Author: admin

  • Farmers lobby loses farmers by wooing multinationals

    The National Farmers Federation is proceeding with plans to make international agribusiness companies paid up members of the lobby group. The invitation to the national conference in Brisbane this June, overtly invites representatives of agribusiness to attend, subtly reminding working farmers of the plan mooted last October to allow agribusinesses to be affiliate members with 40 percent voting rights. The South Australian and West Australian farmers federations have left the national body and raised concerns about the conflict of interest between farmers and international corporations.

    Check the program and invitation

    Check out other news on the move

  • Labor government wastes billions on geosequestration

    Calculations on Coal to Carbon Dioxide

    From the Minister’s office

    With historic global economic growth accompanied by an insatiable thirst for energy, coal and fossil fuels will continue to provide a significant proportion of the world’s energy for the foreseeable future.

    It is worth noting that Australia’s coal resources alone, assuming the advent of successful clean coal technologies, are so large that they could be significant in the global energy mix for several hundred years.

    I hope this project will encourage community acceptance of CCS and its potential role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    While the Otway Basin Project will demonstrate the carbon storage aspect of CCS, the Australian Government is also supporting projects to demonstrate post combustion capture at coal-fired power stations.

    These projects form part of our National Clean Coal Initiative.

    This initiative will be underpinned by a $500 million Clean Coal Fund.

    Together with $1 billion from the coal industry through COAL21, the fund will support total investment of $1.5 billion in the development and deployment of clean coal technologies. 

    From the CO2 Cooperative Research Centre’s newsletter

    Monitoring at the CO2CRC Otway Project, Australia’s first demonstration of geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2), has confirmed that the CO2 injected two kilometres below the surface is behaving as predicted.
    Instruments at the Naylor-1 monitoring well, 300 metres from the injection site, have detected minute amounts of tracer gases with elevated CO2 content, confirming that
    the CO2 is moving through the depleted underground gas reservoir at the rate and in the direction that researchers predicted using computer modelling.

    The decommissioned Naylor-1 well was equipped with downhole sensors to monitor the injected carbon dioxide and confirm its arrival in the reservoir. Regular sampling using specially designed equipment has been underway since injection began.

    CO2CRC Otway Project manager Sandeep Sharma says that the work put into the extensive monitoring program is now paying off.

    “Monitoring and verification of the CO2 storage is a major part of the Otway Project,” he said. “It helps us demonstrate that CO2 can be stored safely and securely under Australian
    conditions.

    “The data from the monitoring well is also helping calibrate our computer modelling, ensuring that our monitoring tools are some of the most accurate in the world.”

    The monitoring and verification program also includes regular sampling of soil, air and groundwater for CO2 content and has found no evidence of higher levels of CO2.

     

  • MIT predicts at least two degree rise

    This is the article about the No Policy roulette wheel from MIT depicting the likely temperature rises under a lack of major policy agreement at Copenhagen this year.

    No-Policy Case

    The “roulette” wheel below depicts the MIT Joint Program’s estimation of the range of probability of potential global warming over the next hundred years, assuming a scenario in which “no policy” action is taken to try to curb the global emissions of greenhouse gases.

    The face of the wheel is divided into six slices, with the size of each slice representing the estimated probability of the temperature change in the year 2100 falling within that range.

    The size of the slice for greater than 7 degrees Celsius warming (shown in red) has a probability of 9%. Or, if stated in another way, that probability has the same likelihood as the “odds” of (about) 1 chance in 11. The slice representing the smallest predicted change, less than 3°C (shown in blue), has a probability of less than 1% (1 in 100 odds).

    The median value, that level where there is a 50% chance of falling above or below (even odds) is 5.1°C. The other areas of the wheel have likelihoods of occurring: 3 to 4°C, 12% (about 1 in 8); 4 to 5°C, 30% (almost 1 in 3 odds); 5 to 6 °C, 33% (1 in 3 odds); 6 to 7 °C, 15% (about 1 in 7 odds).

    For more technical detail see Sokolov et al., 2009.

  • Toaster testers caught red handed

    Mullumbimby, Tuesday

    Red handed, guysThe Toaster Tester gang was apprehended yesterday with an appliance appropriated from Power and Air Tools.

    Owner of the kidnapped and abused kitchen-ware, Jane Thomson, told The Generator that the high quality Dualit toaster had been sent for repairs, but when the repair shop changed hands she lost track of the item. “It was a wedding present from me Mum,” she sobbed into her Pinot Grigot.

    Malcolm McKenzie is the outgoing owner of the company at the centre of the kerfuffle, Power and Air Tools.

    “I innocently gave the toaster to Giovanni Ebono, expecting it to be returned,” he said, “to its owner.”

    Evidence leaked to The Generator by officials investigating the incident, however, put McKenzie at the centre of the scandal. A photograph shows him, with Ebono, gloating over the toaster. Both men have greasy smiles and toast crumbs on their shirts, according to a forensic expert who viewed the photographs.

    Ebono was unavailable for comment but is believed to be pleased with the performance of the purloined appliance and enjoying his orange marmalade in the mornings. “I suspect the theft adds extra zest,” a source close to the gang leader said.

    Further analysis by Steve Posselt

    Our man in Alstonville, Steve Posselt, has followed the case with interest.

    Although I am no detective, it would seem to me that the trail of
    crumbs would have been easy to follow.

    Of greater concern is the jumper that
    Ebono is wearing in the photograph. Did he steal that from the unfortunate Jane
    Thomson at the same time? Is cross dressing part of the villain’s plan
    to confuse the evidence trail? Beware the man with the toothy smile and the
    fluffy ladies’ top. How will he get the marmalade out of the mo hair?

     

     

  • Monbiot burns char cheersquad

    Well that got ’em going. So far James Lovelock, Jim Hansen and Pushker Kharecha, Chris Goodall and Peter Read have all responded in the Guardian to my column on biochar.

    Reading their responses, I realise that it was unfair of me to include James Lovelock and Jim Hansen on the list of those who have been suckered by the charleaders. Their position is more nuanced than I made out. Chris Goodall, to his credit, has accepted that he was too bullish about the technology. The points he makes in its defence seem fair and well-reasoned.

    On the other hand, I wasn’t harsh enough about Peter Read. In his response column today he uses the kind of development rhetoric that I thought had died out with the Indonesian transmigration programme.

    To him, people and land appear to be as fungible as counters in a board game. He makes the extraordinary assertion that “degraded land” – which he wants to cover with plantations – is uninhabited by subsistence farmers, pastoralists or hunters and gatherers. That must be news to all the subsistence farmers, pastoralists and hunters and gatherers I’ve met in such places. Then he repeats the ancient canard that, by denying such people the opportunity to have their land turned into a eucalyptus plantation/hydroelectric dam/opencast mine/nuclear test site/re-education camp or whatever project the latest swivel-eyed ideologue is trying to promote, we are keeping them in poverty.

    Has he learnt nothing from the past 40 years of development studies? Does he not understand that development is something that people must choose, not something that can be imposed on them from on high by megalomaniacs?

    As for the “unused potential arable land” he wants to use, that could apply to most of the surface of the planet that possesses a soil layer: rainforest, wetland, savannah – you name it. From my office window I can see a perfect candidate for his attentions: the brakes and thickets of the Cambrian Mountains. I can also see the kind of crop with which Read would cover them: the sitka spruce plantations that blight the lives of everyone who loves the countryside here. Yes this land is degraded, overgrazed and poorly managed. But is there anyone who would prefer that it was all converted to plantations?

    But at least a debate is taking place. This technology has gone largely unchallenged by environmentalists for far too long, fooled perhaps by Read’s cunning rebranding of charcoal as biochar, on the grounds – wait for it – that this stuff is “finely divided”. By all means, as Hansen and Kharecha recommend, let’s use genuine waste – whether from crops, forestry, sewage or food – to make biochar. But let’s stop the charleaders from pyrolising the planet in the name of saving it.

    monbiot.com

  • Depleted soils and food additves are killing us

    When Bathurst doctor Carole Hungerford graduated in the late 1960s, breast cancer was late-life disease diagnosed in about one in fifteen women.

    “Now the surgeons are saying it’s one in eight, perhaps one in seven,” Dr Hungerford said.

    “And a lot of it is the young person’s cancer, the aggressive one.

    “We didn’t even look for it 40 years ago.”

    What’s happened? According to the author of Good Health in the 21st Century, we’ve stuffed up.

    “Nature didn’t stuff up, we stuffed up. Modern humans have been on the planet for 200,000 years, and in the last few decades have we thrown out a lot of challenges to the body,” she said.

    “We’ve started putting chlorine in the drinking water, sulfates in the wine, additives in the food … people don’t know where they are getting their headache from because they are reacting to everything.”

    At the same time, Dr Hungerford says, people are getting less nutrient from their food.

    “Some of us are eating good food grown in bad soils, or good food that is not fresh. More of us are eating bad food that is neither fresh nor grown in good soils.”

    For many people, the result is an immune system compromised on one hand by lack of resources to do its job, and on the other by a raft of environmental challenges that the human body has never before encountered.

    According to Dr Hungerford, a host of modern diseases have their roots in this situation: cancer, arthritis, asthma, autism, Alzheimers, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease, to name a few.

    Teasing out what is behind these diseases, which are swallowing the health budgets of Western nations whole, has been a long obsession for Dr Hungerford.

    It culminated in her 2006 book—among other things, a short course in human biochemistry—which swelled the waiting list at her practices in Bathurst and Balmain out to three months and more.

    Health is complicated, something that changes from individual to individual, but after years of research and medical practice, Dr Hungerford has come to believe health starts in the soil.

    “I think if we were all eating organic foods growing in pristine volcanic soils, and we didn’t process that food—so if we ate rice we ate brown rice, and if we ate wheat we ate whole wheat—I think we’d conservatively slash our health budget by 70 per cent,” she said.

    This may be a logistical impossibility, particularly in Australia and its old, depeleted soils, but Dr Hungerford feels that farming practices, and food processing, need to develop practices that better acknowledge the vital health component of food.

    In the meantime, she believes that “most, if not all of us” needs to supplement their diet with key minerals like zinc, selenium, calcium and magnesium.

    That’s not a common view in the medical profession, which Dr Hungerford believes is one of the reasons that health services everywhere are foundering against a tide of ill-health.

    In focusing on “the disease model” and the science of curing disease, Western medicine and related policy has neglected the science of prevention.

    “In America, one per cent of the cancer research budget goes into prevention; 99pc goes into other areas—early detection, and looking for the magic bullet. Or it goes into support groups,” she said.

    “That’s all supported by the medical profession. We cure disease. Where’s the excitement in prevention?

    “Even Medicare isn’t funded for prevention. If you come and see me and say, ‘Look, I feel terrific, and I want to stay that way, can you advise me how to do that?’—that’s not covered under Medicare.”

    In her book, she eloquently argues that prevention of disease begins with soils capable of growing nutrient-dense food; with food supply chains that nuture that nutrient through to consumers; with consumers willing to eat a balanced, healthy diet; and with a general willingness to stop fouling the environment with toxins that are making many of us sick.

    “I think it’s an idea whose time has come,” Dr Hungerford says.

    “Once your mother and your sister and your best friend’s wife have all got breast cancer, young, you start to think what’s happening—what’s gone wrong?”

    In her experience, a lot has gone wrong, and is still doing so.

    Signs that this is the case recur every time she does an interview: afterwards, the desk staff at her medical practises deal with a barrage of phone calls, explaining to desperate people that her waiting list already stretches months ahead.

    “I don’t need any more patients, but it’s a message that needs to be told,” Dr Hungerford says.