Obama has staked much political capital on winning Senate support for legislation backing a 17 per cent reduction on 2005 carbon emissions by 2020.

    Just as Kevin Rudd did, Mr Obama took his position to the UN climate change summit in Copenhagen in December, only to see no common agreement.

    Mr Rudd wanted a 5 per cent emissions cut on 2000 levels by 2020 and also pushed to introduce a cap-and-trade scheme, but he dropped his government’s legislation this year when it was blocked in the Senate by the Coalition.

    The push for US climate change legislation had been in doubt for months. The main prospect of success rested on a senior Republican, Lindsey Graham, joining a coalition with Democrat John Kerry and independent Joe Lieberman, and possibly luring some Republicans to go with them.

    Senator Graham bowed out last month, saying he could no longer back a joint plan.

    Without legislation, Mr Obama’s opportunity to curb emissions relies on the US Environmental Protection Agency using its powers to control dangerous pollutants.

    The blow to Mr Obama’s climate change agenda yesterday came as the US Senate agreed, after resistance, to pass an extension of emergency unemployment benefits.

    Mr Obama also signed into law new financial regulations to limit the behaviour of banks, following the passage of legislation by the Senate.