Author: Neville

  • Security Risks of Extreme Weather and Climate Change

    Security Risks of Extreme Weather and Climate Change

    Feb. 11, 2013 — A Harvard researcher is pointing toward a new reason to worry about the effects of climate change — national security.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Share This:

    122

    Related Ads:
    •Climate Change
    •Global Warming
    •Weather
    •Wild Science

    See Also:

    Matter & Energy
    •Energy Policy
    •Biometric

    Earth & Climate
    •Climate
    •Global Warming

    Science & Society
    •Environmental Policies
    •Resource Shortage

    Reference
    •Consensus of scientists regarding global warming
    •Security engineering
    •Instrumental temperature record
    •Climate

    A new report co-authored by Michael McElroy, the Gilbert Butler Professor of Environmental Studies, and D. James Baker, a former administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, connects global climate change, extreme weather, and national security. During the next decade, the report concludes, climate change could have wide-reaching effects on everything from food, water, and energy supplies to critical infrastructure and economic security.

    “Over the last century, the trend has been toward urbanization — to concentrate people in smaller areas,” McElroy said. “We’ve built an infrastructure — whether it’s where we build our homes or where we put our roads and bridges — that fits with that trend. If the weather pattern suddenly changes in a serious way, it could create very large problems. Bridges may be in the wrong place, or sea walls may not be high enough.”

    Possible effects on critical infrastructure, however, only scratch the surface of the security concerns.

    On an international scale, the report points to recent events, such as flooding in Pakistan and sustained drought in eastern Africa, that may be tied to changing weather patterns. How the United States responds to such disasters — whether by delivering humanitarian aid or through technical support — could affect security.

    “By recognizing the immediacy of these risks, the U.S. can enhance its own security and help other countries do a better job of preparing for and coping with near-term climate extremes,” Baker said.

    The report suggests that climate changes could even have long-reaching political effects.

    It’s possible, McElroy said, that climate changes may have contributed to the uprisings of the Arab Spring by causing a rise in food prices, or that the extended drought in northern Mexico has contributed to political instability and a rise in drug trafficking in the region.

    “We don’t have definitive answers, but our report raises these questions, because what we are saying is that these conditions are likely to be more normal than they were in the past,” McElroy said. “There are also questions related to sea-level rise. The conventional wisdom is that sea level is rising by a small amount, but observations show it’s rising about twice as fast as the models suggested. Could it actually go up by a large amount in a short period? I don’t think you can rule that out.”

    Other potential effects, McElroy said, are tied to changes in an atmospheric circulation pattern called the Hadley circulation, in which warm tropical air rises, resulting in tropical rains. As the air moves to higher latitudes, it descends, causing the now-dry air to heat up. Regions where the hot, dry air returns to the surface are typically dominated by desert.

    The problem, he said, is that evidence shows those arid regions are expanding.

    “The observational data suggest that the Hadley circulation has expanded by several degrees in latitude,” McElroy said. “That’s a big deal, because if you shift where deserts are by just a few degrees, you’re talking about moving the southwestern desert into the grain-producing region of the country, or moving the Sahara into southern Europe.”

    The report is the result of the authors’ involvement with Medea, a group of scientists who support the U.S. government by examining declassified national security data useful for scientific inquiry. In recent decades, the group has worked with officials in the United States and Russia to declassify data on climatic conditions in the Arctic and thousands of spy satellite images. Those images have been used to study ancient settlement patterns in the Middle East and changes in Arctic ice.

    “I would be reluctant to say that our report is the last word on short-term climate change,” McElroy said. “Climate change is a moving target. We’ve done an honest, useful assessment of the state of play today, but we will need more information and more hard work to get it right. One of the recommendations in our report is the need for a serious investment in measurement and observation. It’s really important to keep doing that, otherwise we’re going to be flying blind.”

    The study was conducted with funds provided by the Central Intelligence Agency. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the CIA or the U.S. government.

    Report: Climate Extremes: Recent Trends with Implications for National Security at www.environment.harvard.edu/climate-extremes

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

  • Howes lashes anti-Gillard leakers

    HomeNational TimesPolitical NewsArticle

    Search smh:

    Search in:
    National Times

    .
    .

    Howes lashes anti-Gillard leakers

    Date February 21, 2013 – 1:23PM 29 reading now

    Read later

    Daniel Hurst

    Federal political reporter

    View more articles from Daniel Hurst

    Follow Daniel on TwitterEmail Daniel

    inShare.
    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    AWU chief Paul Howes signs his name to a pledge to stop Tony Abbott in his tracks at the union’s conference in Queensland. Picture: AWU

    Key Labor figure Paul Howes has lashed out crudely at Labor MPs he says are undermining Prime Minister Julia Gillard, telling those who anonymously attack their leader to ”grow a pair”.

    The Australian Workers’ Union national secretary, who earlier in the week pledged his 110 per cent support for Ms Gillard, took aim at insiders who spoke anonymously to journalists and speculated about a return to Kevin Rudd or spread criticism.

    ”Nothing upsets me more lately than opening newspapers on a daily or weekly basis and reading anonymous quotes from ‘senior Labor sources’ undermining our Prime Minister, undermining the leadership of our movement and this country,” he said in his closing speech to the AWU national conference on the Gold Coast.

    ”What a bunch of gutless pricks they are that they can’t put their names to what they are saying.”

    Advertisement

    The tough talking drew applause from union delegates at the four-day national conference.

    Mr Howes appeared on ABC’s Lateline the night before Ms Gillard was installed as Prime Minister in June 2010 to declare that the powerful AWU had withdrawn its support for Mr Rudd.

    Mr Howes told the gathering: ”I might get the odd attack for appearing once or twice too many times on television or being a bit too blunt about [former Rio Tinto chief] Tom Albanese or former prime ministers or going on shows like Lateline on that particular night and maybe that’s right, but we say what we do, we have the guts to put our names to what we mean, we don’t background.

    ”We get out on the front foot and we say it loudly and clearly.”

    Mr Howes said he had a message for Labor members who were trying to undermine the cause.

    ”Grow a pair and put your name to what you’re saying and have the fight out here publicly. Don’t go slinking around the back rooms of the press gallery on a daily basis. Come out and articulate your case. Make your message. Have the discussion with the Australian people. Get out there and argue your point.”

    The warning came after Mr Howes warned that unionists faced ”the fight of their lives” to prevent the election of an ”extreme” Tony Abbott-led government.

    Mr Howes launched a full-throttle attack on Mr Abbott as he reaffirmed plans to send advocates into key marginal electorates to promote the struggling Gillard government.

    The move ties into a broader union movement strategy to use word of mouth in the workplace in an attempt to turn the electoral tide in the face of opinion polls pointing to a landslide Labor defeat.

    As the four-day AWU conference wrapped up on Thursday, hundreds of delegates signed a pledge vowing to ”stop Tony Abbott in his tracks”.

    Mr Howes took up the attack to the Opposition Leader and some of his frontbenchers.

    ”We know what type of man Tony Abbott is. We know what type of man Eric Abetz is. We know what kind of joker Joe Hockey is. Hell, we even know who Barnaby Joyce is even if he doesn’t know it himself.”

    Mr Howes ridiculed the image of Senator Joyce as an average Australian, saying: ”He’s a guy who goes on cruise ship holidays with Gina Rinehart. He’s a guy who writes letters to Gina Rinehart’s children begging them to stop litigation against their mother.”

    Mr Howes labelled Mr Abbott as ”the most inconsistent so-called conviction politician that this nation has ever seen”, pointing to contradictory statements over climate change and WorkChoices.

    He said Mr Abbott was only consistent on ”extreme social conservative” positions on reproductive rights.

    ”It’s hard to actually call Tony Abbott a conservative because he’s so extreme; because he’s so brash; because he resorts to the politics of smear and innuendo so much. That’s not conservative; that’s extreme. And when nations have extremist politicians and when extremists gain power it’s a very, very scary thing.”

    But after launching the attacks, Mr Howes bemoaned how politics had become ”so nasty, so personal”.

    ”I do despair sometimes at the level of political discourse in this country,” he said.

    Mr Howes later denied he was being hypocritical, saying: ”I’m not in Parliament . . . I think it’s right to call a spade a spade.”

    Follow the National Times on Twitter

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/howes-lashes-antigillard-leakers-20130221-2et33.html#ixzz2LWgrJfmM

  • Gillard threatens to bypass states on health funding

    Gillard threatens to bypass states on health funding

    By chief political correspondent Simon Cullen

    Updated 6 minutes ago

    Video: Watch Julia Gillard’s comments today (ABC News)

    Related Story: Hospital funding boost a short-term fix: Baillieu

    Related Story: Government demands health funding be restored to Qld

    Related Story: Political ‘operatives’ hijacking local hospital debate

    Related Story: Baillieu vs Plibersek: Funding showdown

    Map: VIC
    Prime Minister Julia Gillard is threatening to bypass state governments and directly fund local hospitals amid a new row over health budgets.

    The Commonwealth and Victorian governments have been involved in a long-running feud over $107 million that was cut from the state’s allocation of health funding, resulting in bed closures and a blowout in elective surgery waiting times.

    Ms Gillard says the funding adjustment was based on revised population figures, but last night she wrote to Victorian Premier Ted Baillieu to say the money would now be given directly to local hospital networks.

    “That money won’t pass through Premier Baillieu’s hands,” Ms Gillard told reporters in Adelaide.

    “And what we will do to balance the books is we will cut $107 million off other sources of funding to the Victorian Government.”

    She says Victoria will lose $55 million in reward funding it would have received under national economic reforms, with the remaining money to be recouped through cuts to other grants.

    In her letter to Mr Baillieu, Ms Gillard said the Commonwealth’s overall contribution to Victoria’s health system was being increased by 26 per cent, and accused him of running a “disingenuous and purely political campaign” in relation to last year’s $107 million adjustment.

    Across the board, Commonwealth funding to the states was scaled back by $1.6 billion because it said population growth had not been as high as the Bureau of Statistics had previously predicted and funding should be curtailed accordingly.

    ‘Short-term fix’

    Audio: Federal and state governments face off again over health (PM)

    But Mr Baillieu has described the population figures as “dodgy” and says the restoration of the $107 million is only a “short-term political fix”.

    “That $107 million only covers this financial year, so from July 1 the cuts that were previously announced will resume and there’s a further $368 million of cuts in Victoria in the [forward estimates],” he told Fairfax radio.

    The Prime Minister’s fight with Victoria is threatening to spread to other states, including Queensland, which has today demanded the Commonwealth reverse a $103 million cut in its allocation.

    Ms Gillard has written to all premiers and chief ministers warning them they will suffer the same fate as Victoria if they engage in “game playing” over health funding.

    In the letter, Ms Gillard says the states can elect to return to the Howard-era funding deal, which she claims would cost Queensland $2.3 billion over an eight-year period, or have future Commonwealth payments made in arrears, as opposed to the current system which provides money to the states upfront.

    Queensland Premier Campbell Newman says today’s announcement by Ms Gillard in relation to the Victorian health system is an admission that “the feds” had cut funding, adding that he would have no problem with federal funding going directly to his state’s hospitals.

    “What isn’t acceptable is that they are saying ‘what we’ll do is take the $103 million out of other programs in Queensland’ and who knows what that means?” he told Fairfax radio.

    “What they are doing now is even more outrageous. It’s just a sad, sick joke.”

    Scribd: Letter sent by Julia Gillard to Ted Baillieu

    ‘Bizarre’

    NSW Health Minister Jillian Skinner says Ms Gillard’s actions in relation to the Victorian Government are “bizarre”, although it will help that state’s hospital patients.

    “It doesn’t absolve the Commonwealth from providing restoration of this funding right across Australia to all of the other states and territories,” Ms Skinner told Sky News.

    West Australian Premier Colin Barnett has declined to buy into the argument, saying he has a “good working relationship” with the Federal Government on health policy.

    The Federal Opposition’s Health spokesman Peter Dutton says the funding stoush between the Commonwealth and some states is already having an impact on patient care.

    “I’m very worried about patients in Victoria who have been written to, who have been told that their elective surgery was not going to proceed because of the Government cuts and now they restore the funding,” Mr Dutton told ABC News 24.

    “The question is whether or not the funding is going to be restored to Queensland and New South Wales and South Australia in particular. They’re the other jurisdictions that were hit very hard.”

    Federal Health Minister Tanya Plibersek says the Commonwealth is “open” to the possibility of doing to other states what it has done with Victoria, by directly funding local hospitals and recouping the money through other savings.

    Topics:health, health-administration, government-and-politics, federal-government, federal—state-issues, vic, australia, qld

    First posted 5 hours 44 minutes ago

    Contact Simon Cullen

    More stories from Victoria

    Search ABC News

    ABC Health & Wellbeing
    Travelling for treatment: breast cancer in regional Australia
    New dietary guidelines all about balance
    The hard facts on food additives

    Featured Video

    Video PM Julia Gillard says she will not allow state governments to play politics with healthcare policy.

    Video The prosecution and the defence make claim and counter-claim as Oscar Pistorius continues his fight for bail.

    Video Key Labor powerbroker Bill Shorten has hosed down leadership speculation.

    Video Peter Hammerstadt says the captain of the Nissin Maru whaling ship collided with his Sea Shepherd vessel several times.

  • Methane emissions from shale gas activities: FOI request 13/0101 …

    Why this ad?
    Cheapest Electricity? After Cheapest Electricity Prices? – EnergyWatch.com.au/Cheapest-Electricity – Call Australia’s No.1 Energy Broker
    Google Alert – METHANE
    Inbox
    x
    Google Alerts

    6:08 PM (1 hour ago)

    to me
    Web 1 new result for METHANE

    Methane emissions from shale gas activities: FOI request 13/0101 …
    Request for information for the period 18 January 2012 to date on the assessment of estimated or likely methane emissions from shale gas. ZIP , 693KB …
    https://www.gov.uk/…/methane-emissions-from-shale-gas-acti…

    Tip: Use site restrict in your query to search within a site (site:nytimes.com or site:.edu). Learn more.

    Delete this alert.
    Create another alert.
    Manage your alerts.

  • ICAC weighs in on mining licences as Barry O’Farrell considers cancellation

    ICAC weighs in on mining licences as Barry O’Farrell considers cancellation

    Andrew Clennell
    The Daily Telegraph
    February 21, 201311:23AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    0

    Ian Macdonald after leaving ICAC. Picture: Craig Greenhill Source: The Daily Telegraph

    PREMIER Barry O’Farrell has received advice from ICAC as to whether or not he should suspend or cancel controversial mining licences granted by the former mining minister Ian Macdonald including one over former MP Eddie Obeid’s farm.

    Mr O’Farrell has called a special cabinet meeting for 1:30pm to discuss the advice ahead of Question Time.

    There is speculation the Premier will make an announcement in Question Time.

    An ICAC spokeswoman confirmed Commissioner David Ipp sent his response to Mr O’Farrell last night.

    Mr O’Farrell had written to the ICAC requesting advice on whether there should be any amendments to the mining act and whether the NSW government should commence legal proceedings against individuals or companies

  • Gaffe-prone Prince Philip strikes again

    Gaffe-prone Prince Philip strikes again

    Date February 21, 2013 – 10:45AM 437 reading now

    Read later

    inShare.
    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print

    .

    Prince Philip has a reputation for questionable off-the-cuff remarks. Photo: PAUL HACKETT

    LONDON: The Duke of Edinburgh has joked about the number of Filipinos working in Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) – telling a nurse her country must now be “half-empty”, it has been reported.

    Prince Philip, who is famed for his off-the-cuff remarks, made the hospital worker from the Philippines laugh with his comment during a visit to open a cardiac centre.

    BBC Online reported the Duke as saying to the unnamed woman: “The Philippines must be half-empty – you’re all here running the NHS.”

    Prince Philip’s remark came during a visit to Luton and Dunstable University Hospital on Tuesday, where he officially launched the multimillion-dollar cardiac centre.

    Advertisement

    A spokeswoman for the hospital described the royal visit as a huge boost for staff morale and said the Duke was in a jovial mood, making jokes throughout his tour.

    Prince Philip had a stent fitted to clear a blockage in a coronary artery in December 2011 and when, during the visit, he was given a gold plated stent, he quipped that he now had a spare.

    The Duke is well-known for his outspoken comments and famously told British students during a 1986 state visit to China: “If you stay here much longer, you’ll all be slitty-eyed.”

    He also once told a group of deaf youngsters: “Deaf? If you are near there, no wonder you are deaf,” referring to a school’s steel band.

    He also told Susan Edwards, who is blind, uses a wheelchair and has a guide dog: “Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now?”

    The hospital spokesman said of yesterday’s visit: “Staff greatly enjoyed the opportunity to meet the Duke of Edinburgh, and we regard all personal conversations he had with our staff and guests as private and therefore would not comment on them.”

    Buckingham Palace said it did not comment on private conversations.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/gaffeprone-prince-philip-strikes-again-20130221-2esm2.html#ixzz2LUnGSteF