Author: admin

  • 9/11 Truth professor isolated

    Jones was teaching two classes this semester, which began Tuesday. Other professors will cover those classes, and Jones will be allowed to continue to do research in his area of academic study, Jenkins said.

    Jones became a celebrity among 9/11 conspiracy-theory groups after he wrote a paper titled "Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Collapse?" The paper was published two weeks ago in the book "9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out" and lays out Jones’ hypothesis that the three towers fell because of pre-positioned demolition charges ­ not because of the planes that hit two of the towers.

    When Jones began to share his demolition theory publicly last fall, he politely declined to speculate about who set the charges other than to say terrorist groups couldn’t have been the source.

    Then, later, he started to speak publicly about research conducted at BYU on materials from ground zero. He said he found evidence of thermite ­ a compound used in military detonations ­ in the materials.

    In recent weeks, after becoming the co-chairman of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Jones seemed willing to go further, implicating unnamed government groups but not President Bush.

    The Deseret Morning News requested a statement from the university Wednesday afternoon for a story it was preparing on Jones and his high-profile role in the 9/11 truth movement. University officials informed Jones of the decision to place him on leave Thursday afternoon and released a statement to the newspaper Thursday night.

    "BYU has repeatedly said that it does not endorse assertions made by individual faculty," the statement said. "We are, however, concerned about the increasingly speculative and accusatory nature of these statements by Dr. Jones."

    Last fall, BYU faculty posted statements on the university Web site that questioned whether Jones subjected the paper to rigorous academic peer review before he posted it at physics.byu.edu. Jones removed the paper from BYU’s Web site Thursday at the university’s request.

    Efforts to reach Jones prior to press time Thursday night were not successful. He later declined comment. Jones told the Deseret Morning News on Wednesday that his paper had gone through an unusual third round of peer review in what is now an apparently unsuccessful effort to quell concerns on campus.

    "BYU remains concerned that Dr. Jones’ work on this topic has not been published in appropriate scientific venues," the university statement said.

    Jenkins said BYU’s reputation was a consideration, too.

    "It is a concern when faculty bring the university name into their own personal matters of concern," she said.

    Jones, also known for his cold fusion research, provided academic clout to the 9/11 truth movement. C-SPAN repeatedly broadcast a conference that featured Jones this summer. Recent articles about Sept. 11 conspiracy theories that focused at least in part on Jones have appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian in London and other publications.

    Recent rebuttals to the demolition theory have been released by the State Department and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which published a 10,000-page report on the towers’ collapse.

    A modified version of Jones’ paper was scheduled to be published this week in the online Journal of 9/11 Studies. Jones is a co-editor of the journal.

    BYU does not grant tenure, generally regarded as a permanent position, to professors. However, it does give continuing status to professors found worthy after six years on campus.

    "Continuing status," Jenkins said, "grants the expectation that faculty members will have continuing employment at the university, although it is not a guarantee. They still need to meet satisfactory performance levels for scholarship, citizenship and teaching."

    The review will be conducted at three levels by the administration, the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and the Physics Department.

  • US Press Club calls for new 9/11 investigation

    Event Date: Sep. 11, 2006
    Event Name: Breaking the 9/11 Myth 
    Event Type: Meeting 
    Time: 9:30 AM 
    Sponsored by: McClendon Group 
    Event Location: Murrow Room 
    Details: On the Fifth Anniversary of the Attacks and just three hours before the Kean-Hamilton luncheon address, the former top Air Force officer who won Florida’s 15th District Democratic primary with 54% of the vote on an explicit platform to expose the fraud of the Kean Commission Report, and top 9/11 researchers, authors and activists will present hard proof that the official narrative of the Kean-Hamilton Commission and Bush-Cheney Administration is a fraud of world historic proportions.

    Proposed legislation for a new and genuinely independent expert investigation, the first reality-based 9/11 feature film, and the International Grand Jury on the Crimes of 9/11 will be announced.

    Speakers will make brief presentations and take questions from the press:

    Dr. Robert Bowman, Lt. Col. USAF (Ret.), one of the nation’s foremost authorities on national security, directed all ‘Star Wars’ programs under Presidents Ford and Carter, flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam, has a Ph.D.
    in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech, and has chaired eight international conferences. Dr. Bowman is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, and the Air Medal with five oak leaf clusters, among many others.

    Jim Marrs, award-winning Texas journalist and author of the 9/11 expose Inside Job and just-released sequel The Terror Conspiracy, which includes “The Pentagon Attack Papers”, is a former U.S. Army Intelligence officer.
    He is the author of the New York Times Best Seller Crossfire, which was a basis for Oliver Stone’s film “JFK”, on which he served as a chief consultant.
    He is working on a movie script whose final scene will awaken audiences
    to the fact that 9/11 attacks were a mass assassination.

    Barbara Honegger, former White House Policy Analyst to President Reagan and Senior military affairs journalist is the author of The Pentagon Attack Papers that has transformed the understanding of what happened inside the Pentagon on 9/11.
    Ms. Honegger’s seminal contributions on the central importance of plane-into-tower and hijack-scenario counter-terror exercises and wargames being run by the military and intelligence communities that morning explain core ‘mysteries’ the 9/11 Commission acknowledged it hadn’t solved: How the date for the attacks was chosen, and why Mohammed Atta traveled to Portland, Maine.

    Lynn Pentz, producer/creative director, breakthrough consultant, and grass-roots organizer, has been centrally involved in some of the largest transformation entertainment events of recent times, including Live Aid, Hands Across America, and the Bicentennial Celebration of the U.S. Constitution. Ms. Pentz is co-founder of 9/11 Truth Los Angeles, director of the film documentary “Connecting the Dots: Awakening to the Crimes of 9/11”, and convener of the Citizens Grand Jury on 9/11. A national speaker in the 9/11 Truth movement, Ms. Pentz will announce the upcoming International People’s Grand Jury on the Crimes of 9/11:
    The Case to Indict.”

    Contact – Barbara Honegger (831)-659-3058 bhonegger@nps.edu

  • White House involved in 9/11

    More than sixty percent of Americans believe that there is evidence that the White House was involved in some way in the 9/11 attacks according to an MSNBC survey running at the moment.

  • Japan begins weaning from oil

    Energy laws "obstructive": Fumiaki Watari, chairman of the country’s biggest integrated oil company, Nippon Oil Corporation, warned that unless the Alternative Energy Law and the New Energy Law were replaced they would "obstruct and crush all of the energy technology developments we could see in the foreseeable future".

    Premise "wrong": He said the two laws, adopted after the 1970s oil shocks, were based on the premise that Japan should avoid and restrict, wherever possible, the use of fossil fuels. That encouraged petroleum refiners to develop innovative ways to use heavy and waste oils. Watari cites innovative projects undertaken by his company to use waste oils.

    Total oil use efficiency not encouraged: One process, integrated gasification combined cycle, produces electricity by gasifying and burning industrial asphalt. "The Government’s plan shows that in 2030, Japan will still be more than 40 per cent oil dependent and, if that is the case, these current laws are obstacles to our efforts to develop new technologies to make the most efficient use of all oil," he said.

    Imports still at 4.3m bpd: Japan, which has almost no indigenous fossil fuel resources, is a world leader in energy-efficient petroleum use and since 1973 has reduced the proportion of oil in its primary energy supply mix from almost 80 per cent to 48 per cent. Japan now imports about 4.3 million barrels daily.

    New strategy: A new long-tem energy supply strategy adopted in March aims to reduce oil’s role to 42 per cent by 2030 and coal from 21 per cent now to 17 per cent. The strategy also calls for Japanese oil companies to build the share of imported supplies they control from less than 15 per cent now to 40 per cent in the next 24 years.

    Push to buy into offshore fields: This is a demanding objective, requiring the companies to buy heavily into oil developments, particularly in Iran, Libya and the Caspian Basin. Iran’s planned 260,000 barrels per day southern Azadegan project, in which Japan’s Inpex Corp is earning a 75 per cent interest, is the most important project in this program.

    The Australian, 6/9/2006, p.34

  • Water Crisis adds urgency to guidelines

    Recycling guidelines get push along: "Water Ministers will ask the Environment Protection and Heritage Council to accelerate work on national water recycling guidelines as soon as possible," Chairman, Ken Matthews said.

    Uniform national standards: "With proposals for recycling water for communities like Toowoomba and Goulburn currently being considered, moving national water recycling guidelines forward will mean that consistent, national standards are in place as more communities consider water recycling options."

    Water data exchange left for summit: Meeting in Canberra this week, the National Water Commissioners noted that Water Ministers had discussed the importance of free and open water data exchange between jurisdictions. To advance the issue commissioners agreed to convene a National Water Data Summit in August.

    Boost ability to monitor climate change: "Improved access to data will improve capability to plan and manage water resources, improve water productivity and to predict the impacts of climate change and land use change on water resources and entitlements at local, regional and national levels. It is also consistent with the Commission’s work on the Australian Water Resources 2005 and development of the Australian Water Resources Information System," Mr Matthews said.

    Water trade met with ‘good discussion’: Commissioners also had very positive discussions with senior state officials on the progress on water trading and current state and territory water trading issues this week. The Commission has consistently identified water trading as one of the most vital elements of the NWI. The discussions this week also form part of the Commission’s work in assessing states’ progress in order to regain their suspended competition payments.

    Urban water reform meeting held: Urban water reform was another major focus for the Commission, with the first meeting of the Urban Water Advisory Group. The Group comprises urban water experts and industry practitioners and has been established by the Commission to improve its understanding of the important urban water issues facing our cities.

    Restrictions brought under scrutiny: The Group considered a range of current urban reform issues including NWI commitments in relation to institutional and regulatory barriers to integrated urban water cycle management, water sensitive urban developments and a national review of water restrictions.

    Supply issues: The Commissioners considered a number of urban reform priorities to progress the NWI, including approaches to assist Parties to the NWI better coordinate water resource and urban planning at a whole-of-government level and to assist water agencies to undertake urban water supply and demand planning.

    Business access: The Commissioners also supported a comprehensive review of the issues to provide greater certainty and innovation in the access arrangements to water infrastructure by the private sector. They also reiterated their support for policy development to clarify entitlements to alternate sources of water, including recycled water and stormwater, and also to review the issues and requirements to support water trading between regional and urban areas.

    Raising National Water Standards: Commissioners also encouraged relevant organisations to get behind the recent call for proposals under the Raising National Water Standards Programme launched on 16 June 2006 by the Prime Minister’s Parliamentary Secretary with responsibility for water, the Hon Malcolm Turnbull.

    Water Smart Australia: Commissioners noted the closure of the current Water Smart Australia call for proposals on 16 June, which included a separate call for proposals from the irrigation sector, and were encouraged by the number and diversity of projects put forward.

    Unprecedented move: "This was the first time the Commission had conducted a special round for a specific sector under the Water Smart Australia Programme and we will be reviewing the success of the special call and identifying other sectors where special attention may be required," Matthews said.

    Reference: Media contact: Kim Ulrick, Manager NWC Communications, Tel: 02 6102 6023, Mob: 0412 786 945. Website: http://www.nwc.gov.au

    Erisk Net, 14/7/2006

  • Strippers cause storm at Climate Change Conference

    Government sponsorship of a climate-change conference was axed on 7 September after outraged scientists stormed out of a formal dinner at which female burlesque entertainers danced with balloons and stripped to their underwear, reported The Age (8/9/2006, p.1).

    Women storm out in protest: Many of the women who attended the dinner at Old Parliament House left the room in protest, with the conference organiser calling a premature halt to the show when the extent of the offence taken became clear.

    Attendee stunned at balloon frolics: "I honestly could not believe my eyes when a woman covered in balloons started prancing around as delirious male scientists popped them with a pin," one attendee said in an email to The Age Online.

    Display scuppers recognition of contributions by women: Robin Robertson, another conference participant, said she was not personally offended "but there were a lot of people who were really upset". Dr Robertson said it was a pity because the rest of the conference had done a great deal to recognise the contribution of women in the field.