Category: Energy Matters

The twentieth century way of life has been made available, largely due to the miracle of cheap energy. The price of energy has been at record lows for the past century and a half.As oil becomes increasingly scarce, it is becoming obvious to everyone, that the rapid economic and industrial growth we have enjoyed for that time is not sustainable.Now, the hunt is on. For renewable sources of energy, for alternative sources of energy, for a way of life that is less dependent on cheap energy. 

  • Wind farms shut down for migrating birds

    Related story from The UK Guardian

    US wind farms kill about 7,000 birds a year but radar systems developed for Nasa can prevent fatal collisions by detecting approaching birds and analysing weather conditions

    It could be considered an air traffic control system for birds who have flown perilously off course. A wind farm in southern Texas, situated on a flight path used by millions of birds each autumn and spring, is pioneering the use of radar technology to avoid deadly collisions between a 2,500lb rotating blade and bird.

    US wind farms kill about 7,000 birds a year, according to a recent study. Other studies of individual wind farms suggest a higher toll on bats and birds, who crash into towers, blades, power lines and other installations. Estimates from a single wind farm in Altamont, California showed as many as 1,300 birds of prey killed each year – or about three a day.

    Such direct threats to wildlife, and concerns for habitats, have increasingly pitted conservationists against the renewable energy industry. A handful of wind power projects in the US have been shelved because of wildlife concerns.

    But new radar technology now in use at the Peñascal wind farm in Texas claims to have found a balance between competing environmental concerns – taking action against global warming and protecting wildlife – by protecting migrating birds at times of peak danger.

    The 202MW farm, operated by the Spanish firm, Iberdrola Renewables, is the first in the world to use radar systems to enable it to shut down automatically if bad weather hits in peak migration times.

    The installation, which opened late last month, uses radar systems originally developed for Nasa and the US Air Force to detect approaching birds from as far as four miles away, analyse weather conditions, and then determine in real time whether they are in danger of flying into the rotating blades.

    If they are, the turbines are programmed to shut down, restarting once the birds are safely on their way, said Gary Andrews, the chairman of DeTect, Inc, the Florida company that developed the technology.

    The system spots the birds and assesses their altitude, numbers and the visibility. “With all these pieces coming together properly … the turbines will shut down,” said Andrews.

    Conservationists however are sceptical of such an easy fix. They argue that wind farms should still be sited away from migration routes in the first place, and that the technology does nothing to solve the problem of installations that disturb bird and animal habitats and nesting grounds.

    “The bottom line with wind energy is that it has great potential but it must be done correctly,” said Doug Inkley, a senior scientist at the National Wildlife Federation. “The windiest site may not be the most suitable and one may have to live with having less windy conditions and less impact on wildlife.”

    Even in Texas – where there are virtually no environmental restrictions on wind farms – there was controversy when the Peñascal project was first proposed and local conservationist organisations tried to block the project in the courts.

    The Peñascal wind farm is located on the Central Flyway, a main route for migratory birds in the Americas.

    Millions of birds funnel through the narrow air corridor during the semiannual migration. A study in the autumn of 2007 found 4,000 birds an hour passing overhead.

    More than 30 species of warbler alone fly the route, along with waterfowl, raptors, and hawks. The area is also known as a nesting ground for reddish egret, which the Audubon Society views as threatened, terns and pelicans.

    In ordinary circumstances, the birds would be thousands of feet above the wind farm, passing the turbines without incident. But that can change dramatically in a sudden storm.

    A sudden cold snap, like the legendary Texan “Blue Northern”, can prove fatal for migrating birds, bringing strong head winds and fog. The birds, which typically fly at night, become disoriented and exhausted, elevating the risk they will lose altitude and crash into 400ft wind towers along their route, wildlife experts say.

    “If inclement weather hits the birds that are aloft at that point may be very vulnerable,” said Christopher Shackleford, an ornithologist with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.

    Andrews says his radar systems can avoid such consequences – and at relatively little cost to the wind farm. Forecasts suggest the wind farm would be forced to close only between 40 to 60 hours during peak migration times.

    The US Air Force has been using similar technologies for more than a decade. Nasa also turned to such systems after a turkey buzzard flew into the Discovery shuttle moments after its launch in 2005.

    The radar sets developed by DeTect draw on a network of 148 weather radar to provide real-time information about bird activity. It is updated every six minutes.

    The wind power industry has used such data before when planning wind farms, Andrews said. It is illegal, under US law, to kill migratory birds or damage their nesting areas. But this is the first time that a wind farm will use such data in real time.

    Andrews’s company is also working on a variation that will allow wind farms to detect raptor if they start diving to close to the turbines as they chase down their prey.

    Conservationists are reserving judgment. “The wind energy industry makes bold claims, and they need to prove them,” said Andrew Kasner, director of bird conservation for Audubon Texas.

    He added: “It’s possible for them to do [switch off the turbines], but I don’t know whether they would do it during peak wind time.”

  • UK government to fathom depth of marine energy potential

    UK government to fathom depth of marine energy potential

    A new study will provide the British government with data on how much renewable power the seas could generate. From the BusinessGreen, part of the Guardian Environment Network

    A new government-commissioned study is to examine the full energy potential of English and Welsh waters, as part of ongoing efforts to accelerate the development and deployment of wave and tidal generation technologies.

    The new study, which will be carried out by environmental consultancies AEA and Hartley Anderson, will seek input from developers, utilities and small businesses about how and where they plan to install marine renewable energy projects.

    Speaking at the British Wind Energy Agency (BWEA) tidal and wave conference earlier today, energy minister Lord Hunt said the study marked a “significant step forward” in the government’s plans to bolster the UK’s marine energy sector, adding that it came at “a pivotal stage” for the emerging industry as growing numbers of firms deliver devices that are ready to be deployed.

    “The screening exercise will allow us to better understand the energy potential of marine energy devices and the realistic timescale of when multiple devices will be installed and commissioned,” he said.

    The government said that the results of the preliminary study will be used to decide whether or not a full-scale Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA) is required for English and Welsh waters, in addition to the SEAs that have already been carried out off the coast of Scotland and in the Severn Estuary.

    However, the Renewable Energy Association (REA) expressed disappointment at the move, arguing that there was no need for a screening exercise and that a full SEA should be given the go-ahead straight away. “It’s good that government seems to recognise the need for an SEA but we’d rather have heard that the work was actually going to start,” said Steph Merry, head of marine renewable energy at the REA. “The screening exercise is an unfortunate delay and the timescale needs to be expedited.”

    Scientists and engineers have long argued that the UK has some of the richest marine energy resources in the world, and the country is already home to a number of the world’s leading marine energy firms.

    Previous studies have suggested that tidal technologies in the Severn Estuary could generate five per cent of the UK’s electricity, while Scottish first minister Alex Salmond recently delivered a high-profile commitment to make Scotland the “Saudi Arabia of marine energy”.

    The REA said that under present English and Welsh rules The Crown Estate, which manages UK marine resources, will only grant short-term leases for demonstration projects no larger than 10MW, effectively blocking larger developments. In contrast, the Scottish government has followed its SEA by opening bidding in the Penland Firth for tidal devices up to 300MW in size.

    “An SEA would make a huge difference to the development of commercial-scale wet renewables in England and Wales,” said Merry. “The UK is currently a world leader in the development of wave and tidal stream devices. It is imperative that we keep hold of that lead in order to meet our renewable energy targets and to ensure jobs and investment in UK manufacturing now and in the future.”

    A spokesman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change said that there was no fixed date for a report, but that the screening exercise would take about six months.

    • This article was shared by our content partner BusinessGreen, part of the Guardian Environment Network

  • BHP Billiton plans biggest pit of all at Olympic Dam

    BHP Billiton plans biggest pit of all at Olympic Dam

    Jamie Walker and Michael Owen | May 02, 2009

    Article from:  The Australian

    BHP Billiton has shrugged off the global economic blues to press ahead with plans to turn its Olympic Dam mine in South Australia into the largest open cut on earth and help kick the economy back into prosperity.

    But the company will stick to its controversial plan to send uranium-infused copper concentrate to China for processing, if it moves ahead with the multi-billion-dollar expansion.

    A 4600-page environmental impact statement, released by the company yesterday, set out an ambitious timetable for the conversion of the copper, gold, silver and uranium mine from underground to pit operations. Preparatory work would start as early as April next year, with excavation scheduled for July.

    Under the plan, the mine’s workforce would double from 4000 to 8000 when it reached full capacity next decade.

    The open cut envisaged by BHP Billiton at Olympic Dam would become the biggest man-made hole on the planet and yield $1 trillion worth of ore over its century-long life, more than $100 million of which would be paid in royalties to the South Australian Government. Production would lift sixfold from 12million tonnes of ore a year to 72 million tonnes after 2020.

    The news was welcomed by residents of the nearby mining town of Roxby Downs, where the boom had turned to gloom amid recent job cuts at Olympic Dam and falling local property values.

    BHP’s Uranium Australia division chief operating officer Dean Dalla Valle defended the decision to send the copper concentrate to China, saying it was “exactly” what other mines did and safe transportation would not be a problem.

    “The go-forward case we’ve been running for quite a while now has processing offsite for a proportion of our material,” he said. “It lets us concentrate on the things we do best.”

  • BHP’s Olympic Dam dilemma: fuel nuclear risks as a uranium quarry or trade as a copper mine?

    BHP’s Olympic Dam dilemma: fuel nuclear risks as a uranium quarry or trade as a copper mine?

    Date: 1-May-2009

    BHP Billiton should use the Olympic Dam mine expansion Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process to set out a path that avoids the risks and responsibilities associated with uranium exports and positions the mine to trade as a copper venture, the Australian Conservation Foundation said today.

    “Under the existing proposal BHP plans to expand Olympic Dam to make it the uranium quarry to the global nuclear industry, but this is not the only option open to the company,” said ACF Nuclear Free Campaigner David Noonan.

    “BHP could spare South Australia the massive risks and responsibilities associated with uranium exports by retaining all radioactive materials on the mine site and developing Olympic Dam’s significant copper deposits.

    “The uranium quarry plan would make BHP and South Australia complicit in selling uranium to nuclear weapons states and in unresolved radioactive waste management problems overseas and at the mine site.

    “US President Obama has recently withdrawn support and budget for the proposed nuclear waste disposal site at Mt Yucca in Nevada after 20 years and more than A$13 billion have been spent on this single project.

    “The EIS to be released today must explain how BHP proposes to manage the expanded mine’s bulk radioactive tailings waste for the 10,000 years the tailings remain a radiological hazard and need to be isolated from the environment.

    “BHP’s plan to simply leave these hazardous tailings on the surface forever fails to satisfy the existing Commonwealth requirement, set out in environmental conditions for the Ranger uranium mine, to return radioactive tailing to the pit.

    “Setting out a path for Olympic Dam to process all its copper products in South Australia, instead of processing a bulk radioactive copper concentrate in China, would boost local jobs and be much better for the global environment.”

  • Ethanol producers press for higher limits

    Ethanol Producers Press for Higher Limits

    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Friday, March 6, 2009; Page D01

     

    The nation’s ethanol producers are urging the Obama administration to raise the 10 percent limit on ethanol in motor fuel to 15 percent or more, a move they hope will create new demand at a time when many distilleries are idle.

    The producers say higher ethanol blends would help create jobs and reduce petroleum imports. Moreover, without a change in the 10 percent limit, ethanol makers say it could be difficult to fulfill a congressional mandate for renewable fuel use and the makers of new forms of ethanol, which rely on raw materials other than corn, could be locked out of the fuel market.

    “This is about jobs, energy security for America, improving the environment and meeting our legal responsibilities under the 2007 energy bill,” said retired Gen. Wesley Clark, co-chairman of a group of ethanol firms called Growth Energy.

    Growth Energy plans to formally request a waiver today from the Environmental Protection Agency to raise the ethanol content of motor fuel to 15 percent.

    Under the existing 10 percent limit, ethanol production would theoretically top out at 14 billion gallons a year based on current fuel consumption trends, or less because of transportation constraints that limit ethanol deliveries in many parts of the country. That falls far short of the targets in current law, which requires refiners to use 36 billion gallons a year of ethanol by 2022, up from the current 10.5 billion gallon production level. President Obama said during the presidential campaign that he favors a 60 billion-gallon-a-year target.

    But many critics say the push for higher ethanol limits is really about propping up the heavily subsidized ethanol industry and giving a boost to venture capital firms that are still struggling to come up with an economically competitive way to produce other forms of ethanol made from plants that do not compete with food products.

    In addition, the American Petroleum Institute and some carmakers say they want to wait to make sure that higher percentages of ethanol in gasoline won’t damage vehicles’ engine parts.

    Edward B. Cohen, vice president of government and industry relations at American Honda, said questions remain about the effect on existing engines in motorcycles, lawn mowers and weed trimmers.

    “What is the implication for those engines of using a higher blend, which has more water and is therefore more corrosive?” Cohen asked. “I think that displacing petroleum with ethanol is a plus, but before moving precipitously, we need to make sure that the products are going to continue to perform and that emissions will not be adversely affected.”

    Not all automakers oppose the change. In a letter two weeks ago to the chief executive of ethanol maker POET, Ford said it would endorse an immediate increase in ethanol blends up to 15 percent.

    The ethanol industry’s push comes as the Obama administration appears to be leaning toward lifting the ethanol ceiling slightly, perhaps to 12 percent, while research on higher concentrations is done.

    “The only issue is what auto companies say about the damage it could do to engines,” Energy Secretary Steven Chu told reporters at a recent forum sponsored by the trade publication Platts.

    Many ethanol producers are pressing for a decision quickly. The industry has the capacity to produce 12.5 billion gallons a year of corn-based ethanol, about 9 percent of the nation’s motor fuel supply and three times as much as was produced in 2005.

    But it is falling about 2 billion gallons short of that capacity as prices have tumbled in the economic downturn. VeraSun, once the nation’s second-biggest producer, filed for bankruptcy protection last fall after losing hundreds of millions of dollars on a bad bet on corn prices. It accounts for about half of the nation’s idle capacity.

    Other firms have been hit too. Last week Pacific Ethanol, struggling to negotiate new loan terms with Wachovia and other lenders, announced that it would suspend operations at two 60 million-gallon-a-year facilities, one in Stockton, Calif., and one in Burley, Idaho. Pacific Ethanol had already suspended operations at a 40 million-gallon-a-year plant.

    “It’s because of the economic climate,” said Matt Hartwig, a spokesman for the Renewable Fuels Association. Companies are struggling to get operating capital and profit margins are being squeezed. “Things are bad,” he said.

    Congress might soon weigh in on the issue. Yesterday, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) said the issue was under discussion, adding “it’s unlikely that I would want to roll back” the renewable fuels standard Congress set in 2007.

     


  • Advanced Anaerobic Digestion: More Gas from sewage Sludge

    April 27, 2009

    Advanced Anaerobic Digestion: More Gas from Sewage Sludge

    One UK water company is using Advanced Anaerobic Digestion in its wastewater treatment process to generate biogas and is using this in an on-site CHP unit.

    by Graham Neave

    Northumbria, UK [Renewable Energy World Magazine]

    At a time of heightened concerns about waste, climate change and the need for cleaner energy, it is worth pointing out that not all the news is bad. Technologies are redressing the balance — and one of these is Advanced Anaerobic Digestion (AAD).

     

    AAD will not turn muck into brass, or gold, but it does offer the potential to transform the sewage treatment process from a simple clean-up to one that recovers significant quantities of energy.

    In the Northumbrian Water region, in the north-east of England, there are more than 400 (437 to be exact) sewage treatment works that all produce varying amounts of sludge. This material has to be removed from every works but, inevitably, it is difficult to handle and, to say the least, rather smelly.

    To make this sludge stable to further degradation and (nearly) odour free, Northumbrian Water Ltd (NWL) has long employed anaerobic digestion techniques for about 10% of its total sludge.

    These technologies harness natural oxygen-free decomposition by which organic materials break down to produce biogas – roughly made up of 65% methane and 35% carbon dioxide – along with a much reduced residue of stabilized organic material. The latter can be safely deployed as fertilizer. In fact, by returning it to the soil in this way, nutrient and organic matter cycles that occur naturally are completed.

    In the last five years, however, technology has advanced significantly and a technique has been perfected that can do much more.

    Advanced Anaerobic Digestion significantly enhances the benefits of anaerobic digestion by separating and optimizing the key process stages used in more conventional digestion systems.

    A More Sophisticated Process

    There are two main pre-digestion processes used in AAD in the UK — thermal hydrolysis (the Cambi process) or enzymic hydrolysis (the Monsal process). Currently there are examples of each in operation and under construction.

    Regardless of which process is used, the key to the AAD process is a phase that significantly enhances the breakdown of organic materials by, for example, breaking down cell walls. With thermal hydrolysis this is achieved by an initial high temperature of 165°C combined with high pressure (6 Bar) for less than one hour, or with enzyme hydrolysis this is achieved by phasing an increased temperature from 42°C to 55°C over several days.

    The result is a far greater conversion of organic matter into biogas when the material is transferred into the anaerobic digestion phase. Following this digestion phase, there is a 50% reduction in sludge volumes, combined with the additional biogas/CHP- derived energy being produced, and ultimately a better quality bio-solids fertilizer.

    One of the major benefits of this, of course, is that energy from biomass, including sewage sludge, are classed as renewable and therefore contribute to meeting Britain’s international commitments to address climate change.

    But it does more than that too.

    Using AAD reduces the mass of material that is required to be transported off site and offers the benefit of nutrient recovery from materials that are presently wasted.

    Indeed, some particularly difficult materials, such as food wastes under the Animal By-products Order (ABPO), need the conditions of AAD to render them safe.

    One other benefit that is not to be sniffed at, AAD results in reduced odour.

    The digested sludge cake remaining after the process will be a Class A biosolid – a safe and low odour product containing no detectable levels of pathogens, such as E. coli, and may be used as a valuable agricultural fertilizer.

    A New Sludge Strategy

    With the obvious benefits AAD offers, NWL decided to invest in a complete new build AAD and CHP plant at its existing sludge treatment centre at Bran Sands on Teesside. The facility, on a 52 acre (21 ha) site, is the company’s largest, and treats sludge from Northumbrian Water sewage treatment works south of the river Tyne and in the Tees Valley.

    The existing process at Bran Sands has served NWL very well since it was brought online in 1998. It involves the use of a thermal drying plant which dries wet sludge to pellets that have been used both as an alternative fuel and as a fertilizer. The downside is that the plant uses a lot of energy. The introduction of AAD will instead use the sludge to create energy and will reduce more than 500,000 tonnes of sludge — from the treatment of domestic sewage and industrial effluent from a population equivalent of 1.9 million people — to about 60,000 tonnes.

    The methane produced in the process will be collected in 11 metre diameter biogas storage bags (similar to hot air balloons) before being used. The £33 million (US$50 million) contract to design, construct, install and commission the new facility was awarded to Aker Solutions E&C Ltd from Stockton in the Tees Valley.

    The new plant will generate 4.7 MWe from the four on-site CHP engines. The engine heat recovery system captures a further 2 MWth, which is used to minimize the use of natural gas for steam production for the thermal hydrolysis process.

    The process will also reduce Bran Sand’s reliance upon natural gas down to less than a tenth of previous requirements — from 17 MW to 1.4 MW.

    Aside from Jenbacher, key equipment suppliers include Cambi, and Eurograde (boilers).

    The energy recovered from the sewage sludge goes a long way towards making the entire wastewater treatment process energy self-sufficient, producing about half the requirements of the entire treatment works site at Bran Sands. This eliminates the need for large amounts of grid electricity and therefore has the dual benefits of cutting energy use and costs. Annually the advanced digestion facility has an annual output of 37 GWh, of which 22 GWh/year will be utilized to power the rest of the Bran Sands site. Financially, this equates to greater than £5 million ($7.5 million) in operational savings, which includes a renewable obligation certificate (ROC) contribution of £1.6 million ($2.4 million).

    At Bran Sands, the processes also maximizes the efficiency of the solids loading for the anaerobic digestion phase. The thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment process begins with a sludge cake, produced by squeezing sludge to reduce the water content, which therefore provided the opportunity to review NWL’s sludge transport policy. By transporting cake wherever possible this avoids the wasteful transportation of large amounts of water associated with liquid sludge tankering.

    These changes have resulted in a substantial reduction in the road miles associated with moving sludge.

    Changing to AAD from thermal drying at Bran Sands, along with a planned change from lime stabilization at another NWL plant at Howdon on Tyneside, will reduce CO2 emissions by 62,000 tonnes a year for the group.

    AAD has provided the company with a regional sludge management solution in line with their strategic direction statement, with the added benefit of a negligible odour impact on both the site and on the agricultural land when the residue produced is recycled for use as fertilizer.

    There are regulatory benefits to take into consideration as well. Recycling treated bio-solids to agriculture is considered the best practicable environmental option (BPEO) by both the UK and the EU. The process produces an enhanced treated product that improves the public perception of recycling at a time when doubts have been expressed in some quarters.

    The site is covered by Pollution Prevention and Control regulations (PPC), ensuring thorough monitoring of the total environmental impacts of the entire process and, when operational, the site will be registered with regulator Ofgem as a renewable electricity generation station.

    To achieve these benefits does, of course, requirement investment — some £33 million [US $50 million] in total for a construction programme whose principal contractor is Aker Solutions E&C Ltd. There are a further 30 subcontracting teams and a total workforce of over 200 people.

    Construction commenced in summer 2007, although the actual concept of introducing the new technology into Northumbrian Water began in 2005.

    Much of the site construction work is now complete, with equipment already in place. Some 10,000 tonnes of concrete have been poured, a full 100,000 metres of cabling laid, along with 4000 metres of pipe work. Commissioning of the plant will begin shortly with biogas production commencing this summer. The full process and business benefits are due to be realized by the autumn of this year.

    Construction of the new plant has involved the use of a very tight and complex scheme, which was only made possible through the integrated team approach of Northumbrian Water Ltd, the contractor and consultants working very closely together.

    The AAD Advantage

    The process that the Bran Sands AAD plant facilitates is not only environmentally friendly, it is economically attractive too. The plant approaching energy self-sufficiency not only reduces costs, it also shields the company from the impact of volatile and unpredictable energy prices. It further offers demonstrable operational cost savings and improves the efficiency of sludge management throughout the region.

    In addition to the ever-important cost benefits, there are also significant operational benefits. The new AAD process allows reduced maintenance compared to the existing process, which has been operating on a ‘business as usual’ basis while the plant is being constructed. It continues to allow the utilization of existing sludge assets where cost effectiveness has been demonstrated and the current sludge drying facilities will be retained at Bran Sands as a strategic contingency back-up.

    The final completion of the Bran Sands AAD plant (Teesside) is not the end of the process. NWL also plans to roll-out the sludge strategy to a second AAD centre at Howdon on Tyneside, see box panel on page 64.

    Looking still further ahead, and aware of the growing synergy between the water and waste industries in relation to these processes, the company is actively investigating the possibility of co-digestion — the simultaneous digestion of compatible wastes — to understand the technical, regulatory and market implications. It seems that the Bran Sands development proves the old Yorkshire adage that ‘where there’s muck, there’s brass’, more advanced processes are now proving that where there’s muck there’s gas, and that is a valuable resource.

    Graham Neave is a Northumbrian Water executive director and has overall responsibility for the Customer, Technical and Operations directorates.


    Sidebar: Future AAD roll-out plans

    Bran Sands is the first phase of Northumbrian Water’s AAD strategy. A second plant is already planned for Howdon, on Tyneside, subject to the usual regulatory approvals and planning consents.

    Like Bran Sands, Howdon offers the advantage that it can be built on an existing site while the current treatment process continues to operate.

    The two plants will also be all but identical when complete, utilizing many of the same design features and operating the same processes. The project therefore offers an unusual opportunity to take the design of the first and effectively drop it on to the second site as a package.

    The lab tests and trials have already been carried out on the equipment, giving confidence that the second plant will meet Northumbrian’s specifications. Considerable cost savings can also be reaped by using the specifications of the first in the second because of the synergies that this will provide for the company. The detail and operational management of the building site will also be all but identical. Furthermore, having gone through the process once, regulatory approvals will be eased.

    However, all parties — Northumbrian Water, the principal contractor and the various sub contractors — can learn from the implementation of the first to make the second more efficient.

    The relationship with the contractors during construction at Bran Sands has proved crucial and enhancing — and developing that relationship will be a key step in the Howdon project, with the building work planned for 2011–2013.

    The potential benefit of having both plants online to both Northumbrian Water and the Northumbrian region is clear. The end point will see the adoption of an entirely new sludge management strategy for the entire Northumbrian region. Energy will be recovered from sludge from all of the 400-plus sewage plants operated by the company.

    That sludge management strategy will also be one that is entirely energy self-sufficient and may even provide additional energy to off-set much of the power used in sewage treatment.