Author: Neville

  • Scientists Image Deep Magma Beneath Pacific Seafloor Volcano

    Scientists Image Deep Magma Beneath Pacific Seafloor Volcano

    Mar. 27, 2013 — Since the plate tectonics revolution of the 1960s, scientists have known that new seafloor is created throughout the major ocean basins at linear chains of volcanoes known as mid-ocean ridges. But where exactly does the erupted magma come from?

    ——————————————————————————–

    Share This:

    20

    Related Ads:
    •Geology
    •Earth Science
    •Magma
    •Iceland Volcano

    See Also:

    Earth & Climate
    •Volcanoes
    •Oceanography
    •Geology
    •Earthquakes
    •Earth Science
    •Natural Disasters

    Reference
    •Mid-ocean ridge
    •Lithosphere
    •Plate tectonics
    •Oceanic trench

    Researchers at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego now have a better idea after capturing a unique image of a site deep in the Earth where magma is generated.

    Using electromagnetic technology developed and advanced at Scripps, the researchers mapped a large area beneath the seafloor off Central America at the northern East Pacific Rise, a seafloor volcano located on a section of the global mid-ocean ridges that together form the largest and most active chain of volcanoes in the solar system. By comparison, the researchers say the cross-section area of the melting region they mapped would rival the size of San Diego County.

    Details of the image and the methods used to capture it are published in the March 28 issue of the journal Nature.

    “Our data show that mantle upwelling beneath the mid-ocean ridge creates a deeper and broader melting region than previously thought,” said Kerry Key, lead author of the study and an associate research geophysicist at Scripps. “This was the largest project of its kind, enabling us to image the mantle with a level of detail not possible with previous studies.”

    The northern East Pacific Rise is an area where two of the planet’s tectonic plates are spreading apart from each another. Mantle rising between the plates melts to generate the magma that forms fresh seafloor when it erupts or freezes in the crust.

    Data for the study was obtained during a 2004 field study conducted aboard the research vessel Roger Revelle, a ship operated by Scripps and owned by the U.S. Navy.

    The marine electromagnetic technology behind the study was originally developed in the 1960s by Charles “Chip” Cox, an emeritus professor of oceanography at Scripps, and his student Jean Filloux. In recent years the technology was further advanced by Steven Constable and Key. Since 1995 Scripps researchers have been working with the energy industry to apply this technology to map offshore geology as an aid to exploring for oil and gas reservoirs.

    “We have been working on developing our instruments and interpretation software for decades, and it is really exciting to see it all come together to provide insights into the fundamental processes of plate tectonics,” said Constable, a coauthor of the paper and a professor in the Cecil H. and Ida M. Green Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at Scripps. “It was really a surprise to discover that melting started so deep in the mantle — much deeper than was expected.”

    Key believes the insights that electromagnetics provides will continue to grow as the technology matures and data analysis techniques improve (last week Key and his colleagues announced the use of electromagnetics in discovering a magma lubricant for the planet’s tectonic plates).

    “Electromagnetics is really coming of age as a tool for imaging the earth,” said Key. “Much of what we know about the crust and mantle is a result of using seismic techniques. Now electromagnetic technology is offering promise for further discoveries.”

    Key also has future plans to apply electromagnetic technology to map subglacial lakes and groundwater in the polar regions.

    In addition to Key and Constable, coauthors of the paper include Lijun Liu of the University of Illinois and Anne Pommier of Arizona State University.

    The study was supported by the National Science Foundation and the Seafloor Electromagnetic Methods Consortium at Scripps.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

  • Fears of sea level rises

    Fears of sea level rises

    Posted 8 hours 0 minutes ago

    Map data ©2013 GBRMPA, Google – Terms of Use

    Map

    Map: Bega 2550
    A Eurobodalla Shire Councillor says there is confusion surrounding predicted sea level rises due to global warming.

    Professor Alan Stokes from the National Sea Change Taskforce this week described sea level as a serious risk to the community.

    He has called for councils to deal with the problem even though there’s no national benchmark on a minimum rise.

    But Councillor Fergus Thompson says despite conflicting predictions, the shire has to factor tidal inundation into its development planning.

    “We know there is a level that we have been talking around the Australian coastline whether it is 0.8 of a metre or 0.9 of a metre,” he said.

    “It is really not that relevant; it is about the fact that we have known since 1990 about this information.

    “Legally we will not be able to walk away from that and we will be held accountable,” Cr Thompson said.

    Topics:environmental-impact, environmental-management, bega-2550, batemans-bay-2536

    More stories from New South Wales

  • New Study Confirms Water Injection Caused Oklahoma Earthquake

    New Study Confirms Water Injection Caused Oklahoma Earthquake
    Print Friendly
    32 47 Share

    The linkage between wastewater injection and earthquakes seems to have been covered ad nauseum over the past few years, especially in relation to the Oklahoma earthquakes on November 6, 2011, when a 5.7 magnitude earthquake near Prague (in Oklahoma, not in Europe) was preceded by a 5.0 shock and followed by literally thousands of aftershocks.
    More Evidence Points to Water Injection Induced Oklahoma Earthquake

    A 2011 magnitude 5.7 quake near Prague, Okla., apparently triggered by wastewater injection, buckled U.S. Highway 62.
    Image Credit: John Leeman via The Earth Institute Columbia University

    Earthquakes in Spain have been linked to groundwater pumping from an aquifer, and reports from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the University of Texas, and our very own Editor in Chief Zachary Shahan also made a compelling case for the links between wastewater injection and earthquakes.

    Now, a new study in the journal Geology has added its weight to the debate as to whether the Prague earthquake was wastewater induced.

    For those a little on the edge of the story, wastewater injection is simply the removal of water from fossil-fuel energy production into the ground — whether for hydrofracking, which uses the pressure of the water to crack open rocks to release natural gasses, or using the water to force petroleum out of conventional oil wells. In both cases the water has to be disposed of somewhere away from drinkable and habitable water supplies, so it is often pumped underground somewhere.

    For the Prague case specifically, the watery culprit was once used to extract oil from a nearby oil well and then pumped into an abandoned oil well close by.

    Normally geologically sedate areas of Arkansas, Texas, Ohio, and Colorado have recently become relatively earthquake-prone, with quakes in the middle of the US jumping 11-fold over the past four years when compared to the previous three decades. The risk is such that the National Academy of Sciences in a report last year called for further research to “understand, limit and respond” to induced seismic events.

    The study looked at the evidence for the Prague quake and found that as wastewater refilled now-empty oil wells the pressure to continue filling the holes with water had to be increased which caused the Wilzetta fault to jump.

    When you overpressure the fault, you reduce the stress that’s pinning the fault into place and that’s when earthquakes happen,” said study coauthor Heather Savage, a geophysicist at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.

    The amount of wastewater injected into the well was relatively small, yet it triggered a cascading series of tremors that led to the main shock, said study co-author Geoffrey Abers, also a seismologist at Lamont-Doherty. “There’s something important about getting unexpectedly large earthquakes out of small systems that we have discovered here,” he said. The observations mean that “the risk of humans inducing large earthquakes from even small injection activities is probably higher” than previously thought.

    Recordings taken by lead author, University of Oklahoma seismologist Katie Keranen, showed that the fault rupture was no more than 650 feet from the active injection wells, and maybe even closer.

    The Oklahoma Geological Survey is still continuing their own account of the events, and survey seismologist Austin Holland said the study showed the earthquake sequence could have been triggered by the injections. But, he said, “it is still the opinion of those at the Oklahoma Geological Survey that these earthquakes could be naturally occurring. There remain many open questions, and more scientific investigations are underway on this sequence of earthquakes and many others within the state of Oklahoma.”

    Distressingly, the Wilzetta fault remains under stress and regulator’s have yet to suspect injection of water despite the cloud hanging over the recent earthquake. The study’s authors believe that water injection should be kept away from known fault locations, and that companies involved in wastewater injection should be compelled to provide accurate measurements of the amount of water that is being pumped into the ground and at what pressure. They also recommend that sub-surface monitoring of fluid pressure for earthquake warning signs. Further research is needed but at a minimum, “there should be careful monitoring in regions where you have injection wells and protocols for stopping pumping even when small earthquakes are detected,” said Abers.

    Read more at http://planetsave.com/2013/03/27/new-study-confirms-water-injection-caused-oklahoma-earthquake/#eAfrgrLUzqt0my4s.99

  • A new script needed for Labor and the nation

    A new script needed for Labor and the nation

    Date
    March 28, 2013
    Category
    Opinion

    68 reading now
    Comments 200

    Bill Kelty

    The ALP must forgo the politics of division and seize the chance to inspire pride in its achievements.

    Zoom in on this story. Explore all there is to know.

    Martin Ferguson
    Labor Party
    Hawke
    Keating

    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    Ads by Google
    Australia’s Fiscal Cliff

    www.dailyreckoning.com.au

    Why Obama’s debt crisis will be Australia’s 2013 inflation crisis
    Illustration: John Spooner.

    Illustration: John Spooner.

    Opinion: When unity is king, Labor can’t stop bickering

    The politics of the next few months is no longer about the result of the next election. It is about the future of the ALP. Political parties are resilient, can defy the odds and rebuild quickly. However, the essence of that rebuilding begins with a clarity of purpose as to what the party stands for and its point of difference with its competitor.

    When the last two warriors of the Hawke/Keating era are sacked or resign you know the situation is serious, very serious. Simon Crean and Martin Ferguson have given their entire lives to the labour movement, have mentored the Prime Minister and have been the banner carriers for loyalty.

    The polls tell us that the party is headed for a devastating defeat, the divisions are on show and the accumulated wisdom of John Faulkner, Crean, Kim Carr and Ferguson has been sidelined.
    Advertisement

    Politics can be made more difficult than it really is. There are three essential tenets. First, take responsibility; second, reject the ideas that distract, divide and discount the nation; and third, argue to the last breath for the ideas and ideals that make the nation a better place. Honesty will, nearly always, win over duplicity.

    The starting point is responsibility. It is too easy to blame the opposition, the media or Kevin Rudd. The latter may have been an irritant, but in the big picture of recent politics he was a mosquito. The government’s problems do not stem from Rudd’s removal but the means and justification for doing it.

    The result was that the electorate did not give the ALP the right to govern alone. In the process of forming government, concessions were made that had lasting significance. When a sensible policy of pricing carbon at international levels became a tax, it subverted trust in a government that promised it would not introduce such a tax. When the umbilical cord of trust between the governed and those who govern is broken, it cannot be easily restored.

    When the mining tax was touted as a negotiating coup, somebody forgot to tell us about state royalties. These are errors of judgment and explanation.

    All that was necessary was for the government to argue that the policies are natural extensions of pre-existing policies – the international pricing of crude oil and the petroleum resources tax. The tax will prove effective, but will have left behind a reputation for incompetence.

    The two most recent prime ministers have sought from caucus a special right to select their own ministers, but in both cases, the cabinet process has been allowed to be frittered away. The media reform was moderate, but the process was flawed. A jackboot approach to discussions and timing would not have been permitted if the proper process of cabinet had been followed.

    Once responsibility is accepted, the ALP must reject the ideas and processes that have no home in the party. A Labor Party that cultivates division, or taxes superannuation retrospectively, or cannot justify deficits, or makes regional tours presidential visitations, or reinvents class warfare, or steals the rhetoric of Pauline Hanson on migrants, or embraces the Pacific refugee solution of John Howard, or attacks single mothers and narrows its base to a mythical group of blue-collar workers, cannot win an election.

    On the other hand, an ALP that demonstrates its commitment to future generations through education, health care, fair wages, superannuation, the environment and protection of the most vulnerable is capable of winning.

    We need a new script for the ALP about this nation that begins with the premise that the nation should not be written down or diminished. A country proud of itself, comfortable that it has plotted a different course over past generations and the opportunities it has created.

    The government should start with the benefit of strong economic credentials, measured by low unemployment, inflation and interest rates. Living standards have improved in difficult times and the rest of the world sometimes marvels at the model for success created in this country. The debt level by comparison with most other nations is small. We are in this position partly because of collective government and Reserve Bank management that opened the economy and because of the decisive action of the Rudd government on the global financial crisis. We need to win the debate that economic success is not measured by the size of the surplus.

    But running a deficit does not imply that governments can in some magical ways find the capacity for free goods. The essential truth of what Crean and Ferguson were arguing is that a society must create wealth before it can be distributed. A productive and adaptive nation knows the vital role of businesses, both large and small, who invest in the country.

    It knows that businesses often risk their home and life savings to make those investments. Business is vital, but people are not just economic units. It also knows that there is an essential role of unions in protecting the interests of workers and acting as agents for constructive change. If real wages and superannuation and conditions of work are to be improved, increases in productive capacity will be many times more important than fights over shares of the cake.

    From these twin principles – a country writ large and consensus about our capacity to fund improvement in living standards – the ALP has an opportunity to define its priorities and commitments.

    A simplified tax system for small business, investments in education, improvements in superannuation and healthcare, the development of an effective infrastructure, investment market, the adoption of the Crean blueprint for regional development (which institutionalises the role of local governments and regional leaders), and the generation of its own environmental credentials will give the party a policy base for the future.

    There will be imposts and changes to tax necessary to produce these outcomes. The employees must know that their negotiated wage outcomes will contain superannuation, the minimum wage will contain a component in recognition of superannuation improvement. The Medicare levy may be required to help fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme. The government should not underestimate the common sense and compassion of the Australian people.

    Politics is ultimately a choice between parties. The points of difference based on personality are peripheral and the real differences need to be based on principles.

    The Labor Party will need to demonstrate it is the culture and philosophy that counts. In that regard Whitlam, Hawke and Keating have provided the party with a solid foundation. Crean and Ferguson have helped build those foundations.

    The task for Julia Gillard is to build on them, not put them at risk.

    Bill Kelty was secretary of the ACTU from 1983 until 2000 and a key influence during the Hawke and Keating governments.

    Follow the National Times on Twitter
    Ads by Google
    Self Managed Superfund.

    www.esuperfund.com.au/superfund

    Free Fund Setup. Free 1st Year Fee. Offer Ends Soon. Apply Now!
    Air Conditioning Guide

    Lookforthetick.com.au/Download

    Free Government-Approved Guide to Air Conditioning. Download Now…
    Cheaper Electricity Bill?

    ElectricityWizard.com.au/Business

    Check Your Business Energy Rates! Save Up To 20% Today On Your Power
    Recommended
    [?]
    Melbourne’s Legal Brothels
    Melbourne’s Legal Brothels
    McLaren apologises for Webber software issue
    McLaren apologises for Webber software issue
    Why Thailand and Greece spell tragedy for travellers
    Why Thailand and Greece spell tragedy for travellers
    How ‘Chicken Kev’ has left Labor on its knees
    How ‘Chicken Kev’ has left Labor on its knees
    Get Inside Honda’s Clever Process
    Play Video
    From the web
    Get Inside Honda’s Clever Process
    YouTube
    Melbourne’s Legal Brothels
    McLaren apologises for Webber software issue
    Why Thailand and Greece spell tragedy for travellers
    How ‘Chicken Kev’ has left Labor on its knees
    Get Inside Honda’s Clever Process
    Play Video
    200 comments so far

    “The starting point is taking responsibility. It is too easy to blame the opposition, the media or Kevin Rudd”… Exactly! The current Labor government have comprehensively shown what not to do in politics.

    Commenter
    Jimc
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 6:57AM

    Political joke, 2025: What do John Howard and Julia Gillard have in common ? They both kept Labor out of office for 12 years.

    Pretty sad that a Labor stalward feels the need to write an article like this.

    Commenter
    Hacka
    Location
    Canberra
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 8:19AM

    @”Jimc”

    There’s nothing to blame the “Slick” Abbott opposition for.

    “Stop the boats”, “Stop the carbon tax”, “Stop the fair wages” …. nothing there.

    “Slick” Abbott’s policies …. nothing there.

    So “Slick’ Abbott and his godlike opposition are blameless and will one day be turning water into wine.

    Commenter
    J. Fraser
    Location
    Queensland
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 8:39AM

    In fairness guys, Fairfax needs a new script too,

    Endlessly telling Labor what to do.

    Is it because she’s a woman that she has to be told by men?

    Commenter
    sarajane
    Location
    melbourne
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 8:44AM

    Political Joke 2013: Julia Gillard….

    but seriously folks, as far as the ALP is concerned, the Mayans weren’t too far off.

    Commenter
    Jimc
    Location
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 8:45AM

    But she does need a new script.

    She has to stop saying the same thing at every turn and at every question.

    “My job is to secure Australian jobs for the Australian people and for our great country….”

    But please, be honest with yourselves, everyone here needs a new script

    (except me …. woo-hoo go GREENS!!)

    Commenter
    sarajane
    Location
    melbourne
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 8:54AM

    And the boats keep washing up on our shores. Love it or hate it, it’s a stake thru the heart of Labor at our house and september just can’t come soon enough.

    Commenter
    cape kev
    Location
    penrith
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 8:57AM

    Agreed Jim, and the first agenda item should be acknowledging that the cynical machinations involved in obtaining power in 2010 are not the actions of a party workinjg for the greatest good for the greatest number.
    To wilfully defy the electorate and introduce a Carbon Tax to catch the votes of the lunatic fringe was Labor’s 1975 moment, and the fact that so many in the party airily try to wave this away by citing John Howard’s GST turn around as justification suggests that there is no longer any sort instinctive moral compass at play.
    As a Labor supporter I’m tired of hearing about “renewal”, and the “grassroots”, to be dished up more of the same,and written off as being a stooge or troll for not slavishly falling into line.
    Last week I received a form email of dubious veracity from Labor’s marketing director, trying to whip up support for Julia by citing a story involving an alledged “regular guy”, who rang up head office to reaffirm that Labor is our last and best hope. Not an average bloke – “a regular guy”. And this cringeworthy Americanism from Labor’s Marketing Director!
    The only recourse now appears to make myself physically sick by voting for the appalling leader of the opposition, and contribute to an electoral catastrophe that at least offers the chance of obliterating the current leadership and structure, and inaugurating genuine renewal.

    Commenter
    Bulgaris
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 8:59AM

    I think Keltys words are wise and represent the beginnings of a blueprint for Labor’ future. He rightly asserts that Labor has had some real achievements-poorly explained, justified defended though they were.
    Ignore the LNP boosters: they will always try to downplay and mis-represent Labor’s achievements.

    As Kelty asserts, the next election is probably lost already but Labor needs to look to the future and come up with improved internal processes that allow the rank and file member much more say in policy development and pre-selection processes (and not be over-ridden by leaders seeking to “parachute” in some high profile candidate.
    Disunity is death: if you cannot present a united front how much confidence will voters have in your ability to govern without distraction?

    Commenter
    Harry
    Location
    Churchill
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 9:02AM

    Maybe they both think the public are a bit stupid and will fall for Nationalistic slogans.

    But guys…. Abbott’s script is even worse.

    “I blame this incompetent government…. I blame this incompetent government …”

    over and over.

    We desperately need a debate about environmental policies. They’re always the hidden ones. And they lead to damage that can never be undone.

    Please, as journos, step up to the plate and take on the responsibility of reporting environmental policies/promises.

    “oil slick” Abbott says climate change is crap, now where is that going to take us?

    He doesn’t just need a new script, he needs a new understanding of reality.

    Commenter
    sarajane
    Location
    melbourne
    Date and time
    March 28, 2013, 9:02AM

    More comments
    Login to Comment

    New user? Sign up

    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    Advertisement

    Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/a-new-script-needed-for-labor-and-the-nation-20130327-2gufy.html#ixzz2On9Kmq8s

  • Discovery May Allow Scientists to Make Fuel from Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere

    Discovery May Allow Scientists to Make Fuel from Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere

    Mar. 26, 2013 — Excess carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere created by the widespread burning of fossil fuels is the major driving force of global climate change, and researchers the world over are looking for new ways to generate power that leaves a smaller carbon footprint.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Share This:

    118

    Related Ads:
    •Climate Change
    •Global Warming
    •Air Quality
    •Fossil Fuel

    See Also:

    Matter & Energy
    •Organic Chemistry
    •Alternative Fuels
    •Fossil Fuels

    Earth & Climate
    •Air Quality
    •Global Warming
    •Climate

    Reference
    •Carbon-14
    •Carbon cycle
    •Yeast
    •Fossil fuel

    Now, researchers at the University of Georgia have found a way to transform the carbon dioxide trapped in the atmosphere into useful industrial products. Their discovery may soon lead to the creation of biofuels made directly from the carbon dioxide in the air that is responsible for trapping the sun’s rays and raising global temperatures.

    “Basically, what we have done is create a microorganism that does with carbon dioxide exactly what plants do-absorb it and generate something useful,” said Michael Adams, member of UGA’s Bioenergy Systems Research Institute, Georgia Power professor of biotechnology and Distinguished Research Professor of biochemistry and molecular biology in the Franklin College of Arts and Sciences.

    During the process of photosynthesis, plants use sunlight to transform water and carbon dioxide into sugars that the plants use for energy, much like humans burn calories from food.

    These sugars can be fermented into fuels like ethanol, but it has proven extraordinarily difficult to efficiently extract the sugars, which are locked away inside the plant’s complex cell walls.

    “What this discovery means is that we can remove plants as the middleman,” said Adams, who is co-author of the study detailing their results published March 25 in the early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. “We can take carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere and turn it into useful products like fuels and chemicals without having to go through the inefficient process of growing plants and extracting sugars from biomass.”

    The process is made possible by a unique microorganism called Pyrococcus furiosus, or “rushing fireball,” which thrives by feeding on carbohydrates in the super-heated ocean waters near geothermal vents. By manipulating the organism’s genetic material, Adams and his colleagues created a kind of P. furiosus that is capable of feeding at much lower temperatures on carbon dioxide.

    The research team then used hydrogen gas to create a chemical reaction in the microorganism that incorporates carbon dioxide into 3-hydroxypropionic acid, a common industrial chemical used to make acrylics and many other products.

    With other genetic manipulations of this new strain of P. furiosus, Adams and his colleagues could create a version that generates a host of other useful industrial products, including fuel, from carbon dioxide.

    When the fuel created through the P. furiosus process is burned, it releases the same amount of carbon dioxide used to create it, effectively making it carbon neutral, and a much cleaner alternative to gasoline, coal and oil.

    “This is an important first step that has great promise as an efficient and cost-effective method of producing fuels,” Adams said. “In the future we will refine the process and begin testing it on larger scales.”

    The research was supported by the Department of Energy as part of the Electrofuels Program of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy under Grant DE-AR0000081.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

  • New-look Climate Change Department: What’s ahead?

    New-look Climate Change Department: What’s ahead?
    By environment reporter Sarah Clarke

    Updated 42 minutes ago
    Icebergs in Antarctic waters Photo: Some commentators say the Government just needs to take climate change seriously. (Karen Barlow: ABC News)
    Map: Australia

    After last week’s spill that never happened and in a week described by the Prime Minister as “appalling”, it was on the cards that those who stuck by Julia Gillard would be rewarded.

    But with the new ministries unveiled and extra portfolios being taken on by some, you have to ask, are they being rewarded or overloaded?

    Climate Change Minister Greg Combet has been a staunch supporter of the Prime Minister and that has now translated to a number of extra titles and a huge portfolio.
    What issues matter to you?
    ABC News is launching an interactive online application called Vote Compass to help voters engage on important policy issues during the coming election campaign.

    The tool will allow ABC audiences to compare their views in policy areas with the platforms of political parties.

    Join the conversation by filling out a short survey and tweeting about your top issues with the hashtag #abcmyvote.

    Help us prepare the tool and find out more here…

    As Fairfax’s Tony Wright put it, imagine the letterhead on that one; the “Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education”.

    It is a mouthful by any standards.

    And what does this mean for what was the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency? It is now being squeezed under the umbrella of the Industry Department, while the Energy Efficiency component is being shifted to the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism.

    The Climate Change Department’s staff once numbered above 1,000. It is now down to “approximately 620 with 50 contract staff” and, according to Senate Estimates from October last year, “employee staff numbers are steadily declining”.

    Around 300 staff moved to the Clean Energy Regulator in 2012. Departmental secretary Blair Comley moved to the Resources Department last month.

    A spokesman from Mr Combet’s office says there will now be “one secretary in the merged department, Don Russell”.

    So with no more Climate Change Department, there will no longer be a Climate Change secretary.

    As for the future of the department’s deputy secretary and the executive, the spokesman noted “these sort of decisions will be determined by the secretary of the merged department in the coming period as the merger is implemented”.
    Has the Climate Change portfolio been neglected in the reshuffle? Is the Government doing enough? Have your say.

    Which agencies are safe?

    A spokesman from Mr Combet’s office says the “Clean Energy Regulator, Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)” are all clear.

    The Clean Energy Regulator will remain independent with the newly-merged Climate Change Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education portfolio.

    The Clean Energy Finance Corporation is an independent agency within Treasury. That too won’t change.

    ARENA is independent within the Resources, Energy and Tourism portfolio. That too continues as is.

    But can Climate Change and Industry work together? The Climate Institute thinks so.

    “It’s not illogical to have Climate Change, Industry and Innovation under one umbrella,” chief executive John Connor said.

    Mr Connor says what matters is that climate change is taken seriously across all of government and across all portfolios.
    Will it work?

    Not everyone is convinced it is a partnership that will work.

    When it comes to the movement of Energy Efficiency to Resources, some industry insiders had thought that energy and emission reduction policies best fit with the Climate Change Department.

    To quote one: “how can the minister overseeing the big mining companies turn around and manage renewable energy?”

    Leigh Ewbank, from the group Yes 2 Renewables, stated that Climate and Energy Efficiency is a more natural fit, given the urgent need to decarbonise the economy.

    And what happened to Climate Change Adaptation? Has that once commonly used title now gone altogether?

    The ABC did a story last month about the future of the body charged with preparing the nation to meet the challenge of global warming, the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility.

    It saw the writing on the wall. The Federal Government did not recommit any future funds and the facility is worried about its future.

    So the Government has five-and-a-half months to make this new Industry and Climate Change partnership work.

    For now, the 600-plus staff at the formerly known Department of Climate Change can continue enjoying their six green star accommodation at the Nishi building at a cost of $10 million a year.

    But that residence may be short-lived.

    Come September, the Coalition says if elected it will reassess the building contract and its expense.

    It has got another marriage in mind.

    It has vowed to reunite Climate Change and the Environment in a relationship it believes makes more sense.