Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Bill passed to allow elite tourist accommodation and facilties in national parks

    Media Release                                                   10 June
    2010
     
    Bill passed to allow elite tourist accommodation and facilities in
    National Parks
     
    Legislation passed late last night by the NSW Upper House will see some
    of the State’s most iconic national parks subject to commercial tourist
    facilities for the elite end of the tourist market at the expense of the
    general public and environment, the NSW Greens said tonight.
     
    “The passing of this legislation with the support of the Opposition
    threatens the integrity of our National Park estate by allowing areas
    within the boundaries of National Parks to be developed,” said NSW
    Greens MP Ian Cohen.
     
    “The Government is keen to adopt the Tourism and Transport Forum’s
    ‘high yield, low volume’ approach to visitors to National Parks which
    could see elite tourist resorts built in some of our most precious
    natural areas.
     
    “This Bill will now make it easier for the public to be excluded from
    some parts of National Parks with private operators being granted
    ‘exclusive access’.
     
    ‘The Government is sending a clear message to the public about the
    future enjoyment of some National Parks – if you can’t pay, stay away.
     
    “With commercial development comes associated infrastructure such as
    powerlines, roads and waste services. These all have an impact on the
    biodiversity values that National Parks are there to protect.
     
    “This legislation has been driven by the bureaucracy in its effort to
    meet performance measures pertaining to increased numbers of visitors to
    our National Parks.
     
    “Allowing elite tourist resorts in National Parks is not the way to get
    more people to enjoy them. Investing in basic park infrastructure and
    upgrades and marketing their natural values is.
     
    “More people appreciating the beauty of the State’s National Parks is a
    great thing, but not if it’s at the expense of the nature with the Parks
    itself,” said Mr Cohen.
     
     

    Further Information: Cate Faehrmann 0412 207 043
     
    Cate Faehrmann
    Adviser
    Greens MLC Ian Cohen
    NSW Parliament
    Macquarie St
    SYDNEY NSW 2000

  • Miners reject Rudd’s $6Bn olive branch

     

    “Perhaps if there had been negotiations earlier it would have been different, but now the damage to Australia has gone on for too long,” she said.

    But the Prime Minister has shown no signs of backing away from his planned reforms.

    During his press club address Mr Rudd invoked the name of Sir John Forrest, the former premier of Western Australia and a long-distant relative of mining magnate Andrew Forrest.

    Mr Rudd says Sir John also started a program of infrastructure building during the gold rush boom and in the face of protests at the time.

    The Prime Minister promised billions from the controversial tax would go to the regions responsible for the mining boom.

    But the announcement sank like a stone, with one journalist claiming Mr Rudd had shot himself in the foot with the tax and his policy on asylum seekers.

    He was blasted for allegedly failing to genuinely consult the industry on the tax changes.

    Mr Forrest rose to his feet to challenge the Prime Minister.

    “Would you now be consulting with your cabinet colleagues… about how you’ve taken your government from their great chance at the next election to no great chance at all now?” Mr Forrest asked.

    Mr Rudd, well versed in the art of diplomacy, trod carefully.

    “As I say to other companies here in the room today, the reason we are here in the west is to consult,” he said.

    “The reason we are here in the west is to listen… [and] to make sure we have heard clearly how the proposed tax change effects your individual company’s circumstances.”

    Under pressure

    The Prime Minister no doubt will face similar tough questions at the community cabinet hearing in south Perth this evening and it is believed he will sit down with Mr Forrest tomorrow to discuss his concerns.

    Mr Rudd is under pressure from mining companies to compromise on the tax proposal, with a strong push for him to change the definition of a “super profit”.

    But before his entrance to the press club, he indicated the tax rate was not going to change.

    “I’ve said we’re consulting with industry on implementation, on detail and on generous transitional arrangements. And that’s precisely what the treasury consultation panel is doing with companies right across Australia,” he said.

    Mr Rudd also revealed for the first time that his talks with BHP Billiton chief Marius Kloppers were as well as expected.

    “We had a cordial and frank discussion and I’m sure we’ll continue to do that in the future,” he said.

    He says the Federal Government has got the tax rate correct and will help mining companies with generous transition arrangements.

    Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says it is hard to see what compromises the Government can make.

    Mr Abbott says the tax needs to be dropped before it causes more damage.

    “The problem with this tax is that he can’t change it without destroying his budget strategy and he can’t keep it without destroying the resources sector’s expansion in this country,” he said.

    “He’s in a very difficult position.”

  • Millions starved after Niger drought

     

    Save the Children says more than seven million people are suffering from some form of malnutrition in a country that has a population of around 15 million.

    Of those, more than three million are described as severely malnourished or starving.

    The aid group’s country director Ibrahima Fall said the extent of the crisis was being grossly under-estimated.

    ‘The transitional government in Niger has appealed for urgent assistance but the response from other rich governments and international donors has been slow and insufficient,’ he said.

    ‘Far more children will die if we don’t act fast.’

    Sky News was given pictures showing some of those being brought to the Aguie centre for emergency treatment.

    Seventeen-month-old Tsahirou was a fragile bundle when he arrived.

    Most of his short life has been spent fighting a seemingly never ending cycle of disease and malnutrition – so far without success.

    His mother Salmey said the family’s food ran out 40 days ago and they have nothing left to eat.

    Two-year-old Rahina was also given urgent treatment.

    The small child struggles to breathe, but her mother Hadija said it was hunger that could kill her.

    ‘We grow crops to sell to feed ourselves, but we received little rain in the last growing season and it wasn’t enough,’ she said.

    ‘We didn’t harvest any beans or peanuts and the yield of millet was very small. There is no food left over from our last harvest. Really there is nothing.’

  • Transforming Waste Plastic Into an Alternative Fuel

     

    Self-sustainability is the key to the double-tank combustor design. Plastic waste is first processed in an upper tank through pyrolysis, which converts solid plastic into gas. Next, the gas flows to a lower tank, where it is burned with oxidants to generate heat and steam. The heat sustains the combustor while the steam can be used to generate electric power.

    “The prototype can be scaled up to drive a large power plant, which could connect to a plastic recycling center for a constant flow of fuel,” said David Laskowski, an undergraduate student working on the team.
     
    Levendis, who has pursued research on the combustion of plastics and other post-consumer wastes for the past 20 years, is currently focusing on the concept of vaporizing solid plastic waste, which would reduce levels of harmful emissions during the combustion process.

    “The inspiration behind my research is the quest to develop clean, cost-efficient power sources in the face of dwindling fossil fuel reserves,” Levendis said. “It will also help get rid of unsightly, non-biodegradable plastic waste that cannot be recycled.”

    According to Laskowski, calculations show that the new technology has the potential of replacing up to 462 million gallons of petroleum in the United States alone, if all recycled plastics were to be processed.

    “We are currently consuming highly-priced conventional premium fuels (to produce electricity). The fuel developed using this system will lower the cost of electricity for future generations,” Levendis said.

    The team members included Jeff Young, Shane McElroy, Jason Lee, David Laskowski, David Garufi, and Paul Conroy, all senior undergraduate students; and Brendan Hall and Chuanwei Zhuo, who are graduate students.

    With the success of their prototype, Hall and Zhuo plan to continue working with Levendis on further development of the project.

    Teresa Cheong is a media relations assistant in the marketing and communications department at Northeastern University.

  • City brings renewable energy to the little guy

     

     

    The Beginning

    Ellensburg, population 15,000, lies just east of the Cascade Range. Unlike drizzly Seattle, 93 miles to the west, the sun-drenched town gets more than 300 days of rays a year. (But note: Solar power can work anywhere the sun shines.) Residents would often call the city, wanting to know how to install solar panels. “But there was always a problem,” says Nystedt. “It was too expensive, or the wife didn’t want ugly panels on the house, or there was too much shade from trees.”

    Brainstorming with colleagues at a solar conference in 2003, Nystedt came up with an innovative solution — a city-owned solar installation that could feed right into the city’s grid, but would be financed like a cooperative, open to anyone who wanted to invest. The city council liked the idea, but wanted pledges of at least $53,000 from residents before moving forward. Nystedt put the word out, and got $103,000 in response.

    Ellensburg already owned a sunny spot of land next to a major highway, which had the added advantage of advertising the awesomeness of solar power to 15,000 drivers every day. The two-acre site is now home to 10 huge solar arrays and there are plans to add six more arrays, 10 concentrating solar collectors (which look like TV satellite dishes), and eight small wind turbines.

    “The thing I love is that it requires almost no maintenance,” says Nystedt, who goes out on rainy days with his scrub brushes to clean dirt and bird poop off the panels. “There are no moving parts, other than electrons. You build them and they just sit out there and generate energy.”

    The Dreamers

    Gary NystedtGary NystedtGary Nystedt, 58, is a 20-year Ellensburg resident who originally hails from Nebraska. His vision brought the solar project to life, but he’s just as passionate about other forms of clean energy — including not using energy in the first place. As resource manager for the city, he also oversees Ellensburg’s conservation programs, such as home weatherization. His interest in solar energy dates back to his days in architecture school in the late ‘70s, when he studied passive solar design.   

    Recent law school graduate Gary Shaver was working as a consultant for the state energy program when he was called in to help Ellensburg plan its solar system. Since Ellensburg was the first-ever community solar project, Shaver was flying blind. “There were no models to follow, no incentives, really, to speak of,” he says. “It was very much uncharted territory.” (See related Q&A with Gary Shaver.)

    Stanley DudleyStanley DudleyStanley Dudley, 91, is one of the city’s 90 resident investors whose donations fund the project. As a retired engineering professor, he likes the idea of clean energy, but would rather come visit solar panels in the park than install them at home. His house is too far away to get any electricity generated by the solar park, but he doesn’t mind. “My panel sends electricity into the grid. What do I care if I don’t get the electricity?” he says. “Somebody gets it. It’s the same environmental benefit.”

    Walt Kaminski, before he passed away in 2004, brought the local university on board, which turned out to be an invaluable source of free labor. As dean of the Department of Engineering Technology at Central Washington University, based just a few miles away from the solar site, Kaminski got students to write grants, design the adjustable racks that hold up the solar panels, and create the project’s logo — the letters ESC for Ellensburg Solar Community, with rays of sun shooting out from the curve of the C.

    The Outcome

    In the years since Ellensburg’s project stirred its first few electrons, the arrays have generated more than 217,000 kilowatt-hours of energy — enough to power 4,800 homes for one day, and keep more than 304,000 pounds of greenhouse gasses out of the atmosphere.

    The project launched with 120, 300-watt photovoltaic panels, the sparkly, blue-tinted panels composed of semiconductors (in this case, crystals) that convert sunshine directly into electricity. The second phase added more panels and 21.6 more kilowatts of energy in 2009.  The third phase, underway now, will diversify the project, adding more panels, as well as solar concentrators and small wind turbines, all for an additional 24 kilowatts.

    Still, Nystedt concedes that the solar panels contribute just a “tiny speck” of the city’s overall power needs — 0.05 percent, to be exact — the rest of which Ellensburg purchases from the Bonneville Power Administration. The BPA operates several hydropower dams along the Columbia River and one nuclear power plant about 80 miles away.

    Only the 25 homes closest to the solar arrays are actually getting the energy generated there. (All solar power gets channeled into the grid through the nearest transformer, which only serves a certain part of the city.) But 90 of the town’s 9,000 homes are investing in the project. “If you extrapolate that percentage out to a big city, like Seattle, that could be significant,” Nystedt says.

    The Money

    So far, the solar community project has cost roughly $500,000 — $264,800 from residents, $53,000 in a grant from the Bonneville Environmental Foundation, and $184,400 from the city.  

    Ellensburg pays roughly $6,100, total, back to its citizen investors each year. The amount per person depends on how much they invested. For example, if someone’s contribution was one percent of the total cost, they get a credit for the value of one percent of the total energy produced by the solar park. In a quarter when the solar park generated 13,000 kilowatts of energy, the individual credit would be $6.55. (The value for each kilowatt-hour is based on BPA’s wholesale rate.) The credit continues for 20 years.

    “Pretty much all of our initial investors were doing it because it’s the right thing to do,” Nystedt says. “The more we promote, and design, and manufacture [solar energy] the more the price will come down.”

    The Copycats

    City officials have hosted curious guests from at least a dozen states and two countries (South Korea and Ghana). The success of Ellensburg’s project was instrumental in recent passage of landmark state legislation that provides tax incentives to community solar investors, homes and businesses that produce renewable energy, and manufacturers of renewable energy components such as solar panels or wind turbines.

    In the years since Ellensburg figured out how to make solar power affordable, other communities have followed suit. Though inspired by the Ellensburg approach, each city has made slight modifications to the plan. For example, in Sacramento, Calif., residents subscribe to the one-megawatt Solar Shares program for a year at a time, rather than owning shares, which allows for a shorter commitment. A grass-roots group on Bainbridge Island, west of Seattle, built a community-funded solar installation on the roof of Sakai Intermediate School, channeling the resulting energy to the school. St. George, Utah, has a program similar to Ellensburg’s, in which residents invest in a 100-kilowatt project called SunSmart. The Utah project went online in January 2009.

    It all goes to show, says Nystedt, that a community solar power project is possible anywhere there are passionate advocates of renewable energy, a forward-thinking utility company, and people who want to buy in. “Germany is the largest user of solar power in the world,” he says. “And their weather is less sunny than Seattle.” 

    Claudine Benmar is a freelance writer and editor based in Seattle, Wash. She specializes in health and medical topics.

  • Give decision makers access to the value of nature’s services

     

    Unlike the impacts of climate change, biodiversity – and the ecosystem services it harbours – disappears in a mostly silent, local and anonymous fashion. This may explain in part why the devastation of nature has triggered fewer alarm bells than a hotting-up planet. However, complex systems such as rainforests, wetlands, coastal estuaries and mangroves are very difficult to restore once they have been felled, dug up, polluted or filled in.

    If the true value of the economic, social and spiritual services of ecosystems were factored into decision making, wetlands, forests and reefs would be viewed and treated very differently. For there is mounting evidence to show that the value of preserving ecosystems can far outweigh that of destroying them. Some companies – although too few of them – are also becoming aware that factoring biodiversity into their policies is important to their survival. The above-mentioned Vittel, for example, has launched a project to preserve water quality through the management of ecosystems and farmlands.

    The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity project , part of the UN Environment Programme’s Green Economy Initiative, has compiled a database of more than 1,000 examples showing a high ratio of economic benefits to the costs of conserving ecosystems and biodiversity. In Vietnam, to give just one illustration, planting and protecting nearly 12,000 hectares of coastal mangroves cost US$1.1m but saved the government $7.3m annually on dike maintenance. Environmental NGOs including the World Resources Institute are also developing information and tools to make nature’s services visible for decision makers, including business risk assessment, valuation, mapping, and indicators.

    Unfortunately, government officials, local planning authorities, international development banks, corporations and myriad other decision makers rarely have access to such data and tools. As a result, they lack the necessary information to weigh up accurately either the trade-offs among ecosystem services that stem from development choices, or the resulting consequences for people. And every day the world’s ecosystems, and the essential life-support services they provide us, are further degraded by human activity.

    If we are to preserve Earth’s dwindling natural assets, accounting for ecosystem services must become second nature for decision makers. Just as they weigh up economic and social factors, leaders at every level of government and business should be able to answer the following three questions:

     

    • What ecosystem services do I depend upon?

    • How will my decision affect ecosystem services?

    • What is the condition of these services and how will this create risks and opportunities for me?

    This may sound like a tall order given that the phrase “ecosystem services” is not even part of most policy makers’ lexicons. But urgently needed help may be on the way.

    A proposal for a new body, modelled on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is in the making. This week, governments from all regions of the world will meet in Busan, Republic of Korea, to decide on whether to establish a new Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. The effort is championed by France and Japan – whose leaders have made it a personal priority – and strongly supported by environmental and conservation groups, including the World Resources Institute.

    The new panel would provide a long overdue forum in which scientists engaged in research on biodiversity and ecosystem services, and their links to economics and human wellbeing could provide policy makers and other stakeholders with the independent, authoritative, peer-reviewed scientific information needed to promote more sustainable, nature-friendly development. The panel would provide regular assessments of the condition of, and trends in, biodiversity and ecosystem services, and develop a common terminology and indicators. It could also organise information by biome – enabling research and exchange between scientists and policy makers for ecosystems such as grasslands, mangroves, woodlands or deserts.

    Such a panel could also improve knowledge on the links between climate change and ecosystem change, and facilitate sharing of ecosystem management and climate change adaptation strategies. To be truly effective, however, the panel must bridge the institutionally divided worlds of environment and development. Rather than just preaching to the converted (environment ministries), the information it generates must serve the decision-making needs of national ministries of finance, planning, agriculture, forests, fisheries and energy.

    In France, the ministry of environment is also that of energy, transport and the sea. But in times of economic crisis, issues such as biodiversity conservation may be put aside – even where environmental ministries have a broader scope. The fate of ecosystems, therefore, does not lie primarily in the hands of the environmental ministries who will be at the table in Busan. Rather, it is the world’s finance and development ministries who must learn – and act on – the lesson that mounting devastation of ecosystem services jeopardises economic development goals.

    How to ensure cross-governmental participation and buy-in is therefore the key question for countries gathering at Busan this week. The future health of the natural world – and humanity’s wellbeing – may depend upon it.

     

    • Chantal Jouanno is secretary of ecology at the French Ministry of Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and the Sea. Janet Ranganathan is vice president of science and research at the World Resources Institute