Author: admin

  • Droughts & flooding rains: what is due to climate change?

    23 May 2012, 2.21pm AEST

    Droughts & flooding rains: what is due to climate change?

    While most people now understand that the enhanced greenhouse effect means a much warmer planet, communicating regional shifts in weather remains a significant challenge. As with most complex science, nuance is everything. But how do you communicate complexity and nuance in a world increasingly geared…

    Author

    Disclosure Statement

    Karl Braganza is Manager of Climate Monitoring at the Bureau of Meteorology. The Bureau presently operates under the authority of the Meteorology Act 1955, which requires it to report on the state of the atmosphere and oceans in support of Australia’s social, economic, cultural and environmental goals. His salary is not funded from any external sources or dependent on specially funded government climate change projects. Karl Braganza does not consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

    The Conversation provides independent analysis and commentary from academics and researchers.

    Founding and Strategic Partners are CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS and UWA. Members are Deakin, Flinders, Murdoch, QUT, Swinburne, UniSA, UTAS, and VU.

    Articles by This Author

    22 May 2012 A land of (more extreme) droughts and flooding rains? 23 December 2011 Australia expecting an active cyclone season, but future cyclones still hard to predict 10 October 2011 Do cosmic rays influence climate? Some new results from CERN 20 July 2011 There’s always the sun: solar forcing and climate change 14 June 2011 The greenhouse effect is real: here’s why

    Xggzrmc2-1335234365 Scientists’ job is to brief us on how future climate might affect our lives, even when all the data isn’t in. Rae Allen

    While most people now understand that the enhanced greenhouse effect means a much warmer planet, communicating regional shifts in weather remains a significant challenge.

    As with most complex science, nuance is everything. But how do you communicate complexity and nuance in a world increasingly geared to a 140-character limit? This is part two of a series looking at the relationship between climate change and rainfall. Part one is here.

    I thought the drought was due to climate change?

    The issue of recent rainfall trends, what caused them, and future rainfall projections has become very conflated in the public discourse.

    Perhaps the first place to start to untangle this is to isolate the recent rainfall trends that are the most significant.

    The most notable trends are the reduction in rainfall during the cooler months of the year across southern Australia; and increases in summer, monsoon rainfall across northern Australia.

    These two changes have happened concurrently. Increases in tropical northern rainfall have more than offset winter decreases across southern regions, such that rainfall averaged over the whole continent is increasing. It has also been dry, on average, over Eastern Australia during the last few decades — particularly south-east Queensland and the southern Murray Darling Basin – the last two years of heavy rainfall notwithstanding.

    The high, natural rainfall variability in Australia makes determining any rainfall trends a difficult job. In fact, the apparent trends in rainfall over most parts of the continent, including the recent heavier summer monsoon, are not statistically distinguishable from the background of highly variable, decade-to-decade and year-to-year rainfall changes.

    However one important rainfall trend does stand out. The reduction in winter rainfall over southwest Western Australia is a clear trend in the observational data. Similarly, the loss of late autumn and early winter rainfall over the southeast of the continent is also notable, but less statistically significant than the reduction in the west.

    And it is here that we can zero in on the changes that the scientists have been mostly concerned with, and have mostly been talking about.

    Reduction in winter rainfall in southwest WA has been most notable. Phillip Capper

    Changes to autumn and winter rainfall in the Mediterranean climate regions of Australia can have large impacts. Typically, these regions receive the largest chunk of their annual rainfall during this period. This is delivered by cold fronts and storms that sweep across the coast from the Southern Ocean from April through to November.

    The massive temperate forests and open woodlands found in both the southwest and southeast corners of the Australian mainland are evidence that cool season rainfall in these regions has been historically high and relatively reliable, over a very long period of time. Over the last 200 years, the rainfall has also supported some of our most significant agricultural areas. The natural water supplies of Perth, Adelaide and Melbourne are also highly dependent on rainfall during autumn, winter and spring.

    However something significant happened to rainfall in the southwest of Australia in the second half of the twentieth century. The observational data shows a sustained 10-20% drop in winter time rainfall, starting in the late 1960s. Two decades later, a similar sustained reduction in rainfall occurred during autumn and winter in the southeast. This represents a significant change in the seasonality of southern Australian rainfall. Drying during the regular growing season is now apparent across large tracts of the southern agricultural zones.

    The causes of this reduction in autumn and winter rainfall are an area of active research. Nonetheless, there is certainly evidence that the long-term drying is not just natural variability. Research conducted to date has shown that certain aspects of the rainfall changes are consistent with an enhanced greenhouse effect.

    Research at the Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO has shown that the rainfall reductions are due to changes in atmospheric circulation during the winter half of the year. In southwest Western Australia, the drying has been associated with reduced rainfall from storm systems and fewer storm systems in general.

    These changes are consistent with higher atmospheric pressure that has been measured over the region. Studies have shown that aspects of these changes are, in turn, consistent with greenhouse gas increases, and decreases in stratospheric ozone in the Southern Hemisphere.

    You could think of the effects of climate change on Australia, as regions ‘migrating’ from one climate zone to another. dwdyer/Flickr

    A simple lay person explanation is that global warming pushes storms that track across southern Australia even further south — towards the poles — as the planet heats up. It’s a bit more complicated than that, the temperature gradient between the warm equatorial and cool polar regions ‘fuels’ mid-latitude storm systems. Global warming changes the strength and position of this gradient, which leads to a change in the mean position of the storms. The rain is still falling, but its falling out over the Southern Ocean. It is reasonable to think of this as the tropics expanding and temperate regions moving poleward.

    If this is the mechanism at play, then you might expect the changes to have occurred in the southwest earlier than the southeast. Since it lies further to the north, a southward shift of the storm systems should affect Western Australia before the southeast — and this is indeed what we observe.

    We have now had 40 years of lower winter rainfall in the southwest. During 2010, with the rest of the country awash with water, southwest Western Australia experienced its driest year on record. The last decent wet year in the southwest was in 1965, and such years were fairly common in the preceding six-and-a-half decades of rainfall observations.

    It is important to note here that even in the southeast, the heavy rainfall of the last two years has fallen outside of the autumn and winter period. The rainfall was tropical in origin, and generally associated with La Niña – in fact the 2010-11 event was one of the strongest La Niña’s of the past century. The bulk of what fell was out-of-season rainfall, and not the typical southeast rainfall delivered by winter-time cold fronts and storms.

    Indeed, between the La Niña event of 2010 and the weaker event of 2011, late autumn and early winter rainfall returned to below average, continuing a trend that has lasted for more than 15 years. It is this trend that climatologists have been following, and it continued through the last two La Niña years.

    Click to enlarge

    It is inevitable that a wetter-than-average autumn or winter will occur again in future, but a single wet season is unlikely to have climate scientists revising their conclusions. It’s the long-term trend that is important.

    The reduction of rainfall during autumn and early winter has significant hydrological and agricultural impacts. Heavy rainfall in spring and summer might help recharge reservoirs, but it is not necessarily helpful to grain growers. In addition, we can’t rely on these Mediterranean climates getting consistent heavy rainfall over the summer months without the help of La Niña.

    Was the recent heavy rainfall due to climate change?

    Attributing recent extreme events to climate change is a difficult, but emerging, part of the science. It’s also an emerging piece of evidence: extreme climate events are increasing all over the world.

    Rainfall over 2010 and 2011 was the highest on record for Australia, beating the previous record for a two-year stretch in 1973 and 1974. A double La Niña event has been associated with both records, highlighting the role of natural variability in driving the heavy rainfall.

    However, climate scientists have noted that some of the background conditions for the recent rainfall were consistent with expectations in a warmer world. Most notably, sea surface temperatures around Australia have been the warmest on record over the past two years. We know from the science behind seasonal rainfall prediction that elevated local sea surface temperatures are a key driver of above average rainfall for Australia, not just through the increased atmospheric moisture that they provide, but also — most importantly — due to the way they change local atmospheric circulation.

    Rainfall over 2010 and 2011 was the highest on record for Australia. Brian Yap

    Scientists over the next decade, will explore the role of elevated ocean temperatures on the record rainfall of 2010 and 2011 in closer detail.

    So what on Earth (or twin Earth) are we to make of all this?

    Recent rainfall trends observed across Australia are, in many ways, consistent with a warming world; that is, decreases in southern Australian winter season rainfall, and increases in the tropical monsoon.

    The severity of the drought, followed by the record breaking summer rainfall, is also consistent with projections for a warmer world.

    In saying that, the big proviso here is that scientists have been careful not to overstate this case, and in releases such as the recent State of the Climate report, BoM and CSIRO highlight that we are still researching these issues.

    The most consistent feature of modelling studies shows a likely future drying over southern and parts of eastern Australia, and less conclusive projections elsewhere. It is important to remember that these are projections for 2030 and 2050, and we should not necessarily expect to see such changes clearly right now, unless climate change is progressing more rapidly than the climate models have shown.

    Scientists are still researching how a warming climate will affect flooding. daisy.r/Flickr

    However we can use recent events as a heuristic for future climate change in a sensible and reasoned manner. We know that warming due to increasing greenhouse gases will change future rainfall patterns. We know that there is uncertainty in that, but that this uncertainty – coupled with the speed of changes to the climate system – serves to increase the risk in many regions.

    Hence we can legitimately ask questions as to what we might do if recent, long-term rainfall changes turn out to be permanent.

    Within this context, climate scientists have pointed out that the rainfall declines across the south have some consistency with what we would expect due to global warming. We also point out that the changes in the southwest have been very long lived. It is pertinent to draw the link between more recent rainfall reductions across the southeast, and the longer-term declines in the southwest.

    It’s too early to make a definitive call on all of those issues, and another ten years of data will provide more concrete evidence. But the scientists’ job is to brief people, including the primary industry sector, water managers and ecologists, on what the best available current data and science is showing.

    The experience of the Bureau of Meteorology has been that these science stakeholders are coming to understand the complex nature of the challenges that they are planning for, and are increasingly sophisticated users of climate information. That’s good news.

    Tomorrow James Risbey from CSIRO explains how greenhouse climate change expresses itself through the natural modes of the climate system and what that implies in assessing the evidence of runs of wet and dry years.

    Comments (5)

     

  • British Energy Plan Would Add Nuclear Plants

    Alert Name: CLIMATE CHANGE NEWS
    May 23, 2012 Compiled: 1:09 AM

    By STEPHEN CASTLE (NYT)

    Britain announced plans Tuesday to finance a new generation of nuclear power plants and renewable energy facilities, though other European Union countries are moving away from nuclear power.

    By STEPHEN CASTLE (NYT)

    Britain announced plans Tuesday to finance a new generation of nuclear power plants and renewable energy facilities in a move that illustrates divergent energy policies within the European Union.

    About This E-mail

     

    You received this e-mail because you signed up for NYTimes.com’s My Alerts tool. As a member of the TRUSTe privacy program, we are committed to protecting your privacy.

  • Fresh allegations against Ian Macdonald

    Fresh allegations against Ian Macdonald

    Kate McClymont

    May 23, 2012 – 12:39PM

    Resigned ... Ian Macdonald.

    Fresh allegations … Ian Macdonald. Photo: Louie Douvis

    Disgraced former NSW minister for energy Ian Macdonald is to face a new corruption inquiry into the granting of coal exploration licences.

    “The Commission has been investigating allegations that corrupt conduct has occurred in connection with the granting of certain coalmining tenements in NSW,” the Independent Commission Against Inquiry said in a statement.

    The Herald reported this week that Andrew Kaidbay, a friend and adviser to former minister Eddie Obeid and his family, who had no mining background and a $1 company, won a coal exploration licence in the Hunter Valley worth millions of dollars in a controversial tender run by then minister Mr Macdonald.

    The Obeid family also received at least $10 million after they sold an option over their land to another of the successful bidders in this tender process.

    Nine months before Mr Macdonald announced the invitation-only tender, the Obeids bought a farm in the Bylong Valley, near Mount Penny, for $3.65 million.

    One of the exploration licences the commission has confirmed it is investigating relates to a licence at Doyle’s Creek.

    In December 2008, Mr Macdonald granted this licence – without going to tender – to a company associated with John Maitland, the former general secretary of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union.

    Mr Maitland paid $165,000 for his 11 per cent share in NuCoal Resources, which was later valued at $12million.

    In a statement, the ICAC said because of the fresh allegations against the former minister, the commission was delaying announcing the findings of a previous corruption inquiry into Mr Macdonald.

    Last year, the ICAC held a public hearing into allegations that businessmen Lucky Gattellari and Ronald Medich, who are facing murder charges, offered escort services in return for Mr Macdonald arranging meetings with state energy executives.

    No date has been set for the new public inquiry.

    Mr Macdonald resigned from NSW parliament in June 2010 following allegations that he made “errors” in his travel expenses relating to a 2008 trip to Italy and Dubai.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/fresh-allegations-against-ian-macdonald-20120523-1z49g.html#ixzz1verBOrgz

  • Car maker turns down buyers

    Car maker turns down buyers

    May 23, 2012 – 8:06AM

    Suitability test ... Nissan's new Leaf electric car.

    Suitability test … Nissan’s new Leaf electric car.

    Some customers have “failed” a Nissan test to see if they were suitable for the new Leaf electric car.

    Nissan has knocked back some customers interested in purchasing its first electric car, the Leaf, because they have been deemed “unsuitable” for ownership.

    The plug-in electric vehicle officially hits the market on June 1, but interested customers need to pass a two-stage approval test before being issued with a certificate that will allow them to purchase the $51,500 car from one of Nissan’s special EV dealerships.

    The test involves answering five questions about their intended usage for the car, followed by a visit from Nissan’s electrical supplier Origin Energy for an assessment of the suitability of the customer’s home electrical network.

    Speaking at a promotional event at Melbourne’s Federation Square designed to raise awareness of the Leaf’s non-reliance on petrol, Nissan Australia model line manager James Staveley told Drive the company had approved about 100 customers with another 100 undergoing the process.

    Some intending customers have also been declined. “If you answered that you regularly drive from Melbourne to Sydney, then we might have politely informed the customer that this is not the car for them,” Staveley says.

    “The majority of customers we have declined have been because they don’t have off-street parking available to them, which we consider essential for a safe and convenient recharging environment.”

    When Mitsubishi brought the only other mass-produced electric car available in Australia to market, the i-MiEV, it initially appointed leases only to high-profile corporate customers.

    As supply restrictions eased it later placed the car on general sale, although Nissan says it intends to maintain its selection criteria “to ensure our customers have a great experience with the Leaf”.

    Nissan Australia is only holding one firm order on its books for the Leaf. “We chose to do it that way. We held a competition to be the first person to own a Leaf in Australia, and the family that won now holds the first and only order,” Staveley says.

    For customers who pass the two “toll gates” of the selection process, the car will retail for $51,500 (plus on-road and dealer costs). That includes a recharging cable, but not a wall-mounted recharging station.

    A package including the telephone book-sized station adds a minimum of $2700 to the price, or more depending on the logistics involved in its installation.

    Staveley says the recharging station isn’t a mandatory purchase, but that plugging the car directly into a 15-amp power outlet – which is the minimum infrastructure required and costs several hundreds of dollars to install – will take five hours longer to fully charge the car.

    “It’s the customer’s choice but we’d really prefer that people take the option of the recharging station because then we know it’s being properly and appropriately installed and minimises the risk of anything going astray,” he says.

    Nissan Australia is displaying more than 40 petrol pumps in Melbourne’s Federation Square today, each modified for a new purpose in life including a coffee machine, a fountain, a robot and a gumball machine. The display intends to symbolise that electric cars can help to overcome the world’s strong reliance on petrol.

  • Upper House short circuit for NSW power sell-off

    Upper House short circuit for NSW power sell-off

    Updated May 23, 2012 08:16:51

    The New South Wales Government’s plans to sell the state’s electricity generators have come unstuck in the Upper House.

    Premier Barry O’Farrell announced in November last year that NSW generator assets would be sold, along with the Cobbora coal mine and land set aside for future power stations.

    The money had been earmarked for investment into critical infrastructure.

    Legislation for the privatisation passed the NSW Lower House in March, but debate was adjourned in the Upper House shortly after it had its first reading.

    Labor and the Greens are adamant they will not support the sell-off.

    To get through Parliament the legislation needs the support of the Shooters and Fishers and Christian Democrats parties.

    But earlier this month the Coalition angered the Shooters MPs by bringing on a bill to restrict the sale of ammunition.

    Greens MP John Kaye says the Government should admit defeat.

    “Two months on the notice paper of the Upper House and no progress. The Government needs to admit the obvious – this bill is going nowhere,” Dr Kaye said.

    “They need to back off from electricity privatisation and get on with the business of managing a publicly owned electricity industry.

    “Mr O’Farrell needs to understand that he was elected because his predecessors made a mess of electricity privatisation. He needs to get right away from it.”

    A senior Government spokesman was unable to say when debate on the bill would resume.

    The Government has said it has no plans to sell the electricity transmission network of poles and wire.

    Topics:states-and-territories, state-parliament, privatisation-and-deregulation, electricity-energy-and-utilities, nsw, liddell-2333, cobbora-2844

    First posted May 23, 2012 08:02:30

  • Fossil fuels vs. Renewable energy.350org

    Fossil fuels vs. Renewable energy.

    Inbox
    x

    Bill McKibben – 350.org organizers@350.org
    2:09 AM (7 hours ago)

    to me
    Images are not displayed. Display images below – Always display images from organizers@350.org

     

    Why are we giving hundreds of billions to the industries wrecking the climate?

    Join the global call demanding that world leaders end all fossil fuel subsidies at the Rio Earth Summit.

    Sign On Todaywww.350.org/rio

    Dear friends,

    In just a few weeks, world leaders are converging on Rio for a landmark “Earth Summit” to talk about sustainability issues — but it’s time for them to stop talking and start doing. And we know where they can begin.

    This year our governments will hand nearly hundreds of billions of dollars in government subsidies to the coal, gas, and oil industries. Instead, they should cut them off. Now.

    Cutting fossil fuel subsidies could actually take a giant step towards solving the climate crisis: phasing out these subsidies would prevent gigatonnes of carbon emissions and help make clean energy cheaper than fossil fuels.

    And here’s the thing: this demand is completely reasonable — so reasonable that the leaders of the big countries have already agreed to it. The G20 promised in 2009 that fossil fuel subsidies would be phased out in the “medium term.” But the political power of the corporate polluters scares them, and so no nation has yet followed through.

    If we want real action to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, we need to give world leaders a people-powered push as the Rio Summit approches — and that push starts today with this global call to action: www.350.org/rio

    Why focus on subsidies? Well, remember those pictures we took all over the world a few weeks ago, the ones where hundreds of thousands of people rallied in places wrecked by the drought, flood, fire, and melt that come with climate change? The billions in fossil fuel subsidies handed out to the fossil fuel industry are driving those climate disasters, and it’s time for us, and our political leaders, to conenct the dots. Those billions should be spent investing in the world we want — in renewable energy, in efficiency, in public health and education — not sent to the corporate polluters who are super-heating our planet and threatening our future. 

    How are we going to ensure world leaders make good on their committment to end fossil fuel subsidies? With a huge global groundswell of citizen pressure. Our friends at Avaaz, the planetary network for social good, are helping to lead this fight — already there are over half a million people signed on. In the US, hundreds of thousands of activists are pushing for landmark legislation to remove $113 billion in American fossil fuel subsidies over the next 10 years. But now we need a truly international effort in the leadup to the Rio Earth Summit — which means enlisting you, and your friends.

    Click here to sign on and spread the word: www.350.org/rio

    After you sign on, please share the campaign with anyone you know who cares about the future. Or, for that matter, anyone who cares about not wasting their tax money by sending it to the richest industry on earth.

    We’ll deliver the signatures on June 18th when world leaders arrive for the Earth Summit — in fact, we’ve got big plans brewing for some exciting ways to make sure our message in Rio is unignorable. But first we need you on the list, so please sign on today.

    Onwards,

    Bill McKibben for the 350.org team


    More Info and Articles


    350.org is building a global movement to solve the climate crisis. Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter, and sign up for email alerts. You can help power our work by getting involved locally and donating here.

    What is 350? Go to our website to learn about the science behind the movement.

    To stop receiving emails from 350.org, click here.