Author: Neville

  • Sad sorry joke but nobody’s laughing

    Sad sorry joke but nobody’s laughing

    The Daily Telegraph
    March 22, 201312:00AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    3

    GOVERNMENTS can be many things: right-wing or left-wing, good or bad, hard or soft. The best ones are often a combination.

    But the federal Labor government is no longer any of those things. It is, quite simply, a joke.

    The scenes that played out in Canberra yesterday were nothing short of farcical. It was more a primary school playground brawl than a serious political contest.

    First we had the extraordinary declaration by Simon Crean that he was supporting Kevin Rudd for the leadership and nominating himself as his deputy.

    This, it emerged, was made not only without Mr Rudd’s imprimatur but with the knowledge that he was not even Mr Rudd’s preferred candidate.

    Furthermore it was made before question time, thus consigning Julia Gillard to the humiliating prospect of facing the opposition as a dead duck prime minister and pushing the whole government to the brink of a no-confidence motion that could have ended its life then and there. If that’s strategy then no wonder the Rudd camp didn’t win.

    But perhaps Mr Crean’s real targets were Treasurer Wayne Swan and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy, the Dumb and Dumber of Australian politics. Mr Swan’s appallingly implemented mining tax caused the death of one prime minister and his subsequent class war may yet cause the death of another.

    It is astonishing to think that the great legacy of Hawke and Keating – the repositioning of the Labor Party towards the centre of Australian life and the abandonment of the “us versus them” mentality of militant unionists and undergraduate revolutionaries – has been not just squandered by Mr Swan but deliberately discarded.

    What’s more it is hard to know if his Woodstock-era rhetoric is genuine or a cynical attempt to recapture the once rusted-on working-class voters who are now abandoning Labor along with everybody else. And it’s hard to know which is scarier.

    And so one at least sympathises with Mr Crean’s frustration. No wonder he was prepared to go kamikaze when other Labor MPs seem equally determined to plummet to their political deaths.

    Helping them of course is Senator Conroy, a man whose actions over the past fortnight make Wayne Swan look like Thomas Edison. His media reforms represented a nadir in this country’s conventions of freedom of the press and we can be thankful to the steadfastness of independent MPs Andrew Wilkie, Rob Oakeshott and Craig Thomson in saving this country from potentially crippling restrictions on our media and the public’s right to know.

    Whatever their mistakes in the past, they deserve high credit for this one act alone.

    But despite their impotence, Conroy’s napoleonic instincts also almost brought down his Prime Minister.

    Which brings us to Kevin Rudd. After years of shadow-boxing and at times openly undermining his successor, the former PM failed to step up to the plate when his party and his country needed him.

    Clearly he knew he didn’t have the numbers and felt the need to maintain his so-called honour in keeping his ludicrous promise not to challenge unless he’s carried into the caucus room on a litter.

    Yet it is precisely this sort of vanity that got Mr Rudd booted in the first place and it is worrying that at a time when his country and his party need him the most he has refused to even stand up and be counted, turning what could have been a valiant defeat into a pathetic embarrassment.

    It is now clear that the Labor party is incapable of resolving its own leadership in a way that remotely resembles popular will and so the Prime Minister should immediately call an election so she can discover it for herself.

    She’ll soon realise who the real winner of yesterday’s debacle was. And it certainly wasn’t her.

  • Gillard prepares for frontbench shake-up

    Gillard prepares for frontbench shake-up

    ABCUpdated March 23, 2013, 9:59 am

    tweet

    Email
    Print

    Prime Minister Julia Gillard is working on drastic changes to her frontbench after losing four experienced ministers in the wake of a botched attempt to unseat her.

    Chris Bowen, Martin Ferguson and Kim Carr , and will join Simon Crean on the backbench.

    Federal Transport Minister and Leader of the House Anthony Albanese is also under pressure to consider his future.

    The resignations leave Ms Gillard with a big hole to fill, including three vacancies at cabinet level – and all just six months before the election.

    Mr Rudd , and is asking the Prime Minister to spare the lives of those who backed him.

    “It’s important to bring people in the tent,” he said.

    “Ultimately, leaders and prime ministers will make these calls, but I think it’s really important that we bind up the wounds.”

    But mercy does not seem to be on offer from the Prime Minister.

    “A number of people clearly considering their position. And I too will consider ministerial arrangements,” she said.

    The Prime Minister is already coming under pressure over who to install where.

    One resources lobby group is urging Ms Gillard to install a West Australian into the Resources portfolio.

    Mr Ferguson’s resignation brought down the curtain on 17 years on Labor’s frontbench after a long career in the union movement.

    Reg Howard-Smith from the Chamber of Minerals and Energy says with WA accounting for more than half the country’s resources sector, there are some obvious choices to replace him.

    “I think that it would ideal if under these circumstances that you did have a West Australian becoming the resources minister,” he said.

    Mr Howard-Smith says Defence Minister Stephen Smith, or the Special Minister of State Gary Gray, a former Woodside executive, both have a good understanding of the sector.

    Senior Labor ministers are to sell the party’s message.

    “It has been awful, no other way of describing it, it has been awful,” Environment Minister Tony Burke told Lateline.

    “All four are good people, very good people and all four have made their own decisions and they’ve given their reasons.”

    Many party figures agree with former New South Wales minister John Della Bosca who says the resignations, while difficult, are the best thing for Labor.

    “Removing the opportunity for the media to say, ‘but you’re here as the parliamentary secretary for XYZ, or the minister for ABC, or as the chief government whip, and you’re not supporting the Prime Minister because only two days ago you were supporting Kevin Rudd in a ballot’,” he said.

    “That’s gone now. There’s no possibility of that. So I think they’re doing the right thing. The Government is settling down.”

    Special Minister of State Gary Gray told AM that although the leadership fiasco has been damaging for Labor, it can still win the federal election.

    “I think it was extremely damaging for the Parliament, and I think it was damaging for the party,” he said.

    “I think it’s an experience that no-one would ever want to live twice.

    “I think if the election were held this Saturday, we wouldn’t [win].

    “[But] the election in September is some time away.”

    But some supporters say uniting a divided party will be extremely difficult this close to an election.
    Analysts are predicting more leadership troubles if the party slips further in the polls.

  • Grattan on Friday: Demoralised Labor faces bleak future

    22 March 2013, 6.35am AEST
    Grattan on Friday: Demoralised Labor faces bleak future

    An extraordinary orgy of self-destruction has left Labor looking a shambles, with Julia Gillard now facing a reshuffle and an almost impossible task to get her government into fighting form for the September 14 election. Nearly three years ago, Kevin Rudd was brought down by Gillard and her backers…

    Author

    Michelle Grattan

    Professorial Fellow at University of Canberra
    .

    Disclosure Statement

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.

    Provides funding as a Member of The Conversation.

    Kevin Rudd resisted supporters’ pleas to run. AAP/Lukas Coch.

    An extraordinary orgy of self-destruction has left Labor looking a shambles, with Julia Gillard now facing a reshuffle and an almost impossible task to get her government into fighting form for the September 14 election.

    Nearly three years ago, Kevin Rudd was brought down by Gillard and her backers in a coup that came out of nowhere. Gillard said the government had to be got “back on track”. Now her government is more off track than the Rudd one ever was.

    The 2010 coup was brutal; the 2013 attempted coup was farcical. If you count yesterday, Labor has had three chops at its two prime ministers in under three years. Even in this hyperbolic age, that smacks of irrational behaviour.

    Look at things from the vantage point of ordinary voters. A majority have said repeatedly in the polls that they want Rudd back as Labor leader. Many Labor MPs in marginal seats believe he would give them a better chance of survival.

    The Rudd forces have prodded and pushed to try to reinstall him. Their effort reached a crescendo this week, with lobbying of backbenchers and planted media stories – including one saying that good polling for Rudd in one South Australian seat in 2010 had been kept highly secret so as not to hinder the coup.

    Former leader and cabinet minister Simon Crean gave the marginal seat holders their chance. They chose not to take it.

    Chief government whip Joel Fitzgibbon encouraged Crean into the move. Crean had recently met with Rudd, sorting out differences; he had been critical of the Rudd style in government.

    Calling for the spill, Crean announced he would run for deputy leader. It would have been history repeating itself. His father Frank was deputy PM for the last few months of the Whitlam government.

    Rudd camp sources claim they had about 47 votes – they only needed a handful more. The hope was that Crean would bring across some numbers from among his old friends. They didn’t follow him.

    Gillard forces insist the numbers were not even close. A pro-Gillard source said Rudd has “bad timing and can’t count”.

    Rudd, who pledged after his first disastrous challenge that he would not mount a second, wanted a big draft so he could arrive back in his old job with public credibility. He refused the entreaties of backers who went to his office after Gillard announced the spill. But sources among his followers are convinced he would have stood if he was sure of even a narrow win.

    Gillard’s toughness and determination mean that there was never a chance she would crumple under the pressure. She’ll always fight, whether it is against Rudd or Tony Abbott.

    The swordless lunge against Gillard has drawn a lot of blood and left many angry and upset people.

    Crean says he doesn’t regret his action but he has been sacked – the first time he has not been on the front bench since he entered parliament in 1990. Richard Marles, who called on Rudd to stand, has resigned his parliamentary secretaryship. A clutch of whips – chief whip Joel Fitzgibbon (one of Rudd’s main numbers men), and Ed Husic and Janelle Saffin quit last night. The fall of the whips is ironic – they are supposed to be the ones who protect the leader.

    A wave of resignations would have been expected if the leadership had changed. How bizarre to have several resignations when nothing happened.

    At a human level, the day dramatised the estrangement between Gillard and two once close colleagues, She was Crean’s protege; when Crean was pushed out of the leadership she helped him do the numbers successfully for Mark Latham. She and Fitzgibbon worked together in 2006 to bring down Kim Beazley and put in Rudd and herself.

    Rudd’s supporters have been left high and dry by his unwillingness to step up. But Rudd has also been harmed by the hyperactivity of his camp and the way he himself trailed his coat. It is unwise to ever pronounce Rudd politically dead, but it is worth taking the risk. Who can see the caucus thinking about him again? One depressed loyalist said last night Rudd should retire at the election.

    Gillard has once again showed her tactical strength. But if Labor is trounced at the election, history won’t laud how she saw off Rudd this week but condemn the way she left Labor a badly depleted party in the wilderness.

    Gillard, her deputy Wayne Swan and various other Labor figures are insisting the whole sorry mess has been put to bed. Gillard may have been cemented in, but the legacy of bitterness and unhappiness will remain.

    No one could be sure how much better off the party might have been going to Rudd – and many would say that would have been a recipe for more division. But the failure to grasp the chance will likely haunt many members as they stare at electoral defeat.

    Gillard used the rather lame excuse that she had work to do to avoid taking questions at her news conference. But she certainly has plenty on her plate.

    Government sources say she recognises that faults have to be addressed. One of them is “process”. Everyone denounced “process” in the handling of the media reforms which crashed in another disaster yesterday.

    How the media package could be so botched, in timing and salesmanship is impossible to understand. Communications Minister Stephen Conroy presumably won’t be moved in the coming reshuffle but he should be. If he wasn’t a passionate opponent of Rudd, you could have suspected he was deliberately trying to undermine the PM. Instead, it seems to be simply a case study in incompetence. Thanks to that, the chance of media reform has been lost for more years than can be contemplated.

    Now a demoralised government faces a test that even one in good shape would find difficult: framing and selling a budget that needs to be tough just months out from an election. Only the diminishing band of true believers would have any confidence that it is up to this task.

  • Can Intraplate Earthquakes Produce Stronger Shaking Than at Plate Boundaries?

    Can Intraplate Earthquakes Produce Stronger Shaking Than at Plate Boundaries?

    Mar. 20, 2013 — New information about the extent of the 1872 Owens Valley earthquake rupture, which occurs in an area with many small and discontinuous faults, may support a hypothesis proposed by other workers that these types of quakes could produce stronger ground shaking than plate boundary earthquakes underlain by oceanic crust, like many of those taking place along the San Andreas fault.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Share This:

    6

    See Also:

    Earth & Climate
    •Earthquakes
    •Natural Disasters
    •Geology
    •Tsunamis
    •Earth Science
    •Landslides

    Reference
    •Hayward Fault Zone
    •Elastic-rebound theory of earthquakes
    •Alpine Fault
    •North Anatolian Fault

    Published estimates of the 1872 Owens Valley earthquake in southeastern California put the quake at a magnitude 7.4-7.5 to 7.7-7.9. Early work indicates the Owens Valley fault is ~140 kilometers long, and ~113 kilometers ruptured in 1872. Recent work comparing magnitude estimates from reported shaking effects versus fault rupture parameters suggests that the Owens Valley surface rupture was either longer than previously suspected, or that there was unusually strong ground shaking during the event. Colin Amos of Western Washington University and colleagues tested the hypothesis that the 1872 rupture may have extended farther to the south in Owens Valley. They conclude that the 1872 Owens Valley earthquake did not trigger additional rupture in the Haiwee area, indicating that the 1872 rupture was not likely significantly longer than previously reported.

    Amos and colleagues dug trenches in the southwestern Owens Valley area to look at the prominent Sage Flat fault east of Haiwee Reservoir. The trench data, combined with dating of the exposed sediment, allowed them to preclude the southern extent of the 1872 rupture from the Sage Flat area and identify two other much older surface-rupturing earthquakes in the area 25,000 to 30,000 years ago. The evaluation of their trench site suggests that the only recent ground disturbance, possibly coincident with the 1872 earthquake, was mostly weak fracturing that may have resulted from ground shaking — rather than triggered slip along a fault. Soil liquefaction — the conversion of soil into a fluid-like mass during earthquakes — likely occurred at other nearby saturated wetlands and meadows closer to the axis of the valley.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

    Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

    Share on reddit Share on stumbleupon Share on pinterest_share Share on blogger Share on digg Share on fark Share on linkedin Share on myspace Share on newsvine | 6

    ——————————————————————————–

    Story Source:

    The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Seismological Society of America, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

    Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Journal Reference:
    1.B. Amos, Andrew T. Lutz, Angela S. Jayko, Shannon A. Mahan, G. Burch Fisher, and Jeffrey R. Unruh. Refining the Southern Extent of the 1872 Owens Valley Earthquake Rupture through Paleoseismic Investigations in the Haiwee Area, Southeastern California Graphic Colin. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013 (in press)

  • Warming Has Doubled Risk of Katrina-like Storm Surges

    Warming Has Doubled Risk of Katrina-like Storm Surges

    Published: March 18th, 2013 , Last Updated: March 18th, 2013

    808 560 185 1

    Print
    Permalink
    RSS

    Andrew Freedman By Andrew Freedman

    Global warming has already doubled the risk of Hurricane Katrina-magnitude storm surges in the U.S., according to a new study published Monday.

    The study, which was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, estimates that for every 1.8°F increase in global average surface temperatures, there could be a two-fold to seven-fold increase in the risk of Katrina-magnitude surge events.

    Views of inundated areas of New Orleans following breaking of the levees surrounding the city as the result of storm surge from Hurricane Katrina (2005).
    Credit: NOAA.

    The latest climate projections call for the globe to warm by between 3.2°F and 7.2°F by 2100, depending on future greenhouse gas emissions and the precise sensitivity of the climate system to such pollutants.

    When Hurricane Katrina struck the shoreline of Mississippi and Louisiana on Aug. 29, 2005, it caused water levels along some parts of the shoreline to rise by 28 feet above the astronomical tide level, flattening communities and contributing to the deaths of more than 2,000. Storm surges — which occur due to hurricanes’ strong winds and low central air pressure — are hurricanes’ greatest killer, a point that was driven home again just last year, when Hurricane Sandy killed at least 72, mainly along the coast of New Jersey and New York.

    Technically, Sandy was a post-tropical cyclone at landfall, although its effects were similar to a land-falling hurricane, as it resulted in hurricane-force winds and some of the largest waves ever recorded in New York Harbor.

    The new study uses a historical record of storm surge events from six tide gauges located along the U.S. coast, all with data going back to at least 1923. The authors of the study compared the changes in observed surge records to several well-known or theorized influences on tropical cyclones, such as global temperature changes, regional sea surface temperature changes, and sources of natural climate variability such as El Niño and La Niña events.

    The study concluded that regional sea surface temperatures and global average surface temperatures best match the tide gauge records.

    The study also used the tide gauge data to project changes in the probability of extreme storm surge events. It factored out other influences that could affect the magnitude and damage from storm surges, such as sea level rise, but it also may have captured surge events caused by non-tropical storms, such as Sandy-like hybrid storms or nor’easters.

    “An increase in surge activity could also indicate that such types of weather systems are becoming more frequent in a warmer climate,” said lead author Aslak Grinsted, a climate researcher at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen, in an email conversation.

    The study found that the warming that took place during the 20th century has already led to a doubling of the risk of Katrina-magnitude storm surge events. It found that a warming of just 0.72°F could cut in half the return period of Katrina-magnitude surges, thereby making them a far more frequent occurrence.

    NASA visualization of the wind field associated with Hurricane Sandy as it approached the Mid-Atlantic coast on Oct. 28, 2012. This map was produced with data from a radar scatterometer on the Indian Space Research Organization’s (ISRO) Oceansat-2. Wind speeds above 40 mph are yellow; above 50 mph are orange; and above 60 mph are dark red.
    Click to enlarge the image. Credit: NASA.

    “Our study shows that extreme (storm) surges become more frequent in a warmer climate, and that the relative change in frequency is much more pronounced for the most extreme events,” Grinsted said. “I think our study is important because it says that coastal adaptation measures should include changes in surge statistics in addition to local sea level rise.”

    James Elsner, a professor at Florida State University, who was not involved in the new storm surge study, said it is a valuable contribution to this research area. But he questioned the magnitude of the study’s results, noting that the statistical model the researchers used may have overestimated the level of the storm surge at different future time periods. Nevertheless, Elsner said, “I think it advances the science on hurricanes and climate change by showing a methodology to address future storminess.”

    Kerry Emanuel, an atmospheric sciences professor at MIT who also was not involved in the study, said the surge record helps provide another window into tropical cyclone history and how global warming may already be influencing such powerful storms, even though it, like observational records of hurricanes from storm landfall data and aircraft measurements, has some drawbacks, including the way it captures storm surges from both hurricanes and non-tropical storms.

    “… The new study does give a kind of ground truth to modelers who are trying to simulate the effects of 20th century climate change on storm surges,” Emanuel said via email.

    The new study found that global warming is increasing the risk of large storm surge events by a greater amount, and at a faster rate, than other studies that have used different methods.

    Emanuel and other researchers have been using computer models that simulate the physical aspects of the global climate system to examine how hurricanes may change as the climate continues to warm. That is a different approach than the one taken by Grinsted and his colleagues, which relies on a so-called statistical model to test for relationships between various climate-related variables.

    Some of the modeling studies have found that global warming is likely to increase the risk of large storm surge events, both because of sea level rise, which will make even weaker hurricanes more damaging, and changes in the strength of the storms themselves.

    A diagram of a hurricane’s storm surge.
    Credit: NOAA.

    For example, Emanuel is a co-author of a 2012 study that was published in the journal Nature Climate Change, which found that the combined effects of changes in storm intensity and tracks that may occur as a result of climate change could cause the present-day 100-year surge event in New York to occur once every 3 to 20 years by 2100, and the present day 500-year surge event to occur once every 25 to 240 years. That represents a significant escalation in storm surge risk, the study said.

    Hurricane Sandy brought impacts that were actually worse than the 500-year surge event calculated by the 2012 study, since the combination of the storm surge and astronomical high tides caused the peak storm tide during Sandy at The Battery in Lower Manhattan to reach about 4.23 meters above mean sea level. That was about 1 meter higher than the 500-year storm tide calculated for the 2012 study.

    And a forthcoming study in the journal of Climate, by a research group based at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory in Princeton, N.J., finds that tropical storms will likely become less frequent but more intense as the climate warms, which is in line with the findings of previous studies. That research, which also relies on computer models that simulate tropical storms and hurricanes in a warming world, found a significant rise in the “lifetime intensity” of tropical storms and hurricanes, and found that hurricanes will produce more rainfall than they do now, on average.

    Visualization of Hurricane Katrina’s winds on Aug. 25, 2005.
    Click to enlarge the image. Credit: NASA.

    However, using the newest generation of global climate models, the forthcoming study found a smaller increase in the frequency of intense hurricanes, such as Category 4 or Category 5 storms, compared to the results of previous studies.

    “Nevertheless, we recognize the much greater importance of Cat 4-5 hurricanes, compared to lower-intensity hurricanes, on damage potential, as reflected in historical studies of damage from hurricanes,” said study co-author Tom Knutson in an email message.

    Yet another study, published in the March issue of the journal Climate Dynamics, found that the proportion of Category 4 and 5 hurricanes in all ocean basins has increased at a rate of about 25 to 30 percent per each 1.8°F of global warming, but that this rate of increase may slow considerably as warming continues.

    Clearly, the question of how global warming will influence tropical storms and hurricanes, which are nature’s most powerful storms, remains a focus of active scientific research. Using a variety of techniques, scientists are honing in on the most likely scenarios, and the science as a whole points to growing risks for damaging storms along the rapidly-developing U.S. coastline.

    Although the studies differ in the details, their main message is consistent: As time goes on, the risk of damaging storms, with potentially devastating storm surges, is increasing.

    Editor’s Note: This article has been amended to include a more precise definition of storm surge.

    Related Content
    Global Warming May Bring More ‘Black Swan’ Storm Surges
    Risk of Hurricane Sandy-Like Surge Events Rising
    Ongoing Coverage of Historic Hurricane Sandy
    Sea Level Rising Faster Than Average in Northeast U.S.
    Sandy’s Storm Surge Explained and Why It Matters
    Hurricane Isaac Spurs Design of Storm Surge Warnings
    Surging Seas

    Follow the author on Twitter @afreedma or @ClimateCentral. We’re also on Facebook & other social networks.

    Posted in Causes, Greenhouse Gases, Impacts, Projections, Climate, Extremes, Flooding, Hurricanes, Oceans & Coasts, Sea Level, Weather, Extreme Weather, United States, US National

    Comments

    By christi (Bozeman)
    on March 18th, 2013

    Are you able to post the PNAS link to the article that you are referring to? Thanks!

    By Lindsay Harmon
    on March 19th, 2013

    @Christi – The link has been added!

    -Lindsay Harmon
    Web Producer, Climate Central

    By dan_in_illinois
    on March 19th, 2013

    Hmmm…

    I wonder if these predictions about Katrina-like storm surges are being made by the same “experts” who predicted that, after Katrina, we would face increasingly intense hurricanes each season due to, naturally, AGW. After making those predictions, the subsequent hurricane seasons were, in fact, comparatively mild.

    By Andrew
    on March 19th, 2013

    Dan,

    The seasons after 2005 were generally much more active than average, but U.S. landfalls of major hurricanes (Cat 3,4,5) were down significantly. So the perception is that the seasons were mild, but that’s not quite the case from an Atlantic Basin perspective. -A

    By Don (Davis, Ca 95616)
    on March 19th, 2013

    Dan: Do you have a citation for the claim that experts predicted increasingly intense hurricanes?

    By dan_in_illinois
    on March 19th, 2013

    Don,

    There were quite a number of such predictions back in 2006. Here’s one from NOAA:

    http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2006/s2634.htm

    By Ida Sætersmoen (Oslo Norway)
    on March 20th, 2013

    I thought americans loved Florida ? In 87 years it will be about 15 feet higher ocea level and most of Florida will bee under water. 400 ppm CO2 gives 20 feet higher sealevel, but NASA is not sure. It can go as high as 66 feet.
    We waste a lot of money on infrastructure and buildings if we do not plan with this higher sea-level. When 75 % af the worlds population live along the shore / ocean it is stupid not to plan with higher ocean level.

    By Bill Linton (London N13 4AJ, UK)
    on March 20th, 2013

    Storm surges will be getting bigger at (I presume – I’m not a scientist) roughly the same rate as warming happens. That’s still quite slow until we start to hit the tipping points, so for the moment the difference between 2012 and 2011, say, would be detectable only by close scrutiny of the data. And there’s a random element in it too – hurricanes don’t come off a production line.

    Doesn’t mean it isn’t happening!
    Name (required):
    Email (required):
    City/State/Zip:
    Enter the word “climate” in the box below:

    [+] View our comment guidelines.

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.
    Archives

    2013
    2012
    2011
    2010
    2009

    Climopedia
    Library

    Extreme Weather and Climate Change: The Northeast
    Extreme Weather and Climate Change: The Midwest
    Extreme Weather and Climate Change: The Southwest
    Extreme Weather and Climate Change: The Southeast
    Podcast: Digging Into Past Climate

    Climopedia

    The Global Energy Assessment – Chapter 11: Renewable Energy
    The Global Energy Assessment – Chapter 12: Fossil Energy Systems
    The Global Energy Assessment – Chapter 17: Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development
    Coal and Biomass to Fuels and Power
    Making Fischer-Tropsch Fuels and Electricity from Coal and Biomass: Performance and Cost Analysis

    Library
    Gallery
    Maps Show Quarter Million New Yorkers Reside Below Potential Storm Surge Level This map shows the land zone within five vertical feet of the average high tide line in the New York City area.
    View Gallery
    Also find us on…

    ClimateWatch
    Yale 360
    Time
    The NewsHour
    On Earth
    Scientific American
    TckTckTck
    Weather Channel
    Guardian Network

  • Largest concentrated solar power plant opens in Abu Dhabi

    Largest concentrated solar power plant opens in Abu Dhabi
    Advertisement
    18 March 2013 Last updated at 16:13 GMT Help

    The oil-rich state of Abu Dhabi has officially opened the world’s largest concentrated solar power plant.

    Shams 1 – which means ‘the sun’ in Arabic – uses advanced parabolic trough technology to harness the light from over 250,000 mirrors.

    Deborah Basckin reports.
    Share this page
    1.3K