Author: Neville

  • A note of thanks from ANU

    Click here to enable desktop notifications for Gmail.   Learn more  Hide
    1 of 11
    AdMaster of Public Healthtua.edu.au/Scholarships – Up to 30% Scholarships Available For 2015 Enrolment. Enquire Today!

    A note of thanks from ANU

    Inbox
    x

    The Australia Institute <mail@tai.org.au>

    2:26 PM (12 minutes ago)

    to me
    The Australia Institute

    Dear Neville —

    Today you may have read that United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has urged investors to “Please reduce your investments in the coal- and fossil fuel-based economy and [move] to renewable energy.”

    You and almost 10,000 other Australians — as well as dozens of investors and business people, including former Liberal Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser — are way ahead of the curve, adding your names to an open letter supporting the Australian National University’s socially responsible divestment decisions a few weeks ago.

    We could only fit a fraction of the names into the letters published in the Canberra Times and Australian Financial Review, so we printed copy of the open letter with every signatory’s name attached and hand delivered all 71 double-sided pages to the Vice-Chancellor’s office.

    In response, we received this letter from ANU Vice Chancellor Ian Young:

    Dear Dr Denniss,I write today to thank you for your support over recent weeks of The Australian National University (ANU) and the decision by the University Council to realign the University’s investments in line with our social responsible investment policy. The community reaction and volume of messages was unexpected.

    Although ANU has been attacked for its decisions, we are simply part of a much bigger debate about carbon and carbon pricing.

    My own views are that the world will gradually move away from the use of fossil fuels. This, however, will take decades. In the meantime we will require such fuels.

    The real debate in climate should be about producing cost-effective alternative energy. Here, there are great opportunities for Australia. Australia should not just be an adopter of alternative energy, we should be a producer. Universities like the ANU should be the powerhouses to produce the new technologies of the future.

    If ANU has pushed this debate a small way in this direction we will have acted exactly as a leading Australian, and world, university should.

    Please pass on my thanks to all who signed the petition and encourage them to remain engaged with ANU into the future.

    Yours sincerely,

    Professor Ian Young AO
    Vice-Chancellor and President

    In the last few weeks your support has helped shift the debate away from attacks on ANU’s right to divest and refocused the debate where it should be: Australia’s growing fossil fuel divestment movement and the financial risks of the carbon bubble.

    Our research shows that one  in four  Australians with super would prefer their retirement savings not be invested in fossil fuels. That’s around $250 billion worth of consumer sentiment. It also shows that investments in coal, oil and gas increase financial risk without increasing returns over a full business cycle.

    Thank you again to everyone who added their name to the open letter, and to the hundreds who chipped in to get the open letter published in the Australian Financial Review.

    Yours sincerely,

    The Australia Institute Team

    Weekly updates from TAI

    We aim to keep you updated every week. Every fortnight we send out the Between The Lines which provides an overview of our research and topical issues. On alternate weeks we send out a newsletter based on our work in equity and mining. If you would like to receive those, click here, choose your newsletter, and we’ll make sure they land in your inbox.

  • IPCC 5TH ASSESSMENT REPORT

    Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)

    AR5 provides a clear and up to date view of the current state of scientific knowledge relevant to climate change. It consists of three Working Group (WG) reports and a Synthesis Report (SYR). Further information about the outline and content and how the AR5 has been prepared can be found in the AR5 reference document and SYR Scoping document. Information about how the AR5 was prepared can be found here.

    • AR5: Synthesis Report
    • Working Group I: The Physical Science Basis
    • Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
    • Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change

    Synthesis Report

    The Synthesis Report distils and integrates the findings of the three working group contributions to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report — the most comprehensive assessment of climate change yet undertaken, produced by hundreds of scientists — as well as the two Special Reports produced during this cycle.

    Summary for Policymakers 
    Synthesis Report – Longer Report 
    Factsheet
    Quick link to report PDFs

    News and Sessions

    IPCC 40th Copenhagen, Denmark (27-31 Oct 2014)

    Documents

    From the Media Centre

    Press Materials

    Recorded Press Conference

    Press Release

    Opening Statement by the IPCC Chair

  • Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)

    AR5 provides a clear and up to date view of the current state of scientific knowledge relevant to climate change. It consists of three Working Group (WG) reports and a Synthesis Report (SYR). Further information about the outline and content and how the AR5 has been prepared can be found in the AR5 reference document and SYR Scoping document. Information about how the AR5 was prepared can be found here.

    • AR5: Synthesis Report
    • Working Group I: The Physical Science Basis
    • Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
    • Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change

    Synthesis Report

    The Synthesis Report distils and integrates the findings of the three working group contributions to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report — the most comprehensive assessment of climate change yet undertaken, produced by hundreds of scientists — as well as the two Special Reports produced during this cycle.

    Summary for Policymakers 
    Synthesis Report – Longer Report 
    Factsheet
    Quick link to report PDFs

    News and Sessions

    IPCC 40th Copenhagen, Denmark (27-31 Oct 2014)

    Documents

    From the Media Centre

    Press Materials

    Recorded Press Conference

    Press Release

    Opening Statement by the IPCC Chair

  • The John James Newsletter 25 – STOP PRESS

    1 of 13

     

    Ad850% + Investment Returnsthe-best-investments-today.com – Invest In Alternative Investments. Huge Profits. Free Top-Pick Guide!

    The John James Newsletter 25 – STOP PRESS

    Inbox x

    John James

    5:05 AM (2 hours ago)
    to John

    The John James Newsletter 25

    3 November 2014. 

    IPCC: rapid carbon emission cuts vital to stop severe impact of climate change

    Climate change is set to inflict “severe, widespread, and irreversible impacts” on people and the natural world unless carbon emissions are cut sharply and rapidly, according to the most important assessment of global warming yet published. The stark report states that climate change has already increased the risk of severe heatwaves and other extreme weather and warns of worse to come, including food shortages and violent conflicts. Carbon emissions will have to fall to zero to avoid catastrophic climate change.

    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/02/rapid-carbon-emission-cuts-severe-impact-climate-change-ipcc-report?CMP=ema_565

    Climate conference end acrimoniously

    Behind the scenes particular countries had insisted on the removal of sentences, paragraphs and diagrams from the report’s summary that didn’t suit their perceived national interest.

    http://www.smh.com.au/world/climate-conference-analysis-a-new-urgency-appears-20141102-11fmn7.html

    Climate report huge omission obscures the real danger – methane

    Rapid warming in the Arctic – where temperatures are rising twice as fast as the global rate – is thawing an incomprehensibly vast stockpile of nature’s own carbon which has been trapped in ice for millennia. The scale of this threat is mind-boggling. There is over three times more heating power stored in this “permafrost” than that which has been caused by human greenhouse gas emissions since the beginning of the industrial age – and this refers only to that located on land (as opposed to the coastal seabeds).

    http://arctic-news.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/climate-reports-huge-omission-obscures-full-danger.html

    IPCC significantly under-state the rate extent of impending change 

    At the heart is the omission of major feedback effects from the climate-models. The entire suite of the climate-change projections for the next 100 years come from models that omit significant ‘positive feedback’ effects thatt are already starting to become major sources.

    http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/IPCC_AR5_Underestimates_Climate_Change.pdf

    9 significant scientific findings too recent to be included in the new IPCC report 

    The IPCC reports, released roughly every six years, are the most comprehensive, authoritative consensus on climate change among scientific experts. However, the cut-off date for literature for each Assessment Report was in 2013 , so it’s worth taking stock of recent scientific advancements and climate-related events that have occurred since then. We discuss research highlights around four areas: sea level rise, extreme weather and climate events, ecosystems, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and temperature.

    http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/10/9-significant-scientific-findings-too-recent-be-included-new-ipcc-report

    The Last Hours

    The threat is described in a new mini-documentary

    http://lasthours.org/

    And the talk I gave in Katoomba in June last year. 

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=UFhNyWHv0qQ

    Attachments area

    Preview YouTube video Remaining Conscious in Tumultuous Times – only if prepared.

  • Scientists warn time is running out to tackle climate change

    Scientists warn time is running out to tackle climate change

    Final AR5 IPCC report urges governments and businesses to work together to prevent temperatures rising beyond two degrees

    By Jessica Shankleman

    02 Nov 2014

    More from this author

    0 Comments

    Dr Rajendra Pachauri chairman of the IPCC

    Governments, businesses and consumers will need to work together to eliminate manmade greenhouse gas emissions by the end of this century, in order to have a good chance of preventing global warming of two degrees celcius – in an affordable way.

    That is a key finding from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scientists and officials, in a Synthesis report, which summarises the causes, impacts and solutions of rising temperatures.

    It has been termed as “the most important document on climate change”, combining the three studies from the IPCC’s AR5 assessment that have been produced during the past 13 months. It will also be the final document United Nations countries will use to formulate their pledges to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in a global deal on climate change, due to be signed in Paris next year.

    As such, scientists and governments have hotly debated the language of the Synthesis report during the past week, to ensure it paints a picture that will drive appropriate action on climate change.

    Today’s report concludes that warming of the climate “is unequivocal” and that its effects are already being felt around the world, causing ice caps to shrink, and sea levels to rise.

    It also argues with greater certainty than before that rising greenhouse gas emissions from industry, and other human activity, is to blame for the warming climate.

    However, it says that it is within our reach to limit temperature rises to below two degrees – the target that was set by governments in 2009 to avoid catastrophic climate change.

    “We have the means to limit climate change,” said Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC. “The solutions are many and allow for continued economic and human development. All we need is the will to change, which we trust will be motivated by knowledge and an understanding of the science of climate change.”

    He added that in order to have a good chance of staying below two degrees at a manageable cost, greenhouse gas emissions should drop by 40 to 70 per cent between 2010 and 2050, falling to “zero or below” by 2100.

    “We have that opportunity, and the choice is in our hands,” he added.

    Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and increase the risks to all economies and societies, but particularly poorer countries that lack the capacity to cope with impacts of extreme temperatures, flooding and drought, the report says.

    “Many of those most vulnerable to climate change have contributed and contribute little to greenhouse gas emissions,” Pachauri added. “Addressing climate change will not be possible if individual agents advance their own interests independently; it can only be achieved through cooperative responses, including international cooperation.”

    The report argues that limiting carbon emissions could delay the impacts of climate change, potentially by several decades, allowing more time for countries to adapt to the impacts.

    However, it argues that delaying new measures for cutting emissions until after 2030 would make it significantly harder to achieve the two degree target.

    “It is technically feasible to transition to a low-carbon economy,” said Youba Sokona, co-chair of IPCC Working Group III. “But what is lacking are appropriate policies and institutions. The longer we wait to take action, the more it will cost to adapt and mitigate climate change.”

    The IPCC predicts that ambitious efforts to reduce greenhouse gases would margially reduce economic growth. In business-as-usual scenarios, consumption would grow by 1.6 to 3 per cent per year over this century, but this would be reduced by 0.6 percentage points in tackling climate change.

    However, these economic estimates do not include the benefits of curbing climate change. “Compared to the imminent risk of irreversible climate change impacts, the risks of mitigation are manageable” said Sokona.

    The report was welcomed by a number of green businesses that have commited to reducing their greenhouse gases in line with, or exceeding government targets.

    Philippe Joubert, chairman of The Prince of Wales’s Corporate Leaders Group, which includes Skanska, Kingfisher and Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE), said the report underlined the need for politicians to act on tackling climate change.

    “This report, developed by thousands of scientific experts, drawing on over 30,000 scientific papers, has reaffirmed that human interference is the origin of climate disruption and that climate change is humanity’s greatest threat,” he said.

    “It also concludes that there are solutions within our reach, and this is a message that business leaders understand. Many businesses, such as those represented in the Corporate Leaders Group are already investing in a low-carbon future. But if we are to unlock the scale of change that we need, we must have a level of policy clarity equal to this scientific clarity.”

    Hubert Patricot, executive vice president and European group president at CCE, said the report showed that governments and businesses needed to work together on reducing emissions and adapting to the risks of temperature rises. “Climate change has significant impacts on our core business, and is something we are already factoring into our long-term strategy,” he said. “This report highlights the reality of climate change to all businesses, but we can’t make a meaningful change alone. Government and business need to work together to mobilize a concerted and coordinated response to address the most significant environmental issue of our time.”

    Nick Molho, executive director of the Aldersgate Group, said the report gave both a clear warning and a message of hope. “It has made it crystal clear that man-made climate change is a reality but has also shown that prompt, cost-effective and coordinated action by the world’s governments can help limit the detrimental impacts that unabated climate change would have on the natural environment and the world economy,” he said in a statement.

    “It is now time for governments to deliver a deal at the pace and scale required by climate science.”

    The report was also welcomed by the Obama administration in the USA. John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy, said the report is another wake-up call to the global community that the world must act “together swiftly and aggressively in order to stem climate change and avoid its worst impacts”.

    “These studies-the most comprehensive and detailed ever-confirm that climate change caused by human activities is having impacts on ecosystems and human well-being across the United States and around the world,” he said in a statement. “The new IPCC report underscores the need to fully implement President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, including continued engagement with other countries on ambitious emissions-reductions targets and the policies and technologies necessary to achieve them.”

  • IPCC report warns greenhouse gas levels at highest point in 800,000 years, identifies fossil fuels as cause of recent increases

    IPCC report warns greenhouse gas levels at highest point in 800,000 years, identifies fossil fuels as cause of recent increases

    Updated 19 minutes agoSun 2 Nov 2014, 11:19pm

    The world’s top scientists have given their clearest warning yet of the severe and irreversible impacts of climate change.

    The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has released its synthesis report, a summary of its last three reports.

    It warns greenhouse gas levels are at their highest point in 800,000 years, with recent increases mostly due to the burning of fossil fuels.

    “Continued emission of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and long-lasting changes in all components of the climate system, increasing the likelihood of severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems,” the report said.

    “Limiting climate change would require substantial and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions which, together with adaptation, can limit climate change risks.”

    One of the authors, Professor Jim Skea, said the document would be invaluable in future climate change negotiations.

    “The statements are much more powerful because they’re put together,” he said.

    “The inferences that you can draw are just very obvious for policymakers now and I think that’s what the achievement is.”

    Leaders must act, UN chief warns

    UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon said the report was the most comprehensive appraisal of climate change yet and that human influence was clear.

    “Science has spoken, there is no ambiguity in their message,” he said.

    “The report found that the world is largely very ill-prepared for the risk of changing climate, especially the poor and most vulnerable, who have contributed least to this problem.

    “Leaders must act. Time is not on our side.”

    Australian oceans expert John Church was in Copenhagen to negotiate the final wording of the report.

    Dr Church was the coordinating lead author of the sea levels chapter and said warming of the climate system is “unequivocal”.

    “There’s many components – increasing surface temperature, melting glaciers, increasing ocean heat content, ice sheets losing mass, sea level rising,” he said.

    “It’s very clear that there’s a human component that’s contributed significantly to that with rising impacts across many regions.”

    The document will be an invaluable summary for climate negotiations for emission reduction targets post-2020.

    Governments will meet in Peru this year as part of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change annual meeting.

    Targets are expected to be finalised at the 2015 negotiations in Paris, but the Peru conference will serve as an important step forward in setting the framework.