Category: General news

Managing director of Ebono Institute and major sponsor of The Generator, Geoff Ebbs, is running against Kevin Rudd in the seat of Griffith at the next Federal election. By the expression on their faces in this candid shot it looks like a pretty dull campaign. Read on

  • The scientists are crying AVAAZ

    More

    1 of 45

    The scientists are crying

    Inbox
    x

    Oli MacColl – Avaaz Unsubscribe

    2:42 PM (9 minutes ago)

    to me
    Looks like you were interested in the climate march, but didn’t sign up. Over 180,000 people have joined in just 3 days! Click here to join them and be the first to find out what’s happening in your local area.

    Climate change is wreaking havoc on our planet — and scientists are literally crying in despair. The biggest climate summit of the decade is just four months away. If we can pack the streets at the largest climate march in history we can get our leaders to agree to end fossil fuels for good — join now!

    I’m in
    Dear friends,

    A leading scientist just broke down in tears during an interview on carbon pollution, describing a dark future where the oceans are ruined. Whether her nightmare comes true depends on us.

    The biggest climate summit of the decade is just four months away, and our leaders could agree to a revolutionary target to get the world off fossil fuels. It would be a guiding star to navigate away from climate catastrophe, signalling to politicians, boardrooms and stock-markets everywhere that the era of dirty energy is over. Winning won’t be easy — but if we make leaders feel the power of this movement then we can win.

    Last year our community helped create the biggest climate mobilisation in history at the People’s Climate March. Now, on the weekend of November 28th & 29th — hours before leaders arrive at the Paris climate summit — it’s time to go even bigger! Click to say “I’m in” for this year’s People’s Climate March and you’ll be the first to find out what’s happening in your local area.

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/save_the_date_rb_loc_cl_aus/?bhPqncb&v=62940

    Paris is not our final destination in the struggle to stop climate change, but there’s every reason for hope that it could smash the deadlock. The Pope has just called for real climate action, G7 leaders have already committed to phase out fossil fuels, and the cost of renewables is dropping every single day. And all over the world, the climate movement is winning big, forcing clean energy onto the agenda of national leaders everywhere and moving millions out of fossil fuel investments.

    We already have the technology we need to spark the revolution to shift us off our collision course with climate catastrophe. But for decades our leaders have pandered to the interests of powerful fossil fuel companies, and unless they know that people everywhere will fight for their future, there’s a real risk they’ll cave again.

    Our 42 million strong movement was built to stop that! Last year’s climate marches put our leaders on notice that a new world was on its way. Now we need a giant march in Paris, together with coordinated marches in major global cities and thousands of smaller solidarity events hosted all over the world to make sure our leaders know we won’t let them put fossil fuel profits before the future of our species. Click below and say you’re in!

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/save_the_date_rb_loc_cl_aus/?bhPqncb&v=62940

    Or if you’re part of an organisation that’s interested in taking part — click below to let us know if you’d like to partner with Avaaz on making this march magic:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/pcm_2015_org_sign_on/

    With hope and gratitude,

    Oli, Morgan, Ricken, Iain, Emma, Ari and the Avaaz team

    P.S. – Our founder Ricken Patel just wrote a call to action for the march in the Guardian — click here to read and share it widely!

    SOURCES

    No plan B if Paris climate summit ends in failure, says EU climate chief (The Guardian)
    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/06/no-plan-b-if-paris-climate-summit-ends-in-failure-says-eu-climate-chief

    Apple, Microsoft, Google and other US firms to commit $140bn to address climate change (International Business Times)
    http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/apple-microsoft-google-other-us-firms-commit-140bn-address-climate-change-1512696

    Vatican Keeps Up Eco-Pressure, Invites Mayors to See Pope (New York Times)
    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/07/15/world/europe/ap-eu-rel-vatican-climate.html

  • BREAKING: We just won in court get up ADANI Carmichael mine approval rejected

    More

    1 of 43

    BREAKING: We just won in court

    Inbox
    x

    Sam R – GetUp!

    10:40 AM (3 minutes ago)

    to me
    Dear NEVILLE,

    We just won in court.

    About an hour ago, Adani’s Carmichael Mine approval was ruled invalid by the Federal Court!

    Faced with overwhelming evidence, both Environment Minister Greg Hunt and Adani have conceded defeat and withdrawn the approval for the largest coal mine in Australia. Minister Hunt must now make a new decision to accept or reject the mine.

    The case, run by the incredible Mackay Conservation Group, was funded by thousands of GetUp members across the country. It leaves Adani without an approval for the monstrous mine, no approval for dredging in Great Barrier Reef waters at Abbot Point, and no investors. It’s not over yet, but we just landed one almighty blow.

    This is an historic, landmark victory. It couldn’t have happened without GetUp members like you. Thank you.

    The Mackay Conservation Group fought the mine on three fronts. They argued that Minister Hunt didn’t consider the impacts of the mine on climate and the Great Barrier Reef, didn’t consider Adani’s poor environmental record, and didn’t consider the impact on vulnerable species. It was a rare, stunning victory that will reverberate across the country.

    Thank you so much to the small but mighty Mackay Conservation Group and their lawyers, Environmental Defenders Office NSW, who fought with limited resources against a giant opposition and won. The GetUp movement is proud to support these wonderful organisations.

    The landmark victory puts the ball back in Minister Hunt’s court. He must now either re-approve the mine, or reject it for good. He will be under huge pressure from his own government and Adani, and there’s a real threat he’ll try to rush a re-approval.

    Today is a day to celebrate, but we know we can’t lose focus. Let’s share the good news, and ask Minister Hunt to reject Adani’s Carmichael disaster for good. You can use this moment to celebrate, or to get on the front foot against Minister Hunt. The choice is yours!





    As Minister Hunt gears up to make his next decision, we’ll be there. Just like we were when 15,000 of us donated to fund incredible legal actions. Or when we lined the streets of Brisbane and demanded Reef protection. Or convinced eleven major investment banks not to fund Adani. Or helped get rid of one of the most destructive State Governments we’ve ever seen.

    Keep your eyes out for the next action. In the meantime, take a moment to reflect on this momentous victory.

    And, one more time. Thank you.

    Sam R and Adam, for the GetUp team

    PS – Amazing victories like this can only happen thanks to the generous donations of GetUp members, who fuel the ongoing fight to protect the Reef. Whether it’s sending a film crew to India to investigate Adani’s track-record or working to uncover potential legal challenges, a small weekly donation can help make sure we can continue to fight to protect our Reef in strategic and high-impact ways. Can you become a core member to support GetUp’s ongoing Great Barrier Reef campaign?

  • 5 ways the PC report hurts

    1 of 23

    5 ways the PC report hurts

    Victorian Trades Hall Council

    Inbox
    x

    Victorian Trades Hall Council

    10:30 AM (6 minutes ago)

    to me
    Dear Neville

    We’ve said from the start that the Productivity Commission is a thin disguise for Tony Abbott’s WorkChoices agenda.

    And now that the draft report is out, the media’s starting to catch on.

    Neville, as someone who cares about our rights at work, you’re probably about to get really angry.

    Even though the report explicitly points out that our current IR system works well, it still recommends a return to the worst aspects of WorkChoices: Individual Flexibility Agreements that allow employers to undermine entitlements, reduced protection for unfair dismissal, and NO protection from increased use of insecure work such as labour hire.

    (Oh, and slashing Sunday penalties for retail and hospitality workers. Because apparently their weekends aren’t important)

    Here’s our article about just a few of the serious nasties the report recommends. 

    Neville, we’ve made it easy to spread the word.

    Click here to share our article – it’s technical but it’s important.

    Or follow us on facebook and twitter to see some of the simple graphics we’ve created.

    penrates_gov.jpg

    The more workers who hear about the attacks on our rights, the better prepared we’ll be to fight Tony Abbott’s second crack at WorkChoices. So let’s organise, stand up, and fight back!

    In unity,

    Your team at Vic Trades Hall
    http://www.weareunion.org.au/

  • The tiny finch and the mega mine Paul Sinclair ADF

    1 of 20

    The tiny finch and the mega mine

    Inbox
    x

    Paul Sinclair, ACF Unsubscribe

    3:17 PM (5 minutes ago)

    to me

    Hi INGA

    Right now Indian mining giant Adani is itching to build one the world’s largest coal mines in Queensland’s Galilee Basin.
    But the Carmichael Coal Mine is being held up by a court case that questions whether Federal Environment Minister Greg Hunt did his homework on the impacts of the mine.
    From its massive contribution to global warming right down to the tiny finch it will drive towards extinction, the impact will be colossal.
    The Galilee Basin breathes life into eastern Australia. It straddles the Great Dividing Range with its water catchments feeding inland to Lake Eyre and its deep springs flowing all the way out to the Great Barrier Reef.
    In the Basin’s grassy, open woodlands, a 400-strong flock of the endangered Southern Black-Throated Finch holds tight to one of its last remaining strongholds.
    Etched in its rocks and deep in its veins, is the ancient living culture of the Wangan and Jagalingou Traditional Owners.
    With this knowledge, to allow a giant coal mine in the Basin in the age of clean energy is nothing short of wilful neglect.

    Here are 6 reasons the minister must revoke approval of the Carmichael Coal Mine:

    1. The mine is estimated to contribute 130 million tonnes of carbon pollution each year to global warming.

    2. It will require a whopping 12 billion litres of water every year, could dry up or contaminate ancient springs, and drain sections of the Basin.

    3. It poses a huge threat to the Great Barrier Reef with its contribution to global warming, potential to pollute ecosystems that support the Reef and from the coal ships that will pass through the Reef’s waters.

    4. It will destroy 10,000 hectares of endangered Southern Black-Throated Finch habitat, plans to offset the damage are woefully inadequate, and it could drive the species to extinction.

    5. It does not have the consent of Traditional Owners, the Wangan and Jagalingou people.

    6. The mine’s proponent Adani has a terrible track record in India of flouting regulations and destroying environments.

    Under national environmental law any of these factors alone should have stopped the approval of the Carmichael Coal Mine. Combined, the approval of the mine is unfathomable.

    It’s clear our system is broken. It’s broken when our Federal Environment Minister takes the word of a big polluting company with a terrible track record as truth. It’s broken when the government does not consult the community. And it’s broken when a vital life source like the Galilee can be destroyed with the signature of a single minister.
    We’ve written to the minister to ask him to consider all the facts and revoke his approval of the Carmichael Coal Mine. We’re meeting with Australian banks to make sure they think long and hard before investing in the mine. And we’re bringing people together to amplify our voices.
    Let’s keep coal out of the Galilee.
    Thank you,
    Paul
    Paul Sinclair
    Director of campaigns
    Australian Conservation Foundation
  • Homeowners Insurance Does Not Cover Many Types of Damage

    geology McAfee SECURE sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams

    Home » Geologic Hazards » Homeowners Insurance

    Homeowners Insurance Does Not Cover Many Types of Damage

    Flood, earthquake, expansive soil, hurricane, landslide and subsidence damage is often not covered!

    “All Perils” Means:   Learn About the Geology

    Every year in every state many property owners discover that their homeowners insurance policy will not pay when their homes are damaged by common geological processes such as earthquakes, expansive soils, floods, hurricanes, landslides and subsidence. These homeowners probably had the impression that their “all perils” insurance policy would pay for almost any type of damage that their home would experience.

    I felt the same way when I purchased my first homeowners insurance policy. I distinctly remember sitting in the agent’s office and listening to him tell me that I was buying an “all perils” policy. I felt good about that because I was covered for “all perils.” I didn’t read the policy word-by-word to see what it really covered – who reads 50-page insurance policies issued by leading companies in the insurance industry? Everyone assumes that they cover everything. It’s an “all perils” policy, right?

    A few years later my work as a geologist brought me in contact with lots of homeowners who were unable to collect when their homes were damaged by floods, landslides, subsidence and other problems. I was surprised at how many people received this rude insurance awakening. At first I blamed it on “cheap insurance.” Then I began to realize that the people I met under these circumstances were not going to have their losses covered by their insurance company – not even by the companies that I always thought were the leaders of the insurance industry.

    “Exclusions: What We Do Not Cover”

    One day I received an updated policy from my insurance company in the mail and I decided to spend a little time reading. I wanted to find out if my policy would cover the same disasters that I saw other people suffering. Sure enough, the policy had an exclusions statement that listed a large number of geologic hazards. The list of exclusions was almost identical to the table of contents of an environmental geology textbook. There was no coverage for landslides, floods, mine subsidence, mud slides, mud flows, volcanic eruptions, surface water, sewage and a long list of other problems.

    I have since looked at the exclusions statements of many homeowners insurance policies and my personal opinion is that the typical homeowners insurance policy is often just a fire and limited liability policy – and maybe some coverage for damage done by falling objects and wind.

    Your homeowners insurance probably does not cover half of the things that you assumed it would. In my opinion, the “all perils” name is misleading because the coverage excludes so many different types of losses that commonly occur. Many homeowners never learn about these exclusions until after they have paid premiums for many years and then suffer an uncovered loss.

    An Idea for Insurance Companies:   Perhaps insurance companies could generate an enormous boost in revenues by offering their current policies as “fire, wind and limited liability coverage” (or another appropriate title). They could then offer a real “all perils” policy for a higher price. Don’t you think a lot of people would appreciate this clarity and security — and opt for the upgrade?

    The lesson to be taken away from this is: “Learn about the geology before you buy the house.” If the home has some geological risk you should not buy it. Or, you should know exactly what your risks are and either find specific insurance to cover them or live in the house informed of your exposure.

    Below I have done my best to summarize what many homeowners policies do not cover and provide links to more detailed information. More detailed learning for these topics can be obtained by reading an environmental geology book or taking an environmental geology course at a university. For site-specific information you can contact a consulting geologist or the geological survey that serves the area where the house is located.

    Expansive Soils and Homeowners Insurance

    In a typical year in the United States, expansive soils cause damage to more homes than earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and tornadoes combined. Most homeowners insurance policies do not cover damage from expansive soils.

    Expansive soils contain a significant amount of clay which can expand when wet and shrink when dry. These volume changes can generate enormous forces which can damage foundations, underground utilities, sidewalks, driveways and other parts of a home. The United States Department of Agriculture estimates that one half of the homes in the United States are built on expansive soils and one half of these will have some damage.

    There are certain areas of the United States where expansive soils are beneath much of the land. A general guide to where they are is shown in the map and references at right. In those areas where expansive soils are a known problem, professional inspection for the presence of expansive soils or expansive soil damage should be done before purchasing an existing home or construction lot. Small areas of expansive soils occur almost anywhere so inspection is never a bad idea.

    Many state geological surveys have detailed information about local expansive soil problems. The United States Department of Agriculture has a publication titled “Understanding Soil Risks and Hazards” that explains some of the problems with expansive soils.

    Earthquake Insurance

    The typical homeowners insurance policy does not cover damage from earthquakes. A homeowner who desires this coverage normally needs to purchase a “named perils” policy – an earthquake insurance policy.

    One way to do this is to ask your homeowners insurance agent if your policy provides earthquake coverage. If the policy does not cover earthquake damage then ask where you can purchase the coverage. Some insurance companies will add earthquake insurance coverage to an existing homeowners policy for an additional annual fee. In some geographic areas, earthquake insurance is available through government-sponsored programs such as the California Earthquake Authority. Many insurance agents can advise on the companies and government programs that offer earthquake coverage in your area.

    Another question that many homeowners ask is: “Do I need earthquake insurance?” There are a few situations where a homeowner must have earthquake insurance to comply with mortgage requirements. However, for most people the answer depends upon where the home is located and the level of risk that the homeowner is willing to take.

    The map at right shows the geographic variability of earthquake hazard in the conterminous United States. White areas on these maps have the lowest hazard and the pink areas have the highest. Earthquake insurance is probably a very good idea in the red, pink, and orange areas. If I lived in these areas I would buy the insurance for my residence and for a commercial building if I owned one. It is a prudent idea in the yellow areas. Earthquake hazards are lower in the green, blue and white areas. If you live in one of these areas and want the peace of mind that you are financially protected in the event of damage then the insurance is a good purchase. I live in southwestern Pennsylvania and do not have earthquake insurance – perhaps I will regret that someday.

    Flood Insurance

    According to the National Flood Insurance Program, floods are America’s #1 natural disaster. They occur in every state and almost every community. Homeowners insurance usually does not cover flood damage so it is very important to understand the flood hazards at your location and obtain appropriate insurance coverage if needed.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency provides address-specific flood hazard information on the FloodSmart website. There you can type in your address and learn about the specific flood hazards at your location. They also have information for assessing flood hazards and purchasing flood insurance.

    FloodSmart recommends flood insurance even if you live in an area of low to moderate risk. This is because 25% of all flood insurance claims come from areas with minimal flood risk. Flooding occurs there during exceptionally large flood events and also as a result of local drainage problems. Purchasing insurance in these areas is often inexpensive – it starts as low as $59/year for renters (contents coverage only) or $129/year to cover a home and its contents.

    Hurricane Insurance

    Homeowners insurance usually does not cover “hurricanes”. Instead, the coverage or exclusion is based upon which element of a hurricane (such as wind, waves or flooding) directly caused the damage.

    These issues are not easily resolved and often must be settled in court. For example: a house was flooded by a storm surge and the homeowner claims that since the surge was produced by wind that the damage should be covered. The insurance company maintains that they do not pay for flood damage. Many of these types of cases – based upon definitions and impacts – are difficult to resolve.

    Persons who buy property in areas that might experience hurricanes should learn about the types of hazards that come with these storms and how they impact the specific location where they will live. History is often a very good teacher. For example, if a location was inundated by storm surge in the past, then a future inundation will probably occur.

    Landslide Insurance

    Homeowners insurance usually does not cover landslide damage. I have been to many homes that have been damaged by landslides and know of only one situation where the homeowners insurance company paid for the loss (after a lawsuit determined that the damage was done by a rock fall and the policy did cover damage from falling objects). Anyone who intends to buy or build a home on sloping land should be cautious about potential landslide problems. Properties above a slope or at the base of a slope can also be at risk.

    Although landslide problems occur in all 50 states, some areas have a much greater incidence than others. The three factors which determine incidence are: 1) slope steepness, 2) soil strength, and 3) moisture content of the soil. The map at right shows areas with a high incidence of landslide problems in brown and red. Persons buying or building in these areas should be especially cautious because of the special conditions which occur there.

    The best way to protect yourself is to avoid buying or building in hazardous areas. If you are in doubt have an expert inspect the site and look for building damage that indicates a building under stress. Even if no landslide problems are revealed by the inspection, excavation, grading or fill placement can increase landslide probability. Also, landslide damage on adjacent properties is a good indicator that your home might be at risk – and will often result in difficult resale. Always be cautious on slopes and seek expert advice if you are uncertain. State geological surveys often have detailed information about local landslide hazards and problems.

    Subsidence Insurance

    Subsidence is usually not covered by homeowners insurance. The most common and damaging subsidence occurs in areas above underground mining. Here, voids opened during mining slowly or suddenly collapse. This can damage buildings, roads and utilities above. Your home can be damaged or ruined by this type of subsidence or it can be condemned – even if it is not damaged.

    Condemnation occurs when a government inspector determins that your home is unsafe for occupancy. It can also occur if the utility and road infrastructure of a neighborhood becomes too expensive or impossible to maintain. Then local government can condemn the property and prohibit occupancy. If your home is condemned you are required to move out – even if you rent, owe $500,000 on the mortgage or own the home free and clear.

    Mine subsidence occurs where coal or another mineral resource has been removed below the surface. The map at right and link to the USGS Coal Fields website shows where this is most likely to occur. More specific information and underground mine maps can often be obtained from state geological surveys or mine regulation agencies. These agencies can often tell you about minable resources beneath your property and provide information on past or present mining activity. You don’t need mine subsidence insurance if your building is in an area with no minable resources below.

    Avoiding properties above mined out areas is the best way to be safe from mine subsidence. However, existing structures over mines can often be insured through government mine subsidence insurance programs or through supplemental policies from insurance companies. Your homeowners insurance agent should be able to advise you on where it can be obtained or you might contact a government agency in your state to ask.

    The area where I live is entirely underlain by the Pittsburgh Coal, which was mined out decades ago. Although the seam is a few hundred feet below the surface and there is no obvious subsidence damage in my area I bought mine subsidence insurance from the Pennsylvania Mine Subsidence Insurance Fund. For about $170/year I have up to $250,000 in coverage. Contact your insurance agent for information.

    Subsidence can also occur from natural voids below, such as underground caverns in limestone. Extensive cavern systems are beneath large areas of some states. The United States Geological Survey has information on areas where potential karst subsidence can occur.

    Subsidence also occurs in some areas where large volumes of water or oil are being extracted through wells. In these areas the water aquifer or oil reservoir begins to compact and that compaction results in subsidence or fissuring at the surface. The United States Geological Survey has information about subsidence in response to water and oil production.

    Last update of this article: March 20, 2015.

    Contributor:

  • Atlantis awaits: melting #ice and rising water for coastal citiesI James Hansen 66 page PDF

    Inbox
    x

    Neville Gillmore <nevilleg729@gmail.com>

    7:44 PM (1 hour ago)

    to me
    Michelle MacEwan@michellemacewan 2h2 hours ago

    Atlantis awaits: melting #ice and rising water for coastal citiesI James Hansen http://fw.to/yrLpJeG