Author: admin

  • Advanced Anaerobic Digestion: More Gas from sewage Sludge

    April 27, 2009

    Advanced Anaerobic Digestion: More Gas from Sewage Sludge

    One UK water company is using Advanced Anaerobic Digestion in its wastewater treatment process to generate biogas and is using this in an on-site CHP unit.

    by Graham Neave

    Northumbria, UK [Renewable Energy World Magazine]

    At a time of heightened concerns about waste, climate change and the need for cleaner energy, it is worth pointing out that not all the news is bad. Technologies are redressing the balance — and one of these is Advanced Anaerobic Digestion (AAD).

     

    AAD will not turn muck into brass, or gold, but it does offer the potential to transform the sewage treatment process from a simple clean-up to one that recovers significant quantities of energy.

    In the Northumbrian Water region, in the north-east of England, there are more than 400 (437 to be exact) sewage treatment works that all produce varying amounts of sludge. This material has to be removed from every works but, inevitably, it is difficult to handle and, to say the least, rather smelly.

    To make this sludge stable to further degradation and (nearly) odour free, Northumbrian Water Ltd (NWL) has long employed anaerobic digestion techniques for about 10% of its total sludge.

    These technologies harness natural oxygen-free decomposition by which organic materials break down to produce biogas – roughly made up of 65% methane and 35% carbon dioxide – along with a much reduced residue of stabilized organic material. The latter can be safely deployed as fertilizer. In fact, by returning it to the soil in this way, nutrient and organic matter cycles that occur naturally are completed.

    In the last five years, however, technology has advanced significantly and a technique has been perfected that can do much more.

    Advanced Anaerobic Digestion significantly enhances the benefits of anaerobic digestion by separating and optimizing the key process stages used in more conventional digestion systems.

    A More Sophisticated Process

    There are two main pre-digestion processes used in AAD in the UK — thermal hydrolysis (the Cambi process) or enzymic hydrolysis (the Monsal process). Currently there are examples of each in operation and under construction.

    Regardless of which process is used, the key to the AAD process is a phase that significantly enhances the breakdown of organic materials by, for example, breaking down cell walls. With thermal hydrolysis this is achieved by an initial high temperature of 165°C combined with high pressure (6 Bar) for less than one hour, or with enzyme hydrolysis this is achieved by phasing an increased temperature from 42°C to 55°C over several days.

    The result is a far greater conversion of organic matter into biogas when the material is transferred into the anaerobic digestion phase. Following this digestion phase, there is a 50% reduction in sludge volumes, combined with the additional biogas/CHP- derived energy being produced, and ultimately a better quality bio-solids fertilizer.

    One of the major benefits of this, of course, is that energy from biomass, including sewage sludge, are classed as renewable and therefore contribute to meeting Britain’s international commitments to address climate change.

    But it does more than that too.

    Using AAD reduces the mass of material that is required to be transported off site and offers the benefit of nutrient recovery from materials that are presently wasted.

    Indeed, some particularly difficult materials, such as food wastes under the Animal By-products Order (ABPO), need the conditions of AAD to render them safe.

    One other benefit that is not to be sniffed at, AAD results in reduced odour.

    The digested sludge cake remaining after the process will be a Class A biosolid – a safe and low odour product containing no detectable levels of pathogens, such as E. coli, and may be used as a valuable agricultural fertilizer.

    A New Sludge Strategy

    With the obvious benefits AAD offers, NWL decided to invest in a complete new build AAD and CHP plant at its existing sludge treatment centre at Bran Sands on Teesside. The facility, on a 52 acre (21 ha) site, is the company’s largest, and treats sludge from Northumbrian Water sewage treatment works south of the river Tyne and in the Tees Valley.

    The existing process at Bran Sands has served NWL very well since it was brought online in 1998. It involves the use of a thermal drying plant which dries wet sludge to pellets that have been used both as an alternative fuel and as a fertilizer. The downside is that the plant uses a lot of energy. The introduction of AAD will instead use the sludge to create energy and will reduce more than 500,000 tonnes of sludge — from the treatment of domestic sewage and industrial effluent from a population equivalent of 1.9 million people — to about 60,000 tonnes.

    The methane produced in the process will be collected in 11 metre diameter biogas storage bags (similar to hot air balloons) before being used. The £33 million (US$50 million) contract to design, construct, install and commission the new facility was awarded to Aker Solutions E&C Ltd from Stockton in the Tees Valley.

    The new plant will generate 4.7 MWe from the four on-site CHP engines. The engine heat recovery system captures a further 2 MWth, which is used to minimize the use of natural gas for steam production for the thermal hydrolysis process.

    The process will also reduce Bran Sand’s reliance upon natural gas down to less than a tenth of previous requirements — from 17 MW to 1.4 MW.

    Aside from Jenbacher, key equipment suppliers include Cambi, and Eurograde (boilers).

    The energy recovered from the sewage sludge goes a long way towards making the entire wastewater treatment process energy self-sufficient, producing about half the requirements of the entire treatment works site at Bran Sands. This eliminates the need for large amounts of grid electricity and therefore has the dual benefits of cutting energy use and costs. Annually the advanced digestion facility has an annual output of 37 GWh, of which 22 GWh/year will be utilized to power the rest of the Bran Sands site. Financially, this equates to greater than £5 million ($7.5 million) in operational savings, which includes a renewable obligation certificate (ROC) contribution of £1.6 million ($2.4 million).

    At Bran Sands, the processes also maximizes the efficiency of the solids loading for the anaerobic digestion phase. The thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment process begins with a sludge cake, produced by squeezing sludge to reduce the water content, which therefore provided the opportunity to review NWL’s sludge transport policy. By transporting cake wherever possible this avoids the wasteful transportation of large amounts of water associated with liquid sludge tankering.

    These changes have resulted in a substantial reduction in the road miles associated with moving sludge.

    Changing to AAD from thermal drying at Bran Sands, along with a planned change from lime stabilization at another NWL plant at Howdon on Tyneside, will reduce CO2 emissions by 62,000 tonnes a year for the group.

    AAD has provided the company with a regional sludge management solution in line with their strategic direction statement, with the added benefit of a negligible odour impact on both the site and on the agricultural land when the residue produced is recycled for use as fertilizer.

    There are regulatory benefits to take into consideration as well. Recycling treated bio-solids to agriculture is considered the best practicable environmental option (BPEO) by both the UK and the EU. The process produces an enhanced treated product that improves the public perception of recycling at a time when doubts have been expressed in some quarters.

    The site is covered by Pollution Prevention and Control regulations (PPC), ensuring thorough monitoring of the total environmental impacts of the entire process and, when operational, the site will be registered with regulator Ofgem as a renewable electricity generation station.

    To achieve these benefits does, of course, requirement investment — some £33 million [US $50 million] in total for a construction programme whose principal contractor is Aker Solutions E&C Ltd. There are a further 30 subcontracting teams and a total workforce of over 200 people.

    Construction commenced in summer 2007, although the actual concept of introducing the new technology into Northumbrian Water began in 2005.

    Much of the site construction work is now complete, with equipment already in place. Some 10,000 tonnes of concrete have been poured, a full 100,000 metres of cabling laid, along with 4000 metres of pipe work. Commissioning of the plant will begin shortly with biogas production commencing this summer. The full process and business benefits are due to be realized by the autumn of this year.

    Construction of the new plant has involved the use of a very tight and complex scheme, which was only made possible through the integrated team approach of Northumbrian Water Ltd, the contractor and consultants working very closely together.

    The AAD Advantage

    The process that the Bran Sands AAD plant facilitates is not only environmentally friendly, it is economically attractive too. The plant approaching energy self-sufficiency not only reduces costs, it also shields the company from the impact of volatile and unpredictable energy prices. It further offers demonstrable operational cost savings and improves the efficiency of sludge management throughout the region.

    In addition to the ever-important cost benefits, there are also significant operational benefits. The new AAD process allows reduced maintenance compared to the existing process, which has been operating on a ‘business as usual’ basis while the plant is being constructed. It continues to allow the utilization of existing sludge assets where cost effectiveness has been demonstrated and the current sludge drying facilities will be retained at Bran Sands as a strategic contingency back-up.

    The final completion of the Bran Sands AAD plant (Teesside) is not the end of the process. NWL also plans to roll-out the sludge strategy to a second AAD centre at Howdon on Tyneside, see box panel on page 64.

    Looking still further ahead, and aware of the growing synergy between the water and waste industries in relation to these processes, the company is actively investigating the possibility of co-digestion — the simultaneous digestion of compatible wastes — to understand the technical, regulatory and market implications. It seems that the Bran Sands development proves the old Yorkshire adage that ‘where there’s muck, there’s brass’, more advanced processes are now proving that where there’s muck there’s gas, and that is a valuable resource.

    Graham Neave is a Northumbrian Water executive director and has overall responsibility for the Customer, Technical and Operations directorates.


    Sidebar: Future AAD roll-out plans

    Bran Sands is the first phase of Northumbrian Water’s AAD strategy. A second plant is already planned for Howdon, on Tyneside, subject to the usual regulatory approvals and planning consents.

    Like Bran Sands, Howdon offers the advantage that it can be built on an existing site while the current treatment process continues to operate.

    The two plants will also be all but identical when complete, utilizing many of the same design features and operating the same processes. The project therefore offers an unusual opportunity to take the design of the first and effectively drop it on to the second site as a package.

    The lab tests and trials have already been carried out on the equipment, giving confidence that the second plant will meet Northumbrian’s specifications. Considerable cost savings can also be reaped by using the specifications of the first in the second because of the synergies that this will provide for the company. The detail and operational management of the building site will also be all but identical. Furthermore, having gone through the process once, regulatory approvals will be eased.

    However, all parties — Northumbrian Water, the principal contractor and the various sub contractors — can learn from the implementation of the first to make the second more efficient.

    The relationship with the contractors during construction at Bran Sands has proved crucial and enhancing — and developing that relationship will be a key step in the Howdon project, with the building work planned for 2011–2013.

    The potential benefit of having both plants online to both Northumbrian Water and the Northumbrian region is clear. The end point will see the adoption of an entirely new sludge management strategy for the entire Northumbrian region. Energy will be recovered from sludge from all of the 400-plus sewage plants operated by the company.

    That sludge management strategy will also be one that is entirely energy self-sufficient and may even provide additional energy to off-set much of the power used in sewage treatment.

  • Anger at plans for nuclear power station to replace wind farm

    Anger at plans for nuclear power station to replace wind farm

    • Threatened site is one of the most efficient
    • Proposed atomic plant backed by government

     

    One of the oldest and most efficient wind farms in Britain is to be dismantled and replaced by a nuclear power station under plans drawn up by the German-owned power group RWE.

    The site at Kirksanton in Cumbria – home to the Haverigg turbines – has just been approved by the government for potential atomic newbuild in a move that has infuriated the wind power industry.

    Colin Palmer, founder of the Windcluster company, which owns part of the Haverigg wind farm, said he was horrified that such a plan could be considered at a time when Britain risks missing its green energy targets and after reassurance from ministers that nuclear and renewables were not incompatible.

    “My first reaction was disbelief, quickly followed by a sense of years of commitment to sustainable energy being destroyed,” Palmer said. “At a time when the government is calling for wind energy development to be accelerated, it beggars belief that they are supporting plans that will result in the destruction of existing capacity.”

    Palmer said he was angry that he was never consulted about the plan by RWE or anyone else before the site was put forward for official approval.

    “The first we heard was when the proposals were made public, which is contrary to the nomination requirements that stipulate early consultation with key stakeholders,” he said.

    The Haverigg site, on the fringes of the Lake District, was commissioned in 1992 and is believed to be one of only two of its type in this country.

    The scheme has been praised by Friends of the Lake District as a fine example of appropriate wind energy development and the turbines were financed by a pioneering group of ethical investors. The site was subsequently expanded to a total of eight turbines after £6m additional investment. Haverigg was still one of the most efficient wind farms with a 35% “capacity factor” – or efficiency – compared with an average of 30%, said Palmer.

    RWE confirmed last night that its plans to construct a nuclear plant at Kirksanton could lead to the destruction of the windfarm, but said that was by no means certain. “It is true there is an overlap and it could lead to some turbines needing to be moved or the whole site being used. But we would have to discuss that with the operator and landowner,” said a spokesman for RWE.

    “Its worth pointing out that we could build up to 3,600 megawatts of low or free CO2 power compared to the 3.5MW or so of wind power that we might replace. And it’s not a case or wind or nuclear. We ourselves are spending over £1bn on wind.”

    Triodos Renewables, the owner of three of the turbines on the same site, shares Windcluster’s concerns.

    Matthew Clayton, operations director of Triodos, said: “It’s staggering that they [ministers] don’t exclude areas that are already productive sites for renewable technologies as part of the initial screening process. It just isn’t very joined up. They’re stamping out prime wind sites with arguably a much less sustainable technology.”

    Martin Forwood, a spokesman for local environmental campaign group Cumbrians Opposed to a Radioactive Environment, said the RWE plans had been revealed at a Cumbria county council forum meeting. “It beggars belief that at a time when wind power has never been more vital to the UK, a viable windfarm is to be sacrificed on the altar of nuclear power.

    “It also exposes the duplicity of RWE, who have previously claimed that it was a myth that newbuild will detract from the construction of renewables,” he said.

    The British Wind Energy Association said the enormous speed with which nuclear plants appeared to be moving through the planning process – responsible for part of the anger around Haverigg – compared dramatically with all the problems being faced by dozens of windfarms. “We need a level playing field for all types of generation when it comes to planning regulation and government support,” said the association.

    How they compare

     
    Wind
    Nuclear
    Overall cost of generating electricity/KWh 5.42p 2.8p
    Cost of fuel per Mwh none 4
    Speed of build 5 years 8 years+
    Lifetime 15 years 50 years
    Waste produced none Several grades of radioactive substances, some that remain dangerous for thousands of years
    Lifetime carbon footprint (gC02 equivalent/KWh) 4.64g/5.25g (onshore/offshore) 5g
    Fans Environmental NGOs James Lovelock, UK government
    Opponents David Bellamy, CPRE Environmental NGOs

    • Sources: Vestas, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, BERR, Royal Academy of Engineering

  • Kevin Rudd set to soften stance on energy

    Kevin Rudd set to soften stance on energy

    Lenore Taylor, National correspondent | April 29, 2009

    Article from:  The Australian

    ENERGY-HUNGRY industries could be offered exemptions from the federal Government’s new 20 per cent renewable energy target, as Kevin Rudd struggles to win support for his climate change policies in the face of the global economic crisis.

    The Prime Minister will ask premiers to sign off on the further concessions for the industries at tomorrow’s Council of Australian Governments meeting in Hobart.

    The Government had foreshadowed an exemption for aluminium, which consumes about 15per cent of the nation’s electricity, but sources said it was now considering a broader partial exemption or compensation scheme that would cover other big electricity users such as pulp and paper, steel, cement and silicon.

    Major industries had complained about the “double whammy” from both the planned carbon pollution reduction scheme and the renewable energy target, which requires that electricity retailers and large users source 20 per cent of electricity supply from renewable sources by 2020.

    Some sources suggested the broader RET exemptions could soften industry resistance to the emissions trading law when its fate is decided in the Senate next month.

    Bluescope Steel chairman Graham Kraehe yesterday launched a bitter attack against the emissions trading scheme plan, saying it was “dangerous”, “flawed” and could lead to thousands of job losses.

    “It is very disappointing that the Government still appears stubbornly committed to its 2010 carbon pollution reduction scheme deadline, despite its obvious and serious flaws,” Mr Kraehe told a meeting of the Australian Institute of Company Directors in Brisbane.

    He said the Government was on the one hand injecting more than $50 billion into the economy to soften the downturn and on the other hand potentially destroying employment for thousands of workers with a carbon tax that would have a serious destabilising effect on industry and regional Australia.

    Climate Change Minister Penny Wong said clear domestic laws were crucial to the success of the UN climate change talks in Copenhagen in December to determine a successor agreement to the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.

    Speaking from Washington, where she is attending a meeting of ministers from major emitting nations as part of a process organised by US President Barack Obama to inject momentum into the Copenhagen negotiations, Senator Wong said: “The consistent message has been that international negotiations have to be underpinned by domestic actions.”

    A decision to exempt more electricity-hungry industries from the renewable energy target would anger environmentalists.

    The Australian Conservation Foundation, the ACTU, the Australian Council of Social Service and the Climate Institute think tank wrote to Kevin Rudd last week arguing against any exemptions from the target.

    The groups said they could see “no public policy justification for assistance to Australia’s most polluting industries under RET, particularly in the context of the generous, poorly targeted assistance to industry proposed in the CPRS.”

  • Conservation coalition debunks Coral Sea Hertitage Park Myths

    Marine

    Conservation coalition debunks Coral Sea Heritage Park myths

    Date: 29-Apr-2009

     CAIRNS: A coalition of conservation groups today debunked several myths about the proposed Coral Sea Heritage Park.

    “The proposed park is in a remote area that is visited by only the few anglers with the means to head out far into the open ocean,” said Mr Steve Ryan, Marine Campaigner, Cairns and Far North Environment Centre. “A small number of recreational fishers have been misleading in their claims about the proposal leading to the end of fishing along the coastline.  This is totally incorrect.”

    The proposal for a Coral Sea Heritage Park was publicly released last September. If declared, the Park would extend from the eastern boundary of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP) out to Australia’s maritime borders with Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands and New Caledonia.  The proposal calls on the Federal Government to protect this deep ocean area. 
     
    “Some misinformation about the Coral Sea Heritage Park proposal has unnecessarily caused concern in Cairns.  We believe that once people are better informed, they will see the potential locally for being the gateway to the world’s largest marine park,” said Ms Imogen Zethoven, Coral Sea Campaign Director, Pew Environment Group. 

    “The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has confirmed that fishing in the GBR Marine Park will continue as usual, regardless of what happens with the Coral Sea Heritage Park,” said Ms Amy Hankinson, National Liaison Officer, Australian Conservation Foundation.

    “This proposal is about honouring the natural, military and civic heritage values of Australia’s remote Coral Sea, where Australians fought heroically in a Battle that turned the tide of WWII in the Pacific and where precious marine wildlife now abounds,” said Ms Nicola Temple, Coral Sea Campaigner, Australian Marine Conservation Society.

    The groups – the Australian Conservation Foundation, Australian Marine Conservation Society, Queensland Conservation Council, the Pew Environment Group and Cairns and Far North Environment Centre – made the following clarifications about inaccuracies that have been aired in recent discussions about the park proposal:

    • Recreational fishing along the coastline and in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP) will not be affected at all by the proposed Coral Sea Heritage Park. It’s business as usual in the GBR Marine Park.
    • There is no link between the Coral Sea Heritage Park and the GBRMP zoning plan review which will occur sometime after 2011 (the Federal Environment Minister must decide the date).
    • Most charter fishing occurs inside the GBRMP, between Cairns and Lizard Island, along the Ribbon Reefs. Charter fishing inside the GBRMP will not be affected by the Coral Sea proposal.
    • The Coral Sea Heritage Park is totally compatible with, and will help secure, a vibrant tropical coast charter fishing industry operating in the GBRMP.
    • The Cairns economy will benefit from the Coral Sea Heritage Park as it will create new tourism opportunities and new jobs in Cairns. The proposal is good for Cairns.
    • Commercial fishing in the Coral Sea would cease under the proposal, which can only be good for game fishing in the GBRMP.

    “99.9 percent of the world’s oceans are open to fishing,” said Ms. Zethoven. “With our oceans under increasing pressure, governments need to set aside a few large areas that can be kept as safe havens for marine life so our children and their children can appreciate unspoilt places in the future.”

    The Australian Coral Sea Heritage Park initiative has the support of a broad range of agencies, non-governmental groups, and civic leaders including:

    • Vice Admiral (Rtd) David Shackleton AO (Chief of Navy 1999-2002)
    • Vice Admiral (Rtd) Chris Ritchie AO (Chief of Navy 2002-2005)
    • A group of six professors of marine science led by Professor Terry Hughes, Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, recent winner of the international Darwin Medal
    • Battle for Australia Commemoration National Council

    See below for resources.

  • Ministers split over Antarctic ice shelf claims

    Ministers split over Antarctic ice shelf claims

     Greg Roberts | April 29, 2009

    Article from:  The Australian

    A SPLIT over global warming has emerged in Kevin Rudd’s cabinet after it was revealed that a 13-month-old photograph was published this month to support the view that a catastrophic melting of Antarctic ice was imminent.

    Federal government sources said Climate Change Minister Penny Wong was disappointed with the way her ministerial colleague, Peter Garrett, weighed into the debate about global warming, claiming sea levels could rise by 6m as a result of melting in Antarctica. Senator Wong yesterday pointedly refused to indicate whether she supported Mr Garrett’s view.

    “The impacts of climate change are being seen in many ways, from sea level rise through to extreme weather events,” Senator Wong said yesterday.

    “Climate change is a clear and present danger to our world that demands immediate attention.”

    Senator Wong declined to nominate potential levels to which seas could rise.

    At a time when the Rudd Government is battling to salvage its emissions trading scheme, some of Mr Garrett’s Labor colleagues were annoyed the Environment Minister used his responsibility for Australia’s Antarctic territory to weigh into the climate change debate with exaggerated claims.

    Mr Garrett claimed the break-up of the Wilkins ice shelf in West Antarctica indicated sea level rises of 6m were possible by the end of the century, and that ice was melting across the continent.

    The Environment Minister later sought to distance himself from his comments.

    A study released last week by the British Antarctic Survey concluded that sea ice around Antarctica had been increasing at a rate of 100,000sqkm a decade since the 1970s.

    While the Antarctic Peninsula, which includes the Wilkins ice shelf and other parts of West Antarctica were experiencing warmer temperatures, ice had expanded in East Antarctica, which is four times the size of West Antarctica.

    British newspaper The Observer this month published prominently a story with a photograph of breaks in the Wilkins shelf.

    “A huge ice shelf in the Antarctic is in the last stages of collapse and could break up within days in the latest sign of how global warming is thought to be changing the face of the planet,” the story began.

    In March last year, US news agency msn published the same photograph with a similar story that began: “A vast ice shelf hanging on by a thin strip looks to be the next chunk to break off from the Antarctic Peninsula, the latest sign of global warming’s impact on Earth’s southernmost continent.” The photograph was published by numerous other outlets, including The Australian.

    A spokeswoman for the British Antarctic Survey said the photograph in both stories was taken in March last year.

    Nationals Senate leader Barnaby Joyce said the misuse of the photograph and the similar story lines 13 months apart reflected how the Wilkins ice shelf break-up was being recycled annually to fuel global warming concerns.

    Senator Joyce said Mr Garrett’s entry into the debate demonstrated how it was being hijacked by misinformation.

    “We are on the edge of a possible pandemic that could cause untold misery and people are running around tilting at windmills,” he said.

    Opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt said Senator Wong should distance herself from Mr Garrett’s comments.

    Mr Garrett was defended by Australian Conservation Foundation director Don Henry.

    “The minister is right to raise concerns that melting of our ice caps could lead to that kind of sea level rise,” he said.

  • The Generator at EcoForum

    The Generator is at EcoForum in Sydney this week. Watch this space for a series of interviews with the exhibitors and speakers at that conference.