Author: admin

  • Greenhouse gases up three percent per annum

    That’s an amount that exceeds the most dire outlook for emissions from burning coal and oil and related activities as projected by a Nobel Prize-winning group of international scientists in 2007.

    Meanwhile, forests and oceans, which suck up carbon dioxide, are doing so at lower rates than in the 20th century, scientists said. If those trends continue, it puts the world on track for the highest predicted rises in temperature and sea level.

    The pollution leader was China, followed by the United States, which past data show is the leader in emissions per person in carbon dioxide output. And while several developed countries slightly cut their CO2 output in 2007, the United States churned out more.

    Still, it was large increases in China, India and other developing countries that spurred the growth of carbon dioxide pollution to a record high of 9.34 billion tons of carbon (8.47 billion metric tons). Figures released by science agencies in the United States, Great Britain and Australia show that China’s added emissions accounted for more than half of the worldwide increase. China passed the United States as the No. 1 carbon dioxide polluter in 2006.

    Emissions in the United States rose nearly 2 per cent in 2007, after declining the previous year. The U.S. produced 1.75 billion tons of carbon (1.58 billion metric tons).

    “Things are happening very, very fast,” said Corinne Le Quere, professor of environmental sciences at the University of East Anglia and the British Antarctic Survey. “It’s scary.”

    Gregg Marland, a senior staff scientist at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory, said he was surprised at the results because he thought world emissions would drop because of the economic downturn. That didn’t happen.

    “If we’re going to do something (about reducing emissions), it’s got to be different than what we’re doing,” he said.

    China the trendsetter

    The emissions are based on data from oil giant BP PLC, which show that China has become the major driver of world trends. China emitted 2 billion tons of carbon (1.8 billion metric tons) last year, up 7.5 per cent from the previous year.

    “We’re shipping jobs offshore from the U.S., but we’re also shipping carbon dioxide emissions with them,” Marland said. “China is making fertilizer and cement and steel and all of those are heavy energy-intensive industries.”

    Developing countries not asked to reduce greenhouse gases by the 1997 Kyoto treaty — and China and India are among them — now account for 53 percent of carbon dioxide pollution. That group of nations surpassed industrialized ones in carbon dioxide emissions in 2005, a new analysis of older figures shows.

    India is in position to beat Russia for the No. 3 carbon dioxide polluter behind the United States, Marland said. Indonesia levels are increasing rapidly.

    Denmark’s emissions dropped 8 percent. The United Kingdom and Germany reduced carbon dioxide pollution by 3 percent, while France and Australia cut it by 2 per cent.

    Nature can’t keep up with the carbon dioxide from man, Le Quere said. She said from 1955 to 2000, the forests and oceans absorbed about 57 per cent of the excess carbon dioxide, but now it’s 54 per cent.

    What is “kind of scary” is that the worldwide emissions growth is beyond the highest growth in fossil fuel predicted just two years ago by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said Ben Santer, an atmospheric scientist at the Lawrence Livermore National Lab.

    Under the panel’s scenario then, temperatures would increase by somewhere between 4 and 11 degrees Fahrenheit (2.4 to 6.3 degrees Celsius) by the year 2100.

    If this trend continues for the century, “you’d have to be luckier than hell for it just to be bad, as opposed to catastrophic,” said Stanford University climate scientist Stephen Schneider.

  • The damned dam debate is back

    Known only to live on two rivers in Queensland, the lungfish has survived for millions of years but its existence is now threatened by the Traveston Crossing dam proposed for the Mary River. Posselt is appalled that his water engineering colleagues consider it more important to pump clean drinking water to Brisbane so people can wash their cars and water their lawns with it, than protecting the last breeding grounds of this living fossil.

    Because of his background, people listen. This is someone who has spent their lives planning dams and pipelines; Steve talks the lingo of the professional town planner.

    This interstate journey is not the first time the fifty something activist has taken up the paddle to draw attention to the plight of a river. In May 2007 he set off from Brisbane in his amphibious kayak and headed up the Brisbane River, over the Great Divide and down the Darling and Murray Rivers to South Australia. After paddling 2,200 kilometers and dragging the kayak for another thousand he became more convinced than ever that we have no idea what we are doing when it comes to water management and, worse still, have learned almost nothing from our mistakes.

    We consider crayfish stupid because they never learn to avoid the craypot, no matter how often they’re caught. For all our mental superiority, we appear to be as stupid.

    Last October, the people of Tyalgum protested in the streets of Murwillumbah about the proposed damming of the Oxley River. Jeering motorists that day echoed Max Boyd at the Mur’bah Civic Centre a fortnight earlier, “Put people on level 5 water restrictions and they’ll demand a dam. You just can’t get around the fact that people need water.”

    The crayfish cannot resist the scent of the bait.

    I asked Steve Posselt the same question I put to Max a year ago. Why can’t we reduce demand by capturing the water that falls on our rooves, and recycling the water we do use?

    Max believes this is idealistic nonsense. Steve believes that it’s not only possible, it’s absolutely necessary. There’s simply not enough water flowing in the rivers to fill the dams that we have now, let alone any new ones that people are proposing. All over Australia, existing dams are at their lowest levels in decades. New dams cannot produce extra water.

    Steve believes the problem is the attitude that we can take resources from one place, use what we need and throw the rest away. Unless we learn to live in harmony with nature we are doomed, he said.

    When engineers sprout green philosophy and sitting politicians defect to the Greens there is a seismic shift afoot. Watch this space.

    Steve’s website, kayak4earth.com, contains more details about his journeys and the lungfish of the Mary River.

    You can hear Giovanni on Bay FM 99.9 this morning from 9 until 11.

  • Grandparents are great for the earth

    Last week’s news that grandparents are good for children’s early development will come as no surprise to parents or, indeed, grandparents themselves. If babies bothered to read the newspaper, they’d chortle in agreement too.

    The role of grandparents as childminders is hardly new. Extended families have been the norm in most societies across most of the planet for most of human history. It is the nuclear family iolated in the suburbs that is peculiarly modern.

    Grandparents are coming back as families shrink. China’s one child policy has resulted in family setups known as the 4-2-1s. Four grandparents and two parents all focus on one child, often spoiling s/him rotten in the process.

    In southern Europe, 85 per cent of people live within five kilometres of where they were born and machismo has been replaced by mamismo as increasing numbers of thirty-something males remain at home so mum can continue to cook and wash for them.

    Australia’s ongoing obsession with the suburban dream, personal space and instant satisfaction mean we still consider it normal to exclude our parents from our lives, often condemning them to battery farming for their pension cheques.

    Inclusion them in the extended family is not only good for babies but the elderly as well. As Beryl King of Coraki said in this journal last Thursday, “I’d be lonely without them all.”

    The extended family is not just good for us, it is also good for future generations.

    Building a house for every couple and supplying that house with its own laundry, garage, lawnmower, clothes dryer, refrigerator (you can complete your own list) steals resources from your grandchildren because we used them once and throw them away. We burn irreplaceable fossil fuel driving from house to house because staying home alone is too lonely. As it vanishes, literally, in a puff of carbon dioxide it causes extra problems that we can only speculate on.

    The granny flat is almost a caricature of a community but is better than nothing, even though the housing crisis means they are overpriced and under maintained.

    As we move into an era of severely limited economic growth, the generation that survived the depression can teach us all a thing or two even if we are toilet trained and can speak for ourselves. Bring on the grey power and lets remember to learn from the past.

    Giovanni is the founder of the Ebono Institute and radio show The Generator

  • Cameras herald a brave new organism

    Kingscliff business owner Kelly Craig was quoted in these pages last week seeking the protection of closed circuit television cameras. In contrast to the burghers of Nimbin, most business owners on the Tweed Coast seem to feel the same way.

    We hope that a watchful eye will keep things under control.

    Be careful what you wish for. We are building a world where everything we do in public is visible to anyone in the world.

    In the four decades since Andy Warhol said, “In the future everyone will be famous for fifteen minutes” digital cameras, reality television and online social networks have rendered this almost true. The difference is that we are visible rather than famous.

    There are now more images of us being captured than it is possible to watch. Central London has over one million closed circuit television cameras, 10,000 of them owned and operated by local councils. The presence of these cameras has almost no impact on the rate of solving crimes, partly because there is no way that anyone can afford to pay staff to watch the millions of images being captured. As a result, a flourishing industry in image-recognition-software has developed so that computers can detect unusual and suspicious activity.

    We are creating a vast, digital nervous system that watches us for our own good.

    This mimics the commercial network that traces every cent we spend and the communications network that pinpoints our location every time we use a mobile phone.

    Visiting a precomputer India twenty years ago, I was amazed at the amount of paperwork required to book a hotel room or train ticket or to exchange foreign currency. As a commentator on computer systems at the time, I inevitably compared the Indian paper-based system to the automation that was delivering vast profits to modern corporations. In a practical sense, the major difference between the two systems is that the automated one employs less humans and is therefore cheaper.

    What automation enables, though, is the ability to add layer upon layer to the system. For example, the systems have already been developed to replace printed barcodes with microchips that can be read from a distance. Using these ‘active’ product ids, every item of clothing you wear and everything in your pockets can be identified as you walk through the mall. Advertisers are salivating at the opportunity to sell you items based on what you already own.

    As this “intelligent” nervous system develops, individual humans will be reduced to cells in a much larger organism, an organism designed to maximise profits, not empower or protect individuals. This is not wild speculation or alarmist semantics, it is the stated purpose of these inventions.

    If you already feel trapped on a treadmill that funnels wealth and power into someone else’s hands, you are far from mistaken you have simply awakened. To revive another sixties phrase, “Do not adjust your set, reality is at fault.”

    There are two ways to look at this.

    You can, like the people of Nimbin, decide this is not the future for you. Or, you can rejoice in the brilliance of the brave new world that globalisation delivers and accept the loss of individuality as an inevitable consequence.

    Just don’t delude yourself that you are in control.

    Giovanni is the founder of the Ebono Institute. www.ebono.org

    and then as it became true

  • Google and GE outline plans for smart grid

    The two executives gave few details of their planned collaboration. In an interview after their presentation, Dan Reicher, director of climate change and energy initiatives at Google.org, an operating unit of Google, said the effort was in its planning stages and did not have a set budget.

    “All this talk about renewable energy will not be realized if we do not build substantial additional transmission capacity,” Mr. Reicher said.

    Without additional capacity, Mr. Reicher said, it would not be possible, for example, to get power from a solar plant in the Mojave Desert to Los Angeles, or from a wind farm in the Dakotas to Chicago. Mr. Reicher said that environmental standards, overlapping state and federal regulations and other policy issues were among the biggest impediments to building additional transmission capacity.

    Google and G.E. are also discussing how to combine their respective software and hardware expertise to enable technologies like plug-in hybrids on a large scale and to accelerate the development of geothermal energy.

    For Google, the partnership with G.E. is part of larger set of energy initiatives, including direct investments in green technology to help develop renewable energy that is cheaper to produce than coal-generated power. For its part, G.E. has made a large bet on green energy technologies, an initiative the company calls Ecomagination.

  • US buyers seek Aussie ingeneuity

    Landholders are expected to look over the more than 700 exhibitors for new machinery, information, networking or as a break from the stress of farming.

    But it was a delegation of rural machinery buyers from the US which stirred the most dust at the field days scouring for new and innovative implements and machines for export.

    Australian Trade Commission Kansas City district manager, Randall Tosh, said Australian products had always been a stand out, leading innovation in sectors including irrigation and water use.

    “The US market is very competitive and we’re getting offers from lots of countries for machinery,” he said.

    “The US market has seen it all so we need to stand out in some way by finding the best and most innovative of the industry.”