Author: admin

  • Recycled water for new Gold Coast settlement

    Project will reduce pressure on drinking water, create jobs: It will reduce the region’s reliance on drinking water by up to 84 per cent; recycled water will be used for flushing toilets and outdoor use and rainwater water tanks will provide cold water to washing machines." Councillor McDonald said implementation of the master plan would provide more than 200 jobs.

    An integrated urban water cycle community: “A wide range of infrastructure projects related to this project are currently on the boil, which will ultimately create the largest integrated urban water cycle community of its kind in Australia," said Cr McDonald.

    Towards a sustainable water future: "In the current time of drought, the Pimpama Coomera Master Plan will create a sustainable water future by capturing, using and reusing water in new ways."

    Reference: http://www.goldcoastwater.com.au/pimpamacoomera

    Erisk Net, 15/3/2007

  • Apple growers eye recycled water

    Costly but possibly worth it: "I understand it is would be an expensive 18-kilometre trek, but certainly the apple industry, which is worth $30 million a year, could be given a substantial boost in these tough times if it had a more secure water supply than it currently has. I call on the water minister to instigate a cost-benefit analysis to see what it would cost to send this water south to Harcourt and compare that with the benefits that would accrue to the apple industry and other industries associated with the Harcourt Valley".

    Scheme not efficient enough: Drum said: "The project will take about 15 megalitres a day from the Epsom area. It will go through Bendigo and up to the Spring Gully Reservoir. From there it will be sent to a few sports ovals and recreation reserves along the way. Some of it will be sent out to Eppalock to be used to replace environmental flows, but a large percentage of it is allocated to simply run back down very inefficient drains and back to fill dams on quite a few hobby farms". Under the current scheme quite a lot of this water will go, not to be wasted, but it will also not be put to its best possible use".

    Reference: parliament of Victoria, Legislative Assembly Daily Hansard, Thursday, 15 March 2007

    Erisk Net, 15/3/2007

  • Recent Green Poll shows increase in Aussies opposing nuclear

    The majority of Australians oppose the building of nuclear reactors and only slightly less are in favour of expanding uranium mining according to a new poll, which signals problems for both the federal government and opposition. The poll taken by Green pulse at the end of last month found that;

    •  only 29 per cent of Australians were in favour of nuclear power, 51 per cent were opposed to it; and

    • 20 per cent were undecided.

    This is in contrast to a recent Newspoll that found 45 per cent of Australians were in favour of building nuclear reactors, although they were asked in the context of combating global warming. The new poll is a blow to Prime Minister John Howard who has consistently argued that nuclear power should be a central plank of the energy mix over the next 100 years, as it is the only baseload power source that generates almost no greenhouse gases.

    "Six out of 10 Australians are concerned or very concerned about the country adopting nuclear power," Green Pulse found. The poll of 1000 voting age Australians will be welcome news for green groups and the Labor Party, who say nuclear power is too expensive and is at least 15 years away. They argue the country would be better to focus on wind, solar and geothermal power which can be installed almost immediately and would produce no harmful waste, which must then be stored for hundreds of years.

    The poll also found that 46 per cent were opposed to expanding the local uranium mining industry, 27 per cent were in favour and the same number were undecided.

    This is a potential problem for the Labor Party which will vote whether to scrap its "no new mines" policy at next month’s national conference. Despite the opposition of many on the party’s left, including frontbencher Anthony Albanese and environment spokesman Peter Carrett, most expect the motion to succeed. This would allow new mines in South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory to begin the production and export of uranium, which is becoming an increasingly popular energy source in China, India and Europe.

    Not surprisingly the poll found coalition voters were significantly more likely to support the expansion of uranium mining. Green Pulse found that 73 per cent were opposed to storing waste in Australia, while only 18 per cent were in favour of it.

    The Australian Financial Review, 12/3/2007, p. 9

    Source: Erisk Net  

  • Toxic GE corn given thumbs up

    GE company tries to suppress safety data

    The study results were published last week in the journal Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. The study was headed by Professor Gilles Eric Seralini, a French government scientist and expert in GE technology from the University of Caen. His team of experts analysed the results of safety tests submitted by the world’s largest genetic engineering company, Monsanto. The study found that "with the present data, it cannot be concluded that GM corn MON863 is a safe product".

    Monsanto tried to suppress the test data but it was obtained by Greenpeace, following a court case, and passed on to Professor Seralini’s team for independent evaluation. The same data was available to the national regulator, Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), in 2004 yet FSANZ failed to assess it, relying solely on Monsanto’s analyses which, according to Professor Seralini, "do not stand up to rigorous scrutiny".

    Greenpeace genetic engineering campaigner, Louise Sales, says "These results show that our national food safety regulator has failed in its duty of care to consumers. What’s needed is an immediate and complete recall of MON863 contaminated products.

    "Both FSANZ and the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) have blithely approved numerous GE crops for commercial growing and human consumption. It is only the state moratoria on GE food crops that are preventing the widespread contamination of our fields and our food with GE."

    With most of the state moratoria on GE food crops due to expire next year, Greenpeace calls on the state governments to extend the moratoria until 2013.