Category: Climate chaos

The atmosphere is to the earth as a layer of varnish is to a desktop globe. It is thin, fragile and essential for preserving the items on the surface.150 years of burning fossil fuel have overloaded the atmosphere to the point where the earth is ill. It now has a fever. Read the detailed article, Soothing Gaia’s Fever for an evocative account of that analogy. The items listed here detail progress on coordinating 6.5 billion people in the most critical project undertaken by humanity. 

  • Tont Abbott’s scepticism will shock liberal voters

    Tony Abbott’s scepticism will shock Liberal voters

    Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown has said that Tony Abbott’s stated
    scepticism on climate change today will shock many Liberal voters.

    “And in a world where both big and small business understand the science
    of climate change and the need for appropriate action, Abbott’s comments
    will also dismay most business operators,” Senator Brown said.

    “Abbott’s failure on climate change is shepherding the government’s
    weakness at Copenhagen. For instance, the Rudd government’s failure to
    announce adequate funds for developing countries to deal with climate
    change, described as an insult by the spokesperson for the G77 plus
    China developing nations group, Lumumba Stanislaus Di-Aping.”

    “Oxfam estimates Australia’s baseline contribution should be over $3
    billion a year.”

    “The make-up of Tony Abbott’s new front bench makes Sir Robert Menzies
    look pink,” Senator Brown said.

    Media contact: Peter Stahel 0433 005 727

    _______________________________________________
    GreensMPs Media mailing list
    Media@greensmps.org.au
    To unsubscribe, change your details or change delivery options for this email, visit: http://lists.greensmps.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/media

  • ETS will cost families ‘little or nothing’ promises Rudd

     

    But Mr Rudd said 2.9 million low-income families would be fully compensated for the rises.

    And 2.6 million of those – 90 per cent – would get a windfall, with compensation totalling 120 per cent of cost rises.

    There would be cash assistance for 3.6 million middle-income households, half of which would be fully compensated for extra expenses.

    Single pensioners would get an extra $455 a year as compensation and couples $686, Mr Rudd said.

    The money would come from forcing industries to buy permits for the tonnage of carbon pollution they produced.

  • PM ‘ignoring’ plight of Australia’s sinking islands

     

    Through the plane window I could see Boigu was little more than an oblong mangrove swamp, just a few kilometres off PNG.

    Even at its centre, wide muddy expanses covered in shallow ponds formed intricate patterns of tan and yellow and grey, and reflected the sunlight back at me.

    On arrival I was introduced to Keith Pabai, who, along with being the headmaster of the island’s primary school, is a traditional owner.

    He took me around, showing me how far the last king tide – in January 2009 – had crashed over sea walls and flooded the town.

    All but a tiny proportion of the island had been submerged. The fresh water supply had been threatened.

    “For some of our community members that was a frightening experience,” he said.

    “In my lifetime that’s the biggest tide ever that I’ve seen, where that amount of – that excess of water coming through the community.”

    He motioned toward the small incline which led up to the lip of the covered dam.

    “Having the water here, that was scary, right up next to our water supply. The water was actually right around the whole dam,” Mr Pabai said.

    Also disturbing to the community was the fact that one of its most sacred sites, the waterfront cemetery, was being slowly washed away.

    I went to visit it and, sure enough, many of the graves had clearly been damaged. Wooden crosses had collapsed and were now entwined in tree roots exposed by erosion.

    Here was an ancient culture which, if the scientists were right, would surely soon be swamped. But, according to Mr Pabai, there was no question the community wanted to stay put.

    “It is something we haven’t thought of yet as a community, but these things are something we have to consider in the future, but at this time not as yet,” he said.

     

    ‘Freak tides’

     

    The next day, I flew to another vulnerable island, this time in the centre of the Strait.

    Warraber is, like several other stunning little islands, supported by coral. It is also very low.

    I was received at the airport by local councillor Willie Lui, who toured me around his tropical paradise home.

    Mr Lui showed me the lengths his community had gone to try to hold back the tides.

    The biggest rocks that could be found had been dumped at the foreshore and covered with tyres, dead trees and brush. New palms had been planted in front of piles of coconuts.

    It was an admirable effort for such a small community, but I secretly feared it would not hold.

    In an interview, Mr Lui was clearly angry.

    “We feel that nothing is actually being done,” he said.

    “We’ve seen that the tides are getting higher, the winds are getting stronger, we’re getting more freak tides … and it not only scares me, it scares all of my community members.

    “Australian dollars are going overseas to actually help other countries, and as a newly elected leader I find it hard to wrap my head around why the Government is fixing problems overseas. What about our own backyard. What about the Torres Strait?”

     

    Conspiracy theories

     

    Mr Lui said that the lack of response from authorities had resulted in conspiracy theories.

    Rumours had started circulating that the Federal Government was secretly planning a forced relocation of people living on the six vulnerable islands in the Strait.

    “How things are going at the moment, with the Local Government trying to secure funds from the State and the Federal Government, it makes the people think that the Government wants us to relocate – that’s what goes through the mind of the locals, the community members,” Mr Lui said.

    Back on Thursday Island, which is the Strait’s administrative centre, the chairman of the Torres Strait Regional Authority, John Toshi Kris, has been working to try to secure funds from the Government.

    He too is “bamboozled” at the fact Australia is giving Pacific Island countries $150 million in funding to adjust to climate change, while calls for $22 million to fund mitigation work in the Strait have amounted to nothing.

    “This has been going on for the last two years,” he said.

    “We haven’t had a single dollar coming in to fix up those short-term projects that we’ve identified.

    “We’ve seen houses going under water.

    “People are frustrated with sandbags. What they need to see is real projects on the ground to try and save these communities.”

    Mr Kris also pointed out the potential of a massive influx of climate refugees from the low-lying, swampy southern coast of PNG.

    “Erosion can cause a lot of people, issues coming across the border. The Government has been focusing on other countries but right on their doorstep here is a huge issue which can lead to a [big] national crisis … for our country,” he said.

    “When we’re talking about the low lying part of Papua New Guinea, we’re not talking about tens and thousands of people, we’re talking about over 100,000 people that could actually come across.”

  • Greenpeace greets world leaders with age-old lesson

     

    Greenpeace have also planned a special message for Mr Rudd, giving him a shock preview of how he’ll look in 2020 at Copenhagen International Airport.

    It’s commissioned a series of billboards featuring the world’s leaders apologising in 2020 for their inaction on climate change in 2009.

    Mr Rudd joins an aged US President Barack Obama, Germany’s Angela Merkel and Brtain’s Gordon Brown, looking mournful and claiming: “I’m sorry. We could have stopped catastrophic climate chage … we didn’t.”

    See the billboards here – Kevin Rudd’s at No 10

     

  • Newspapers unite to demand climate action in Copenhagen

    “Unless we combine to take decisive action, climate change will ravage out planet, and with it our prosperity and security.”

    The newspapers range from Italy’s La Repubblica and Politiken in Denmark to The Cambodia Daily, the Irish Times and the Toronto Star.

    The crunch conference gathers 192 nations under the flag of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

    The goal is to deliver an accord that will ratchet up efforts against climate change, driven by uncontrolled emissions of heat-trapping carbon gases from fossil fuels.

  • The truth about climate: Copenhagen isn’t enough

     

    But that is still a distant ambition. In terms of hitching themselves to a model of environmentally sustainable progress, Copenhagen delegates are still haggling over the prenuptial agreement.

    Why the cold feet? The problems divide into three broad categories.

    First is money. On a simple cost-benefit analysis, the best value lies in substantial and early action, as Sir Nicholas Stern’s landmark report in 2006 found. The price of dealing with natural disasters and population movements triggered by global warming in the future is higher than the price of cutting emissions today.

    But at Copenhagen the question of cost cuts across delicate diplomatic lines. It is broadly recognised that countries that have already industrialised, and so already pumped billions of tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere, ought to subsidise the transition to greener energy elsewhere. But there is no agreement on how big the subsidy should be or how the transfer will be managed. The idea of western taxpayers, for example, helping the Chinese to develop competitive new green technology is not an easy sell in the US Senate.

    There lies the second problem: politics. A global treaty to limit emissions would require a global enforcement regime to ensure its provisions were met. That means some submission of national governments to international authorities, possibly with inspections and sanctions of some kind. The US has always been virulently opposed to any such implied subordination. But without US participation a climate deal is practically useless.

    Meanwhile, the prospect, however distant, of a global climate governance regime will surely fire the growing anti-environmentalism movement to new excesses of paranoia.

    And that is the third problem: denial of the science. The opponents of a climate deal are newly emboldened by the recent publication of hacked emails from a leading research centre, purporting to show manipulation of data and intent to suppress dissenting opinion. In fact, the emails, taken in the context of a vast and uncontroversial body of correspondence, prove nothing. They demonstrate, at worst, a cavalier prejudice against work that the correspondents deemed shoddy. They categorically fail to show the case for man-made climate change is flawed, or even exaggerated.

    The climate conspiracy theory falls apart when you consider the effort that would be required to sustain such a scam (recruiting thousands of scientists, falsifying mountains of data) and then ask what plausible motivation there could be to continue such a vast conspiratorial effort? None, is the simple answer.

    Man-made climate change is real. Copenhagen is clearly not the last major climate summit of its kind, but it must be the last one conducted in an atmosphere of public debate where science is still fighting a rearguard action against nonsense.

    It must also be the last summit where binding treaty obligations are deferred. The scientific case for action is irrefutable. So is the economic case. That just leaves the politics, where courage is the deficient commodity. The prenuptial talks have gone on too long already. The time has come to exchange the necessary vows.