Author: admin

  • Collapse in carbon price halts green schemes

    Doubts were raised about how a state scheme would merge with any national emissions trading scheme when the Prime Minister, John Howard, released his emissions trading report in May, according to The Sydney Morning Herald (11/9/2007, p.2).

    Energy-saving devices no longer economical: The New South Wales carbon price, already languishing around $11 a tonne, had fallen further in July, when Howard appeared to exclude demand management and energy efficiency abatement from the scheme. At $6, it was no longer econ­omical for companies such as Easy Being Green, Neco and Fieldforce to install light bulbs, low-flow showerheads and other energy-saving devices into homes free or at heavily discounted prices. Paul Gilding, CEO of Easy Being Green, said the scheme’s most cost-effective and efficient way of cutting greenhouse gas pollution would disappear. "That will be a tragedy," he said. "This is the scheme that is cutting greenhouse gas pollution at the mass consumer level."

    Certificates too easy to obtain: The NSW Government had been accused by some market partici­pants and green groups of con­tributing to the collapse by making it too easy to generate cer­tificates that did not represent genuine greenhouse gas cuts. The NSW Minister for Climate Change, Environment and Water, Phil Koperberg, had declined a request for an interview. A spokesperson for him blamed the Federal Government for the market crash. The State Government had formed a taskforce to investigate the price collapse.

    Energy efficiency companies struggling: The head of the NSW advisory panel on climate change, Martijn Wilder, from the law firm Baker & McKenzie, had said he believed a number of energy efficiency companies in the market were "on the edge". He said there were two simple factors: the oversup­ply of certificates and the uncer­tainty in the market since the Federal Government announced its carbon trading scheme. Fieldforce’s managing direc­tor, Craig Bathie, said if the price of carbon remained at $6, more than half of NSW householders would miss out on free or dis­counted energy installations, and his company might have to lay off a couple of hundred em­ployees in rural areas. Neco’s carbon services direc­tor, Ben O’Callaghan, had said his company might have to close its regional Carbon Services Div­ision, and 60 jobs in 10 regional locations would be lost.

    The Sydney Morning Herald, 11/9/2007, p. 2

  • Bio-fules may be noxious weeds

    The Queensland-based Invasive Species Council has assessed weed risks posed by 18 biofuel crops currently proposed as solutions to cutting greenhouse emissions, wrote science and environment reporter Rosslyn Beeby in The Canberra Times (4/10/2007, p.11).

    Noxious weeds being considered: The Council warned cultivation of energy crops on a large scale would cause "grave environmental damage", deplete water resources and inflict high costs on agricultural productivity. The report, by best-selling Feral Future author Tim Low and conser­vationist Dr Carol Booth, said seven plants currently being considered as promising biofuel crops were already banned as noxious weeds in parts of Australia. Two biofuel species – giant reed and Spartina – being hailed as "miracle crops" were listed by the World Conservation Union among the world’s top 100 worst invasive weed species.

    Solving one problem by creating another: "Australia should not try to solve one environmental problem by cre­ating another. These plants have no proven value as biofuel crops but bad reputations as weeds," Low said. One of the highest risk biofuels – the drought-tolerant tropical succu­lent Jatropha – had been promoted as a crop that could be grown without irrigation on 20 million hectares of "marginal land" in Australia, but was closely related to bellyache bush, one of the worst farm weeds in northern Australia.

    The Canberra Times, 4/10/2007, p. 11

  • Depleted uranium enduring risk

    By Oct. 29, 70 per cent of U.S. air strikes were in support of the Northern Alliance armed forces, most guided by the U.S. Special Forces on the ground. The MQ-1 Predator drone with Hellfire missiles was operating over Taliban forces, directing air attacks and launching missiles.

    By Nov. 5 the number of individual air missions was up to 120 per day, adding F-16 and

    F-15 fighter-bombers out of U.S. bases in Kuwait.

    The turning point in the war to oust the Taliban government came on Nov. 6 at Mazar-e Sharif, a key city in the northern plains. Attack aircraft rained down hundreds of MK82 500-lb bombs. B-52 bombers used carpet bombing to kill thousands of Taliban forces. It was here that U.S. forces dropped the first BLU-82 Daisy Cutter bomb, each weighing 15,000 lbs, producing devastation over a 600-yard radius. All the weapons used by the U.S. air attack included depleted uranium shielding.

    Depleted uranium (DU) is produced during the uranium enrichment process. The U-235 used to produce fuel for reactors generating electricity is removed, leaving the U-238 isotope. The material is extremely dense and increases the penetration ability of weapons; it is used to coat shells and warheads on missiles and bombs. On impact, the shell, with its uranium and traces of americium and plutonium, vaporizes and becomes very tiny particles of radioactive dust. When it is inhaled it can stay in the body, emitting radiation.

    The DU used in U.S. weapons comes from the uranium mines in Saskatchewan.

    In the 1991 Gulf war, DU was delivered almost exclusively with shells from tanks and ammunition used by aircraft. It is used in all armour-piercing ordnance. In the wars in Bosnia in 1995 and Kosovo in 1999, NATO allies added DU missiles and bunker busting bombs. Thousands of DU bombs and missiles have been used by U.S. forces in the Afghan and Iraq wars. A typical bunker bomb contains 1.5 tonnes of depleted uranium.

    In August 2003 Scott Peterson of the Christian Science Monitor used a Geiger counter to test several sites in Baghdad near where bunker-buster bombs and missiles had fallen. He found radiation readings that were between 1,000 and 1,900 times higher than normal background radiation readings. DU weapons are still being extensively used in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    After the 1991 Gulf War, birth defects and leukemia rose dramatically in the areas around Basra where these weapons were used. By 2003, the U.S. Defense Department admitted that over 200,000 Gulf War veterans had filed for compensation for death, illness or disabilities.

    The veterans refer to this as "Gulf War Syndrome." In the first Gulf War, the U.S.-led coalition suffered 148 deaths.

    Since then 8,000 veterans of this war have experienced early death.

    In 1996 the U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution declaring that DU weapons were illegal "weapons of mass destruction." In 2002, the U.N. Human Rights Convention passed a resolution urging a ban on the use of any DU weapons. We will have to wait to find out the impact of these weapons on the people of Afghanistan and the men and women in the U.S., Canadian and NATO armed forces.

    – Warnock is a Regina political economist and author.

    This is an extract from his forthcoming book Afghanistan: The Creation of a Failed State, to be published by Fernwood in 2008

  • Mungo’s slip reveals ALP’s Achilles heel

    Mungo’s defence of Garrett, as much as Garrett’s desertion of principle itself, proves that the Alternative Liberal Party is now a creature of the establishment. The ALP must, according to Mungo, compromise its principles to gain power. If that means selling workers down the drain, Uranium to warring states, or our hospitals, schools and water to international corporations, then so be it.

    When the Liberal Party self destructs after this election, Mungo and other apparatchiks of the establishment will find themselves facing a far more formidable opposition; a passionate and principled movement that is ready to govern on behalf of the people and the environment that supports us.

    The choice for the future is stark. We either vote for the establishment parties that will sacrifice us all on the altar of economic growth or for the emerging parties that recognise we must learn to live better to survive.

  • Current Ebono projects

     The Ebono Institute supports artists, activists and business with a purpose by providing communication services and electronic infrastructure.

    One Stop Green Shop logo At present our primary focus is providing electronic infrastructure to Green businesses through One Stop Green shop.

    Our weekly news service sill available in the top panel.  

    We also continue to provide editorial and communication services to our regular clients and community groups.

    For more information about our business services see www.ebono.com.au

  • Pathways to a low carbon future – We can do it!

    The evening will focus on strategies for achieving change at a community level, overcoming regulatory obstacles and the challenges we face as we make the transition to a sustainable lifestyle. As Tim Winton put it recently on The Generator, “We have had the technology to reduce our footprint for some time. Most of the challenges are human.”

    The evening will include musical interludes, snippets of new and well respected films as well as presentations from the main speakers. The evening will finish with questions from the audience and a call for community action from the audience.

    Introduced by Byron Shire Mayor Jan Barham, the speakers are well known in their fields and popular speakers.

    Tim Winton has built The Permaforest Trust as a not-for-profit education centre and demonstration farm in Barkers Vale in the Tweed Valley. He is well known as a speaker on Permaculture, Peak Oil and transitional lifestyles.

    Dr Sally MacKinnon is a director of the Ethos Foundation, founder of the Gondwana Centre and deeply involved in the Australian water, energy and sustainable development industries.

    Giovanni Ebono is founder and producer of the popular radio show, The Generator, author of Sydney’s Guide to Saving the Planet and editor of Sustainable Living for Dummies.