Author: admin

  • Biofuels behind deforestation surge

    Oil from African palm trees is considered to be one of the best and cheapest
    sources of biodiesel and energy companies are investing billions into
    acquiring or developing oil-palm plantations in developing countries. Vast
    tracts of forest in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and many other countries
    have been cleared to grow oil palms.

    Oil palm has become the world’s number one fruit crop, well ahead of
    bananas.

    Biodiesel offers many environmental benefits over diesel from petroleum,
    including reductions in air pollutants, but the enormous global thirst means
    millions more hectares could be converted into monocultures of oil palm.

    Getting accurate numbers on how much forest is being lost is very difficult.

    The FAO’s State of the World’s Forests 2007 released last week reports that
    globally, net forest loss is 20,000 hectares per day — equivalent to an
    area twice the size of Paris. However, that number includes plantation
    forests, which masks the actual extent of tropical deforestation, about
    40,000 hectares (ha) per day, says Matti Palo, a forest economics expert who
    is affiliated with the Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education
    Center (CATIE) in Costa Rica.

    "The half a million ha per year deforestation of Mexico is covered by the
    increase of forests in the U.S., for example," Palo told IPS.

    National governments provide all the statistics, and countries like Canada
    do not produce anything reliable, he said. Canada has claimed no net change
    in its forests for 15 years despite being the largest producer of pulp and
    paper.

    "Canada has a moral responsibility to tell the rest of the world what kind
    of changes have taken place there," he said.

    Plantation forests are nothing like natural or native forests. More akin to
    a field of maize, plantation forests are hostile environments to nearly
    every animal, bird and even insects. Such forests have been shown to have a
    negative impact on the water cycle because non-native, fast-growing trees
    use high volumes of water. Pesticides are also commonly used to suppress
    competing growth from other plants and to prevent disease outbreaks, also
    impacting water quality.

    Plantation forests also offer very few employment opportunities, resulting
    in a net loss of jobs.

    "Plantation forests are a tremendous disaster for biodiversity and local
    people," Lovera said.

    Even if farmland or savanna are only used for oil palm or other plantations,
    it often forces the local people off the land and into nearby forests,
    including national parks, which they clear to grow crops, pasture animals
    and collect firewood. That has been the pattern with pulp and timber
    plantation forests in much of the world, says Lovera.

    Ethanol is other major biofuel, which is made from maize, sugar cane or
    other crops. As prices for biofuels climb, more land is cleared to grow the
    crops. U.S. farmers are switching from soy to maize to meet the ethanol
    demand. That is having a knock on effect of pushing up soy prices, which is
    driving the conversion of the Amazon rainforest into soy, she says.

    Meanwhile rich countries are starting to plant trees to offset their
    emissions of carbon dioxide, called carbon sequestration. Most of this
    planting is taking place in the South in the form of plantations, which are
    just the latest threat to existing forests.

    "Europe’s carbon credit market could be disastrous," Lovera said.

    The multi-billion-euro European carbon market does not permit the use of
    reforestation projects for carbon credits. But there has been a tremendous
    surge in private companies offering such credits for tree planting projects.
    Very little of this money goes to small land holders, she says.

    Plantation forests also contain much less carbon, notes Palo, citing a
    recent study that showed carbon content of plantation forests in some Asian
    tropical countries was only 45 percent of that in the respective natural
    forests.

    Nor has the world community been able to properly account for the value of
    the enormous volumes of carbon stored in existing forests.

    One recent estimate found that the northern Boreal forest provided 250
    billion dollars a year in ecosystem services such as absorbing carbon
    emissions from the atmosphere and cleaning water.

    The good news is that deforestation, even in remote areas, is easily
    stopped. All it takes is access to some low-cost satellite imagery and
    governments that actually want to slow or halt deforestation.

    Costa Rica has nearly eliminated deforestation by making it illegal to
    convert forest into farmland, says Lovera.

    Paraguay enacted similar laws in 2004, and then regularly checked satellite
    images of its forests, sending forestry officials and police to enforce the
    law where it was being violated.

    "Deforestation has been reduced by 85 percent in less than two years in the
    eastern part of the country," Lovera noted.

    The other part of the solution is to give control over forests to the local
    people. This community or model forest concept has proved to be sustainable
    in many parts of the world. India recently passed a bill returning the bulk
    of its forests back to local communities for management, she said.

    However, economic interests pushing deforestation in countries like Brazil
    and Indonesia are so powerful, there may eventually be little natural forest
    left.

    "Governments are beginning to realize that their natural forests have
    enormous value left standing," Lovera said. "A moratorium or ban on
    deforestation is the only way to stop this."

  • GM contributes to bee death

    The problem, says Haefeker, has a number of causes, one being the varroa mite, introduced from Asia, and another is the widespread practice in agriculture of spraying wildflowers with herbicides and practicing monoculture. Another possible cause, according to Haefeker, is the controversial and growing use of genetic engineering in agriculture.

    As far back as 2005, Haefeker ended an article he contributed to the journal Der Kritischer Agrarbericht (Critical Agricultural Report) with an Albert Einstein quote: “If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man.”

    Mysterious events in recent months have suddenly made Einstein’s apocalyptic vision seem all the more topical. For unknown reasons, bee populations throughout Germany are disappearing — something that is so far only harming beekeepers. But the situation is different in the United States, where bees are dying in such dramatic numbers that the economic consequences could soon be dire. No one knows what is causing the bees to perish, but some experts believe that the large-scale use of genetically modified plants in the US could be a factor.

    Felix Kriechbaum, an official with a regional beekeepers’ association in Bavaria, recently reported a decline of almost 12 percent in local bee populations. When “bee populations disappear without a trace,” says Kriechbaum, it is difficult to investigate the causes, because “most bees don’t die in the beehive.” There are many diseases that can cause bees to lose their sense of orientation so they can no longer find their way back to their hives.

    Manfred Hederer, the president of the German Beekeepers Association, almost simultaneously reported a 25 percent drop in bee populations throughout Germany. In isolated cases, says Hederer, declines of up to 80 percent have been reported. He speculates that “a particular toxin, some agent with which we are not familiar,” is killing the bees.

    Politicians, until now, have shown little concern for such warnings or the woes of beekeepers. Although apiarists have been given a chance to make their case — for example in the run-up to the German cabinet’s approval of a genetic engineering policy document by Minister of Agriculture Horst Seehofer in February — their complaints are still largely ignored.

    Even when beekeepers actually go to court, as they recently did in a joint effort with the German chapter of the organic farming organization Demeter International and other groups to oppose the use of genetically modified corn plants, they can only dream of the sort of media attention environmental organizations like Greenpeace attract with their protests at test sites.

    But that could soon change. Since last November, the US has seen a decline in bee populations so dramatic that it eclipses all previous incidences of mass mortality. Beekeepers on the east coast of the United States complain that they have lost more than 70 percent of their stock since late last year, while the west coast has seen a decline of up to 60 percent.

    In an article in its business section in late February, the New York Times calculated the damage US agriculture would suffer if bees died out. Experts at Cornell University in upstate New York have estimated the value bees generate — by pollinating fruit and vegetable plants, almond trees and animal feed like clover — at more than $14 billion.

    Scientists call the mysterious phenomenon “Colony Collapse Disorder” (CCD), and it is fast turning into a national catastrophe of sorts. A number of universities and government agencies have formed a “CCD Working Group” to search for the causes of the calamity, but have so far come up empty-handed. But, like Dennis vanEngelsdorp, an apiarist with the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, they are already referring to the problem as a potential “AIDS for the bee industry.”

    One thing is certain: Millions of bees have simply vanished. In most cases, all that’s left in the hives are the doomed offspring. But dead bees are nowhere to be found — neither in nor anywhere close to the hives. Diana Cox-Foster, a member of the CCD Working Group, told The Independent that researchers were “extremely alarmed,” adding that the crisis “has the potential to devastate the US beekeeping industry.”

    It is particularly worrisome, she said, that the bees’ death is accompanied by a set of symptoms “which does not seem to match anything in the literature.”

    In many cases, scientists have found evidence of almost all known bee viruses in the few surviving bees found in the hives after most have disappeared. Some had five or six infections at the same time and were infested with fungi — a sign, experts say, that the insects’ immune system may have collapsed.

    The scientists are also surprised that bees and other insects usually leave the abandoned hives untouched. Nearby bee populations or parasites would normally raid the honey and pollen stores of colonies that have died for other reasons, such as excessive winter cold. “This suggests that there is something toxic in the colony itself which is repelling them,” says Cox-Foster.

    Walter Haefeker, the German beekeeping official, speculates that “besides a number of other factors,” the fact that genetically modified, insect-resistant plants are now used in 40 percent of cornfields in the United States could be playing a role. The figure is much lower in Germany — only 0.06 percent — and most of that occurs in the eastern states of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Brandenburg. Haefeker recently sent a researcher at the CCD Working Group some data from a bee study that he has long felt shows a possible connection between genetic engineering and diseases in bees.

    The study in question is a small research project conducted at the University of Jena from 2001 to 2004. The researchers examined the effects of pollen from a genetically modified maize variant called “Bt corn” on bees. A gene from a soil bacterium had been inserted into the corn that enabled the plant to produce an agent that is toxic to insect pests. The study concluded that there was no evidence of a “toxic effect of Bt corn on healthy honeybee populations.” But when, by sheer chance, the bees used in the experiments were infested with a parasite, something eerie happened. According to the Jena study, a “significantly stronger decline in the number of bees” occurred among the insects that had been fed a highly concentrated Bt poison feed.

    According to Hans-Hinrich Kaatz, a professor at the University of Halle in eastern Germany and the director of the study, the bacterial toxin in the genetically modified corn may have “altered the surface of the bee’s intestines, sufficiently weakening the bees to allow the parasites to gain entry — or perhaps it was the other way around. We don’t know.”

    Of course, the concentration of the toxin was ten times higher in the experiments than in normal Bt corn pollen. In addition, the bee feed was administered over a relatively lengthy six-week period.

    Kaatz would have preferred to continue studying the phenomenon but lacked the necessary funding. “Those who have the money are not interested in this sort of research,” says the professor, “and those who are interested don’t have the money.”

    Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

  • No bees? Not just strange, but scary

    Dave Lindorff’s most recent book is The Case for Impeachment (St. Martin’s Press, 2006).

    His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net.

    Sourced from: philly.com 

  • Tanks a cheaper solution

    Have Your Say

    Latest Comments:

    Time for once a week baths and just a "freshen up" every other day. we need a combination of strategies to ensure in 50 years our grandchildren aren’t in the same predicament. poor children of today can’t play under sprinklers or collect things from the dump.

    Posted by: Lizzie mcpoc of brissy 8:38am today

    Certainly something to aim for Rich but I don’t think too many people would want to leave their comfortable coastal areas.However,if the situation became so drastic that living conditions, standard of living and great loss of income occurred the situation would certainly change.

    Posted by: macca of brisbane 5:05pm April 26, 2007

    Tanks are not the answer. They could be part of a parcel of measure, but the only way to ensure a supply for the furure is a better dam infrastructure and a water grid. To say tanks are the answer could be compared with one other suggestion of doing away with water closets and bringing back thunder boxes…but that would devastate the the timber cvresource by requiring more saw dust. NIMBY, NIMBY, NIMBY !!!!

    Posted by: Jeremy Bentham of Brisbane 1:53pm April 26, 2007

    Macca, why don’t we try living where the water is instead of bringing it to us? No jobs there? They why are we setting up new industry here instead of in areas where the water is plentiful?

    Posted by: Rich of Logan 9:29am April 26, 2007

    Of course water tanks are the solution.It’s too much common sense and not enough public funds for the fatcats to dive into to be bothered with.Rudds wife has probably already lined up the contractors for the dams. But whats the big rush anyway? Don’t you’s all want every square inch of the southeast covered in foreigners, cement and bitumen from the border to bundaberg.Think of the big traffic jam we could have then. You’s are just all jealous.Can’t you get on the public funds bandwagon with some big idea and push to go with it?

    Posted by: Jim of Bribie 7:28pm April 25, 2007

    Water infrastructure doesn’t just appear overnight Ben, it’s an expensive and time-consuming process and one that arguably should have begun decades ago. But now it is critical to seek solutions at a variety of levels, and water tanks are an important step in ensuring that we have adequate water before and during the construction of any new water infrastructure. If every new and existing house in SEQ was to invest in a well-configured water tank system, our small amounts of rain could be of great use, if only to give government officials more time to come up with suitable long-term solutions rather than expensive knee-jerk reactions.

    Posted by: Katherine of Brisbane 1:01am April 25, 2007

    Water tanks offer no solution as the increasing population will/has obviously overtaken the token addition that would bring. A complete immigration halt is required as an emergency measure as we are currently adding another million users every 5 years. Even the article only suggests it will extend the day of reckoning another 10 years. Stop immigration or be doomed. And forget the economic growth argument because economic growth will go into permanent reverse when there’s insufficient water to go around.

    Posted by: Ben of World’s Driest Continent 1:32pm April 24, 2007

    Source: Couriermail.com.au

  • Unviable drought effected towns targeted for evacuation

    Mayors of Emerald and Kingaroy do not anticipate Kumbia and Willows will need to be evacuated, but acknowledge the situation is serious and required continued state support.

    In Kumbia, "there is no more water. All of the bores have run dry," Kingaroy Mayor Roger Nunn said.

    But in Kumbia, nearly all the residents have rainwater tanks and council is hiring a driller for more bores.

    "If people have to leave Kumbia, I don’t know what’s going to happen in Brisbane," he said.

    The Courier Mail, 26/4/2007, p.11

    Source: Erisk Net

  • 2003 alpine fires reduced Murray River inflows by 20pc

    Reference: Senator The Hon. Eric Abetz, Minister for Fisheries, Forestry and Conservation, Manager of Government Business in the Senate, 20 April 2007. Joint Natural Resource Management and Primary Industries Ministerial Council, Item 313 – Effects and Impacts of Bushfires.

    Erisk Net, 20/4/2007