admin /19 July, 2010
Blog home
Monckton’s response to John Abraham is magnificently bonkers
Monckton fails to provide a convincing refutation of Abraham’s criticisms but does throw a great deal of dust into the air

Reponse to John Abraham by Christopher Monckton. Photograph: SPPI
Say what you like about Viscount Monckton, he never fails to entertain. His response to the devastating critique of his claims about climate change by the physicist John Abraham is magnificently bonkers.
To give you a flavour of Monckton’s reasoning, here are some examples of what he cites as evidence of Abraham acting out of malice:
• Abraham pointed out that Monckton “has not written a single peer-reviewed science paper on any topic”;
• Abraham stated that Lord Monckton “presented a lot of data with no citations or no explanation”;
• He pointed out that “if you don’t tell us where it’s from we can’t assess the data”;
• He explained that a graph displayed by Lord Monckton was “almost off by 100%”.
These are all straight statements of fact. It is impossible to see how they could be construed as malicious, unless you regard all criticism of your views and credentials as illegitimate.