It’s ironic that the rail system opened up the state and country before the advent of motor vehicles, that it has been allowed to fall into such disrepair. I joined the railways in 1954 and have watched branch lines being closed and rail freight hived off to road transport, resulting in the road chaos we are seeing today. If only we could turn the clock back and start anew.I can also report that top-level strategy was to discontinue all long distance passenger rail travel and only provide a metropolitan and interurban service Devised by David Hill, Neville Wran and Peter Cox, in some respects this has already been done.
RailCorp repairs likely to take years not months according to NSW Transport Minister
NSW Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian. Picture: Justin Lloyd Source: The Daily Telegraph
DRAGGING RailCorp into the 21st century will take years, not months, Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian admitted yesterday.
The state government is reviewing the organisation and will get a report in six months – but Ms Berejiklian said implementing the changes would take much longer.
“It’s a massive, massive undertaking and, to be honest, to get the organisation from where it is to world best practice won’t take months, it will take years,” Ms Berejiklian said in a lunchtime address hosted by the Committee for Economic Development of Australia.
“I guess if RailCorp was providing a world-class service every day of the year you could excuse the cost of $10 million a day but under the current circumstances we do need to give that organisation a shake-up.”
Ms Berejiklian said nothing was ruled in or out of the review and the results of the privatisation of Sydney Ferries services would determine whether more public transport services were sold off.
“I think by the end of the year when we have the operator in place, that will be for us a key milestone for how we might view those arrangements in the future,” she said.
Ms Berejiklian said the current timetable would be completely overhauled next year.
“Rather than tinker with the timetable we will start from scratch, which means we can deal with issues like frequency and travel times.”
She said previous governments also made cuts to the organisation but they cost more in the long run, adding: “For too long we have let things slide and that won’t continue into the future.”
Meet and greet … Milne speaks with grazier Scott Hickman at Marylebone farm in Cudal, near Orange. Photo: Penny Bradfield
In a surprising first move as party leader, Christine Milne went bush to broaden support, writes Lenore Taylor.
For a moment it felt like a day in the life of a prime minister or an opposition leader – the white cars pull up at the chosen venue for the day’s political message, the politician alights, followed by besuited advisers with phones to their ears.
A conversation with the chosen members of the public ensues – only slightly stilted by the presence of a gaggle of journalists recording every word with long fluffy boom mics. And finally there is a media conference, with the real-world backdrop much more lively than a Parliament House lectern.
Julia Gillard does this regularly, often in schools. Tony Abbott does it every other day, his efforts usually involving the driving of heavy machinery, the wielding of knives or the wearing of hard hats.
Advertisement: Story continues below
Green tea … Milne addresses local farmers over some light refreshments. Photo: Penny Bradfield
This week it was the new Greens leader Christine Milne who hit the road on what she says will be a nationwide tour of rural and regional Australia.
There were still a few things that distinguished her trip to Orange, in the seat of Calare held by the Nationals’ John Cobb by almost 11 per cent, from the big party roadshows.
Her conversations with local apple and cherry growers and sheep graziers were much longer and more detailed, and apparently aimed at eliciting information as well as providing footage for the evening news. The major party leaders’ media events are usually pretty quick affairs.
Milne even admitted the multiparty climate committee that designed the carbon tax, of which she was a key member, may have under-estimated its impact on big food processors and promised to look for a remedy. Usually chats with political leaders in front of the cameras do not result in the leader admitting they may have got something wrong.
And on closer inspection the besuited advisers were also slightly different in appearance to their major party counterparts, one had a pony-tail to his waist and his ring tone was a bird call.
But the aim of the exercise was the same – to deliver a political message. And it worked, Milne’s bid to ”start a conversation” with rural and regional Australia was reported in most major newspapers, the local papers in NSW’s central west and was the lead item on that night’s regional television news. Milne had received a ”mixed reception” the report said.
Milne, like the Greens founder Bob Brown before her, insists the party’s political imperative is not that of the now defunct Australian Democrats, to keep the bastards honest, but to replace them and form government.
But even she cannot pretend the Greens have any hope of winning the seat of Calare, where the new NSW upper house member Jeremy Buckingham attracted only 6 per cent of the electorate, or 5345 votes, when he stood at the 2010 federal election, an improvement on the 2.85 per cent or 2351 votes he got at the 2007 poll.
The immediate political purpose appears to have more to do with bolstering the Greens’ Senate vote.
”It will help support and grow our existing vote over time … it won’t, of course, in the short term lead to change in the lower house, but it will build our overall vote and that includes the Senate vote,” Milne told the Herald.
The departure of a dominant leader such as Brown always causes uncertainty for a political party, however brave a face they put on it.
Some commentators see a scenario in which the Greens could lose their balance of power position at the next election – Labor losing a seat to Bob Katter’s party in Queensland and to the Coalition in Tasmania and the Greens losing a West Australian seat to the Coalition. This would mean bills could be passed with the independent senator Nick Xenophon, DLP senator John Madigan and the predicted new senator from Bob Katter’s party.
Others predict a Democrats-style demise without the presence of Brown.
Milne expects the three Green senators up for re-election next year to be returned and also hopes to pick up another Senate seat in Victoria or NSW.
A lot will depend on candidate selection, whether Labor can claw back from its current wipeout position in the polls and whether the Greens can maintain their consistent polling of around 11 per cent. But under any scenario, the Greens’ Senate prospects would benefit from a boost in their vote in the bush.
The Greens also know it is vital to maintain the unity of their team and despite internal differences of opinion over policy and tactics, the leadership transition ran without a hint of public dissent.
Regional Australia also features large in the Greens’ policy agenda. Some of what they say sounds very similar to the stance of the Nationals – the dominant party of regional Australia.
Both talk about the ”abuse of market power” by Coles and Woolworths, the need to keep control of our food production capacity by stopping foreign sovereign wealth funds buying up agricultural land, over-the-odds charges for quarantine inspections and the unfair impact on the country of free trade agreements that leave Australian farmers exposed.
Other ideas passed the ”nod test” with the rural residents she talked to around Orange, such as the plan to link city consumers wanting high-quality food with rural suppliers via online sales – something cherry farmers in Tasmania are already doing, Milne said.
But everywhere she went her proudest achievement, the carbon tax, was a bridge too far.
”Farmers around here are petrified of the carbon tax. We just got told Country Energy’s going to put our bills up by 18 per cent … hooly dooly that’s going to hurt,” said a sheep farmer, Scott Hickman, who, with other local graziers, joined Milne on the verandah of a local farm.
”I wouldn’t mind if the money went back into environmental works, but it goes back to the big polluters. I don’t understand the point of that,” said Peter Roberts, another grazier.
The Greens know it’s a political problem, point out the high costs to farmers of doing nothing about climate change and privately hope that the wild over-estimates of the cost impacts of the tax might take the sting out of the issue once it comes into effect in July.
Apple farmer and treasurer of the Orange branch of the Nationals, Guy Gaeta, who told Milne the tax would threaten his business, based his fears on an estimate it would increase his power bill by 100 per cent, not the estimated 10 per cent.
The Nationals, slightly affronted by the sudden appearance of the Greens on their patch, add a few other issues to the list of deal-breakers in any relationship between the bush and the Greens.
The NSW Nationals senator Fiona Nash suggested Milne should add to her tour itinerary a meeting with irrigators in Griffith, worried about losing their water allocations due to the Murray-Darling Basin plan, and a visit to coal mining towns to explain why the Greens believe no new mines should be allowed.
But Milne was back in the city by then and leaping straight into the national economic debate, arguing against pursuing a surplus at any cost, renewing the Greens’ threat to vote down proposed tax cuts for big business and their call to cut the diesel fuel rebate for miners.
She had a preliminary meeting with Gillard last Monday and will have more detailed talks before the Prime Minister leaves for her Anzac Day trip to Gallipoli. The meetings are paving the way for what will be testing negotiations over the parliamentary passage of the May 8 budget.
And before then Milne’s rural roadshow will continue to South Australia. She wants to visit Port Augusta, where the local community is begging for its coal-fired power station to be closed down, and Victor Harbour, where some are thinking about energy self-sufficiency, trying to take the community off-grid.
Milne knows the Greens have an uphill battle in rural Australia. ”That’s why I am out here talking to people. You have to talk to people. You have to build alliances. It takes time.”
And while NSW Farmers Federal vice-president and local apple grower Peter Darley won’t be voting Green, he was pleased Milne visited his little township of Nashdale all the same.
”I think it’s a start. Politicians have to listen to us as well. She’s a breath of fresh air for the Greens,” he said.
Milne says the Greens’ smooth leadership transition and the way she has started in the job shows voters that ”we are a professional political party and we are a group of people wo look after each other.”
What the voters actually think remains to be seen. But the new Greens leader is intent upon taking on the big parties at their own game.
Given that the Keystone XL pipeline is apparently dead in the water at least until after the next presidential election, Canada is seeking new export markets in Asia for its booming oil and natural gas production. Few Americans realize it, but according to the U.S. Energy Administration, the United States total crude oil imports now average 9.033 million barrels per day (mbpd), with Canada sending 2.666 mbpd southwards to the U.S., making it America’s top source of oil imports. In 1988, Canada and the United States signed a free trade…
It’s no secret that Gene Roddenberry’s venerable “Star Trek” metaseries has inspired the imagination of millions since it first debuted in 1966. Strange worlds, compelling characters, and more techno-babble than you could shake a stick at have always been hallmarks of the series. But Star Trek has also been noted on many occasions throughout the series for seemingly predicting (or perhaps inspiring) the progression of technology.While we’re certainly not cruising the galaxy in starships trying to pick up green women, a lot of Trek tech seems to…
A deal struck earlier this month between Russia’s state gas giant, Gazprom, and Vietnam’s state oil and gas group, PetroVietnam, has geopolitical underpinnings aimed at China’s prowess in the South China Sea. The 6 April Gazprom-PetroVietnam deal grants the Russian gas giant two licenses to explore the Moc Tinh and Hai Thach fields in the South China Sea off the Vietnamese continental shelf and gives Gazprom a 49% stake in the fields, which translates into some 55.6 billion of cubic meters of natural gas for Russia.While the fields…
Let’s Play ‘Blame the Speculators’Most people would probably agree that speculation in the oil and gas markets is hurting American consumers. Consider the case of Aubrey McClendon. Mr. McClendon is the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, where he sells natural gas for a living. Natural gas prices have now been pushed down — by speculators — to below $2 per million BTU. This is a drop of more than 80% from 2008 prices. With these depressed prices, Mr. McClendon will have a hard time ever matching his $112 million of earnings…
A Jihadist, Anti-Western Agenda is Being Forced on Syria The international community has been blindly following a jihadist-driven agenda for Syria; a solution the majority of Syrians reject, but which Turkey and Qatar have been driving. It begs the question: why are analysts in Washington — or Paris or London — not digging more deeply into what is really happening, given that the solution they have endorsed is so profoundly anti-Western? The key test of the Annan plan and ceasefire to help end the widespread violence in Syria came on…
With ever increasing energy prices, and the knowledge that oil and natural gas will one day run out, scientists and engineers are constantly trying to discover new, renewable sources of energy. A recent article released in the Environmental Science and Technology journal describes a promising study by Ngai Yin Yip and Menachem Elimelech of the Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering at Yale University.Via a process known as pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) they believe that enough electricity could be cleanly produced to support the…
In direct response to National Opposition to Windfarms campaign, launched today, the wind trade body, RenewableUK released the results of a poll it commissioned to determine the public’s true feelings about wind power.Quite tellingly, when asked ‘To what extent are you in favour of, or opposed to, the use of wind power in the UK?’ 66 percent confirmed that they were in favour, whilst only 8 percent voted against. Maria McCaffery, CEO of RenewableUK, said that, “it’s clear that the majority of those surveyed are supportive…
China now has the world’s largest battery with a storage capacity of 36MWh to combat any intermittence produced by wind and solar power at an adjoining farm.Brain the size of a planet, battery the size of a building – both sound like figures of speech, but the second at least is solid reality. It’s up and running at a combined solar power and wind farm near you.Near you, that is, if you live in Zhangbei, in China’s Hebei province. It’s currently, by a distance, the biggest battery in the world. Or, strictly speaking, thousands of batteries…
NASA Sees Slow-Developing System 99P Dogging Northern Australia
NASA satellites have been monitoring the slow-to-develop low pressure area called System 99P for four days as it lingers in the Arafura Sea, north Australia’s Northern Territory. Satellite data indicates that System 99P is likely to continue struggling because of weak organization and nearby dry air.
System 99P was captured in an infrared image on April 20, 2012 at 04:55 UTC (12:55 a.m. EDT) by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument that flies onboard NASA’s Aqua satellite. At that time, System 99P was centered about 190 nautical miles (218.6 miles/ 352 km) north-northeast of Darwin, Australia, near 9.9 South latitude and 132.6 East longitude. The western-most extent of System 99P was now entering the Timor Sea (located west of the Arafura Sea). In fact, today’s (April 20) MODIS infrared imagery revealed that System 99P showed some areas of strong thunderstorms west of its center of circulation, over the eastern edge of the Timor Sea. However, those thunderstorms remain disorganized and the low-level circulation is weak.
The TRMM satellite, managed by NASA and JAXA also gathered data from struggling System 99P. The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite passed over April 19 at 1142 UTC (7:42 a.m. EDT), and revealed curved banding of thunderstorms wrapping weakly into the center of the low. Total precipitable water products currently indicate there is sufficient moisture associated with the low, and that’s the fuel for the tropical cyclone.
Even though there’s a good amount of moisture available, dry air lingers nearby. Dry air can sap the life’s blood (moisture) from a developing tropical cyclone. Satellite data shows dry air west of 130 East. In addition, an upper-air sounding from Darwin, Australia indicated dry air in its recent moisture profile.
The Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) is the entity that forecasts tropical cyclones in this part of the world and has been continuously gathering and analyzing data to determine if System 99P will further develop. JTWC cited surface observations from McCluer Island, which is located 65 nautical miles (74.8 miles/120.4 km) south-southeast of 99P’s center. The island’s weather observation noted northeasterly winds at 15-20 knots (17.3 – 23.0 mph / 27.7-37.0 kph). and sea level pressure near 1006 millibars.
Looking back, on April 19, System 99P was centered near 9.0S 132.8E, about 240 miles NE of Darwin, Australia and visible MODIS imagery from NASA’s Terra satellite showed deep convection/t-storms flaring on western quadrant. At that time, maximum sustained winds were near 15 knots (17.3 mph/27.7 kph). On April 18 the MODIS image on NASA’s Aqua satellite showed disorganized cloud cover as System 99P was still struggling. Its maximum sustained winds were 15 knots (17.3 mph/27.7 kph). When NASA passed over System 99P on the date of its birth, April 17, 2012, it was having a difficult time getting organized because of wind shear. It was located in the Arafura Sea, between northern Australia and Irian Jaya, Indonesia.
As of April 20, the forecasters at the JTWC said, “There is no significant model development due [in the next 24 hours] to the overall marginal environment and weak organization.”
SO Julie Bishop has a Huawei-donated iPad. Dangerous. Dangerous for her and dangerous for Australia if she becomes foreign minister.
The iPad is but one of the micro details to emerge from Bishop’s visit to China as a guest of the Chinese telco. Some Liberals led by Bishop, together with vested mining interests, questioned the Gillard government accepting ASIO’s advice against letting Huawei bid for NBN. But the bar has wider significance because the controversy it has sparked illuminates the most vexing issue of Australian foreign policy – our relationship with China.
This was again in sharp relief at the recent Boao Forum, on the luxury resort on Hainan Island.
West Australian mining billionaires Andrew Forrest and Gina Rinehart were there.
Forrest complained the Huawei decision was indicative of the insufficient sympathy for Beijing and that Australia’s foreign policy should reflect our commercial relationship with China.
This is not the first time West Australian mining magnates have sought to stamp “Made in China” on Australia’s foreign policy.
The day after President Barack Obama’s long-awaited visit to Australia, one of Forrest’s Boao buddies “Iron” Mike Young dismissed the visit on the front page of the Australian Financial Review.
Former Liberal senate leader Nick Minchin backed ASIO’s advice. Former foreign minister Alexander Downer told the ABC that Huawei was a “victim of Sinophobia”.
Liberal finance spokesman Andrew Robb, along with Bishop and Bronwyn Bishop, all criticised the government for following the security advice. All have recently been guests of Huawei in China.
Bishop and Downer really should know better. Fortunately, some Liberals do know better.
Senator George Brandis, the shadow attorney-general, was briefed by ASIO and eventually Tony Abbott overruled Robb and the two Bishops.
However it seems that the tribune of mining magnates, Julie Bishop, is not done.
After being silenced she arguably took the pro-Beijing line further. She was quoted in The Australian newspaper saying “confusion about the Labor government’s attitudes towards China was increased significantly by the 2009 Defence White paper that implied China posed a direct conventional military threat to Australia”. The Liberal’s official policy is to support the 2009 Defence White Paper!
Christopher Pyne may have known more when he addressed the Henry Jackson society in London, of which I am a patron.
Pyne made a robust critique of Chinese foreign policy in what many considered a below-the-radar chastising of Bishop.
I’m sorry to sound like an unreconstructed cold warrior, but I have to ask: Has anyone told Bishop the real nature of the Beijing regime? China’s political system represents an amalgam of the traditional Confucian paternalism and the police apparatus of the Soviet Union.
Despite 30 years of economic reform, China is ruled by an interlocking alliance of party, state, military and business elites. While it is true that Beijing has brought hundreds of millions of people up from poverty, China is still run by a regime whose main priority is the preservation of its own power.
The fall of Bo Xilai, the powerful and ambitious Party chief in Chongqing, only underlines the corruption and brutality of China’s leadership – whether in subterranean struggles between relative liberals or in the annual execution of more than 3000 people or the maintenance of China’s vast labour camp system.
For strategic and economic reasons, Beijing supports and protects authoritarian regimes such as North Korea, Burma, Sudan, and Zimbabwe. It also uses its veto at the UN Security Council to block efforts to avert war.
The Huawei episode also highlights the widespread concerns about China’s role in cyber-espionage, both military and commercial.
These concerns first arose more than a decade ago, with particular emphasis on China’s infiltration of the private sector, including blatant intellectual property theft. Last year Mike Rogers, chairman of the US House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said: “When you talk to companies behind closed doors, they describe attacks that originate in China, and have a level of sophistication and are clearly supported by a level of resources that can only be a nation-state entity.”
In these circumstances it was always likely that the US would see Huawei for what it is – an extension of the Chinese communist regime – and bar entry to America’s more sensitive telecommunications networks.
The new American foreign policy doctrine, with its “pivot to Asia”, enunciated by Barack Obama in his speech to federal parliament last year, has predictably made our largest trading partner quick to jump at imagined slights.
Dr John Lee notes the foolishness of any appeasement that is counter to our national security interests.
“Everyone agrees that the alliance with the Americans is the bedrock of Australian security,” he said. Bishop’s free iPad goes to more than just security concerns over her use of that device. Her views on Huawei, and by extension the Chinese government, show a serious deficit in foreign policy and security thinking.
It’s quite understandable that the mining billionaires Clive Palmer, Andrew Forrest and Gina Rinehart, who fund the Liberal Party to which she belongs, don’t want Australia to do anything that might upset their largest customer.
But someone who aspires to be Australia’s foreign minister has to think about our national interest, not just the commercial interest of her party’s paymasters.
If you press Malcolm Turnbull he argues very differently from Pyne and the traditional Liberal anti-communist perspective.
Sounding a bit like a latter day Lord Runciman, Turnbull insisted in a speech given last October at the London School of Economics and Political Science that China’s naval build up was not a sign of “a new belligerence”.
China, he argued, was not like the Soviet Union “and does not seek to export its ideology or system of government”.
Like his former loyal deputy Julie Bishop, Turnbull stated:
“I disagree with the underlying premise of the 2009 Australian White Paper that we should base our defence planning and procurement on the contingency of a naval war with China in the South China Sea.”
He, like paleo-conservative editor of the Spectator Tom Switzer and Switzer’s bizarre anti-American columnist Mark Latham, all think the relationship with the US has gone too far.
This Sydney consensus reaction to China/US tensions is very similar to the West Australian mining oligarchs and the arguments of the chief academic advocate of accommodating China, Hugh White.
A formidable coalition critical of the traditional US/Australia alliance and keen on accommodating Beijing is forming. Surprisingly, it is mainly forming on the political right.
Michael Danby is chair of the US/Australia Parliamentary Friendship Group
Air pollution in London – a Green party campaign video Link to this video
Jenny Jones, the Green mayoral candidate for London, has accused mainstream political parties of lacking the political courage to tackle air pollution – despite strong evidence that it represents a major public health risk.
Jones sought to push the environmental agenda at city hall when she served as deputy mayor to Ken Livingstone between 2003-2004. She is urging supporters to give the Labour candidate their second preference vote in the election.
Jones has repeatedly criticised the incumbent mayor over his use of pollution suppressant vehicles near air quality monitoring stations to deal with the problem in the run up to the 2012 Olympic Games. The trucks spray adhesive to the road surface, effectively glueing pollution to the ground. Jones said this only serves to lower the pollution measured, rather than tackling the actual problem.
She added: “He’s burying the problem and pretending it doesn’t exist. How does he square that with his role as mayor, trying to protect Londoners and make their lives better. He’s actually making their lives worse.”
Other air quality campaigners have gone further, with Birkett describing the move as “public health fraud on an industrial scale”.
Jones has outlined some of the radical measures needed to reduce harmful pollutants by cutting traffic and getting people out of their cars. This includes raising the congestion charge from £10 to £15, slapping a £40 daily charge on “gas guzzlers”, an ultra-low emission zone in central London and replacing the central congestion charge zone with a region-wide road pricing scheme after three years.
Jones, whose pledges sometimes raise eyebrows at hustings, says the Greens are not prepared to shy away from radical policies that may be seen as “politically toxic” but are the only way to clean up the problem.
“Either politicians are not recognising how serious the problem is, or they are choosing not to see it, but you can’t argue against it. The facts are there.”
She added: “Greens are not frightened to tackle politically toxic things if they feel they are important.”
Airborne pollution in the form of fine particulate matter – such as PM2.5, particles of less than 2.5 micrometres – comes mostly from combustion sources, including transport, domestic and industrial sources, and aggravates respiratory and cardiovascular conditions.
Research shows these PM2.5s are likely to be inhaled deep into the respiratory tract and with other forms of air pollution can reduce the lung capacity of children. Air quality in the capital is the worst in the UK and also ranks among the worst in Europe, with research suggesting that up to 50,000 people die early in the UK every year as a result of air pollution.
Transport for London, which Johnson chairs, insists that trials in London and abroad have shown the effectiveness of dust suppressants in reducing particulate matter (PM10) levels .
Leon Daniels, the managing director of surface transport at TfL, said: “Transport for London has always been clear that the use of dust suppressants across London is in combination with other measures to reduce harmful PM10 levels at a range of locations where we know there are higher levels of this pollutant. This is in addition to a range of longer terms, sustainable measures aiming to reduce pollution levels at source across the capital.”
Britain is still facing fines of up to £300m over a repeated failure to meet key EU air quality directives since 2005, when Labour was in government and Livingstone was installed at city hall. Under the coalition government, however, there is little sign that concerted action os planned. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs recently claimed that the costs of meeting EU pollution targets may not match the benefits.
But Jones warns politicians need to introduce the radical measures needed amid signs that the problem is worsening. Last month, pollution in London hit record levels due to a mix of weather conditions and traffic fumes, in particular from diesel cars, vans and lorries.
Jones says part of the problem is that the public don’t realise the scale of the public health risks attached.
“It’s not like the smog of the 1950s that was really tangible. Now, the air looks quite clean but actually it’s not, but people aren’t seeing it. Though if you go to a high building, you can see an orange haze across the horizon and that’s the pollution.”
The Green party has made a six minute film to highlight the threat to people’s health from poor air quality, drawing on the expertise of air quality expert, Professor Frank Kelly, of King’s College London, and Simon Birkett, founder for the Campaign for Clean Air in London.
Jones believes if parents understand the damage to public health, the public will be more willing to accept that a change in behaviour is necessary.
Research by the Campaign for Clean Air in London has found that 1,148 schools in London are within 150 metres of roads carrying 10,000 or more vehicles per day, putting children going to these schools, and living near them, at increased risk of developing asthma, and their parents of developing heart problems.
The Green mayoral candidate, who polled just 2% in the latest survey of voting intention on May 3, wants more Green party members to be elected to the London assembly to pressure the next elected mayor to show political leadership on the issue. Jones, currently one of two Green assembly members, will also defend her assembly seat in May.
She says that one of the measures that needs to be considered by the next elected mayor is simply to close roads from traffic, but admits it is tough getting the message across.
“That’s why it’s incredibly important to have a strong assembly team because then we can speak much more loudly and get the mayor, even if it’s not me, to do the right thing.”
The event will begin outside the offices of Defra and protesters will then take over a road, calling it London’s “first true clean air zone”, and holding a picnic and street party.