Author: admin

  • Banning bad-biofuels good news for renewables

    From the World Watch Institute  

    Casual observers might consider it a setback for proponents of ethanol and biodiesel now that Europe is planning to ban biofuels made from crops grown on high-value conservation lands. But the truth is, shunning biofuels produced on wetlands, grasslands, and deforested land is good for both critics and supporters. Overall, it’s even good for the biofuel industry because it might restore some faith in their product, which has been attacked from all corners in recent months. The main problem with Europe’s new law, in fact, may be that it is not stringent enough.

    A ban on some biofuels is good because there’s a natural tendency to take advantage of a bull market. As with any crop, when demand grows, farmers will expand production onto new territory, whether it’s the sloping, erosion-prone “back forty,” a parcel of nearby forest, or a patch of wetlands. The rising demand for grains and oilseeds for food, livestock feed, and now biofuels is encouraging farmers across the world to expand their cropland as much as the law and the market tolerate.

    In South America, soybean farmers and ranchers are encroaching on the Amazon, and palm oil plantations are continuing an alarming expansion across large swaths of virgin forests and peatlands in Southeast Asia. There are double benefits for local actors to clear forested land now, because the timber is valuable and so is the new cropland. Even though much of the logging and land conversion is done illegally, governments seldom have enough enforcement muscle to stop such profitable businesses.

    But it’s not just about the growers. Consumers are probably the most important part of today’s raging biofuels market. People are interested in biofuels because they want to do something good for the planet—and if they realize that some of these fuels are linked to alarming social and environmental practices, the demand will dry up as they stop buying biofuel blends at the pump and pressure their governments to reverse biofuel mandates.

    The only way forward for the market is to keep working on sustainability standards and accurate life-cycle measurements of the greenhouse gas impacts of a given biofuel. Like jeans and sports shoes, each gallon of fuel needs a tag that promises it was not produced in the equivalent of a biofuels sweatshop. Without regulation and transparency from field to tank, the industry simply cannot live up to its promise of a cleaner, better future.

    The benefits of biofuels can be many: reducing dependence on oil, keeping money and jobs in the local economy, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants, to name a few. But not all biofuels are created equal, and their benefits in fact vary wildly depending on the feedstock, how it is grown and harvested, where it is grown, and how it is processed.

    Making ethanol from corn doused with chemical fertilizers is much less efficient than making it from corn grown in a no-till rotation and fertilized organically with a cover crop. In the United States, biodiesel produced from soybeans grown locally is much more efficient and climate friendly than corn ethanol, and more so if the beans are grown in a no-till system.

    Meanwhile, ethanol from sugar cane grown in Brazil has far higher energy and climate benefits on average than either of these two options. But if the sugar cane is grown on a converted grassland, irrigated heavily, or treated with lots of inorganic fertilizer and pesticides, it starts losing its environmental benefits. Worse, if it is grown on a plantation where the laborers work in terrible conditions for a pittance, its social benefits leak away too.

    Next-generation biofuel crops that can be produced with little water or fertilizer on dry or easily erodable soils, and that actually improve degraded soils, may have far superior benefits to even the best sugarcane ethanol. But if these second-generation fuels—derived mainly from quick-growing grasses and trees—are not produced with the goal of maximizing social and environmental benefits, they will have no more value than the dirtiest corn ethanol.

    If the biofuels market (and related laws) recognize these differences, there will be an incentive to produce better biofuels. If not, then there’s no reason for a producer not to convert more land and throw more chemicals and water at the crop to make it grow, even on totally unsuitable land. The more guidance growers and importers have, and the more they know that someone is paying attention to their growing practices, the less environmental and social abuse there will be. These rules are pretty much universal, and don’t just apply to biofuels—but also to clothes, electronics, toys, and perhaps most interestingly, your food.

    Bioenergy expert Dr. Jeremy Woods of London’s Imperial College noted recently that less than 1 percent of the market for palm oil is for biodiesel (while 99 percent is produced for food, cosmetics, and industrial uses). So a ban on palm oil for fuel alone is not going to stop deforestation. The good news is, you can check out the ingredients of the products you buy and put down that tub of margarine, package of cookies, candy bar, or bottle of shampoo if you see forest-unfriendly contents like palm oil inside.

    This story was produced by Eye on Earth, a joint project of the Worldwatch Institute and the blue moon fund.

  • Plug pulled on Howard’s water plan

    Matthew Warren, The Australian

    JOHN Howard’s $10 billion national water plan will be scrapped and replaced with a more aggressive redistribution of the resource, under a radical reform blueprint released yesterday.

    Under the plan to drought-proof the Murray-Darling basin by leading water economist Mike Young, the 10-year Howard plan to hand out nearly $6 billion to irrigators for efficiency improvements would be scrapped.

    Instead, $5 billion of this would be spent during the first term of the Rudd Government to compensate the 15,500 irrigators in the basin for the permanent restructuring, and in most cases cutting of their permanent water entitlements.

    About $1 billion would be spent on efficiency upgrades but only after the reallocation of water to deliver equal property rights to irrigators, the environment and all other direct and indirect users of water in the system.

    The new plan includes the water being diverted from the system for managed investment scheme (MIS) forests and other related activities, and will formalise trading in the resource between different states and catchments.

    Professor Young and his co-author, Jim McColl from the CSIRO, have been working on the plan since the election lastyear.

  • Rail travel in Europe grows by a third

    The head of Eurostar, the high-speed rail service linking London to Paris and Brussels, said Friday that climate change worries helped make 2007 a banner year and urged the EU to rein in the "unsustainable" growth of airline carbon emissions.

    "We see a 30 percent growth in the number of business travelers on the Eurostar in the last two years," Richard Brown, Eurostar’s chief executive, told a climate change conference of European business leaders.

    "A significant part of that growth comes from companies wishing to switch to greener modes of transport," added Brown.

    He predicted Europe’s 5,000 kilometers (3,100 miles) of high-speed track will double in size by 2018 under pressure of climate change concerns.

    In 2007, Eurostar carried a record 8.26 million travelers, up 5.1 percent with sales of business tickets surging because of concerns of companies about the carbon footprint of their traveling employees.

    Brown urged the European Union to rein in emissions of airlines.

    "Aviation emissions have risen 90 percent in the last 14 years and are projected to double again over the next 10 to 15 years," said Brown. "That is not sustainable growth."

    Europe’s aviation sector objects to a plan that would force airlines into the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme buying and selling credits to offset the environmental damage they cause.

    "We believe it is essential that (road and air transport) is included" in the cap-and-trade program. "I don’t see quite enough urgency or priority being given to carbon impact" by the EU, added Brown.

  • Indian solar ready to shine

    by Anupam Tyagi, Renewable Energy World

    At the moment India has an installed capacity of only about 3 megawatts (MW) of grid-tied solar electricity, but Moser Baer PV (MBPV) has plans to change that.

    "In fact, there is so much interest today from potential investors in solar farms that we are tying them in MOUs that our module capacities and order books are properly planned out."

    — Ravi Khanna, CEO, Moser Baer PV

    The company, a relatively new entrant in the solar photovoltaic (PV) market, has recently announced a series of new initiatives. These include setting up India’s largest grid-connected solar farm in the sunshine abundant state of Rajasthan, and increasing production capacities.

    MBPV announced that it had partnered with the Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation (RREC) to set up a solar farm of 1-5 MW capacity in the state. At US $4.5 million per MW, the total investment for this farm will be US $25 million.

    Mr. Ravi Khanna, CEO of MBPV said, "As per our MOU [memorandum of understanding] signed with the Rajasthan government back in Nov 2007, we are committed to continue working on the solar farm in Rajasthan. And for this, we are in the process of tying up the investors/partners for this project. Moser Baer will be providing the complete turn-key solution for this farm."

    The company is awaiting the announcement of suitable tariffs for its sale of electricity to the state utility. It has other initiatives currently in the discussion phases with other states and investors. "In fact, there is so much interest today from potential investors in solar farms that we are tying them in MOUs that our module capacities and order books are properly planned out," Khanna said.

    Rajasthan already generates about 10% of its electricity from non-conventional private units. According to a press release issued by MBPV, "Rajasthan offers significant opportunities for renewable energy projects and also has large natural resources conducive for setting up such non-conventional energy projects in the state."

    India’s economy is growing fast, nearing a double-digit growth rate. To fuel this growth, more commercial-use electricity is needed in addition to meeting residential demand. India has supply shortages in both residential and commercial electricity, including peak time supply. Solar electricity may help fill this demand gap, especially in peak time demand. Many of India’s remote villages are not connected with electricity grid, and solar offers a solution for this, along with other local small scale renewable electricity generation technologies.

    The government of India has announced subsidy plans of US $750/KW for installed capacity of residential or commercial use, with a maximum of US $1,250/household. For community and institutional use the subsidy is higher, at US $1,250/KW. The government has also announced feed-in-tariffs of up to US $0.30 per unit (KWh). This is up to 75% of the generation costs of PV, which range between US $0.38 to $0.75 per unit.

    Commenting on policy support for PV, Khanna said, "We believe the recent policy announcement is a very positive and welcome step by the Indian government. Though we will continue to work with them to make it a real success, there is no doubt that once a few MWs are installed in India, we can see the beginning of a much wider growth for the PV industry. Already, we are seeing the spiraling effects of this with many state governments like Punjab, Rajasthan, West Bengal, etc. getting in the process to formalize solar tariffs."

    India has abundant solar resources, receiving about 3000 hours of sunshine every year, and has a potential of about 20 MW per sq km, according to energy researcher Mr. Shirish Garud at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) in New Delhi. However, the high price of PV electricity remains an issue.

    With higher volumes and economies of scale the prices are expected to come down as the market expands in the next few years. "We expect the per unit price to drop to US $0.12 to $0.15 cents in the next 3 years. Also, as we have big plans for thin films as well, we don’t expect any delays in this target at least for Moser Baer. We also have a considerable focus on reducing BOS (Invertors, Structures, etc.) parts cost which will help us achieve our target," said Moser Baer’s Khanna.

    PV-based electricity is expected to remain a very small share of total electricity generated in India in the near future. Therefore, even with higher costs it is not expected to add much to the averaged price of electricity. "It may add only about US 1/40 cent to averaged cost of electricity in the short-term. It is important that we invest in solar now, and the costs will come down as the technology and market develops in the future. It is very good option to develop for the future," Garud said.

    Moser Baer PV is fueled by the enthusiasm for PV. It is planning to expand its plant in NOIDA near New Delhi, and planning a new plant near Chennai. The major expansion will be in thin-film capacity going from the present 40 MW to 600 MW by 2010, with a total investment of US $1.5 billion. An immediate doubling of crystalline silicon cell capacity from 40 MW to 80 MW is expected by the end of March 2008.

    The company has also invested in solar technology R&D through stakes in three U.S.-based companies: Stion, Solaria and SolFocus. MBPV hopes to benefit from R&D by these firms in concentration technology and nanotechnology to increase PV output and reduce the of size of PV producing units.

    The growing global market for PV, which is expected to generate revenues of up to 16 billion by 2012 by some estimates, is what MBPV is banking on. Most of the demand for MBPV is expected to come from the U.S. and the EU but MBPV’s expectations for Indian market are also high, 1,000-2,000 MW by 2010.

    PV offers many potential applications in India. According to Garud, "The telecom industry has used it [PV] to power relay systems and telephone exchanges in rural areas. Railways have used it for remote applications, signaling and for operating unmanned gates," he said

    Use in telecom towers is another potential application. Dr Bharat Bhargava, a Director in India’s Ministry of New and Renewable Energy said that in India, "Solar makes possible stand-alone, distributed and decentralized electricity available to rural, remote, difficult areas and unmanned applications. The rule of thumb today is that where reliability and unmanned operation are important — for example, telecom etc — solar offers the best solutions."

    With the flexibility of PV in generating electricity from milliwatt to megawatt it offers a wide range of applications. Moser Baer PV focuses primarily on large scale modules and commercial applications. However, solar lamps and other consumer applications of PV are a large potential market in India, especially in underpowered rural areas and high-tech uses like personal and business computing.

    Anupam Tyagi is a RenewableEnergyWorld.com Indian Correspondent based in Ghaziabad, India.

  • Tide power makes waves

    "I want to extend our company’s thanks for this proposal," Kevin Bannister, Vice President for Business Development, Finavera Renewables told FERC when it proposed expedited pilot licenses in October.

    "We think this is really a very good first step towards creating the kind of environment that our technologies need in order to get our devices into the water [for testing]."

    FERC defines hydrokinetics as energy from flowing waters, not involving a dam. Tidal, wave, current and river energy plans have all emerged as categories in FERC’s hydrokinetic efforts and in some circles, hydrokinetics is being considered the wave of the future, even for places without waves.

    An Idaho study for the U.S. Department of Energy estimated there may be 150,000 sites for wave energy development in the United States. Harnessing natural water motion energy could be a key piece of America’s future energy puzzle.

    "We believe a reliable and robust electricity system will be the result of a balanced and diversified portfolio," said Roger Bedard of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). "Our studies show that hydrokinetics has the long-term potential of providing about 10 percent of our current U.S. electricity consumption," Bedard said.

    As of February 4, 2008, 47 permits had been issued for ocean, wave and tidal projects and 41 were pending. The process has gone on largely under the radar, with some communities expressing surprise at discovering that their waters have been claimed under preliminary permits. A FERC preliminary permit acts like a mining claim, giving the first application exclusive rights to study the area for three years. The permits also give preference to the applicant for FERC conventional hydro licenses, which typically last 30-50 years.

    In 2008, the focus of hydrokinetics has shifted from the ocean to rivers, especially the Mississippi River, where tens of thousands of generating devices are proposed under preliminary permits. There have been 40 in-river permits issued and 55 more pending. Half the preliminary issuances have come in early 2008.

    Proposals include harnessing the Niagara River, the channels between the Florida Keys and a plan to give a European-developed technology for harnessing currents its first U.S. test. That plan claims more than 1000 square miles of the open ocean off Florida’s Atlantic Coast to try to generate power from the flow of the Gulf Stream.

    Alaska has been a hot spot for river preliminary permit proposals, with preliminary permits filed on the Yukon, Kobuk, Tanana, and Kuskok Rivers. Recently the Alaska Power & Telephone Company announced that it intends to file for a pilot license on the Yukon River that would bring power to the city of Eagle, located halfway between the Pacific Ocean and the Arctic Circle, near the Canadian border. While the preliminary permits anticipate generating plants with thousands of in-river devices, this plan is much more modest.

    "During the pilot phase of the Project a single turbine with two side-by-side shrouded runners producing 100 kilowatts of electrical power operating in a river velocity of 5.3 knots while being moored to an anchor on the river bottom will be installed," the application states. A pilot license allows a developer to hook up to the grid for a period of five years, and is restricted to small, experimental proposals. A FERC conventional license has no size restrictions. The Alaskan plans calls for a conventional FERC license at the end of the five-year pilot project period.

    The issuance of large numbers of preliminary permits, however, has irked some environmental regulators.

    A filing by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) challenges FERC’s standing to issue pilot licenses before applicants have complied with federal laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act

    "Issuing licenses in incremental stages is inconsistent with FERC’s obligations under these and other statutes, and could confuse and frustrate license applicants. Incrementally building the conditions in a license is also antithetical to FERC’s goals of shortening the overall regulatory process and providing certainty to potential hydrokinetic licensees and clarity to the public," the NOAA filing states.

    At this point, much of the Oregon Coast has been claimed. Off Fort Bragg, and Eureka California, a competition is to be held for different experimental devices by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company.

    Multiple FERC hydrokinetic permits are being issued daily for what can be thousands of devices in each river application.

    On Febriary 13, 2008, FERC issued a preliminary permit to a limited partnership for study of the Mississippi River in Mississippi County, Missouri, and Alexander County, Illinois, despite objections to the process from those states. That project would consist of 4,100 proposed 20-kilowatt in-river Free Flow generating units having a total installed capacity of 82 megawatts.

    "Hydrokinetic technologies, with their great promise and potential to harness abundant supplies of renewable power by using ocean waves, tides and currents and in-river flows, fit that bill. I am pleased to be a member of a Commission that has adopted a proactive approach to encourage the development of hydrokinetic technologies," Moeller said.

  • Wood pellet market set to boom

    The use of wood pellets as fuel for domestic stoves and boilers and for co-firing in thermal power plants has been an amazing success story over the past 10 years. Recently, the exorbitant speed of growth caused supply problems and a slowdown of markets, but the next boom is waiting, says Christian Rakos.

    Fuel pellets made from wood wastes – and in some cases also from agricultural residues such as straw – are no newcomer.They were actually invented in the late 1970s in the USA, and led a very quiet life in small niches for two decades before a furious market development started in Europe.This was followed by renewed interest in the USA and subsequently worldwide. While this renewed interest in pellets has been confined to a limited number of markets in Europe – Sweden, Denmark, Austria, Germany and Italy being the major areas of interest – sales of pellet heating equipment in these markets has been growing on an average between 30% and 50% per year during the last decade. In addition, the use of pellets for co-combustion in coal-fired plants has grown dynamically and by 2006, markets for heat and power absorbed about the same amount of pellet fuels at 3.5 million tonnes per year each.

    High oil prices in the autumn of 2005 accelerated sales of pellet-fired stoves and boilers, while a very cold winter in Europe created both stronger demand and a significant shortage of raw material for pellet production. With wood harvesting at a standstill due to the extremely low temperatures and large amounts of snow, the combination of rapidly growing demand and supply-side problems created unexpected shortages of pellets in both European and US markets. A continued shortage of raw material through 2006 finally led to a sharp increase in prices, which rose within a few months from a residential average of [euro]180 per tonne of bulk pellets delivered to [euro]270/tonne. These price increases were experienced in most of the European countries with developed pellet markets, though some younger markets with a small number of market players, such as Ireland, experienced less price volatility.

    The effect of this price volatility on market development was significant. Rising pellet prices drew significant media attention and supply shortages knocked consumer confidence in the ‘new’ product.As a consequence, sales of pellet stoves and boilers dropped for the first time in a decade, both in EU markets and the USA. Pellet producers were also affected by the extremely mild winter of 2006-2007, with the warm weather curbing demand for fuel by about 30% in Europe compared with a typical year, and leaving them with high stock levels.

    THE NORTH AMERICAN MARKET SITUATION

    Pellets were developed in the USA as a reaction to the energy crisis in the late 1970s and pellet stoves became quite popular during this period in a few forested regions.As energy prices dropped again, pellet markets were quiet for almost 20 years, until, with rising oil prices, the interest in pellet stoves was rekindled. Pellet stove sales grew from 40,000 in 2000 to 150,000 in 2006, putting growing pressure on pellet supply. In winter 2006 significant pellet shortages occurred on both the west and east coasts of the US. Production has recently grown significantly, but the supply situation varies from region to region. The West Coast still tends towards undersupply, over capacity is available in the northern Midwest, while the situation on the East Coast shows a supply-demand balance.

    Large distances in the US, coupled with a lack of train transport facilities, make logistics difficult when it comes to moving pellets from those places with oversupply to places with undersupply. Shortages again led to a considerable decline in demand for pellet stoves in 2007.

    Over the border, Canada is currently the country with the largest potential for the production of wood pellets. The availability of extremely large volumes of trees destroyed by the mountain pine beetle disaster in British Columbia represents a huge resource that could be utilized for pellet production. Ambitious plans to realize large-scale pellet production from these resources have not, so far, materialized, however. As domestic utilization of pellets is still very low in Canada, producers are strongly dependent on exports, mainly to the USA and Europe. Sharply rising shipping rates have made pellet transport to Europe expensive recently and made it more difficult for Canadian producers to compete with European rivals. Export to the USA is also difficult due to high transport costs and the low value of the American dollar. Significant interest has developed recently in Canada to look at the opportunities to use pellets in the domestic market, particularly for commercial heating applications.

    THE SCANDINAVIAN SITUATION

    Sweden is currently the world’s largest pellet market, with overall pellet demand reaching 1.6 million tonnes in 2006. Pellets are used both for residential heating and in large combined heat and power (CHP) plants.The Swedish market also experienced considerable price increases in 2006 and a temporary decline of demand for residential pellet heating systems, and Swedish pellet prices are significantly higher than than those in central Europe at the moment. However, Sweden has very high energy taxes on fossil fuels, making pellets, even at [euro]220/tonne, 50% less expensive than fuel oil.

    New data published by the Danish Energy Agency reveals that the Danish market development has been strongly influenced by changes in that country’s political framework conditions. During the late 1990s the Danish market for residential pellets boilers was one of the most dynamic markets in Europe.A sudden change of policies was introduced by a new conservative government, which cancelled all subsidies for renewable energies.This led to an immediate decline in the market after 2000. Between 2004 and 2006 the demand for pellets for residential heating increased again and grew by about 200,000 tonnes. Pellets are also used extensively in district heating plants and power plants in Denmark. Given limited domestic wood resources, straw pellets are also used here, and the amount of imported wood pellets is growing significantly.

    THE UK AND IRELAND

    Ireland is an interesting example of how fast a market can be established by financial incentives. Pellet heating in Ireland was virtually non-existent when in March 2006 the Greener Home Scheme was implemented.This subsidy scheme offered [euro]4200 grants for pellet boiler installation, [euro]1800 for pellet central heating stoves and [euro]1100 for pellet stoves. Within one year 4000 applications were submitted to the scheme, although the number of realized projects was lower. Nevertheless, according to Sustainable Energy Ireland, 1900 pellet boilers, 240 central heating stoves and 330 stoves were installed between April 2006 and August 2007.Another subsidy scheme implemented for commercial use of pellets, the Renewable Heat Programme, offers subsidies of up to 30% for commercial applications of biomass.Within a year 52 projects were realized and further 74 applications for the programme accepted. In many cases the projects are in a power range of 500 kW to 2 MW.

    However, one problem for the Irish market is that there is only one producer of pellets. Even though this producer has a very modest pricing policy, a wider supply base is required to give consumers confidence of supply.At present three further pellet production projects are in the process of being planned with an overall production capacity of 150,000 tonnes and pellets are also offered by various importers. Typically for a new market, inconsistent pellet quality and some poor-quality boilers introduced by local companies with no experience of working with the new fuel have created some problems.With the fundamental role of quality in sustained market success not properly understood by all players in an immature market, public policies can be helpful to establish quality criteria for subsidies, training courses and standards.

    At present pellets are used in the UK predominately in power plants – their use in single family households is negligible. The market for larger biomass boilers suitable for heating residential blocks or larger buildings has been more promising. In many cases these boilers use wood chips rather than pellets, however.At present only small amounts of pellets are being produced in the UK although this is set to change – estimates suggest that by 2010 about 400,000 tonnes of pellets could be produced in the UK annually.

    A number of political initiatives could speed up the development of pellet use in the UK. For instance, a rapidly growing number of local authorities are starting to apply the so-called Merton Rule.This rule, which was introduced in the London suburb of Merton, requires all new building projects with more than 1000 m2 of usable space or more than 10 individual buildings to source at least 10% of their energy requirements from renewable sources. Such a ruling forces the construction industry to consider the different possibilities of renewable energy in residential construction and it may be expected that the industry will quickly realise that in terms of a cost-benefit relationship, pellet heating performs much better than most other options.

    From April 2008 to 2011 an extensive carbon emission reduction target programme will be carried out in the UK with overall budget of #3.2 billion ([euro]4.3 billion). The goal of the programme is to realize a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by households.The programme is to be carried out by utilities that have full freedom to realize a range of different measures.Again, it may be expected that utilities will quickly realise where the cost effective opportunities are and focus on pellet heating projects.

    The UK government is also presently considering a subsidy scheme for renewable heat.This move has been influenced by the prospect of the upcoming renewable energy directive from the European Union, which will create the first incentive to use renewable heat at EU level.

    The future use of pellets in the power markets in Great Britain could be very significant, too. It is, however, highly dependent on the regulatory framework and financial incentives. The regulatory framework conditions for biomass co-firing have still not yet been established.

    CONTINENTAL EUROPE

    In France the first official statistics for the sales of pellet boilers have been recently published by the French Energy Agency ADEME. According to these statistics, 210 pellet boilers were sold in France in 2004 while in 2005 and 2006 this figure grew to 895 and 4690 respectively. French pellet production in 2006 reached 120,000 tonnes and was expected to grow to 200,000 tonnes in 2007.The demand for pellet boilers was initially restricted to the eastern parts of France, which were influenced by the booming German market, but the use of pellet boilers is now starting to grow in Central and Western France. Many established pellet boiler producers – most of them Austrian – have entered the French market where the political framework conditions are beneficial. Pellets and pellet boilers are subject to a reduced VAT rate of 5.5%, and 50% of pellet boiler costs can be deducted from income tax payments. In addition, regional subsidies are available. France has a large potential to exploit pellets due to the significant forest coverage and the large traditional use of wood.

    As in France,Austria has played a key role as a pioneering market for residential use of pellets in boilers. This role developed from more than 20 years of R&D in woodchip combustion, which could be immediately applied to pellets as soon as the new fuel appeared on the market. It was Austrian companies that introduced pellet boilers to Germany and several other European countries and no country has a comparable level of market penetration of pellet boilers. In 2006 some 12.5% of all sold boilers for residential use were pellet boilers.

    Austrian pellet production has been growing continuously and will exceed 1 million tonnes in 2008.The current political discussion on carbon dioxide reduction in Austria could lead to increased financial incentives that, together with the ongoing oil price rally, can be expected to again show significant market growth in 2008.

    Due to the ample supply of high quality pellets from Austria, a booming pellet stove business was also able to develop in Italy. According to recently released data from Italian stove producers, some 90,000 pellet stoves were sold in Italy in 2005. In 2006 this figure had increased to 220,000 stoves making the country currently the largest market for pellet stoves worldwide.The volume and speed of growth on the Italian market shows the huge potential of pellet stoves, particularly if the economic framework conditions are attractive. Due to high taxes on oil and gas, pellets have been particularly economic in Italy, where the pellet imports from Austria play an important role in market supply. With the fragmented structure of saw mill and wood working industries in Italy leaving the domestic pellet production industry also fragmented into many small producers, further growth in imports can be expected.

    MARKET FUNDAMENTALS

    The pellet market is a very young market and its extremely rapid growth has inevitably led to a number diverse problems. These issues, such as quality problems, lack of know-how, the emergence of profit hunters, and a lack of market transparency, are typical for emerging markets. In contrast to other renewables like wind or solar, the pellet business faces not only the issue of selling devices, but also establishing sophisticated logistics solutions that support fuel supply over large geographic areas. Establishing such a solution is no easy thing, particularly in a market where margins are limited and many other barriers make development difficult. However, a reliable fuel supply is of fundamental importance for further market development and the engagement of a growing number of LPG and heating oil businesses is a promising trend. Such experienced hands will bring professional practice and a long-term view into the pellet supply business together with the resources to establish a reliable supply chain capable of supporting further growth.

    Strong growth can be expected with certainty, with political support on the EU level playing a major role for the extension of pellet business into new member states. The ambitious EU target of achieving 20% of energy supply from renewable energy by the end of 2020 is impossible without dedicated policies to develop renewable heating. In addition, the on-going oil price rally and carbon dioxide reduction targets have a similar effect on expanding markets for pellets.

    The production of pellets is an easy, low-cost option for upgrading biomass to a dense, homogenous and transportable fuel and offers considerable advantages over other biomass resources. For instance, the overall net energy yield of pellet biomass can be up to 10 times that of producing ethanol per unit area. And, while current global annual pellet production amounts to 9 million tonnes, it is expected to grow to some 15 million tonnes by 2010. By 2020, EU pellet demand alone could grow to 150 million tonnes, based on recent assessments from industry players. This sector has a big future.

    Christian Rakos is the Chief Executive Officer of proPellets Austria, the Austrian Pellet Industry Association e-mail: rakos@propellets.at