Author: Neville

  • Dirty fossil fuel exports will come back to bite Australia

    Dirty fossil fuel exports will come back to bite Australia

    Australian coal and gas is being shipped and burned around Asia at record rates – but at what cost to the climate?
    Share66

    inShare.4
    Email

    A coal truck passes a pile of coal at BHP Billiton’s Mt Arthur coal mine in Muswellbrook, Australia. Photograph: Ian Waldie/Getty Images

    Australia just loves to share, regardless of whether or not the world might universally benefit from what it’s got to give.

    There’s been Kylie Minogue, a certain beer that nobody in Australia actually drinks, unplayable spin bowlers, those mini plastic alopecia-ridden clip-on koalas and pictures of “wish you were here” beaches.

    But there’s another, less famous Aussie-born export: fossil fuels. Lots of ’em.

    I know, I know. Australia is tackling the world’s greatest market failure with its legislated price on greenhouse gas emissions. One tonne can be yours for AU$23 (£15.50).

    Al Gore has said the laws introduced in 2012 by the Labor prime minister, Julia Gillard, had “inspired the world” because “carbon polluters are being held accountable for the global warming pollution they pour into the atmosphere every single day”. Barack Obama has described the policy as “bold”.

    Few would argue that it’s a first step to fundamental change but Gore, Obama and Gillard need blinkers when they use the carbon price as evidence of serious action.

    That way they can avoid seeing the squizillions of tonnes of Aussie fossil fuels being shipped and burned around Asia like they’re going out of fashion (which surely they should be).

    Australia’s domestic emissions of greenhouse gases are relatively modest on a global scale – about 560m tonnes of CO2-equivalent (CO2e) annually. But on a per capita basis, Aussies are one of the worst offenders in the developed world.

    A new study in the journal Biogeosciences finds Australia exports twice as much CO2e via coal and gas than it emits at home from burning fossil fuels for energy. But Australia is only getting started.

    Already the world’s biggest exporter of coal, a Greenpeace report has dubbed the country’s plans to expand those exports as a “carbon bomb” that will add 900 megatonnes of CO2 to the atmosphere every year when its burned.

    On top of that, the state of Victoria is touting, to anyone interested, some 13bn tonnes of its reserves of lignite – low-grade brown coal.

    Australia’s most emissions-intensive power plants are fueled by brown coal. In theory the much-lauded carbon price should hit the dirtiest power generators the hardest.

    But new analysis this week suggests that, so far, the carbon price hasn’t so much hit them hard as provided billion dollar bonus cheques.

    A report commissioned by not-for-profit group Environment Victoria has found, in the first six months of the scheme, the Victorian power firms passed on to customers more than 100% of the carbon price.

    Among the laws and schemes to deliver that price was a pot of cash to supposedly stop power plant owners going under and the lights going off.

    Thanks to this and the extra cash from price rises the report claims the brown coal generators will pocket between AU$2.3bn (£1.5bn) and AU$5.4bn (£3.64bn).

    And where does a fair bit of that filthy lucre go? Clue: it starts with “e” and ends in “xport”. Three of the biggest power plants are owned by two international energy giants: the Europe-based GDF Suez and the Hong Kong-based CLP Group.

    But there are other “carbon bombs” being readied for launch.

    Queensland has three projects going ahead costing AU$45bn (£30.3bn) to take gas from coal seams (with the help of fracking and about 18,000 wells) and pipe it hundreds of miles to Curtis Island next to the Great Barrier Reef for conversion into liquefied natural gas (LNG).

    The Queensland government estimates more than 28m tonnes of LNG will be exported annually, helping Australia compete for the title of world’s top LNG exporter.

    In South Australia, Linc Energy has dollar signs flashing in front of its eyes after finding a possible 233bn barrels of shale oil sitting under its exploration areas.

    Australia also has globally significant stores of shale gas to exploit, which firms are starting to have a crack at.

    But could it be that all that digging, burning and exporting is coming back to bite the Minogue/Fosters/crappy koala souvenir homestead?

    Australia had its biggest and longest heatwave on record in January creating perfect conditions for hundreds of bushfires. For seven days straight, the average maximum temperature across the country topped 39C.

    Then there were the 2009 Black Saturday bushfires, which killed more than 170 people. The 2011 Queensland floods caused $5bn of damage after an area the size of France and Germany was declared a disaster zone.

    Of course these extreme events, like others being shared around the world of late, had absolutely nothing whatsoever, not even in the slightest, how very dare you even contemplate it, to do with man-made climate change.

  • City backyard now barely a memory

    February 21, 2013 Posted by Neville under Uncategorized
    1 Comment Edit This

    City backyard now barely a memory By Nathan Mawby Herald Sun February 22, 20138:15AM Increase Text Size Decrease Text Size Print Email • Fewer people living with backyards • 97 per cent of approvals for medium-density homes The backyard could become a thing of the past for inner-city dwellers. Source: Supplied THE great Australian dream…

  • Swan promises rigorous audit of election policies

    Swan promises rigorous audit of election policies

    By chief political correspondent Simon Cullen, ABCUpdated February 22, 2013, 9:08 am

    tweet1

    Email
    Print

    The Parliamentary Budget Office will be required to release a post-election audit of all election commitments within a month of polling day under changes announced by Treasurer Wayne Swan today.

    In a speech to an Australian Business Economists forum this morning, Mr Swan has also promised to release a preliminary budget outcome for the current financial year well before the September 14 election.

    Amid an increasingly personal debate with the Coalition over economic credibility, Mr Swan has committed to a funding boost for the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) to ensure it has the resources needed to prepare rigorous policy costings in the lead-up to the election.

    “Transparency would be further enhanced if the PBO were to prepare a post-election audit of all political parties, publishing full costings of their election commitments and their budget bottom line 30 days after an election,” he said.

    “We will introduce legislation for consideration by the Parliament to enable this reform.

    “This will remove the capacity of any political party to try to mislead the Australian people and punish those that do.

    “It will avoid a situation we saw last election, where the Liberal Party thought they could con the Australian people.

    “As a result of the reforms I am announcing, their $11 billion black hole in the budget bottom line would have been uncovered regardless of the election outcome.”

    After the 2010 election, Treasury analysis revealed a multi-billion-dollar shortfall in the Coalition’s election costings, although the Opposition described the figures as a “difference of opinion”.

    The analysis was only made public because of the post-election negotiations between the independent MPs and the major parties.

    Shadow treasurer Joe Hockey has welcomed Mr Swan’s move, saying the Coalition strongly supports the PBO.

    “I cannot believe my luck in Wayne Swan calling for sunshine on budget numbers,” he said.

    “I mean, he is just the gift that keeps giving in this regard.

    “Every single number from the mining tax and the carbon tax through to the budget surplus that he claimed he was going to deliver, every number he’s got wrong and transparency only helps the Coalition.

    “It seems as though Wayne Swan is actually trying to get more prepared for opposition than he is actually running the country. I mean, he’s almost declared the innings closed on Labor by going down this path.”

    The Coalition has said it would not be able to finalise its policy costings for the 2013 election until the Pre-election Fiscal Outlook (PEFO) is released, which will occur after the official campaign begins in August.

    Mr Swan has today pledged to release a preliminary budget outcome for the 2012-13 financial year as soon as he is given a “reliable figure”.

    “Treasury and Finance officials last week were clear that a reliable estimate of the underlying cash balance could be made well before the election and we commit to releasing them,” he said.

    “This means that the 2012-13 outcome of the underlying cash balance – the most important budget aggregate – will be there for everyone to see.

    “There will be no fiscal surprises after the election.”

    Both the Coalition and Labor have indicated the economy will be a key focus of its election pitch to voters, although the Government is still dealing with the fallout of walking away from its promise to deliver a surplus this financial year.

    It is also coming under pressure to explain how it will pay for signature policies such as the National Disability Insurance Scheme and the overhaul of school funding.
    “Inevitably, these reforms will involve very difficult decisions, but they will always be guided by our Labor values,” Mr Swan said.

  • Water waste everywhere but no fines in four years

    Water waste everywhere but no fines in four years

    Date February 22, 2013
    Read later

    Nicole Hasham

    inShare.
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    SYDNEY WATER has not issued a single fine to residents for hosing down their driveway or using a sprinkler in the middle of the day, allowing water wasters off the hook for the past four years.

    The public have reported more than 2200 alleged breaches to Sydney Water, all of which were investigated. It issued 71 warnings but no fines.

    The findings come as the utility abandons its decade-long push to save water, despite figures showing household usage in Sydney has outstripped most other cities.

    Tough water restrictions were lifted in mid-2009 after years of drought and replaced by permanent measures known as Water Wise rules.

    Advertisement

    They ban the watering of gardens between 10am and 4pm and stipulate that all hand-held hoses must have a trigger nozzle. Surfaces such as paths and driveways should not be hosed.

    Breaches attract fines of $220 for individuals and $550 for businesses. But figures show not a single fine has been handed out since the rules began.

    A spokeswoman for Sydney Water said it could not issue a fine ”on the basis of a neighbour’s report”. ”We need to witness the breach or have other solid evidence that will stand up in court,” she said.

    The chief executive of the Nature Conservation Council of NSW, Pepe Clarke, said it raised questions about Sydney Water’s effectiveness as a water watchdog. ”To have such a large number of allegations and investigations but to not issue a penalty for a single one of them suggests that Sydney Water is not taking its role as a regulator seriously,” he said.

    As Fairfax Media reported on Thursday, Sydney Water has dumped water saving programs for schools, businesses and households. It claims that continuing to drive down use would cost more than the value of the water saved, which would lead to an increase in bills.

    Warragamba Dam is near full capacity and recent water use matches that of four years ago, when the state was in the grip of drought and extensive restrictions and water efficiency programs were in place.

    However, critics said drier conditions would return and abandoning the programs undermined years of efforts to change water use culture. The CSIRO predicts that by 2030 southern Australia may receive up to 10 per cent less rainfall.

    The latest National Water Commission performance report shows that average water use by Sydney Water households was second only to Perth in the three years to mid-2011.

    The Sydney Water spokeswoman said restrictions were lifted earlier in Sydney than in Melbourne and Brisbane, where dam levels had reached lower levels, which influenced use. ”Water use is not easily comparable on a year-on-year basis across utilities,” she said.

    But Mr Clarke questioned why Sydney Water was cutting investment in water saving when consumption remained high compared with other cities.

    The director of the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures, Stuart White, said Sydney Water had led the way in water saving programs but there was ”more to be done”. He said cuts in efficiency spending had been mirrored by utilities around the country.

    Mr White did not object to a move away from large-scale water recycling, saying smaller, local schemes lowered the cost of carrying water through pipes.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/water-issues/water-waste-everywhere-but-no-fines-in-four-years-20130221-2euba.html#ixzz2LZo83pHs

  • Businessmen fear worst in ICAC inquiry, says lawyer

    Businessmen fear worst in ICAC inquiry, says lawyer

    Date February 22, 2013 123 reading now

    Read later

    Kate McClymont

    Senior Reporter

    View more articles from Kate McClymont

    Follow Kate on TwitterEmail Kate

    inShare.
    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    Involved in suit … Neville Crichton, Denis O’Neil and John McGuigan. Photo: Michele Mossop, Robert Pearce, Rob Homer

    SOME of the nation’s wealthiest businessmen are concerned a corruption inquiry might make findings of serious misconduct against them, including possible allegations of criminal conduct, their barrister told a Sydney court.

    Multimillionaire car dealer Neville Crichton and his eastern suburbs property developing mate Denis O’Neil are suing Cascade Coal directors and a raft of other people who have featured in a sensational corruption inquiry.

    The pair invested in Cascade Coal in November 2010, later discovering their $13 million investment had ended up in the coffers of the family of Labor kingpin Eddie Obeid.

    Cascade has been at the centre of an Independent Commission Against Corruption inquiry.

    Advertisement

    Cascade, controlled by wealthy business figures including John McGuigan, John Atkinson and John Kinghorn, as well as mining magnate Travers Duncan, is alleged to have won a rigged government coal tender for Mount Penny in the Bylong Valley which covered several properties owned by the Obeids and their associates. The Obeids obtained a secret 25 per cent share of Cascade.

    Bob Stitt, QC, is representing Messrs McGuigan, Atkinson and Kinghorn and Cascade Coal in the civil lawsuit taken by Mr Crichton and Mr O’Neil, which had its first day in court on Thursday.

    Mr Stitt foreshadowed an application to have the case delayed until the ICAC hands down its findings.

    He said possible ”allegations of criminal conduct and serious misconduct” could be made against his clients and that ”quasi criminal proceedings” should take precedence over civil proceedings.

    Francis Douglas, QC, who is representing Mr Crichton and Mr O’Neil, told the Federal Court yesterday the pair thought they were part of a capital raising for Cascade, but only $6 was raised.

    Instead, the two businessmen’s millions found their way, via a complicated route, to the Obeids.

    Not only that, but Mr O’Neil’s $8 million investment and Mr Crichton’s $5 million investment was to result in ownership of 280,000 Cascade shares worth $46 each. The two men later discovered their shares were worth $0.0001 each.

    Mr Crichton and Mr O’Neil want their money back, plus interest, and are alleging that many of the same cast of characters involved in the state’s most sensational corruption inquiry engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct.

    The case has a list of 16 defendants which include investment banker Richard ”Digger” Poole and his wife, Amanda, whose bank account was used to channel their money through to a company controlled by the Obeids.

    Also being sued are stockbrokers Brent Potts and Peter Gray as well as Southeast Investment Group, the front company used by the Obeids to hide their interest in Cascade.

    A notable omission in the list of defendants is eastern suburbs wheeler-dealer Greg Jones, who kept his own investment in Cascade a secret due to his friendship with former minister Ian Macdonald.

    Mr Jones introduced his friends Mr Crichton and Mr O’Neil to the Cascade deal. In an intercepted call played to the corruption inquiry, he said to Cascade director Mr McGuigan, ”Yeah, you think I’m really feeling terrific about having invited all those guys in through old acts of mateship?”

    ICAC heard the proposed 2011 sale of Cascade to White Energy, which would have made Mr Jones and the other Cascade investors up to $60 million each, did not go ahead because of rumours of the Obeids’ involvement.

    The case will be back in court for further directions in April.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/businessmen-fear-worst-in-icac-inquiry-says-lawyer-20130221-2euaa.html#ixzz2LZnGO7Et

  • Labor has lost the plot, and the narrative

    here:HomeNational TimesPoliticsArticle

    Search smh:

    Search in:
    National Times

    .
    .

    Labor has lost the plot, and the narrative

    Date February 22, 2013 Category Opinion 320 reading now

    Comments 295
    Read later

    Waleed Aly

    View more articles from Waleed Aly

    inShare.
    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    .

    Greens funding threat

    Greens issue threat over mining tax. Greens Senator Larissa Waters and Nationals Senator Fiona Nash discuss government instability.
    Autoplay OnOff
    Video feedback
    Video settings

    If you’re inclined to take a long-term view of politics, the hand-wringing on whether Julia Gillard should stay or go is really just so much white noise.

    Labor is in crisis, but not principally for the reasons that occupy the commentariat.

    It’s not about a bitterly divided caucus, or political miscalculations such as the ham-fisted Nova Peris saga. It’s not even simply about policy missteps such as the creation of an impotent mining tax.

    Illustration: Simon Letch

    Labor’s problems are not nearly so managerial and technocratic. They are much, much bigger than that.

    Advertisement

    Labor’s problem is ideological. It doesn’t really mean anything any more, and probably hasn’t since Paul Keating lost power in 1996. Sure, Labor has had its moments – most notably in its campaign against WorkChoices, which jolted its ideological memory and gave it a momentary reason to exist.

    But this was no ideological revival. It was reactive: a political opportunity well taken rather than a world view reborn.

    Only John Howard’s pro-business, anti-union zeal, unencumbered by any resistance in the Senate, made this possible. After WorkChoices, much as before it, what then?

    This isn’t an optional, esoteric extra. Governments ultimately thrive on narrative. Voters are not merely electing a suite of set policies. They are electing a party that will respond to future, unforeseen policy questions. They therefore need to know what you’re about. That’s what a clear consistent story tells them.

    A party without a narrative is reduced to seeking your support as a lesser evil. Hence Labor’s focus on Tony Abbott.

    Every successful government can be summarised in a phrase or two. Bob Hawke: a new, deregulated, globalised economy. Keating inherited that story, then added Asia, a growing economic power in our backyard we should embrace by shedding our British skin. Howard was about nationalism, security and capital’s triumph over labour. Everything – asylum seeker policy, counterterrorism, foreign affairs, even unsolicited social commentary about minority groups – was tailored to fit the story.

    Exactly what story has Labor told us since 2007? It began with something about ”Australian working families”, but that too was a relic of the WorkChoices campaign. After that, it has been mostly a blancmange of conflicting messages. Perhaps it started when Kevin Rudd wanted to be ”tough but humane” on asylum seekers. It took Gillard only a matter of days as Prime Minister to continue the incoherence, declaring both that the number of boat people arriving in Australia was much smaller than many imagined, before swiftly going on to reassure those worried about invading hordes that their concerns were legitimate, and that they’re ”certainly [not] racist”. We learn nothing from this about how Labor sees asylum seekers. We learn only that it’s trying to please everyone.

    The problem persists even in Labor-friendly policy areas. Take education, where the Rudd government announced a bold new focus on literacy and numeracy, much as Howard might have. More recently, it commissioned the Gonski review, but tied its hands on the question of private school funding so the panel couldn’t even consider cutting it. Then it pledged a response it is yet to detail or fund.

    Indeed, its only real response to date has been a bill it hailed as the most important of last year, but which had nothing in it at all. Explicitly. It has a section specifically saying the bill creates no rights or obligations on anyone – especially the government. To paraphrase, ”section 10: this legislation does not exist”.

    Even Labor’s most significant reform, the carbon tax, merely symbolises the party’s ideological malaise. The government’s heftiest achievement isn’t even its own policy. Indeed, it was so infamously promised not to be its policy.

    Remember the citizens’ assembly? That was Gillard’s pledge before the last election: a random gathering of ordinary people who would somehow reach a consensus on pricing carbon. That’s a process, not a policy. It’s the kind of thing you do when you want to announce something but you’re not prepared to commit to a compelling vision of your own.

    As the opposition hammers it on Labor’s broken pledge to deliver a surplus this financial year, the government seems to have found some coherence. Confronted with falling corporate profit (and therefore falling tax revenue), it had a choice: either keep finding cuts that would make lots of people unemployed and deflate the economy, or prioritise jobs and growth. It’s a nice line. It sounds like a Labor line. But it follows years of saying the opposite; of elevating the surplus to some inviolable standard of good economic management; of saying the main game was giving the Reserve Bank ”room to cut interest rates”. And this in the face of the ever-lengthening queue of economists advising to the contrary.

    In short, Labor had bought wholly into the Coalition’s narrative for no discernible reason. It conceded the philosophical debate, then lost the political fight. So now, when it has finally found a Labor story to tell, it sounds convenient and insincere. Labor has become a liberal party, so it isn’t even convincing when it sounds like itself.

    That’s not about incompetent leadership; it is the flipside of the Hawke/Keating legacy. Once Labor embraced a deregulated, liberal economy, the political landscape was forever changed, leaving a diabolical question for subsequent Labor leaders: what exactly is the point of Labor politics? The compromise has been to talk about Labor’s ”reforming tradition”, but reform is an act, not an ideology. WorkChoices was a reform, too.

    Labor has been chasing its base ever since. Often it watched helplessly as workers became small business owners and turned into Howard’s socially conservative battlers. Labor cannot offer them industrial protection, and desperately doesn’t want to offend their cultural sensibilities, which is why it says things like ”tough but humane”.

    The result is that Labor cannot even compete on social and cultural politics. Hence the flight to the Greens, the party Gillard so venomously dismissed this week as a ”party of protest”. To which the most devastating reply is surely: ”Fine. But what are you?”

    Waleed Aly is the presenter of Drive on Radio National.

    Follow the National Times on Twitter

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/labor-has-lost-the-plot-and-the-narrative-20130221-2eua9.html#ixzz2LZm8sKB2