Author: admin

  • Population and environment – whats the connection?


    Australia is a large country with a small population. In 2003 we had a population density of 2.5 people per square kilometre; by comparison, the figure for Japan was 338 people per square kilometre, for the United Kingdom 244 and for France 109. Of the world’s developed countries, only Canada (3.2) and Iceland (2.8) have comparable population densities (Box 1: Trends in world population).

    A complex problem

    While the global and local list of environmental problems is long and growing, it’s difficult to be certain of the extent to which population growth is a contributing factor. For example, land degradation in Australia is a major concern. Rabbits are a major cause of land degradation in some regions of the country, yet they were introduced to the country by just one person. This is a problem of too many rabbits, not too many people.

    Clearly, the relationship between the environment and population is complex. To explore it further, we need first to look at population growth.

     

    Population growth in Australia

    Nobody knows how many indigenous people lived here before European settlement: estimates range between 300,000 and 1.5 million. It is known, however, that their numbers declined significantly after the arrival of the First Fleet in 1788.

    Related site: AusStats: Population clock
    Up to the minute projection of Australia’s resident population.
    (Australian Bureau of Statistics)

    By 1887 there were probably about 3 million people, of mostly European origin, living in the colonies. Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show that the 1901 census counted 3,773,801 people. One hundred years later, in 2001, the national census tallied 18,972,350 people. The estimated Australian population mid-2004 was 20,111,300.

    The human population keeps growing

    The human population at the global level has been growing exponentially over time (Box 2: Exponential growth). The absolute number of humans has continued to increase, and the distribution of the population has changed, due to differing birth and death rates and the movement of people from one region to another.

    Australia’s population also continues to increase. The three factors which have the greatest impact on the population of any nation are birth rate (fertility), international migration and death rate (mortality rate).

    The total fertility rate (TFR) is the average number of children a woman gives birth to in her lifetime. A TFR of 2.1 is considered to be the replacement rate, which is the fertility rate needed to keep the population stable if there is no net migration. Australia’s TFR in 2000 was 1.7. Most developed countries have TFRs below the replacement rate. The 2004 estimate of the world average TFR is 2.8, ranging from 1.2 to 8.

    Immigration adds to the Australian population in two ways: firstly, the immigrants themselves; and secondly, their Australian-born children (Box 3: Immigration and population growth). The contribution of net overseas migration to Australia’s population growth has averaged about 39 per cent for the past 25 years. This is projected to increase as the Australian fertility rate decreases.

    The age structure of a population can also contribute to its growth. A population with a large percentage of people in the child-bearing years (15-45) will continue to increase even if parents do not produce enough children to replace themselves. This is because there are a lot of young people yet to have children and a low number of old people who will die in the next few decades.

    Related site: Australian social trends – population
    Fertility, death rate and migration influence the size and structure of Australia’s future population.
    (Australian Bureau of Statistics)

    The combination of birth rate, migration and death rate affects both population size and the age profile. Australia’s population is steadily ageing. Over the next few decades in Australia, the number of people over 65 years of age is predicted to increase, and children will make up a smaller proportion of the population. Population ageing is mostly due to falling fertility rates and increasing life expectancy. An ageing Australian population has economic and social consequences.

     

    Our consuming passion

    Although some aspects of the Australian environment are in relatively good condition, Australia has many environmental problems: land degradation, endangered species, an increasing incidence of toxic algal blooms in our rivers, declining fish stocks, land clearing, air pollution, and vulnerable water supplies. There are more, but that will do for a start.

    Many environmental problems can be attributed to poor management techniques, policy failure or even feral animals. Such factors are largely independent of population, but the sheer number of people can also contribute to the problems.

    Consider, for example, the issue of consumption of material resources. On average, Australians have become steadily richer over the last few decades. As monetary wealth has increased, so has consumption. As a nation we now own more goods, use more energy, eat more processed food and have larger houses than ever before. All this consumption can create environmental problems. In effect, the populated areas of Australia are a sink for natural resources, draining the continent of nutrients, minerals and water. What we don’t consume we export, generating revenue which we use to buy consumer items from abroad. High levels of consumption help to deplete our store of resources, generate waste and increase the stress on the natural and agricultural environments.

    The environmental impact of copious consumption may not be confined to the local area. For example, the use of fossil fuels for energy in Australia can have an impact on global carbon dioxide levels and resulting environmental effects.

    When Australian consumption is viewed from a global perspective, we leave a large ‘ecological footprint’. The ecological footprint is a measure of how much productive land and water is needed to produce the resources that are consumed and absorb the wastes produced by a person or group of people. In 2001, there were 1.8 hectares of globally productive land per person. In 2004 Australia’s ecological footprint was calculated at 7.7 hectares per person (among the world’s top four resource-consuming nations) compared to the average global footprint of 2.2 hectares. Clearly, the consumption of resources at current levels is not sustainable.

    The limits to growth

    Some economists have described humans as the ‘ultimate resource’, because they can turn previously useless things into resources by being intelligent, adaptable and creative. Much of what we value and what makes life enjoyable is the product of human endeavour. However, something good can become a problem when in excess – when there is ‘too much of a good thing’.

    Factors such as population growth, population distribution and migration combine with high-consumption patterns to put stresses on the environment. There is a limit to the environment in terms of supply of resources and the ability to absorb waste products. Examples include the rate of tree growth for timber harvesting, the available fresh water for irrigation and human consumption, and the time required for the recycling of organic waste. Land degradation, loss of forest cover, pollution of water and air, soil erosion and loss of biodiversity are all occurring at a fast pace, and are evidence of the impact of an increasing population on the environment.

    Population and the environment

    The maximum number of a particular organism that an environment can maintain indefinitely is often referred to as its carrying capacity. How do we calculate the human carrying capacity of the Earth? We can’t do it by numbers alone because the relationship between population and environment is neither simple nor straightforward.

    To come up with the best solution, insights and ideas need to be drawn from many disciplines. These include, but are not limited to, environmental science, geology, economics, demography, human biology and health, geography and political science. The future of both the global human population and the global environment relies on bridging disciplinary divides.

    Boxes

    1. Trends in world population

    2. Exponential growth

    3. Immigration and population growth

    Related Nova topics:

    Australia’s threatened species

    Cleaner production – a solution to pollution?

    Feeding the future – sustainable agriculture

  • Device captures leaking oil in Gulf

    Device captures leaking oil in Gulf

    AAP June 6, 2010, 2:42 PM!

     

    BP’s latest bid to contain the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill has registered a first small success, capturing 6,000 barrels of oil in 24 hours, the US official overseeing the spill response said.

    The figure is dwarfed by estimates that up to 19,000 barrels a day could be spewing from the leaking well, but was a rare note of success for the embattled British firm.

    “In the first full 24-hour cycle, yesterday (Friday) as they bring the production level up, they were able to bring up and produce 6,000 barrels of oil from the well,” said retired Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen at a press briefing on Saturday.

    “The goal is to continue that production, and raise it up,” he added.

    The latest containment effort involves a cap placed over the leak that gathers the oil, allowing it to be siphoned up via a pipe to a container ship.

    It is a modified version of an effort tried earlier in BP’s six-week effort to stem the crude gushing from a ruptured underwater pipe after the Deepwater Horizon rig it leased exploded before sinking into the sea on April 22.

    The earlier attempt failed because cold temperatures and high pressure at the leak site, some 5,000 metres down, caused the oil to form a sludge that could not be siphoned.

    The cap has been redesigned with valves that can be slowly shut down to help prevent the buildup of gas hydrates – similar to ice crystals – that doomed the first attempt.

    “What they’re slowly doing is increasing production to the well bore and up to the ship,” Allen said.

    “They want to raise that up to the maximum extent possible on a daily rate basis, and then slowly start turning off those vents where the oil is coming out of right now when they’re sure they don’t have sea water coming in.”

    BP has said it will provide daily updates on how much oil is being captured by the containment device.

    Overnight, all was not smooth sailing with the oil collection. “The flow of oil and gas to the Enterprise was shut down for three hours overnight,” said Coast Guard spokesman First Class Petty Officer Zach Zubricki.

    News of any successful effort to contain the disastrous spill will be welcomed by the four states so far affected by what is now the worst environmental disaster in US history.

    Saturday, US President Barack Obama pledged in his weekly radio address to use “every resource” to help those affected.

    “We will continue to leverage every resource at our disposal to protect coastlines, to clean up the oil, to hold BP and other companies accountable for damages,” he said.

    An estimated 20 million gallons of crude has poured into the Gulf since the Deepwater Horizon sank April 22, 80 kilometres off Louisiana.

    Eleven workers were killed in the blast, and Obama will meet their families in a White House ceremony next week.

    The president said the spill had “upended whole communities,” and local residents were angry not just about lost income, but because of “the wrenching recognition that this time their lives may never be the same.”

    The scale of the disaster forced Obama to postpone a trip to Australia and Indonesia for the second time, as images of seabirds writhing in oil along the Louisiana coast blanketed US television networks and the front pages of newspapers, underscoring the rising environmental toll.

    Spreading in oily ribbons, the slick is now threatening Alabama, Mississippi and Florida after contaminating more than 200 kilometres of Louisiana coastline.

    Amid criticism over his handling of the crisis, BP chief executive Tony Hayward has announced the formation of a team to work with locals and officials in the aftermath of the cleanup.

    The team will be led by one of the oil giant’s managing directors, Bob Dudley, a US citizen, and was seen as a sign that the cleanup and looming legal battles will likely last for years.

    BP said Saturday it has paid out $US46 million ($A54.66 million) in more than 17,000 claims checks since the disaster began and expected to pay the same amount in June,

    “It’ll be 84 million plus… at least what it was in May if not more,” BP’s lead claims coordinator Darryl Willis told reporters in a conference call from Orange Beach, Alabama.

    BP has not set aside any budget for compensations, “we’ll do this until it’s finished… We’ll stay with it until people are able to return to their normal way of life on the Gulf Coast,” Willis added.

     

  • BP’s spill of oil in troubled waters

     

    Dr David Dixon

    Caythorpe, Lincolnshire

     

    • In arguing there can be no undersea oil clouds associated with the spill because “oil has a specific gravity that’s about half that of water. It wants to get to the surface” (BP clashes with scientists, 1 June), Tony Hayward, BP‘s chief executive, displays an alarming ignorance of the properties of his product. True, seawater has a specific gravity of about 1.03g/cubic cm whereas that of crude oil is about 0.8g/cubic cm (less than but not half that of water). But significant fractions of crude oil consist of asphaltenes and other complex substances with specific gravities around 1.4g/cubic cm, ie greater than seawater. These heavier fractions will almost certainly separate and so be retained at depth.

    Emeritus professor John Ebdon

    University of Sheffield

     

    • The BP spill has become an embarrassment, possibly damaging the British business community as a whole. I’m outraged that BP claims to be doing all it can, when, as a specialist company in natural cotton absorbents that not only absorb spillages of hydrocarbon, but also allow in-situ bioremediation when contamination reaches the shores, I know they are not. We approached BP four years ago. Our efforts and any attempts to follow up proved to be a waste of time, as we encountered only arrogance and lip service. We believe that BP is using polypropylene booms in the Gulf: polypropylene is an oil derivative. There are miles of cellulose booms available: why is BP ignoring the more natural approach? Worse: our HQ and manufacturing plant is located three hours’ drive from the contaminated areas.

    Antonella Cane

    Director, Wild Berry Environment

     

    • Gordon Brown agonised over what it meant to be British. Now, British Petroleum and British Airways have shown unambiguously what British stands for.

    Robert Wootton

    Llanbadarn Fawr, Dyfed

  • Don’t shore up minister’s seat: Greens

     

    ‘That’s because of the Greens but it’s unfair,’ Senator Brown told ABC Television on Sunday.

    ‘I would like to see some independent watch again on electorates because why should seats that aren’t marginal be left out of spending on playgrounds and bike ways and refurbishing of buildings?

    ‘And it oughtn’t be happening because the minister feels threatened.’

    Mr Tanner suffered a 5.7 per cent swing against him at the 2007 election, despite a nationwide swing towards Labor, as the Greens candidate Adam Brandt, an industrial lawyer, outpolled the Liberals.

    Labor could lose the seat to the Greens with a swing of less than five per cent against Mr Tanner.

    The Melbourne seat has not been held by a political party other than Labor since 1904.

    The electorate, held for three-decades by former federal Labor leader Arthur Calwell, includes the Melbourne city centre and the now gentrified suburbs of Carlton, Fitzroy and Richmond

  • Poll puts Rudd in trouble on home turf

     

    A poll shows the Federal Government is in electoral trouble in Prime Minister Keven Rudd’s home state of Queensland.

    The Galaxy poll published in the Courier Mail has the Coalition ahead of the Labor Party on a two-party-preferred basis of 52 to 48 per cent.

    The poll says 54 per cent of respondents are opposed to the Government’s proposed resources tax, while 37 per cent support it.

    The poll found 68 per cent of respondents say the Government has done a bad job explaining the tax.

    Mr Rudd and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott are neck-and-neck in the preferred prime minister stakes, with 44 per cent supporting Mr Abbott and 45 per cent supporting Mr Rudd.

    Support for the Greens has increased from 9 per cent to 13 per cent since the last poll in February.

    Tags: government-and-politics, elections, federal-government, labor-party, liberal-party, australia, qld

  • MPs desert the sinking ship that is labour

    MPs desert the sinking ship that is NSW Labor

     
    Kristina Keneally

    Can’t control the party chaos … Premier Kristina Keneally / Pic: Tomasz Machnik Source: The Daily Telegraph

    NSW minister resigns

     

    KRISTINA Keneally lost two ministers in the space of just six hours yesterday as her Government descended into full-blown crisis.

    Major Events Minister Ian Macdonald resigned from the frontbench after he misled parliament and the Premier regarding an overseas trip, part of which was a delayed honeymoon. The minister had taken leave, but the taxpayer footed some of the bill.

    And Juvenile Justice Minister Graham West stepped down yesterday after he failed to get funding for his portfolio – a slap in the face to the Premier as she marked six months in the job.

    Mr Macdonald had told the Premier and the Upper House that he had privately paid for a $2800 airfare to Dubai and Italy but the Opposition came forward with revelations the fare was taxpayer-funded.

    Mr Macdonald last night said he was quitting because he had become a “liability” for the Government amid a continuing campaign against him.

    Simon Benson’s blog

    The minister revealed the trip was his delayed honeymoon, but he had worked for several days in Italy while on leave.

    Ms Keneally said last night he had resigned because he had admitted to spending taxpayers funds on his trip to Dubai “without authorisation”.

    She said she was awaiting a report from the director-general of the Department of Premier and Cabinet, due next Wednesday, before she would reveal any details of the unauthor- ised spending.

    She also said she was “angry” at Mr Macdonald.

    Government sources said the inquiry was also looking at accommodation and dinners around the trip – and whether they may have been incorrectly claimed. The question was being asked as to whether dinners were “official” or involved “friends” the source said.

    A spokesman for Ms Keneally said the Premier’s office had received information on Wednesday “in relation to the minister’s trip that made allegations about a third party – not the minister”.

    “It was referred to ICAC that day by the office of the Premier,” the spokesman said.

    Mr Macdonald claimed last night that he had been hounded out of the job, including by sources within the Labor Party who had leaked details about him to the Opposition.

    He said he had made a mistake by declaring his $2800 airfare was paid for privately.

    He said he genuinely believed he had paid for it and also said he had worked for several days in Italy when he was on leave.

    “I just felt for the Government that it’s better that I get out of the way,” he said.

    He said Ms Keneally had never encouraged him to stand down and it was his own decision. “I think there’s no doubt some people have been aiding and abetting the Opposition and keeping up a consistent and incessant attack on me,” he said.

    Earlier yesterday, Mr West broke down during his speech in Parliament as he expressed frustration at being unable to achieve reforms he wanted.

    His resignation came six weeks after he lost a battle in the Cabinet budget committee to get an extra $400 million for his small juvenile justice portfolio for early intervention programs for youth. Sources said Mr West had been monstered at Cabinet budget committee meetings by Treasurer Eric Roozendaal and this had driven him out.

    He said he felt he could do more outside the world of “partisan politics” and would vacate his seat of Campbelltown at the March state election.

    He almost broke down again as he mentioned time he’d had away from his three children.

    “I want to stay involved in politics but not in the parliamentary system,” he said later.

    The resignations are badly timed for the Premier – less than a week before the budget.

    The Cabinet vacancies will be shared among current ministers. Paul McLeay will take on the forestry and mineral resources portfolio.

    Mr Roozendaal takes state and regional development and Kevin Greene major events, Barbara Perry juvenile justice and John Robertson is Minister for the Central Coast.