Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Labor blows economic trump card-again.

     

    Yet on the same day, Labor’s serial misjudgment on climate change was prominently on display.

    Labor exuberantly promised an emissions trading scheme at the 2007 election. And the electorate has punished Labor every time it has run from this pledge.

    When Kevin Rudd decided to abandon the fight, it destroyed his prime ministership.

    Then, when Julia Gillard brought down the weakened Rudd and applied a political quick fix – a citizens’ assembly to write Labor’s new policy – her own poll numbers started to crumble.

    The result of Labor’s weakness on climate change was that half a million Labor voters took their support to the Greens.

    And it was the Greens’ strength that Gillard yesterday acknowledged when she signed a power-sharing agreement with them.

    The first item on the Greens’ press release? That Labor had agreed to set up a Climate Change Committee of politicians and experts to work towards putting a price on carbon emissions. It’s the issue that Labor can’t escape, no matter where it turns, no matter how hard it tries. But was it a good idea for Labor to sign the deal with the Greens yesterday?

    The Greens had already promised to support Labor in forming a new government. There was no clear benefit to Labor.

    But there was a benefit to Tony Abbott, who claimed vindication of his prediction that the Greens would “form effectively a coalition with Labor”.

    A Labor strategist said that “this deal gives Abbott a platform to attack us from”.

    Labor’s primary aim must be to win over the three rural independents to give it the numbers to form a government.

    Yet by formally embracing the left-leaning Greens in a power-sharing agreement, Labor has now made it harder for the trio to justify to their conservative constituencies such a deal with Labor.

    Labor’s economics are good. Its politics are woeful.

    Poll: Is Labor’s deal with the Greens too high risk to win the independents’ support?

    Poll form
    1. Please select an answer.
    2. View results
    Yes, the independents are inherently conservative

    41%

    No, it shows Labor can work with minor representatives

    59%

    Total votes: 1329.

    Would you like to vote?

    You will need Cookies enabled to use our Voting Feature.

    Poll closes in 23 hours.

    Disclaimer:

    These polls are not scientific and reflect the opinion only of visitors who have chosen to participate.

  • Biofuel Demand Driving Africa “Land Grab”

     

     

    Proponents of biofuels argue they are renewable and can help fight climate change because the growing plants ingest as much carbon dioxide from the air as the fuels made from them emit when burned.

     

    Critics say there is a risk of the crops infringing on land that could be used for growing food and that destruction of rainforests to make way for palm oil and sugar outweighs any carbon benefits gained from the use of such fuels.

     

    “The expansion of biofuels … is transforming forests and natural vegetation into fuel crops, taking away food-growing farmland from communities, and creating conflicts with local people over land ownership,” Mariann Bassey, a Friends of the Earth Nigeria activist, said in a statement.

     



     

    The report said Kenya and Angola each had received proposals for the use of 500,000 hectares for biofuels and there was a similar plan to use 400,000 hectares in Benin for palm oil.

     

    Rice farmers had been forced off their land for a sugar cane project in Tanzania, it added.

     

    “The competition for land and the competition for staple food crops such as cassava and sweet sorghum for agrofuels is likely to push up food and land prices,” the study said.

     

    Other studies have suggested biofuel expansion would not be harmful and could even be beneficial for African agriculture.

     

    Last month, researchers from Britain’s Imperial College, carbon trader CAMCO, and the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA) said biofuels would boost investment in land and infrastructure.

  • Coal crackdown will not reduce emissions

     

    But an analysis by Greenpeace shows that none of the 12 proposed coal plants would be forced into a redesign or be shelved due to the standards.

    The figures show just three of the proposed plants would emit more carbon per megawatt hour of electricity generated than would be allowed under Labor’s promised standards.

    The proposed Bluewaters 3 and Bluewaters 4 coal plants in Western Australia both have emissions intensity rates of 0.92, and the proposed Coolimba plant in WA will have a rate of 0.9 to 1.0. All three have state government approval and would be exempt from federal Labor’s standards.

    The emissions intensity for a new coal generator in South Australia – Altona Energy’s Arckaringa plant, which is in an early stage of development – remains unknown. Calls to Altona Energy’s Australian office went unanswered yesterday.

    A proposed brown coal plant in Victoria with emissions standards of between 0.78 and 0.87 was recently withdrawn for redesign to meet a tougher 0.8 standard set by the Victorian government as part of its climate change white paper.

    The other seven new plants all have estimated emissions intensity rates below Labor’s 0.86 standard. The lowest is the 0.18 at the Wandoan carbon capture project in Queensland.

  • Australian Greens, Labor commit to agreement for stable Government

    1 September 2010

    Australian Greens, Labor commit to agreement for stable Government

    The Australian Greens and the Labor Party have signed an agreement to
    ensure stability for Labor in Government. The Greens will ensure supply
    and oppose any motion of no confidence in the Government from other
    parties or MPs.

    Labor will work with the Greens to deliver improved transparency and
    integrity to Parliament and pursue policies that promote the national
    interest and address climate change.

    As part of the agreement there will be regular meetings between the
    Prime Minister and Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown and newly-elected
    Lower House MP Adam Bandt.

    “There will be a Climate Change Committee resourced as a Cabinet
    Committee, an investment in dental health care in the next budget and
    completion of a $20 million study into High Speed Rail by July 2011,”
    said Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown.

    “The agreement includes a wide range of measures. These include:
    * A Climate Change Committee
    * A full parliamentary debate on Afghanistan
    * A commitment to work with the Greens on dental health care
    investment
    * Completion of a $20 million High Speed Rail study by July 2011
    * Legislating for truth in political advertising
    * A Leaders’ Debate Commission
    * Establishing a Parliamentary Integrity Commissioner
    * Establishing a Parliamentary Budget Office
    * Restrictions on political donations
    * A move toward full three year governments
    * Specially allocated time for debate and voting on private
    members bills and a fixed and fair allocation of questions for
    Independent and minor party members in Question Time
    * Referenda for constitutional recognition of Indigenous
    Australians and Local Government
    * A commitment for reform to provide above the line voting in the
    Senate
    * Better processes for the release of documents in the public
    interest in both Houses of Parliament
    * Access to relevant departments, including Treasury and Finance &
    Deregulation for Greens election policies.

    Media contact: Erin Farley 0438 376 082
    www.greensmps.org.au

  • Solar Array Design: Parallel Wiring Opens new Doors

     

    Series: The Old Way

    Series-wired systems are governed by the principles of voltage. A solar array must provide a high enough voltage to enable its inverter to operate at an efficient level; this has traditionally required series wiring, so that panel voltages sum. Similarly it is important to make sure that the system can never go above the maximum voltage permitted by code, usually 600VDC in the U.S.

    However, the inverter is sensitive to operating voltage levels. It can suffer major swings in efficiency when the input voltage varies in relation to its fixed output voltage. The larger the variation, the harder it is for the inverter to operate at optimal efficiency. Currently inverter efficiency is shown at a single operating point when actual operating efficiency varies as system voltage changes, real operating efficiencies can be off several percentage points from the optimal operating efficiency.

    To accommodate these physical demands, all series-architected solar installations must abide by a set of design rules. The result of these rules is to define the minimum-sized building block (string) used for a given installation. Once this is defined, that exact footprint must be used for the entire array. This can lead to serious challenges, as designers are forced to manage the always-unique geometry of the proposed array location. In many cases, these challenges translate into increased cost of deployment, smaller system sizes or even a decision to forego the installation completely.

    The New Parallel Solar Universe

    The enabling technology for parallel solar deployment is a new generation of low-cost, high-efficiency electronic devices that allow a solar module to deliver a fixed DC voltage to a DC power bus. This DC power bus can be set to the single best point for the inverter or can float to whatever level the inverter requires, allowing the inverter to concentrate simply on optimizing its AC-to-DC conversion efficiency, as opposed to worrying about what compromises it might need to make to effectively harvest power from the solar modules. This mechanism provides an effective transport of power to a central inverter where AC conversion efficiencies can be optimized.

    In this parallel solar paradigm, the PV technology of the module no longer matters, as each module operates with complete independence from its neighbors. Because each module can produce the voltage level needed by the inverter, voltage summing with strings of modules is not needed. This means that a solar array can now be designed and installed just like a lighting system. Each module represents a current source and as long as the array’s wiring is sized appropriately and its branches are capable of handling the current produced, the system will work at optimum efficiency; no other design rules apply.

    What does this mean to the system designer? The biggest advantage is that systems can be built using variable-sized blocks of modules ranging from 200 watts to 31,000 watts. This enables designers to maintain installed cost targets while also taking complete advantage of all available space at an installation site. If the geometry or aesthetics of a project require multiple azimuth angles, different angles of tilt or shading, there is no longer a need to incur the costs or design limitations of multiple inverters. The solar power system can accommodate the architecture of the building, rather than requiring the building architecture to provide an ideal platform for the solar array. Different PV module technologies can even be applied to a single inverter (that is, thin film and crystalline).

    But this new technology also allows us to think a little further out of the box. We now have a new tool available for optimizing a system’s production capabilities in multiple environments. We are only scratching the surface of what we can achieve with this new capability. For example, rather than using a technology like a tracker, we might use different materials technologies to optimize production across multiple seasons and environmental conditions.

    Mathematics of Parallel Solar Power System Design

    Parallel solar design reduces the number of variables that need attention during solar power system design. Voltage is no longer a factor, so Voc overhead and temperature drift are no longer concerns. We are also freed from worry about the NEC 600V upper limit and its restrictions on the number of modules we can wire together. This simplifies the calculation of wiring loads.

    Three basic decisions must be made at the outset: size of the installation in kWh, modules to be used and inverter to be used. With these in mind, we can start to envision the system. As an example, let’s consider a 180 kW building block using 30 kW units with 230 watt solar modules operating at a Vmp of about 40 VDC. The math here is simple: we will need about 132 modules (30,000/230 ‚âà 132). We will assume that the inverter’s peak efficiency point is at about 330 VDC. From this, we can calculate that at maximum power output, we will have to deal with 92 Amps of current into our inverter (132 modules × 230W/330V = 92 amps (P/V=I)).

    Thinking about this as a lighting circuit, we can look at using six branches of 15 Amps each, a conservative level for #10AWG PV USE-2 or RHW-2 cable outside of conduit. Each branch would have an inline 20 Amp fuse connecting it to a #4 AWG PV backbone that runs directly into the inverter through a 125 Amp fused DC disconnect.

    We can also go a bit larger and design a parallel solar power system for 500kW production capacity: module power density, 230 W; voltage input to the inverter, 330 VDC; total power capacity of system, 550,000 W.

    This will tell us the number of modules we want to use: Total System Capacity/Module Power 500,000/230 = 2,174 modules.

    To figure the total current the system will need to manage we take the total power and divide it by the voltage. Modules×Module Power in Watts = System Power. System Power/Voltage to Inverter = Current. Thus, 2,174×230/330 = 1,516 Amps.

    From here it is a simple matter of working out the number of branches needed to manage the current flow. If we assume use of three of our 180 kW building block circuits (506 Amps each) to connect to our inverter, we can place their terminating points close to the array to minimize our use of conduit. If we want to minimize our terminations, we could use #4 AWG PV wire into our building block combiner units, with each handling 85 Amps.

    To minimize I2R losses we can take a conservative approach and use 20-Amp in-line fuses harnessed into the #4 AWG PV backbone, giving us six branches using #10 AWG PV. Each of our three combiners then will have 167kW of power concentrated into a single pair of conductors, handling a total run of 506 Amps into the central inverter. This array would need just six physical field terminations at the combiners, and six at the inverter. If the combiners are placed strategically at the edge of the array, the conduit runs would likewise be limited to three: one from each combiner to the inverter (see figure 1, below).

    The difference between parallel and series architecture for solar power system design is as simple as the difference between current and voltage. In a series system, the voltage of the module drives the design and therefore the economics of the installation. Parallel wiring lets the voltage be set as a constant, which allows the system to be driven by current.

    Current is a much easier variable to work with on several levels. First, it is a familiar, well-understood design variable for designers and installers; the same one used in all lighting system design. Second, the current variable is much easier to regulate and control with existing safety systems. Third, we can optimize the efficiency of the DC-to-AC conversion by regulating the operational voltage of the solar array to the voltage of the grid that the system is providing power to.

    Perhaps most importantly, parallel solar wiring allows different PV technologies to feed a single inverter. This promises to open new vistas for architects and system designers as they search for better ways to integrate solar technology into our everyday lives. It will allow PV manufacturers to optimize products for very specific environmental conditions without having to carry the load of an entire system’s production capacity. It may also make new materials more feasible by isolating each module from the rest of the system, allowing it to work at whatever native voltage is most efficient for that particular technology. All of these new possibilities open the door for innovation in the solar market.

  • Not carbon offsets, but carbon upsets

     

    As with the existing offset approach, financial benefits could be shared in the case of legal and political activities that are “sponsored” by an international partner. Imagine a world in which global financial giants like Goldman Sachs devote themselves not to the exploitation of dubious arbitrage opportunities like HFC-23 capture, but to the identification and promotion of critical political interventions by disempowered voices for sustainability. In that world, the landmark deal recently brokered by the UN development programme to preserve Ecuador’s Yasuni national park would become a model of climate capitalism.

    The carbon upset approach does not directly promote transformative clean-energy technologies. Instead, it aims to disrupt the political and economic inertia of the status quo. But that’s precisely the disruption we need. Conventional policies such as carbon offsets and allowance giveaways have the perverse effect of further subsidising already massively subsidised and politically dominant industries. Moving to a carbon upset system would open space for more dramatic transformations by empowering groups that stand opposed to the interests of business-as-usual beneficiaries. With the playing field tilted this way, who knows what might be possible?